Tenth Doctor Is Pro-willo

He / they . Bodily 20. Nonhuman.

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

My name is Oliver/Silco. I use he/they pronouns and I am apart of a traumagenic DID system. I am an age slider, but my age usually sits at 25. I am bodily 20. The system is professionally diagnosed with all disorders we claim to have. S/BPD with high NPD traits. Also AUDHD.

Welcome! This is my little corner of Tumblr dedicated to systems of every origin. I created this blog with the hope of having a space where people can share their experiences, learn from one another, spread awareness, ask questions, find resources, and simply exist without feeling like they have to justify themselves. Whether you’re here to read, contribute, or just quietly follow along, I hope you feel comfortable here.

I barely have a DNI. Mostly anyone is welcome to interact as long as they’re participating in good faith and treating others with basic respect. For transparency, I’m pro-fiction (not darkship), pro-para (anti-contact), supportive of good-faith identities, supportive of well-researched self-diagnosis, and critical of radqueer ideology. I also believe psychiatry does more harm than good and support mad pride. I know not everyone who comes across this blog will agree with those views, and that’s okay. I don’t mind respectful disagreements or genuine discussions, including with anti-endogenic or anti-willogenic users, as long as everyone involved remains civil. However, I won’t tolerate harassment, personal attacks, bad-faith arguments, or asks that are only intended to provoke conflict. Those will simply be ignored or deleted.

I’ll mainly be posting educational content about non-traumagenic systems and plurality as a whole, along with resources, answers to asks, discussions about common misconceptions, and my thoughts on topics within the plural community. I also plan to respond to common anti-endogenic arguments when I think there’s value in having those conversations. My goal isn’t to argue with everyone who disagrees with me, but to encourage thoughtful discussion, provide information, and give people another perspective to consider.

I also want this to be a place where systems can share their stories, talk about their experiences, celebrate milestones, ask for advice, or vent if they need somewhere to be heard. Every system has a different journey, and I believe there’s value in listening to one another with empathy, even when our experiences don’t look the same.

If you send in a vent, please include any relevant content warnings at the beginning of your ask so I can keep the blog accessible for everyone. If you’d rather your message stay private and not be posted, just let me know and I’ll respect that. I also ask that you avoid naming or targeting specific individuals, since I’d rather not use this blog to encourage callout culture or unnecessary drama.

At the end of the day, I want this blog to be a positive, informative, and welcoming space where systems of all origins can feel comfortable participating. My hope is that people leave this blog knowing a little more than they did before, feeling a little less alone, or simply having had a pleasant interaction. Whether we agree on everything or not, I believe respectful conversations are far more productive than hostility, and that’s the kind of environment I want to encourage here.

My special interest is psychology but with a specific focus on plurality.

Boundaries:

While I am in a professionally diagnosed system, I prefer to not be called a pw a CDD or boxed into those groups.

Please do not DM me if you are bodily 18-. Following is OK.

For comfort reasons, Radqueers and Darkshippers DNI as well as pro-contacts/neu-contacts.

Sometimes other headmates may post on this account under their own names. There will be no sign out emojis, only their names.

If you send a hate tell, I will delete it and block you.

No flirting.

Prefer terms like you& and generally plural terms.

Please be clear to me about boundaries.

I also prefer nonhuman pronouns. Those centered around canines as I am a GSD therian.

Tags:

— #the last drop ; reblogged posts

— #a seat at my desk ; answered asks

— #from the under city ; anonymous asks

— #the river carries ; vent posts

— #at the negotiation table ; debates

— #between the pines ; other headmates text posts

— #silco speaks ; text posts made by me

— #question about the prescription ; text posts about anti-psychiatry & mad pride

[sci-facility]

HOW does one like characters without introjecting them. do we just let it happen? like what is that.

— 🎰

[sugarsugarsugarsugarsugars]

its called not being a delusional retard 😭😭 get help seriously. get. help.

[purewhimsicality]

using nazi lingo is crazzyyyy, using ableism is crazy (with a touch of racism and anti semitism too) @this-is-neuropsych-ableism @this-is-pluralphobia @this-is-alterhumisia @thisisracism @plural-blocklist @pro-plural-silco @thisis--ableism

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

Scrolling through that persons account, I am certain they are ragebaiting. That or they are grappling with very severe internalized ableism. Regardless I would try to ignore or not interact with them as they clearly want attention and it is a waste of time.

[pluralcarton]

Genuinely pisses me off to look through a singlets DNI list and they have (pro) endos on it like you don’t even go here shut uppppppp.

[pcb-system]

If you think it's okay to make false endo safe servers so you can laugh at people, I hope you know that behaviour is genuinely fucking disgusting and you need to grow the fuck up. That is bullying.

Endos please be aware of this being a thing.

[sparkleradz]

PSA: if you’re anti-endo, any “plural” tags (#pluralpunk, #actually plural, #plural system, #pluralgang, etc) are NOT for you!! Plural is an inclusive term! Anti-endos using these tags are getting a major side eye from us

[pcb-system]

Plural as a term, as tags, as a community, etc. was and is always safe for endogenic systems. We also suggest blocking those who seek to exclude based on origin.

[pixie-stick-it-to-the-man]

psychs online trying to connect to marginalized people are so funny bc they’ll say something pretty milquetoast like “the psychiatric profession has made errors in the past that have hurt members of x marginalized communities” and you’ll see someone’s comment whose like “yes! That thing they did in the past was terrible and it’s so awful I’ve experienced something like that actually fairly recently. The issues persist :(” and then the psych will double down and accuse them of trying to mischaracterize the profession even when they’re speaking from lived experience, which apparently matters soooooo much to them. Like pls eat shit forever.

