silvermist

Louise

[guerillawarfare555]

feminist literature;

i tried to make it online/no download no login as much as possible; a "⚘" means its beginner friendly/good place to start

first wave;

her protection for women - jane anger, 1589

declaration of the rights of women and of the female citizen - Olympe de Gouges, 1791

a vindication of the rights of woman - Mary Wollstonecraft, 1792 ⚘

letters on the equality of the sexes - sarah grimke, 1837 

the times that try mens souls - maria weston chapman, 1837

what time of night it is - sojourner truth, 1853

the destructive male - elizebeth cady stanton, 1868 ⚘

Sex Slavery - Voltairine de cleyre, 1890

woman church and state - Matilda jocyln gage, 1890 ⚘

second link for WC&S (easier to read)

rosa luxemberg library, 1894-1919

clara zetkin archive, 1896-1926

the womans bible - Elizabeth cady Stanton, 1895

alexandra kollontai archive, 1908-1946

the hypocrisy of puritanism - emma goldman, 1911

the second sex - simone de Beauvoir, 1949  ⚘

women as a minority group - Helen Mayer Hacker, 1951

second wave;

the bell jar - sylvia plath, 1963 ⚘

the feminine mystique - betty Friedan, 1963 ⚘

women: the longest revolution - juliet mitchell, 1966

no more miss america - robin morgan, 1968 ⚘

scum manifesto - valerie solanas, 1968 ⚘

sexual politics - kate millet, 1968

the church and the second sex - mary daly, 1968 

redstockings manifesto - 1969  ⚘

women and the myth of consumerism - ellen willis, 1969

liberation from eros - mitsu tanaka, 1970

for the equal rights amendment - shirley chisholm ,- 1970

the bitch manifesto - jo freeman, 1970 ⚘

the dialectic of sex; the case for feminist revolution - shulamith firestone, 1970 

the female eunuch - germaine greer, 1970 ⚘

the liberation of black women - pauli murray, 1970

the first sex - Elizabeth gould davis, 1971

the feminization of society - yoko ono, 1972

what educated women can do - indira gandhi, 1974

when god was a woman - merlin stone, 1976

women, race & class - angela davis, 1981 ⚘

patriarchy and accumulation in the global scale - maria mies, 1986

third wave;  

black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment - patricia hill collins, 1990

the sexual politics of meat - carol j. adams, 1990

men, women and chainsaws; gender in the modern horror film - carol j glover, 1992

naree - humayun azad 1992

the war against women - marylin french, 1992 ⚘

ecofeminism and the sacred - carol j adams, 1993 

fourth wave;

caliban and the witch - sylvia federici, 2004

[thatisababyitshuge]

“At a clinic in Anand in northern India, women give birth to Western children. White women’s eggs are inseminated with white men’s sperm, and the embryo is implanted in the wombs of Indian women. The children will show no traces of the women who bore them. They will neither bear her name nor get to know her. After giving birth to the children, the Indian women surrender them. They sign a contract and receive between 2,500 and 6,500 USD the moment they give up their responsibility for the child they just gave birth to. For the women, most of whom are poor and from nearby villages, the payment can be up to the equivalent of ten years’ salary. The buyers are typically American, European, Australian, Japanese, or wealthy Indians; they are childless heterosexual couples, homosexual men, and single men… With traditional surrogacy, the industry had been limited to the Western world. An Indian mother would have meant a child with Indian features. But suddenly, through the miracle of modern technology, it became possible for an Indian woman to give birth to a white child. Thus, Americans could pay two-thirds less than for surrogacy in the USA and still come home with their “own” child, even though it had spent nine months in an Indian woman’s body. Embryo transplantation also impacted on American courts’ judgments in the child custody cases. In one case from 1993, almost identical to “Baby M”—the mother had second thoughts after the birth and wanted to keep the child—the judgment was that she was not the child’s mother. She “was not exercising procreative choice, but was providing a service.” Because the egg wasn’t hers, the pregnancy wasn’t motherhood but a “service”; therefore, she had no rights to the child she gave birth to. This has now become standard practice in the USA, and even when the egg belongs to a third woman—a so-called egg donor—custody is granted to those who paid for the child.”

