Hey. This one just got fired. if anyone can throw some spare cash its way, that would be greatly appreciated. Its venmo is @Trixter_bitch
$LAYYYTER
No title available
No title available

@theartofmadeline
NASA
Color Me Curious
đ
Cosmic Funnies
Noah Kahan
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

Discoholic đȘ©
todays bird

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Sweet Seals For You, Always
h

EXPECTATIONS
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Origami Around

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine

seen from Iraq

seen from South Africa
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
@random-transfem-witch-punk
Hey. This one just got fired. if anyone can throw some spare cash its way, that would be greatly appreciated. Its venmo is @Trixter_bitch
Man who hates the very concept of life and all living beings: I should design portal websites for colleges and job applications
Now would be a good time for everyone to understand how the US dollar hegemony works, and how oil was leveraged to turn the dollar into a weapon. Here, it goes like this:
1. The United States creates dollars, which costs them essentially nothing.
2. Over time, US military power compelled the biggest oil producers (starting with Saudi Arabia in 1974) to trade exclusively in dollars.
3. When a company needs oil, it needs dollars to buy it. You can obtain dollars in a number of ways: you can take a loan or you can sell shoes to the US or teacups to Europe. Notice that the factory has to ship actual shoes to the US or to third markets in order to obtain, basically, a bookkeeping entry that took the US microseconds to create.
4. The oil company receives the shoe factory's dollars in exchange for oil. It invests these dollars into US treasury bonds or securities, which is really the only sensible thing they can do --cash deprecates in value over time, and there are virtually no other risk-free places to park your billions of dollars worth of oil earnings.
5. The US puts part of the investment it received into military use, so that it can keep anyone who would dare to detach from this dollar hegemony in check. The rest goes to enrich the US. Return to step 1.
Note that this mechanism is essentially an obfuscated tax on the rest of the world. An Iranian shoe factory has to obtain dollars if it wants to buy oil, and the oil company is incentivized to store its dollars in the US treasury. This means that part of the value that foreign capitalists would otherwise pocket actually ends up in the United States.
To obtain a million dollars, the US government pushes a button; to obtain the same million a Bangladeshi factory has to sew 500 000 T-shirts.
Because the oil bill comes in dollars and the only deep, liquid, politically safe asset is a US Treasury bond, value flows to Wall Street.
In other words: The US creates money, manufactures a need for everyone to hold some of that money, and then incentivizes them to return that money to the US.
The petrodollar was only ever the beginning. Many things are gated behind the dollar: Shipping, aviation, SWIFT transactions, etc. Everyone needs dollars; if you can't get any you're going to struggle in the global capitalist economy. This is why the US gets to create seemingly endless dollars and have them still hold value, it's why the US can bend anyone reliant on the dollar to their will via sanctions; the dollar itself acts as a weapon. Of course, the status quo is maintained at gunpoint, and the dollar's value is ultimately backed by US military might. The United States exports death.
Because of all of this, the US has an enormous material incentive to keep oil flowing, to keep its military spending high, and to topple any and all projects that would endanger this system. To stop the flow of unequal exchange, to stop the coercive taxation over the rest of the world, would be to destabilize the US empire. Anyone who would provide an alternative must necessarily be seen as an adversary.
Want to nationalize your oil? Want to deal in another currency? Are you another military superpower? No? Too bad, here's one million drone strikes and a new *democratic* government for you.
This is why shifting to renewables has been such a struggle in the west, this is why the planet is warming, this is why the US is engaged in endless wars, this is why most of the world is poor, this is why millions have died. This is imperialism and it must be dismantled.
MAGA boomers SHOCKED by 20y/o commie speaking fluent hog
Hog 201 for anyone interested in trying this:
Bodily autonomy (like abortion, anti draft, etc) -> âThe government shouldnât be able to force anything on my body I donât want.â
Anti surveillance -> âI donât trust big government/big tech (big brother if youâre feeling frisky) with the ability to spy on me and my family.â
Immigration -> âNext to all of us immigrated at some point, I donât see why the elites get to decide whoâs allowed to be where. Whatâs to stop them coming for me?â
Climate Change -> âBig oil shouldnât get to determine whether or not I get to go places. I donât want to be dependent on some big business to survive.â
State Violence -> âI donât want the goddamn secret police breathing down my neck! I trust my community a whole hell of a lot more to help me than I do the state!â
