izzy's playlists!
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
we're not kids anymore.
Cosimo Galluzzi
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Kiana Khansmith
🪼
Mike Driver
No title available
art blog(derogatory)
Keni
RMH
shark vs the universe
DEAR READER
todays bird
will byers stan first human second
Sweet Seals For You, Always
tannertan36
Stranger Things
seen from Colombia
seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Brunei
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@nalyra-dreaming
About me
Nalyra ⏛ she/her/they I love complicated characters and relationships. Vampire lover of old. I like a lot of things, so do mind the tags, please.
Ask | Ao3
This blog is NOT Vampire Chronicles / IWTV / TVL spoiler free.
Life is too short for hate, be brave enough to be kind.
PSA
I reserve the right to be silent human, at least until I‘m turned 😛
Justice For Antoinette | The Vampire Lestat | AMC+
These two immortal idiots. ❤️
looking forward to seeing that glorious chemistry back between Sam and Jacob. I love the show and I'm really enjoying seeing lestats story..but I have missed them so much . They are the heart of it for me
They are.
And ohhhhh the chemistry is going to be brilliant next episode!!!
What are your thoughts on the theory that Daniel might become a ghost and that's how Bogosian is replaced by Luke Brandon Field? X
Mhhhhhh. I think @cbrownjc is onto something there. Once more.
sorry if this is a stupid question but I haven't read the books in 10 years and I have no memory of them really. Is the season gonna end with Akasha kidnapping Lestat ? is it gonna end on a good note for Loustat ? according to you of course
I do not know! Anything is possible after episode 6?!
But the book TVL ends that way, yes.
If Amel is gonna be Lestat’s saving grace. You bet your ass Louis gets a brownie point for not burning him.
Just like Lestat could have made sure Louis was dead for good. Louis could have made sure Lestat was dead for good. Give me a fucking break. They plotted killing Lestat for months. And you know who knew they were going to kill him weeks before? LESTAT! You know whk did nothing about it? LESTAT. You know who stayed? Lestat. You know who went through with the Madi Gras? Lestat!
Lestag spent 6 years in guilt after the drop. And then sat in greif and introspection after the murder.
Louis was literally haunted by Lestat. A manifestation of his greif and regret for what he did. Still haunted by what we did in Dubai. Like come on!
Yes. Do come on.
And do take a step back to look at the big picture.
You'll need it next episode.
What do you make of Akasha’s poster being red?? Obviously she’s different from the rest but why red?
She is the Queen, guys 😈
Will Antoinette be mentioned again in ep 6 outside of this clip we just got? Feels kinda stupid that they only address the relationship lestat has with her in such a comedic way as if it wasnt important in s1 and was what caused the downfall 🙄
Antoinette didn't cause the downfall.
Antoinette was a symptom.
There is a little bit more to the scene, but... well.
There is a LOT in that scene already.
Combined with an earlier scene.... it speaks volumes about them... and them with other people.
VOLUMES.
Something that someone genuinely believes happened that couldn't have?
I feel this way about the witches’ place cause there were no witch burnings anymore in the years Lestat would’ve been a child
Mhhh.
Actually:
"to 1775"
So easily in Lestat's childhood.
A note from an expert on witchcraft trials (me): Actually, no one claimed that it was an official witchcraft trial (witchcraft prosecutions were outlawed in France by the 1682 Edict). However, lynchings continued. It could well have been a lynching.
Officially, references to witchcraft were removed from French criminal law only in 1791. By that time, however, criminal courts had not accepted witchcraft accusations for well over a century.
if you didn't answer a question sent in does that mean it might have contained too many spoilers?
Not necessarily.
Some I also push till later, or delete, because I've already answered them several times.
Something that someone genuinely believes happened that couldn't have?
I feel this way about the witches’ place cause there were no witch burnings anymore in the years Lestat would’ve been a child
Mhhh.
Actually:
"to 1775"
So easily in Lestat's childhood.
the full clip of stained glass eyes because I love to torture myself
Just remembered this video tease from the NY premiere. Lestat and Louis walking through the concert crowd. Episode 7? Post book reunion? Or just promo?
Lestat’s phone wallpaper. Bach - The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1: Prelude No. 1 in C Major (BWV 846) (in Bach’s own hand.)
Saw @nalyra-dreaming’s ask where an anon thought Lestat’s phone wallpaper was music Nicolas had played in Paris.
Just to confirm: it is not. Nicolas plays Mozart the twice we hear him.
Lestat’s phone wallpaper is this Bach piano Prelude.
Do you still believe the theory that raglan james was Marius from back in season 2
.... no? That obviously went out the window when Talamasca established Raglan further....?
(That's been looooong ago and done, nonny.)
But it was a fun theory 😝
Okay, last one. Last one for a while, then I'll shut up, I promise. (I love your blog.)
I think I had something click for me, but I have to think that thing is a thing you can't comment on, so I'm trying to thread the needle here and word this so it's...peripheral to what I think is going to be revealed.
There is something that has been talked about by two characters that I've seen criticized as... let's call it a research error on the part of the writers. I think the writers have absolutely done their research, and it is in fact the character who is wrong (not lying, but genuinely wrong) about something they experienced. And I think the reason they're wrong is so, so very bad and tragic. And my question, now that I probably sound like I'm having a stroke in your asks, is, is there a crucial historical inaccuracy addressed by any characters in ep 6? Something that someone genuinely believes happened that couldn't have? Thank you! (And if this makes no sense whatsoever, apologies for my crazy.)
I do think I know what you refer to, and.... yes.
It is what I came to label as "gentle" as a resolution, because... well. it softens the impact. You know?
naylraaaa
can u give us a taste of ep 6 (pls pls pls)
It's a very, very good one :)