— Kajsa Ekis Ekman, Being and Being Bought: Prostitution, Surrogacy and the Split Self (via invertprivileges)

[radfemyjasdottir]

What if I said that neither of these things are normal, and both benefit the patriarchy only?

[unsentimentaltranslator]

”The argument between wives and whores is an old one; each one thinking that whatever she is, at least she is not the other.” - Andrea Dworkin

[charnel-grounds]

Ingeborg Bruhn Bertelsen and Svend Bille in The Vampire Dancer (1912)

[parasitefem]

women’s criticism on male authors putting rapey undertones into their novels should be taken completely seriously btw. it doesn’t make them less intelligent or intellectual for refusing to read anything with misogynistic material

[plaguedbypatriarchy]

maybe i’m missing something but i simply can’t take marxist feminists seriously. no, i don’t think class equality would somehow make patriarchy, sexism, misogyny, gender based oppression/violence, or sex based oppression/violence magically disappear. i don’t think class is the root of misogyny and i actually don’t even think that makes sense because women’s oppression has existed since long before class-based oppression. women still experience violence and oppression in poor communities at the hands of poor men. i think it’s disingenuous to pretend that class is the root of all oppression, which doesn’t mean i disagree with marxist ideology (i do agree!) but in my opinion you have to consider marxist ideology separately from feminist ideology and then mix them together to see what aspects are better approached from each school of thought (if that makes sense??). but generally i don’t see how marxism and feminism go hand-in-hand the way other social justice schools of thought go hand-in-hand with feminism

[a-lesbian-feminist]

The most ridiculous part of "feminist" Marxism is that they think this random man has the solution to economic exploitation. Marxism is one specific man's personal philosophy. Why would you base your economic model as a feminist on a man's wants?

Marx was a man, and men want women to do free labour for them. Men, even "the good ones", want to use women for their movement, then continue exploiting women in the home the way they have done since long before capitalism was invented.

[nawadi-roman]

A concerning trend i’m starting to notice with a lot of feminists online, is they’re starting to make the same mistakes of liberal feminism. they’re conflating feminism with other things like veganism. You can feel sympathy for the slaughtering of animals and abstain from eating them but it’s a big stretch to say veganism and feminism are alike. It’s no less absurd than vegans who claim veganism and civil rights are the same. It’s insulting.

It’s a noble cause and i admire the resolve and fortitude it takes to stand your ground in a world that oppose you. It’s commendable but veganism has nothing to do with feminism. At all. You can criticize it from the health angle (they feed them crap and shoot them with hormones) or class angle (it exploits immigrants and poor people) etc. however you can’t make it a feminist cause. For god’s sake we can barely save women we know need our help, you want us to save animals too? Feminism is solely about the liberation of women from male control and domination. That’s it. It intersects with class, race, religion, and sexual orientation and that’s about it. Things that women can be. Women are owed a movement that is ONLY about saving them and them alone and that’s what feminism is for.

[radfemme-rage]

feminists connecting feminism to veganism is not at all similar to liberal feminism advocating for groups like men. ecofeminism is a respected and established branch of feminism with its own theory and bright female thinkers spanning back decades, not a concerning online trend.

i don’t think that all feminists need to be vegan by any means (nor do most vegan feminists claim this), but to say they’re not interlinked is incredibly wishful thinking. we’ll never be able to fully dismantle patriarchy while racism, classism, capitalism, etc. are still rampant, and veganism is no different, whether we like it or not.

the exploitation which happens to female animals showcases exactly what males would also like to do to human females, and will continue to do to human females, as long as they can get away with it. it’s the exact same line of thinking based on the exploitation of female biology.

feminism and veganism are also interlinked issues when males in the meat industry are more likely to sexually assault and be domestically abusive towards women, more likely to have misogynistic attitudes and strict gender roles, and both exploit female biology. the ongoing climate crisis also disproportionately affects women and will continue to disproportionately affect millions of women. this is huge.

so this is actually a serious feminist issue. all women benefit from more vegans in the world and society having more favourable attitudes towards female animals. is it also surprising that vegans - a group largely consisting of women - are constantly mocked and trivialised and not seen as legitimate by the rest of society?

