Hiii I wanted to provide some clarity on the EED defense that I didnāt explain well earlier.
The prosecution will still need to prove every element of the charged crime, but this defense is an admission of the underlying act.
The elements of a charged crime are usually an act (actus reus), a specific criminal mindset (mens rea), and several other situational elements. Here, the best way to explain it is that they are conceding that the act was done (taking a life), but they are not admitting guilt to the charged crime because they are challenging the requisite mindset. For murder, the requisite mind set is that the killing was done āintentionallyā to take the life of another. They are arguing that Luigi could not have done this intentionally because an emotional disturbance effected his ability to be able to do so.
Makes sense? If I didnāt explain it well, let me know and Iāll try again lol.
















