Hey cuties! Iām KAngel, your internet angel! A ray of light, illuminating the chaotic internet of today! Bringing happiness to the radfems floating in this electronic sea!
ā¹āā”ā 24 ā¹āā”ā detrans ā¹āā”ā

gracie abrams

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
occasionally subtle

ellievsbear
š
untitled
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Kiana Khansmith
Fai_Ryy
ojovivo
No title available

Origami Around
Phantogram Three
d e v o n
tumblr dot com
Claire Keane

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@omgitskangel
Hey cuties! Iām KAngel, your internet angel! A ray of light, illuminating the chaotic internet of today! Bringing happiness to the radfems floating in this electronic sea!
ā¹āā”ā 24 ā¹āā”ā detrans ā¹āā”ā
itās so interesting that this story about a bookstore no longer selling Harry Potter because JK Rowling started a legal defense fund for women is getting tons of praise in the notes, but steam taking down games such as Maid Kidnapping Diary and Amputee Sex Slave and Daddy Daughter Incest and Hentai Lolita to avoid circulating CSAM is a reason to call visa and scream at a call center employee. those are real titles of games that had to be removed from steam!!! amputee fucking sex slave!!!!! this is progressive? if I want a changing room without men thatās a problem, but god forbid I get between a man and his emotional support rape incest porn!
radfems will see a licensed surgeon remove a glob of useless fat from the chest of a consenting adult resulting in thin, pale scar and call it mutilation
the purpose of breasts is the feed infants and you honestly think thereās nothing under the skin except fat? clearly biology class has failed you so hereās a free lesson:
Firstly, breasts are not useless and having them removed results in chronic pain for around 30-60% of women. This is not just the pain of recovery, this is damage that can be, and often is, permanent. It is quite risky and when it is done cosmetically as a reaction to living in an extremely sexist/homophobic society, that is a feminist issue.
But secondly, uteruses are absolutely not useless. They are extremely important to your health. There are so many negative side effects to having it removed because it is there for many reasons beyond growing babies. The fact that you seemingly donāt know this is just depressing. The way you see female anatomy as useless if it is not being used to reproduce is depressing.
You also seemingly think that plastic surgeons know best as if rich old men are paragons of morality who would never exploit anyone.
You are not Mr. Potato head. Your body is a whole system, and female bodies in particular arenāt even that well understood. To think removing parts that you think are useless due to very incomplete information is frighteningly naive. The internal anatomy of the clitoris wasnāt widely known until less than twenty years ago. Recent studies are showing that hysterectomy is linked with early onset dementia and Alzheimerās, not to mention pelvic floor collapse, bladder and vaginal prolapse, and other lovely things. So much for the uterus being useless!
So who fucking knows what complications opening your flesh to scrape out ducts, veins, and fat off your chest muscles could cause? The ones already known (chronic pain, difficulty with arm movement, skin not adhering to muscle, loss of sensitivity, hypersensitivity, etc.) are bad enough. For all you know, thereās an undiscovered organ whose removal is linked to something horrendous.
No part of your body is useless just because you donāt know what its uses are. Even the appendix still has a purpose and we donāt get it removed unless itās too dangerous not to.
Pornhub is finally going down. They're about to rid most of what's left - which is 9% - by the 30th. The other 91% that's gone consisted of 50+ MILLION files and videos.
This is a victory.
happy pride
ok heres my hot take: women can make whatever fictional content they want i trust them to still be normal irl. men are mentally fragile, easily influenced and should not be allowed to read
women will write someone being graphically mutilated and killed and then go to their job in a grocery store and make friendly small talk with the customers. men will see one movie with a morally grey protagonist and start torturing small animals about it
A woman who can't get pregnant is still a woman.
A woman born with no womb is still a woman.
A woman with a beard is still a woman.
A woman with no periods is still a woman.
A woman with high testosterone is still a woman.
A woman with an enlarged clitoris is still a woman.
A woman with ambiguous genitalia is still a woman.
A man who is infertile is not a woman. A man with no beard is not a woman. A man with a micro penis is not a woman. A man with internal tests is not a woman. A man with low testosterone is not a woman.
Biological sex is binary, but people are not, and tryibg to make them enter boxes too rigid for them is harmful. But pretending someone is less of a man or woman because they have sex variations is harmful too.
"Masculine women are more acceptable than feminine men" and the "masculine woman" they're thinking of is just like. A woman with a t-shirt and jeans.
list of feminist horror books for all my radblr horror fans!!
if you're sick of misogyny/rape scenes/sexualized murder in male written horror, these books are for you! all of these come with varying levels of trigger warnings, so i highly recommend looking them up before you dive in!
-Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a classic. most people look over the clearly feminist theme to only remember the Creature, but it's a heart wrenching feminist book about autonomy, misogyny, with pretty significant religious misogyny undertones