[wheelie-sick]

anti psych blogger: it really sucks that pro-psychs and people exploring antipsychology who haven't unlearned much use "functional" as a standard and goal while many of us can't or don't want to achieve "functional"

very, very misguided people: so you don't want me to be functional??? well I want to be functional so your entire ideology is awful

like holy fuck what?

let's begin by saying "functional" is an entirely subjective experience. right now functional is primarily defined by a capitalist society that is supported by psychiatry as Able-To-Participate-In-Capitalism™ different psychs and therapists might have different definitions but that doesn't change that this is the prevailing one.

no definition will ever be achievable by all people.

not everyone wants to achieve any definition of functional.

one of the foundational tenets of antipsychiatry is that autonomy is always a right. !! there is nothing wrong with wanting to meet a definition of functional and most antipsychiatrists will not disagree with your right to desire this !!

antipsychiatrists may suggest that you not define your worth based on your ability to function and to analyze your desires to make sure you are truly not placing your value on functionality. this does not mean that we don't want you to meet your personal goals

what we do want is an end to the expectation that we all must be functional. we don't want a redefinition of functional (no definition will ever fit everyone) we want a complete abolition of the idea that we must "function" in society/our lives in order to have value and worth.

the flipside to autonomy to choose function is the autonomy to choose dysfunction. recovery is not a moral obligation. recovery is not an obligation at all. if someone wants to continue living a dysfunctional life that is their right and no one should ever attempt to take that right away. it is no one's right to force any definition of recovery or function (the two generally go together) on someone.

when people talk about function this and function that and as long as you're functional and only if you're functional they are reinforcing a tenet of psychiatry that is forced down the throats of people who can't and don't want to meet any definition of functional. that's why antipsychiatrists get so frustrated with it.

if you want to find a definition of functional you like or create one yourself and strive for that goal great, genuinely good for you, but you cannot speak for all people ever about its importance. antipsychiatrists aren't denying your right to do this by suggesting that you not deny other people's rights to not strive for function.

tldr: antipsychiatrists respect your autonomy to strive for function, now respect others autonomy to not do so

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

i really dislike the emphasis that anti-endos put on western psychiatric frameworks of plurality as if plurality hasn’t existed in different forms for thousands of years in different cultures like. why do we believe so strongly there is only one way to do things

secondly trusting crusty mostly white cishet men over my own community is not something i’m willing to do

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

anti-endos might be the first group of people to believe that a self identification label needs evidence

[fixed-systemmie]

Sysmeds when they find out plurality is a framework and CDDs are far from the only cases where it can apply:

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

“there’s never been a positive anti-endo to pro-endo case” except there has been .. ever since i became pro-endo, i started to feel more confident in my plurality as well as less ashamed about it and our headmates got comfortable expressing themselves. i constantly felt judged by anti-endo’s honestly, esp bc my experience with being plural has been a lot more diff than others experience with it

the pro endo comm has personally been nothing but kind to me and i’ve made some genuinely good friendships with people here

no clue abt the rest of yall

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

plural people will not be liked with or without endogenic systems and i need yall to realize this

[thethreeofusalone]

We definitely have some kind of amnesia but also sometimes it feels like a memory is a bar of soap in the shower and I’m the poor soul who’s scrambling to grab ahold of it, never to succeed

[a-mosaic-of-stars]

maybe plurality is keeping different wallpapers ready so different folks can feel more at home in this life. Maybe plurality is gently taking someone’s hand in yours, even though both hands belong to the same body. Maybe plurality is calling out goodnight to the person that’s taking over for you as you slowly slip out of the conscious for the night. Maybe plurality is putting on the perfume your headmate likes because she’s definitely going to be helping you get through the day.

maybe plurality is kindness. A kindness of the brain extended to a tiredness of the soul.

maybe it’s casual. Maybe it’s gentle. Maybe we’re all still learning how to live with each other. Maybe we don’t have to be anything complicated and explainable. Maybe plurality just… is.

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

anti-endos might be the first group of people to believe that a self identification label needs evidence

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

anti-endos using “syspunk”

[i-suggest-being-pro-endo]

i have a suggestion!

consider listening to people's personal experiences and considering other options instead of forcing other people's experience of personhood (not a scientific concept but a philosophical one) into your own boxes and claiming that you can only experience multiplicity through trauma and a medical disorder.

unless you actually have real evidence.

in which case, show the real evidence that completely disproves that one can experience multiple states of self that are at least semi autonomous without severe trauma. and no, just stating "the dsm!" or "science!" or "anything on DID" is not proof. actual proof that shows that the experience of multiple (semi-)autonomous states of self is solely linked to trauma and absolutely cannot be experienced by anyone else.

otherwise, consider listening to endogenic systems personal experiences with an open mind, and don't just brush them off because you think they're larping and ableist just because you think they're basically impossible, or saying that they're treating it as "just an identity like gender" (which waters down the experiences of trans people to being "just an identity" that you seem to associate with a choice? when the majority of trans people do not "choose their identities", they discover their experiences and label them?), or call them slurs because you think you can, or whatever else?

[pro-plural-tenth-doctor]

just saw a post of anti-endos complaining about the endogenic and did flag being similar. you guys are so embarrassing and immature