Okay, last one. Last one for a while, then I'll shut up, I promise. (I love your blog.)
I think I had something click for me, but I have to think that thing is a thing you can't comment on, so I'm trying to thread the needle here and word this so it's...peripheral to what I think is going to be revealed.
There is something that has been talked about by two characters that I've seen criticized as... let's call it a research error on the part of the writers. I think the writers have absolutely done their research, and it is in fact the character who is wrong (not lying, but genuinely wrong) about something they experienced. And I think the reason they're wrong is so, so very bad and tragic. And my question, now that I probably sound like I'm having a stroke in your asks, is, is there a crucial historical inaccuracy addressed by any characters in ep 6? Something that someone genuinely believes happened that couldn't have? Thank you! (And if this makes no sense whatsoever, apologies for my crazy.)
I do think I know what you refer to, and.... yes.
It is what I came to label as "gentle" as a resolution, because... well. it softens the impact. You know?