Reblog so she lives forever.
20 years. If this gets posted and we all survive for another 20âŠthings might be alright.

No title available

Discoholic đȘ©
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Three Goblin Art
todays bird
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka
NASA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Claire Keane

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Janaina Medeiros
đȘŒ
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@metromyv
Reblog so she lives forever.
20 years. If this gets posted and we all survive for another 20âŠthings might be alright.
healthy progression of a relationship would necessarily bring an end to yearning? categorically false. a true yearner can yearn even in the most fulfilled scenarios. a true yearner can be nuts deep, inventing more esoteric levels of desired intimacy on the fly.
the new york times is now charging money for my favorite chocolate cake recipe so i bought a subscription and screenshotted it and canceled my subscription and now it's here for you for free
i do a mixture of red wine and fresh squeezed navel orange juice for the liquid, plus the zest of one large orange. now you make the cake
Recipe transcript:
Yield: 8 servings
ingredients
3/4c or 177 mll extra virgin olive oil, plus more for greasing the pan
1/2 cup or 118 mll Earl Grey tea, or use coffee, dry red wine, orange juice, or water
1/2 cup or 50 grams Dutch processed cocoa powder
1/2 tsp ground cinnamon
1/4 tsp fine sea salt
1 cup or 200 grams granulated sugar
3 large eggs at room temperature
2 tsp vanilla extract
1 cup plus 2 tablespoons or 135 grams all purpose flour
1/2 tsp baking soda
preparation
step 1 heat the oven to 325 degrees F. Grease a 9-inch round pan and line the bottom with parchment paper
step 2: in a medium saucepan over high heat, bring tea or other liquid to a simmer, then turn off heat. whisk in cocoa, cinnamon, and salt until smooth, then set aside to cool
step 3: in the bowl of an electric mixer fitted with the paddle attachment, combine sugar, olive oil, eggs, and vanilla. beat for about 3 minutes. reduce speed and pour in cocoa mixture, scraping down the sides of the bowl. gradually beat in flour and baking soda until just incorporated.
step 4: scrape batter into prepared pan and bake until the sides are set but it's still slightly damp in the center, 35 to 45 minutes. A cake tester should come up clean but with a few sticky chocolate crumbs clinging to it. Transfer cake pan to a wire rack and let cake cool completely in pan.
Not to be a pretentious asshole but yes there is a problem with people no longer reading the classics. A lot of the YA literature romance novel crowd perpetuates the myth that the classics are inherently boring and stuffy and thereâs nothing you can relate to or learn by reading them. And theyâre not. These beautiful universal things we enjoy, comedy, romance, tragedy, family strife, theyâre still so poignant centuries after theyâre written.
Also some of them are entertaining trash. Have you ever read Tarzan of the Apes? If you can white-knuckle through the continuous racism (and I do not want to undrsell the racism, it's all through the book and every time you think you're over the racist part they find a new way to add more racism, you will have to white-knuckle through so much racism to read this) it's on par with modern mary sue isekai slop. Like switch out the forest for a fantasy world and it's a low-effort (racist) teenager's first royalroad web serial. And you have to read this stuff (not Tarzan specifically, but older literature, including some classics) if you want to engage with written fiction as a whole, because fiction is a conversation that takes far longer than a single human lifetime to have. Being a reader who never reads older works and never reads outside their favourite genre is like being a visual art enjoyer who looks exclusively at busty anime girls in 45 degree profile on Deviantart. Like what you like, but you're going to be able to like it so much more, and engage with it so much more competently, if you broaden your experience a little.
Story time!
When I was a kid in about... Grade 8, I want to say, we had the Decameron in history of literature class. (For those who don't know, it's a book of short stories framed as "told by people trying to quarantine from the plague". It's mostly horror, humor and sex. Think COVID entertainment, but maybe more terrifying). We had a few stories from it selected in our reader, and the assignment was "pick a Decameron story and do an oral retelling."
At the time, me and another girl had just ceased routinely beating the shit out of each other with chairs, and instead had become friends in one of those delinquent-nerd duos. She taught me street smarts, I taught her weird intellectual shit. It was a beautiful friendship.
So of course when I saw the Decameron on the curriculum, I told her "you realize a lot of stories in that book are basically porn, right? Let me get you the unabridged version from my house."
My friend's eyes lit up. She read the whole thing in a few days.
Class time comes, and for the first and only time in our class one of the class delinquents shoots her hand up. The teacher goes, "oh wow, what just happened? All right, go ahead."
And of course my friend picked one of the pornier tales. If I recall, it was about a monk seducing a nun by telling her that men had devils, and women had hells, and occasionally one must contain a devil by sticking him into hell. The teacher has no choice but to listen because the assignment doesn't specify "pick a pre-selected story from the reader". It just says "pick a Decameron story."
The retelling was fantastic, as hilariously funny as the story itself, (she did voices and gestures!) and my friend got the class listening on the edge of their seats. My friend got her well-deserved A, the teacher got a pedagogical challenge, and it was a win-win all around. :P
