i've found my little zone in fandom that i'm comfortable in, but it occurs to me that others are still struggling to find the people who actually enjoy this game! and who talk about it!
so please do reply or reblog if you're veilguard positive and talk about it uwu
ngl the latest patches really leaning into the "the wol could be a monster, actually. If they'd want to be. They kinda are already." angle feels very good considering how angry some ppl have been when I as much as voiced that thought before. lmao.
Showing vulnerability is a core part of driving the plot or character development, whether they're building relationships or force them to make choices they wouldn't normally do.
Exposing your character's doubts and insecurities shows the reader that your character is real and has depth.
Here are 20 ways you can create tension by showing vulnerability in your characters through actions:
Letting someone see them exhausted instead of pretending they’re fine.
Admitting they don’t know what they’re doing and not joking about it.
Whispering secrets to objects instead of people.
Holding back tears, not because they’re strong, but because they’re scared.
Accepting help and apologizing for it at the same time.
Taking a deep breath before speaking, as if bracing for impact.
Sitting closer than necessary, then freezing when noticed.
Saying “you don’t have to” when they desperately want them to stay.
Letting their voice crack.
Sharing something small first, testing the ground. Alternatively, sharing small joys to test if it's safe to share bigger ones.
Watching the other person’s reaction instead of finishing the sentence.
Fidgeting with sleeves, rings, or scars they usually hide.
Letting silence stretch instead of filling it with humour.
Admitting they were hurt without assigning blame.
Avoiding eye contact while speaking about something personal.
Trusting someone with a truth they don’t fully understand yet.
Hesitating before touching, afraid of rejection. Their hands hang in the air for a moment as if waiting for permission.
Saying “I don’t want to be alone” instead of “I’m fine.”
Letting someone touch them in a way they usually resist.
Smiling through pain, hoping no one notices the cracks.
01. avoids eye contact or looking at the floor.
02. wringing hands together in silence.
03. fidgeting with the hem of their shirt, unable to stay still.
04. looking at receiver in long silence before looking away.
05. silently leaves a folded note on the table in front of the other.
06. touches the others arm but pulls back out of guilt.
𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 -
01. slams fist onto a table without saying a word.
02. exhaling sharply through their nose and clenching their jaw.
03. throws an object across the room.
04. crossing their arms tightly, digging fingers into their own skin.
05. pacing the room with heavy steps.
06. glares at the other with a clenched fist.
𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞 -
01. gently pushing stray hair behind the others ear.
02. resting their forehead against the others.
03. cups the others face with both hands.
04. pressing a kiss to the others forehead in silence.
05. lingering touches against the others face.
06. wraps their arms around the other from behind and rests their head on the others shoulder.
𝐬𝐚𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 -
01. wiping their eyes before someone can notice.
02. pressing their face into a pillow to muffle sobs.
03. pulls the other into a desperate hug and wont let go.
04. silently reaching for the others hand, needing comfort.
05. walks into the room with red-rimmed eyes and no words.
𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 -
01. spins the other around without warning in a hug.
02. links arms with the other and tugs them along happily.
03. provides the other with a handmade gift.
04. tackles the other in a sudden and joyful hug.
05. kisses the others cheek unexpectedly and grins.
𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐫 -
01. backing away slowly and looking for exits.
02. hiding behind the other and peeking around.
03. flinches at sudden movement from the other.
04. presses their back against the wall with eyes darting around the room.
05. jumps at a noise and instinctively grabs the others hand.
𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠
01. tucks a blanket gently around the other person's shoulders.
02. applies a bandage with slow and deliberate care.
03. brings them food and water and watches to ensure they eat.
04. runs fingers through their hair in efforts to soothe.
05. rubs soothing circles on the others back while they cry.
06. stays silently by the others side in support without saying a word.
𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠
01. raises a hand but hesitates.
02. grips the others arm a bit too tightly.
03. pushes the other away with more force than necessary.
04. turns their back on the other to begin walking away without a word.
05. rips a shared photo in half without a word.
06. steps in closely with cold and narrowed eyes.
new poll based on a semi-viral twitter post going around;
if you were in a committed, sexually active relationship, would you be comfortable with your partner watching p*rnography? (not including reading fictional erotica)
Maelstrom runs pedo rings and most of them have "serial rapist" listed under crimes if you scan them. So you are obsessing on a guy who at best is cool with being friends with pedo rapist and at worst is a pedo rapist.
i don't know what you were trying to accomplish here but if its to make me feel bad or guilty for enjoying a fictional character in a fictional setting with like 10 minutes of screen time and no real background information or lore well
GOD I know you didn't ask for an academic essay and anon won't read it, so I'm just using your post to be a self-indulgent academic, sorry Sev.
Anon, you're the weird one and everyone that thinks like you do are the weird ones.