-Her Body and Other Parties by Carmen Maria Machado will always and forever be on my all time favorite books list. it's a collection of short stories, but the first one is the absolute best, called The Husband Stitch. she's such a gorgeous writer, The Husband Stitch especially is so haunting and heartbreaking, telling the story of a woman's life marrying and having kids, and what her husband takes from her, and just generally a representation of married women's pain and oppression.
-Motherthing by Ainslie Hogarth is addictive. also incorporates marriage themes and complex i cities but deals especially with female "paranoia" and "hysteria" (quotes bc we know those concepts are man made for women and forced onto us). it has this domestic aesthetic that's very creepy and also just very cool
-Cursed Bunny by Bora Chung. ohhhhh my. i'm in love with this author, she's so incredible. Cursed Bunny is a short story collection that deals with misogyny, generational trauma, aging as a woman, and even delves into being kink critical if you're keen at interpretation. she's from South Korea, and also deals a lot in Korean culture and Korea-specific misogyny. it is translated to english, so unfortunately i will always mourn the writing style of it in original Korean but it's still written so beautifully!
-Hangsaman and The Haunting of Hill House both by Shirley Jackson. i'm sorry to clump them both together but for the sake of space + time i will. they're both gradual-horror, they definitely build. a lot of female hysteria type stuff, female loneliness, just generally such a good, creepy vibe that culminates in a truly scary ending.
-Maeve Fly by CJ Leede. a lot of people here on radblr call for truly insane female leads. this is that book! the main character is truly just a bad person, a psychopath, and she isn't moralized or justified in any way. she is allowed to just be crazy and evil without being diluted because she's a woman. women don't tend to get to be evil--truly evil--in media like men do, so it's cool to see a true madwoman. it's very witty, very clever. it's also a love letter to LA in a way, which hit home for me lmao. it's really just a peek into the mind of a psychopathic woman and the crazy stuff she does. very entertaining. not for the faint of heart.
-Such a Pretty Smile by Kristi DeMeester is sooo good. i don't normally get too jumpy about my horror, but this one had me looking up every two seconds to make sure i was safe. genuinely very scary. it's got heavy mother daughter themes, it's primarily about the demureness and politeness expected of women and girls. the "pretty smile" thing is obviously a reference to catcalling, but also to the expectation that we should always be pretty and polite and content and demure. it's a lot of women just breaking free and going mad.
-A Guest in the House by EM Carol. i read this one online and then NEEDED to own it so bad i bought it immediately. it is a graphic novel so a slightly different medium, but the art is so stunning and moving. it's also got marriage themes, about repressed lesbianism, women's desires etc etc. it's so good and beautiful and moving
-Nineteen Claws and a Blackbird by Agustina Bazterrica is another short story collection. not necessarily all horror, but most. i had to read this one twice it was so good. it's harder to talk about short story collections because there's so many different plots and themes, but trust me, it's fantastic
-The Bad Ones by Melissa Albert. it's a bit more rudimentary writing, but it's so so so good. it captures girlhood so wonderfully, especially the whimsical, daydream part and equally the dark, insane, human-sacrifices-with-barbie-dolls parts of that makes any sense. it's about goddesses and monsters and dreams and girlhood and the trauma of growing up a girl and it's marvelous
-A Certain Hunger by Chelsea G Summers. not exactlyyyy a horror but kinda?? it's about a female cannibal who kills and eats her lovers. it's hilarious, like laugh out loud until the people around you stare hilarious. the main character is so witty and man hating and cool. she's a misandrist icon, just so suave and clever and ruthless.
i'll reblog with more books as i find and read them! :)
you people will just. say anything
#Tbf tho the bechdel test is pretty shitty #Like dgmw this is a stupid take but itās a lame test anyway
okay but do you understand that liz wallace made the bechdel-WALLACE test because she was a dyke who wanted to go to movies and pretend the characters were dykes and her friend alison bechdel happened to put her silly little litmus assessment into a comic strip and then the rest of everyone else decided it was a bona fide way of means testing media for Feminist Content? do you know that? it doesnāt sound like you know that
some of you are the dumbest motherfuckers alive
āWhat if the conditions for passing were the opposite?ā is⦠not a counterargumentā¦
Too many people donāt understand that this test is a joke, and I mean that literally. It was published in a comic strip, with a very clear joke structure. There is a setup: The simplest, most basic, most entry-level test for whether women are treated like normal people in a movie imaginable. And there is a punchline: The world is so sexist that the vast majority of movies fail even at this super-easy test. Itās the kind of joke you laugh at because the world is shitty.
(And the few movies that do pass the test often do so by accident. The original comic strip had the punchline that Alien or Aliens passed because Ripley talked with the alien queen.)
People keep treating it like itās this huge feminist thing thatās super important to judge whether a movie is good or not. And then other people keep pointing out that it doesnāt actually work for that. Theyāre right.Ā But thatās because it was never meant to.
This test is the most simple, most meaningless hurdle for depiction of women in media to clear. The absolute bare minimum. Thatās because it originally was the setup for a joke. Today, it is only useful if it is the start for a discussion of women in media; not the end of it. And I think itās still very useful for that.