many feminists inability to see the links to veganism stems from defensiveness over their food choices or even the misogynistic smear campaign present against veganism - a female-led ideology - as opposed to actual intellectual analysis. feminists can understand that patriarchy permeates all aspects of society and interlinks with other systems of oppression, yet somehow believe that veganism is a completely separate area free of patriarchal control. this makes no sense.

feminists are able to advocate against other systems of oppression without being accused of watering down the movement, because it’s clear that women cannot be free while racism or late-stage capitalism exist. yet when feminists want to discuss veganism, they’re wrongly told that veganism somehow has nothing to do with female humans’ liberation and often compared to how liberal feminism advocates for men - which is a complete leap.

liberal feminism advocates for males because it’s a patriarchal and capitalistic movement co-opted by males. vegan feminists advocate for veganism because the sex-based oppression of female animals worsens the sex-based oppression of female humans.

[barbievspredator]

This is literally human exceptionalism in a different font.

Women are livestock in the eyes of men the same way cows are. We are just another resource along with crude oil, metals and wheat. If they could they would make ETFs of us and trade us on stock market the same way they make ETFs of farming produce.

[nawadi-roman]

@radfemme-rage and @barbievspredator Well then i respectfully disagree with those feminist authors. Veganism is different, it’s tied to class fight not feminism. If everyone became vegan today, it’ll hardly move the needle of change for women’s rights. Case in point, most of India’s population are vegans, did it improve women’s rights? Nope. Not even a minuscule

The same pattern of behavior you mentioned exists in a lot of industries like sport. Does that mean banning sport should be a feminist goal? We can directly tie opposing police and military where these pattern of behavior exist to class which affects women because they’re systems that perpetrate racism, misogyny, and imperialism which further oppress and impoverish women. Men already do their worst to women, they don’t need animals to have ideas.

Vegan women being mocked is not a uniquely vegan issue. Women who wear makeup are mocked and so are those who don’t because the only right way to exist is to be a man.

I don’t think animal industry is devoid of usual male cruelty and violence, but it does not make it a feminist concern. Our realm is the human one only and the systems that exist within it. And yes human life is worth more than animal life. And they do trade women like ETFs it’s called prostitution, porn industry, and arranged marriage.

[radfemme-rage]

i don’t think anyone is saying that you individually need to fight for animal rights if you don’t want to. ecofeminism simply shines light on the fact that two systems of domination are interlinked and hence embolden each other, which is true and common sense.

most indians aren’t vegan. most indians eat meat. india has the largest vegetarian population in the world, but this is linked to religion (hinduism is incredibly misogynistic), casteism, authoritarianism and purity culture — hence why one cannot expect a link between indian vegetarianism and ethical practices, but actually rather the opposite (indian vegetarians still also abuse millions of female animals, through milking cows. the country is also the largest exporter worldwide of beef, despite most of its population not being “allowed” to eat it. vegetarianism in india has very little to do with ethics.)

if you’re going to link veganism with broader politics, then the more apt comparison would be using people who willingly went vegan for ethical reasons, who, yeah, are on average more likely to care about women’s issues than many other subsets of the population.

admittedly, i also don’t understand the other points you are trying to make. an industry which revolves around the unnecessary torture and murder of billions of animals globally is blatantly quite different to kicking a ball around a football pitch.

but reducing patriarchal violence associated with male sports fans, and abolishing police forces and military are all absolutely feminist issues that i would support and many other feminists would too. so why should the meat industry, which we both can agree consists of male violence that also spills over to human women, be left out of this? feminists can advocate for many feminist causes.

if any particular woman doesn’t want to, that’s fine. but it’s pretty clear that any society which fundamentally believes it’s fine to exploit female biology, even in animals, and turn this into an industry worth billions of dollars, which makes males within it richer and is even associated with them being more violent towards women, has a misogyny problem.

fully dismantling patriarchy requires dismantling many oppressive systems (including factory farming) and challenging many attitudes, and many established feminists have believed this for many decades. it’s fine if you don’t agree with this, but what i mainly took issue with is you framing this as some sort of threat to radical feminism or some new online fad, both of which veganism simply is not. dismantling patriarchy requires a holistic approach and an entirely new genesis of society.

veganism is not at odds with dismantling patriarchy, but rather the opposite.