The vast majority of conservatives think of themselves as underdogs being repressed by the government/the elite, and they value personal freedom (specifically their personal freedom, they donât care about other people). The will almost always agree with leftist points if you can find a way to blame the problem on their vague enemies (useful, since rich people are the root of most problems), and tie it back to their ability to say fuck everyone else. NEVER appeal to science, theory, logic, or human goodness. Make it seem as if you are a paranoid lunatic who trusts no one. They love it.
#you need to tailor your arguments to people's existing values and priorities if you want to convince them #the flip side is that it's every bit as easy to tailor conservative arguments to convince a leftist audience #so don't get smug #you're not immune to this either <- prev extremely true
This month people have been tearing Flock cameras off their poles.
This month people have been tearing Flock cameras off their poles. Perched above public streets, they are birdlike things, weatherproof, and they photograph every passing car and file it in a searchable national database. Somebody cut two of them in half at Washington Avenue and Westcott in Houston, spray-painted the wreckage, and left an American flag on one of them. Police were notified on the morning of the Fourth of July. Somebody severed a camera in Rutherfordton, North Carolina. The police department posted the photograph itself and collected more than twenty thousand comments. âNot all heroes wear capes.â âGive them a medal.â Here is what the cameras do when nobody cuts them down. Cops use them to hunt immigrants and to follow ICE targets across state lines and to find women who ended pregnancies in states where that is a crime and to watch exes and to watch women they want, without a warrant and without a judge. A cop types a reason in a box and the box does not check. A man in Burleson, Texas, told deputies his girlfriend had taken abortion pills. He showed them the photographs, the FedEx envelope, the instructions. Deputies opened a death investigation into a non-viable fetus, and the district attorney told them the state could not charge her, and they searched anyway: 83,345 cameras across 6,809 networks, a month of everywhere she had been. The reason they typed was had an abortion, search for female. The search reached Illinois and Washington, where what she did was legal. They found her in Dallas. She came into the sheriffâs office a week later, and they thought she had come to explain the fetus, and she had come to report that the man who called them had put a gun to her head. A sheriff in Jerome County, Idaho ran his wifeâs plate more than seven hundred times in three months. He typed the same reason every time. Test. The attorney general found nothing to charge him with. He retired in April. The Institute for Justice counts at least twenty-two officers who used the system to track people they were romantically interested in, and calls that almost certainly an undercount. And the cameras keep falling.
Become ungovernable.
In her first video interview from Johnson County Jail, Hill says she is a âpolitical prisonerâ who has been unjustly locked up by the Trump
Hope it's okay to share some quotes from the transcription of this interview:
SM: Why would they do that as a favor to the president, do you think? Why do you think Trump would see that as an assist for him? AH: Because the president, you know, tweeted directly about us. Our case is the first case in United States history where any defendant has been successfully tried and convicted as part of a, like, an antifa-related thing, right? The Justice Department said, âThis is the first time we have put antifa behind bars,â basically. But not in those exact words, right? But this is a part of the presidentâs agenda, you know, to create this narrative of left-wing terrorism, you know, basically in order to be able to prosecute political dissent against him. So I think that, like, if the Fifth Circuit were to overturn this case, which is the first of hundreds, right? The Justice Department has tried to go after, you know, people from Stop Cop City, you know, people from Minnesota and the George Floyd rebellions, and say like, âThese people are antifa,â and hundreds of such cases have been shut down. Ours is the first such case to have made it all the way to conviction and sentencing, and thatâs because of the fact that they were able to get such a conservative judge, such a conservative prosecutor, and have it tried in such a conservative district, right? In other jurisdictions, this would have been thrown out as a matter of law, but itâs thanks to the fixing of Mark Pittman and the pressure that the prosecutor Sean Smithâs superiors put on him to take this case all the way to trial, that that is what happened and I am here today.
And:
SM: What has this been like for you from a mental perspective? How has it affected your state of mind? Like I canât imagine this has been easy, and through this interview to me, youâve come across as kind of chill. AH: You know, Iâm a pretty spiritual person, pretty philosophical person. When I am in a situation where no action is likely to lead to an acceptable outcome, I take no action. And to a certain extent, I do not believe in 50 years. I donât. Maybe Iâm in denial but I still kind of donât believe that Iâm actually going to serve out this whole sentence and I think thereâs a little reason for optimism in that regard. There is a big movement of support for a political pardon for us from the next Democratic president of the United States. My mother told me that my father said that the next time a Democratic president is in office, heâs going to write him a letter to ask for a pardon for me. And that was the first positive interaction that Iâve had with my dad in five years. And when I heard that, I just burst into tears and, like, just became hysterical for five minutes because it was just the perfection of the absurdity of the time to me. My arch-conservative father, who I canât really stand to be in the same room as right now because of his transphobia, that he would do this thing, right, like appeal to a Democratic president on my behalf. And it really shows this bipartisan sentiment that this is obviously unjust, this is obviously political. You know, if this arch-conservative and I can find common ground over the belief that this is a political persecution, I think that thereâs a very strong chance for some future good thing to come our way out of that.
And:
SM: Is there anything else I didnât ask you that you want to get out, that you wanna say in this context? Obviously, people will see this and I know you have limited connection to the outside world. AH: I would say the same thing that Iâve said before, which is: Be brave. Weâve been accused of being terrorists, but terror is the power that this administration wants to ply in order to keep people quiet, in order to keep people content. Fear of incarceration, fear of homelessness, you know, itâs this fear, this fear that weâre going to lose our privileges, that we are going to use our comfort, that keeps people docile, keeps people from speaking the truth. Donât be afraid.
Reminder that there is some easily accessible info available about Mark Pittman, the âjudgeâ who denied the Prairieland defendants the right to a fair trial. I canât confirm if itâs up to date
I feel like modern people are not sufficiently despising the Bennets for being filthy rich and saving exactly nothing. Probably because a lot of people are under the misapprehension that they are poor. They're not, they are in the top 1% of income for their era. Compared to the average earnings at the time, their yearly income is around ÂŁ1.5 million.
But lets make it more accessible and say they have an income of $500,000 USD. Every single year. Every single year since their children were babies. Babies cost almost nothing. A nursemaid is like ÂŁ10/year and baby clothes are white for bleaching and are passed on through the children. The expenses at this time are very minimal.
Mr. & Mrs. Bennet had $500,000 for at least 15 years when the girls were small and saved exactly $0. Instead, Mrs. Bennet hosted parties where the food was 50x better than Lady Lucas's and, I don't know, bought herself fancy lace. Mr. Bennet probably purchased books. The education budget for their children was basically zero because they never had a proper governess.
Imagine the article, "I am a housewife. My husband and I make $500,000 per year, though about $200,000 of that must go to running our massive estate that we inherited and don't have to pay a mortgage on. We have no savings. When my husband dies, my daughter and I will only be left with only a tiny amount of money ($50,000 every year without lifting a finger) and the estate will go to a cousin. My daughters have no education and no money to inherit. I don't know what to do!!!"
Wouldn't you be reading that in absolute disdain? It is totally ridiculous that neither parent saved a single shilling. It is so stupid. They are both wasteful idiots. They both deserve our disgust.
Honestly, when Elizabeth visits Rosings and Lady Catherine is all like...
"You didn't have a governess?!"
"Your mother didn't even set work for you to do?!"
"They didn't even get you a tutor (aka go to London for the masters) for the subjects you were interested in?!"
"Your literal teenage sisters are Out even though they are teenagers?!"
We should be siding with her.
Like, I was home schooled and there is a lot of bad stereotypes about home schooling... But then there's the family that the home schoolers think are weird. The Bennets are that family.
Lady C is RUDE, but she isnât WRONG!
Excellent tags from @cicerfics
#oh my god YES#this is the thing i am prepared to rant about at a moment's notice#modern audiences usually do NOT grok that the bennets are RICH rich#they are the 1%!#they are just INCREDIBLY BAD WITH MONEY#they ARE the people making $500k+ a year who STILL live paycheck to paycheck because they keep maxing out their credit cards on dumb shit!#they have a BUNCH of money coming in every year and they have been saving NONE of it because saving money is boring and tedious!#also it's fully insane that they are rich people who didn't send their daughters to school OR hire a governess#they gave those poor girls NO proper education even though they#(unlike many/most families in the time period!)#had the RESOURCES to educate their daughters exceptionally well!#the WAY Lady Catherine and Darcy phrase their initial criticism of the Bennets is rude and snobbish#but the criticism ITSELF is BEYOND VALID OMG#i am forever banging pots and pans#begging moderns viewers who have only seen 2005 P&P to understand that THE BENNETS ARE NOT POOR#OMG SERIOUSLY NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT#THEY JUST SUCK ASS AT HANDLING THEIR MONEY#pride and prejudice