Fiction plays an important role in our psychosocial development, both as children and adults. It acts as a psychological safety net allowing us to explore other traits, characteristics, acts, actions, or any other number of themes including morality that we can't explore in our real lives. And when you have characters with such little canon development, the sandbox opens up even more, allowing for even more exploration.
To assume morality based on a character or story someone enjoys is not only stupid, but it's also stunting your own psychological and emotional growth. By shying away from exploring things you enjoy that the status quo, in group, or social justice clique du jour would criticize, you're losing the opportunity for some incredibly rich and important personal development.
These next few sources and quotes refer to reading, but it's the focus on fiction and how we use fictional stories that is most important.
Adolescence is a significant period of identity development and social exploration, and narrative fiction can help adolescent readers to exp
Indeed, research has demonstrated that when relating to a character or a story, readers may recognise or realise something new about themselves and change their self-concept, beliefs and/or behaviours, such as changing their attitude towards characters whose identity and perspective differ from theirs (Kaufman & Libby, 2012). Narrative fiction also allows readers to understand and connect to different characters’ experiences and perspectives, allowing them to ‘fictionally’ experience situations and feelings they may never have experienced themselves.
A novel changed the life of Francesca Lo Basso—and there’s scientific evidence that she’s not alone.
When readers read fiction, they know they are encountering human-constructed characters, settings, and situations. This necessary suspension of disbelief—of having to entertain the possibility of other realities—means readers of fiction aren’t merely learning to understand the world as it is, but, also, how to imagine a different one. And it is this act of imagining that makes alternative futures possible—a future without endless, violent conflict, for example.
Most human beings above the age of three know how to differentiate between fiction and reality. And because they know that, they are able to suspend their disbelief and explore the thoughts and feelings they have when they think about characters like Dum Dum and groups like Maelstrom. (In this sense, I would recommend anon that you see a neuropsychologist to ensure your psychological development is on par with however old you are and not stuck at that of a 2-year-old).
How do participating in a work of fiction and imagining a fictional world intertwine with the reader’s life? I develop an account that explo
A quasi-emotion contains all the elements of an emotion, except the cognitive element and the motivational element. Emotions generated by real-life situations are based on a belief that something is the case, which prompts not only a quasi-emotion but also certain motivations. Emotions generated by engagement with a work of fiction, on the other hand, are based on make-believe that something is the case, which prompts a quasi-emotion. Hence, the quasi-emotions generated by make-believe in fiction reading do not stimulate us to action, the feelings and sensations may have a different intensity, and their duration can be different.
Walton in his work Mimesis of Make Believe identified the fundamental difference in how we process the feelings generated by fiction and how they do not stimulate us to action.
William Golding, in the above linked article, goes further and discusses how we use those emotions and the experiential memories associated with those strong emotions, for personal development. We do not read stories about terrible people doing terrible things and go on to do terrible things ourselves. That is such a profoundly, absurdly, incomprehensibly simplified idea about human behavior that makes anyone who has ever read even a low quality think piece about psychology fucking laugh.
When a reader empathizes with a fictional other, she feels for the fictional other from the inside. She enters the fictional story and the fictional world – up to a point. Ricoeur says that ‘reading itself already is a way of living in the fictitious universe of the work; in this sense we can already say that stories are told but also lived in the imaginary mode’. What exactly does this ‘way of living’ in the imaginary mode entail? Some of the limitations the reader encounters while imagining the fictional other from within are straightforward. First of all, the reader cannot act in the fictional world (although in cliff-hanger scenes, for instance, the reader might imitate the action of the fictional other by grabbing the table or clenching her fist). Second, and following from this, the reader cannot suffer any real-life consequences from what happens in the fictional world. The climber in the story may fall to his death; although we suffered inside him until he died, we continue to live. In spite of this divergence, some things happen in parallel during the reading process: the fictional climber is released from his life, and we are also released from the fictional climber’s life. The other-narrative of the fictional climber comes to an end simultaneously with our self-in-other-narrative. If the story continues after this, we see the deceased climber from the outside.
With this, I actually argue that people who can not only enjoy but continue to explore, create, and transform "evil" characters or groups has an immense amount of and skill for empathy. To like a character like Dum Dum isn't to condone what he's done, it's to see the inner goodness. Which is actually confirmed by a study! (I am so glad I dropped out of college because I do not want to put all of these links in APA style citations LMAO).
How do children make sense of antisocial acts committed by evil-doers? We addressed this question in three studies with 434 children (4-12 y
More specifically, across the ages studied participants more often reported that villains were inwardly good, than that heroes were inwardly bad.
In conclusion
Anon
Has a poor ability to empathize
Has poor sense of self identity
Struggles to interrogate their own biases and flawed thought processes
writing a canon divergent fix-it fic while also shaking my head to show that i actually really like the canon's tragic narrative and am not trying to say i think it would be better if canon was like this