[radfemme-rage]

sorry, i’ve already typed loads but i just wanted to add that ultimately, i don’t even think what i’ve written above is the most compelling reason for radical feminists to adopt pro-vegan views

the most compelling reason is quite clearly the undeniable climate crisis our planet is in, which is undeniably going to punish women and girls the hardest. adopting a more vegan friendly diet is the single biggest change many people can make in their lives to support the planet and in solidarity of women and girls who have to bear the brunt of western governments pumping out a whole host of pro-meat propaganda simply because they could make mass profits off meat in a way that they couldn’t with vegetables

[womenstruation]

One of the biggest ways young girls are exploited in the global South is via the “house girl” culture. I’m speaking on how it works in Nigeria as that is my experience but I know it happens all around the world.

“House girls” are domestic servants, usually late teens though I have seen girls as young as six or seven, employed by middle and upper class families. They do everything from cooking and cleaning to caring for the elderly and young children and get very little wages. Most times these girls never see a penny of their wages- it’s all sent to their families. In Nigeria, these girls tend to come from very impoverished families living in border towns and often times do not speak the language before being sent to these families that exploit them.

Due to their young age, lack of any family nearby or money, poor education, and Nigeria’s legal system, these girls are overwhelmingly subject to sexual abuse at the hands of their male employers. In fact there is a common trope in media of the “husband cheating with the house girl and replacing the “madam” of the house. And when these men impregnate these girls, they are sent back to their villages in shame while the cycle continues.

They also face lots of other abuse. One of my mother’s friends was a “house girl” in the 70s when she was just thirteen and she was only given mouldy food and left overs to eat for most of her childhood. she once told me of a time where she was so thirsty, she drank the dirty water her abusers had used to wash their hands. I have also seen “house girls” physically beaten by their abusers and subject to horrific punishments- once as a child I saw a very young girl forced to ride in the boot of a car while all the employers children threw their imported backpacks at her.

There have also been situations in which families immigrate and arrange to bring their house girls with them. They continue to abuse them and when these girls manage to break free, they face deportation and further exploitation.

Of course such experiences are usually less common but the hiring of house girls is not viewed as the exploitation it is. Some people, my parents included, seem to view themselves as saving these girls from their lives in the village where they would get married young and live in poverty with lots of children. But how is it saving them to deprive them of education and enslave them? It is said that it is easy to recognise a house girl: shaven heads, old and dirty clothes and a scarily small stature. They look nothing like girls who have been saved.

[radfemme-rage]

came across this one conversation on the 4b subreddit where women talked about all the things they do not miss about heterosexual relationships

thought i’d share SOME of the points:

• maintenance sex

• patriarchal sex and lack of orgasm

• constantly shaving their body hair

• disproportionate domestic/emotional/mental labour while claiming the relationship is “50/50”

• subsidising his lifestyle (i.e. splitting the groceries when he’s the one who eats way more, being the only reason his apartment is clean and there’s not pubes on the bathroom floor)

• dealing with his porn addiction (where he’s watching teens and rape and misogynistic acts)

• dealing with his secret porn addiction while he claims he doesn’t watch it

• high chance of him being a pedo, misogynist, abuser, narcissistic, manipulative, etc.

• male ego and general lack of personality and accountability

• constantly having your nervous system dysregulated

• lack of meaningful care and conversation in general, especially in comparison to an average female friendship

• women having to use intrusive birth control methods because the male would rather risk her health than wrap it up

• him bonding with other men over misogyny and not having pro-social behaviours where he pro-actively stands up for women, minorities, etc.

• having to accept him checking out other women in real life, on social media, etc. and being micro-cheated on constantly, while being told it’s not cheating and that you’re insecure and crazy and a controlling bitch actually

• spending hours and hundreds on beauty maintenance while he… looks like that

• being rushed while getting ready

• never being allowed to be ugly in her own space

• total loss of bodily autonomy (i.e. being groped while doing the dishes)

• doing his laundry and cooking for him

• sharing a bed with a man (especially one who snores and is unhygienic)

• skid marks and piss and hair left in YOUR bathroom

• dealing with someone else’s trauma, from a sex that is averse to therapy and developing emotional intelligence

• a male shit-talking their past female exes (what did he do to her?)

