My feelings keep fluctuating, but there is a part of me that is relieved they didnāt just shoehorn in the lesmand of it all.
Bc I know they could have taken a very different route and rushed things for the sake of trying to cover all the major facets of Lestatās dynamics from tvl. So I am ultimately glad we didnāt get some truncated version of them. I just wish we could have found time throughout the season to properly establish some things bc Armand beheading Lestat and that going nowhere feels like a missed opportunity to me.
Itās been a while since Iāve read TVL, and Iām honestly glad I didnāt reread before watching this season bc I think it would have made me frustrated with certain changes. But from what I remember, Iād say the two most important dynamics from the book are gabistat, (which they essentially dedicated this season to) and lesmand.
Perhaps this is just a massive cope to deal with my disappointment, but Iām wondering if they wanted to give that dynamic a bit of breathing room, so they essentially pushed all of it to s4. Then again, thereās the Akasha of it all so idk
The thing is though, it would not have been "shoehorning".
The whole season (apart from Gabriella and her relationship to Lestat) built up to "did they did they not", and what the history between Lestat and Armand actually was, and then Armand starts dishing out against Lestat and then.... that just falls flat?
Maybe they pushed it to s4.
Could be. I doubt it, because as you said, Akasha is coming in then, but... could be.
Not a good decision though, imho.