A good point to help visualise this is the inverse test: How many movies have two men, who have names, and talk to each other, about something other than a woman? Well, all of them, give or take a few. That imbalance is really the issue here.
It doesnāt really matter that much whether any given movie passes or not. What really matters is that not passing this is, still, the normal default case.
The comic in question:
Allison Bechdell is an openly Lesbian comic artist that likes to make comics about her experiences as a Butch Lesbian. The Bechdel-Wallace Test was an inside joke between her and her friend, Liz Wallace.
She wasnāt expecting it to become a cultural phenomenon. Iād like to believe that if it caught up, it was because everyone that understood the joke, also realized how many movies failed to pass it, as simple and dumb as the requirements are.
As the commenter above shows, this Bechdel Test is about women as large but the context is how lesbians experience media and the world at large.
If the only the women get to talk about in most forms of media is their male romantic love interests, then lesbians are excluded from media by its very nature.
It is about being alienated from the only way women often get to see themselves represented and perceived in culture and society.
Truly hate how idiots all across the political spectrum think that lesbians exclusively liking pussy is tied to politics. Homosexuality is innate, thereās nothing to āunpackā about it, itās not the result of socialization or politics.
This post is making the rounds yet again, and I just wanted to take this chance to wish every lesbian, gay and bi person a happy pride month. Especially if theyāre tired of homosexuality and bisexuality being tied to politics.
Happy LGB Pride Month to all my fellow lesbian, gay, and bi folks (but especially to the women)!! Donāt let anyone convince you that same-sex attraction is wrong, bigoted, or weird. Homosexuality is beautiful!
Not sure if anyone else here still uses reddit but thereās this sub called TheLezistance Iāve been lurking on there for the last couple of days and I saw that theyāre planning on a campaign for pride month!
āDuring the pride season and onward, lesbians will express our discontent with the community. Share these hashtags all over the internet. Letās DO this.ā
#NotProudofPride
#LGBwithouttheTQ
#TransIsACult
#LesbiansAreWomen
Menstrual products are all terrible
sit on your own blood all day or stick this in your vagina. stupid woman.
This might be controversial, but Iāve really gone off my reusable period pants that Iāve been using for 5 years and have switched back to (supposedly) sustainable pads and organic cotton tampons.
I got sick of the extra labour involved, adding more time to my morning routine by having to spend ages rinsing the pants in cold water before I could even shower, then hanging them up as I canāt do laundry every day so had to wait until the end of my period to wash them all at once. I also felt gross and smelly after a few hours of wearing them.
I just kept thinking āthis is what my grandma had to do with old rags in the 1940s and she lived on a fucking farm in the Austrian alps, how have we not progressed from then?ā
It pisses me off that women and girls are now under a lot of pressure to choose the most eco friendly option - reusable pads and underwear or cups. I donāt want either of these options and Iām not going to be made to feel guilty for that. Iāve got another 20 years of dealing with periods, and Iām not going to waste hours of my life scrubbing blood out of underwear and doing even more fucking laundry while the rich and powerful are carrying on with their private jets and pointless wars and releasing sewage into our water and forcing more plastic shit on us.
Donāt let anyone make you feel bad for dealing with your period in the way that works best for you.
Maybe one day we can have better sanitary product options, but for now Iām sticking with disposables and Iām not sorry about it.
A hill I will fucking die on - and made someone delete her blog over, although I didnāt actually mean for her to do that - is that the space taken up by oppressed groups getting basic needs met is not the space that environmentalists should be seeking to eliminate. Disabled people point this out about plastic medical items and it is a view I staunchly hold about period products.
And it should be noted that the actual, serious activists arenāt yelling at women about our pads and tampons. What Greenpeace need is for people to attend their protests and/or give them money for a) their campaigns against politicians and corporations and b) their legal funds because corporations keep fucking suing them.
Sorry for being inactive lately my family and I are raising ducks!
theyāre all female! NO DRAKES!!!
DUCKIES!!! Do the ladies have names?? :)
Yes! Floyd (after the bubble yum duck because sheās a hooligan) is the smallest cayuga, Ditsy is the second cayuga, the largest pekin is Daisy and smallest one is Aflac š¤ my older sister named them š
Sorry for being inactive lately my family and I are raising ducks!
theyāre all female! NO DRAKES!!!
gotta love how condescending those "penises are not inherently dangerous" posts are. i guess it's easier to assume we are stupid enough to think a penis is an independent creature that can't help attacking us than believing that the common woman has enough good sense to know that men can, and often do, weaponize their sexual organs. a penis may not be radioactive, but you know what is? the internalized misogyny of the female trans ally.
A penis is just a body part in the same way a gun is just a hunk of metal. Detached from a human being theoretically neither is innately dangerous; but in practice both are frequently used by human beings to inflict violence. When youāre the only person in the room without one itās reasonable to feel unsafe.