Tl;dr: go read the classics, they're a lot of fun.
Also: they will really increase your tolerance for period-specific uncomfortable topics and terminology.
I don't mean they will make you think racism or sexism are okay. I mean they will get you to a point where you can read something written before the 21st century and not flinch away from it. A literary immune system, if you will. I have seen reviews of sci-fi from the 70s that dismissed entire (good) classics for a single sexist paragraph and it makes me sad. People are missing out on so much. You should be able to read things that were not written with your sensibilities, or most of human history and culture will be closed to you.
odysseus absolutely does present a threat to penelope if he perceives her as at all unfaithful, and i feel the unfairness of this, and i think people tend to undersell how much tension at least potentially exists between odysseus and penelope. but i'm also like. his reaction, all speculation aside, his actual reaction in the odyssey to her flirting with the suitors is delight, because he immediately ascertains that she is running a con. sorry that they're so in-sync in spite of the forces that try to drive a wedge between them, including their own misgiving hearts. sorry that they invented homophrosyne ÂŻ\_(ă)_/ÂŻ
oh, you meant they literally did, ok
would i, tumblr user thee odysseyofhomer, lie to you?
this is the only funny addition to this post
relationships and jobs are temporary. your shitty unpopular tumblr blog is forever
Akira bike sliding on a horse
concept art
concept art
ELI SHOWED ME A COOL THING where it generates a skeleton in various angles for you !!!!!!
oh shiiiit itâs the ultimate warmup tool yesss thank you
FEEL ITâS MIGHTÂ
ORT
This site is SO FRICKIN COOL!!! OMG I am ADDICTED!!!
WHOA WHAT IS THIS DOING ON MY DASH AGAIN
How are you, friend? I hope lifeâs treated you well these past years. Iâm sorry I stopped responding all that time ago. I donât have any good reason for it, life just happens like that sometimes. I know that Iâve not been a very good friend to you, but I hope you still think of me as one, as I do of you. I think about you a lot and hope any of the bad blood that ever mightâve lingered between us has long since been water under the bridge. I miss you, so letâs talk again, if thatâs something youâd like.
Stunning gardens
Im crying this is so beautiful
iâm in this fandom
i'll let phie-san say it:
Your daily dose of cat memes
utterly losing my mind that literally right as i was putting up our display for banned books week coming up in september, my boss got a call saying that the county higher ups have declared that weâre prohibited from saying âbanned booksâ in association with any library programs or materials. âfreedom to readâ is okay apparently, but the phase âbanned booksâ is, well, banned. if i tried to publish this scenario in a novel, my editor would probably send it back with a note saying that the irony is a bit too on the nose & that i need to tone it down a little. we have censored the discussion of censorship. i cannot handle how hilarious this is
A question I get asked a lot while working at a public library is "how do you deal with homeless people?"
And the answer is, we don't.
The unhoused people who come here seeking refuge 99% of the time understand that they will be kicked out if they misbehave.
The people you have to watch out for are Jessica, who only came because the kid she didn't want had to visit for a homework assignment and she just *needs* to yell at her child for asking to borrow two books or stay an extra five minutes, or Michael, who came in to look at porn on our computers for whatever fucking reason, or Karen who just wanted to come by to throw a fit that the particular book she wanted was checked out and harrass our staff about our collection being too limited.
99% of the time, the people we need to ban are middle to upper-middle class white people while the homeless and mentally ill/disabled people mind their own damn business and are honestly some of the best patrons we have.
I bring this up because today we had a man come in. He stopped at the desk, pulled up a chair and said "I'm newly homeless and was living in my car. I'm disabled. It was impounded. It's raining. I don't have a phone and I don't know where to go tonight."
And we did what we could to help. He was incredibly kind and patient despite his obvious anxiety and stress, more than most able bodied, housed patrons are to us under much less dire conditions. I liked knowing that we were the first place he came.
We have so many people like this who come in everyday. Many are quiet and keep to themselves, but sometimes they talk to us.
They tell us about how they're taking a few courses on a scholarship they applied for from our library's computer at the local community college to get their diploma. Or ask about a manga or dvd or book we might have to help them pass the time.
One woman, who comes in daily with her tattered walker always says hello to me and likes to work on the new jigsaw puzzle with me when we set one out.
So like, treat unhoused people like people. Treat disabled people like people. I don't want my library to feel like the only safe space in the world, but I'm glad it can be one of them.
I'm so sick of hearing about how "the homeless are ruining everything" when they are some of the kindest, most respectful people here. Sometimes they mutter, might not have had a place to shower, and might need a little extra space for their backpacks but that's FINE. It Doesn't Matter Actually. None of that is a problem or any of my business to care about (unless they request help/services), and I also don't think it's any of yours.