• most males being okay with casually lying to their partner

• most males only being as loyal as their options and cheating on her if another woman ever expressed interest in him

• playing the role of a mother and a wife to a manchild

• no empathy or meaningful additional support while on your period

• having to tip toe around mantrums

• constant yeast infections and UTIs

• constantly being belittled, gaslighted, psychologically micro-abused on a daily basis

• male insecurity and jealousy, especially if you’re accomplished and attractive

• manage all the logistics and mental load (grocery lists, doctors appointments, “oh, we should go on a date” and subsequently planning the date)

• having to overlook their problematic opinions on most things

• general lack of empathy

• most men aren’t cut out to be romantic partners or platonic friends so how could they possibly be cut out for fatherhood

• having to take interest in his hobbies (sport, video games, anime) while he don’t give a flying fuck about yours

• dealing with male body hair and fat men

• man sweat, armpit hair, asshole hair, balding

• constant objectification

• constantly being reminded that no matter how progressive he is, he is fundamentally a man

• heterosexual relationships being rooted entirely in chance (i.e. of him not being a pedo, misogynistic, abuser)

what strikes me is the fact that you could have the most “feminist” man on the planet yet most of the above still apply lmao

feel free to add more, this is just the beginning of a very long list

[ffuscous]

“Back Off Boys, They’re Butch!”

10 themed pin-up intaglio prints, each ~2”x3”

[ohpannoinno]

Alla Horska's Map of Ukraine (1960, 1970)

[fembandit-deactivated20230528]

It's increasingly aware how much the newer generation sees misogyny as a joke.

Misogyny has become so ingrained into our society that people see it as a "lesser" form of oppression. "Misogyny is only done by harmless incels online!" Yeah, and those "harmless" incels go on to beat women because they won't give them what they want. The harness incels who degrade women for wanting to live life peacefully without misogyny. The harmless incels who then go on to make YouTube videos targeted to little boys ages 9 about "trolling feminists" who are just women online saying they don't want to be treated unequally and telling them to go back into the kitchen. The harmless incels who idolize fictional characters and even men in history who kill women. So yeah, I guess misogyny isn't such a big issue, huh!

[madwomxxn]

Men kill hundreds of women and girls globally every single day, not counting the thousands if not millions more being abused/raped/trafficked etc. Every single day. But yeah misogyny should take a back seat.

[clytemnestradidnothingwrong]

If you don't believe misogyny is a serious form of oppression, I do not trust you. I will never believe you're a smart or compassionate person, and I will certainly never call you "feminist".

[kkoffin]

hate crimes against women aren’t even considered on most charts and statistics records because they make it impossible to visually compare the other forms of hate crimes because they literally become so small in comparison.

it’s literally just seen expected now though. my entire life i’ve been told “women belong in the kitchen” “shut up dishwasher” etc etc. women face misogyny day in and day out, and it literally shapes our lives. it gives us a life-long curfew, every single time we are in a car park, elevator, public bathroom, we search for something to defend ourselves. it becomes a part of our lives and habits next to eating and sleeping. but that is simply seen as “just how things are”, “just the way the world works”

they know perfectly well what misogyny is, how it effects women - they just don’t care to change it. they expect us to just accept it.

they simply accept women’s role as something akin to prey animals. like it just has to happen and everyone needs to move on. it’s a waste of time to mourn or do anything. they accept women as second class.

if a man tells you misogyny isn’t a real form of oppression it’s because he sees you as a prey animal in a wildlife documentary.

[empiredivinite]

at the end of the day, we live in a patriachal society. misogyny is the only type of discrimination that doesn't oppress any man, that's why they give zero fucks about it. it's that simple.

[cyberglittter]

wings scarf by harune horigome

[coochiequeens]

i have no words

[chadradfem]

Urgh imagine your dying wish is to donate your body to medicine thinking that maybe you will give a child a new lease on life with a heart transplant or help someone whose liver is failing and then your skin ends up in some fetishistic, misogynistic male’s open wound… disgosteng

[coochiequeens]

@chadradfem those are the words I was looking for

[powerfem]

Wow this makes me so fucking mad. Alloderm is a very expensive material, because it comes from a donor of course, but also because of the process to make it. So expensive that they use a limited amount on burn victims, its intended use, only on very mobile areas or in very grave cases.

Imagine seeing person with the majority of their body burned, who isn't getting alloderm everywhere because it is very expensive, and then reading this 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 Did you now that many times doctor struggle finding donor skin for burn patients? That can easily mean life or death.

[some-random-radfem]

Considering that I am currently struggling with kidney disease, I can not describe to you the levels of furious that this makes me on behalf of every person requiring any kind of life-saving organ donation at all. There aren't even words. The only real reaction I can think of besides writing this post is to throw every fetishistic TiM into a wood chipper, and then to start screaming and never, ever stop. 🤬🤬🤬

[some-random-radfem]

Sorry not sorry, but I have to share this again because someone posted something in the tags that is just making me RAGE at this TiM all over again.

This is so utterly infuriating to me ("this" referring to the dude's surgery, not the tagger's decision, just to be clear). When these fetishistic males do these things, when they go in for these purely elective surgeries, not only do they take organs away from potentially dying people who really need them for totally redundant and unnecessary purposes, but they also scare people off of becoming organ donors due to the fear of one's organs being used for this purpose once deceased. Yet, requirements for life-saving organ transplants are not going to disappear just because some disgusting male fetishist is pining for his own personal designer "vagina" (translation: open surgical wound). There are still going to be dying people who desperately need them. And now, because of the trans cult and their plastic surgery obsession, there are fewer of them to go around, and what's there may not even be used on them.

These men are so utterly, clinically narcissistic and self-centered that they are willing to let terminally ill or severely injured innocent people suffer and die because these misogynistic AGPs have decided that they want, idk, boob jobs or some shit.

Do you all understand my wood chipper comment now? 🤬🤬🤬

[ihatemenandtherearereasons]

Exhibit 1480

[yenneterf]

As someone who works in the field of tissue/eye donation, this shit absolutely infuriates me. Especially because of how difficult and opportunistic it can feel to speak to families (which I do!! daily!!!) about how life-saving tissue donation can be, and now knowing it can go to some man's fetishistic impulses. it breaks my heart.

these surgeries aren't life-saving. they're for men's sexual gratification. they're a waste of valuable tissue that could save the lives of burn victims. i'm livld.

[nansheonearth]

[goblinous]

Obviously the most minor of this shitstain's crimes, but that's not even what cyberpunk means! He's not getting a robotic "vagina". His open wound isn't gonna have wifi. This would be biopunk at best, really more frankensteinian than anything.

Honestly, I'm hoping he's just making things up and not actually going to waste medical resources.

[ambessas]

Gender Disparity in Organ Donation: She Gives, He Receives

A detailed look at the gender disparity in organ donation, where women overwhelmingly become organ donors, and men are the primary recipient

The 2021 report from the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO) reveals a troubling gender disparity in organ donation: 80% of organ recipients were men, while 75% of organ donors were women. Although men and women are equally likely to face medical conditions that require organ transplants, very few women actually seek or receive them. From 1995 to 2021, of the 36,640 people who received organ transplants in India, 29,695 were men. Meanwhile, 4 out of 5 living donors are women, and they are often wives and mothers who overwhelmingly take on this role.

Gender disparity in organ donation: Why women outnumber men as living organ donors

The problem is not in India alone.

A Google search will take you into the global scenario of gender disparity in organ donation. A 2021 study in the Journal of the American Heart Association notes that sex disparities in organ donation in the US have persisted for over 25 years. As per this study, women are more willing to donate their own organs to family members or strangers than men.

[barbievspredator]

So if any of us dies without letting doctor steal donating her organs is also taking a man to the grave with her.

Good.

One last act of feminism and misandry on the way out.

[probuccalfat]

these women did wonders for the “i’m single and i like it that way” community… i’m having a sexy ass life!

[antisextrade]

Important Articles about Porn & Prostitution

Here are some of the best articles about Porn and Prostitution one should know:

Important Articles about Prostitution

What’s Wrong with Prostitution?

A brief history of the ‘Sex work is work’ movement

Where did the idea that prostitution is a normal job that can be empowering for women come from and why did it gain ground so quickly?

How the British establishment was captured by ‘sex work’ lobbyists

What It Means to Call Prostitution ‘Sex Work’

Buying sex makes men more prone to violence against women

Why don’t victims just leave? ​- Trauma Bonding in Prostitution

Survival Mechanisms and Trauma Bonding in Prostitution

The Psychology Behind the Grooming Process

How Legalizing Prostitution Has Failed

How legalization made Germany the brothel of Europe

“Bitch, You Got What You Deserved!”: Violation and Violence in Sex Buyer Reviews of Legal Brothels - PDF

Prostitution is not a job and never will be. Here’s why.

New Study Reveals: Half of Young Adults Believe Rape Is Only a Crime in Law If Victims Fight Back (This also explains why many don't believe in rape in porn & prostitution)

Important Articles about Porn

Women Expose the Sexual Abuse and Trafficking Hidden in the Porn Industry

Shattering the Porn Star fantasy

Porn shapes misogynistic attitudes

Porn and Violence are linked

Evidence of the harmful impact of online pornography on viewers and society

Why Porn's 'Interracial' Label is Racist

Pornography’s role in shaping risky sexual norms in young adults

Conditioned Arousal: What Experiments Reveal About Porn’s Influence on Desire 

Porn Makes Men Terrible in Bed

Why Pornography Hurts Men

The children on Only Fans

Behind the OnlyFans porn boom: allegations of rape, abuse and betrayal (Part 1 - You can find the other parts at the end of the article)

[clit-licker420]

how much of the strength divide between males n female is truly biological and how much is the result of epigenetic trauma from the worldwide comparative starvation of female children for thousands of years?

[clit-licker420]

especially considering that nat geo article about prehistoric women being stronger today than female athletes. and even today girls are encouraged to eat less than boys, when i was a child i knew girls on diets aged EIGHT! chronic malnutrition severely impacts the ability to build muscle - multiply that by five thousand odd years, centuries of discouragement from exercise, positioning of strength as an ‘unfeminine’ quality, confinement to the home, constant pregnancy, sexual preference for weaker, delicate women, and you have a recipe for progressively weaker generations.

i don’t deny at all that there is some natural difference in strength levels, but i wonder how much of an impact the past millennia of misogyny has had on women’s strength, whether we will ever know the extent, and how long that would take to undo.

[deerwomann22]

Also I think pedophilia plays a huge role in this. Men were taking for a fucking millennia really young brides and assaulting them I dont believe that it caused no consequences

[scribbles-0f-a-madwoman]

I read somewhere that anthropologists believe the age our ancestors would start their first period was around 17 years old. They also suspect a woman would have her first child at around the age of 19. Furthermore, humans did not have contraceptives, YET, their children were commonly 4 years apart in age. Our relatives in the great ape family do not practice abstinence, they just have a naturally set cycle of reproduction. Somehow, scientists haven't figured out why human females have started their periods earlier and earlier. They also have no explanation for the disruption of natural childbirth sequences. Let me be a skeptic of knowledge for a second... science is largely male. Lets be honest, they know its patriarchal reproduction "methods" (if you can even call it a method, its more inefficient chaos where bad genetics are passed through rape, effectively fucking our species up). They wont study it because they don't want to know the truth. Thats why they wont study the female body in medical research either. When you actually learn about a subject, you have to confront the lies your society has made about it. The lies that comfort you, the lies that soothe your subconscious instinct. Instinct that whispers about the blasphemy of current sex dynamics. Males are truly the variable subjected to the use of female. Its written in the law of sexual selection. And they hate that. So much so that they scream over women and enforce the idea that nature consists of purely patriarchal brute force and female submission. Thats far from the truth. Why would the sex that labors the least have the authority on when labor takes place? They do not know efficiency. But thats how men work. Men are dogs without masters, lost without direction. They act without cause because they have lost their leader, the one who determines efficient production with her desire and welfare.

That is why I believe we as women need more skepticism. Men twist knowledge to make it seem like this pain is innate, but its really a cover up. I've been in scientific studies, I've seen the loopholes and casual disregard of female welfare. What made me stand out from the others (and eventually leave due to the unbearable conformity, the constant push to accept that humiliation is intrinsic to female) was that I dared to doubt. I dared to question. Knowledge is a tool, and men use it against you, constantly. Many times I'm looked at as if I am a conspiracist, operating on crazed urges rather than logistically assessing if something is true, but so many eat the poison that we call knowledge without thinking of who curated it in the first place. No true knowledge can be derived from mindless following.

In short: yes I do think men have raped their way into devolving our species collective health ESPECIALLY womens health :)