https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/unblock-my-f-ing-anime-dps-arrests-houston-man-after-threatening-call-to-governor/amp/
The affidavit does not say which anime the man tried to watch or how he attempted to watch it.
the problem with tumblr spells is all of you lil sluts are casting and not giving it time to charge so you're all casting cantrips and not 9th level death spells. everyone wants to be the one to take them down no one wants to be the one who assists
we're going to try again witha little but minimal casting
IT will happen in August of 2026. like to charge and reblog to cast but cast sparingly
Wait stop. everyone +like now and spread it a little but cast on the same day in August. lets try August 6th or something.
CAST NOW
the problem with tumblr spells is all of you lil sluts are casting and not giving it time to charge so you're all casting cantrips and not 9th level death spells. everyone wants to be the one to take them down no one wants to be the one who assists
we're going to try again witha little but minimal casting
IT will happen in August of 2026. like to charge and reblog to cast but cast sparingly
Wait stop. everyone +like now and spread it a little but cast on the same day in August. lets try August 6th or something.
CAST NOW
the problem with tumblr spells is all of you lil sluts are casting and not giving it time to charge so you're all casting cantrips and not 9th level death spells. everyone wants to be the one to take them down no one wants to be the one who assists
we're going to try again witha little but minimal casting
IT will happen in August of 2026. like to charge and reblog to cast but cast sparingly
Wait stop. everyone +like now and spread it a little but cast on the same day in August. lets try August 6th or something.
CAST NOW
the problem with tumblr spells is all of you lil sluts are casting and not giving it time to charge so you're all casting cantrips and not 9th level death spells. everyone wants to be the one to take them down no one wants to be the one who assists
we're going to try again witha little but minimal casting
IT will happen in August of 2026. like to charge and reblog to cast but cast sparingly
Wait stop. everyone +like now and spread it a little but cast on the same day in August. lets try August 6th or something.
CAST NOW
all public school anti-bullying activism is extremely transparent and meaningless
faculty: BULLYING IS BAD!! ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY!! THIS IS A HATE FREE ZONE!!
me: hey this person called me a stupid dyke today
faculty: hmm thatâs unfortunate. have you tried perhaps, not being gay?
I feel like everyone is against bullying until they actually look at the kids who are being bullied.
The cheesy anti-bullying tapes that they show in schools feature these skinny straight white neurotypical kids who get picked on for no reason. Usually the insults are something along the lines of âYouâre a loser!â or âGet lost, freak.â All the kids watching immediately feel bad for the victim, and think âAw! She didnât deserve that!âÂ
Then, ten minutes later, they go pick on some marginalized kid without thinking twice. As an autistic person, I was often this kid. The insults I heard growing up were not âYouâre a loser!â or âGet lost, freak.â They were âDonât let the retard work with usâ or âShouldnât she be going to the special school?â
The problem is we teach kids that bullying occurs for no other reason other than just to be mean. This could not be further from the truth. Bullying occurs because as a society, we condition kids into hating fat, black, neurodivergent, queer, and disabled people. Kids donât bully each other just to be mean. They do it because if somethingâs âwrongâ with the person, itâs completely justified.
But of course, we canât tell kids this kind of stuff. We canât say, âHey! Making fun of your gay classmate is bad!â
Because when we do, suddenly the phone calls come pouring in, each with a parent on the other end screaming âYou canât be feeding my son that liberal propaganda!âÂ
It really bites that when I find a new author with a cover that I canât immediately discern as gen AI or otherwise, I simply donât promote them until Iâm sure. And it sucks. I shouldnât have to do research on hundreds of book covers and author stances to be sure a human made it.
I was just reading the ask about modifying eureka to have a masquerade and it got me thinking, does the team have any license or interest in licensing for expansions? I tend to think the OGL ended up being kind of a disaster, but I think it would be cool to be able to be able to a) be able to add extra options for settings/groups/etc and b) support y'all with it and c) be able to see a metaphorical stamp of approval that this splat doesn't fuck up the base game
Legally, we own a copyright for Eureka but practically speaking we donât have an army of lawyers to enforce that and donât love most copyright laws even if we did. The most serious thing is that like, we ask that nobody thatâs not us host any official A.N.I.M. product for download anywhere. (Thereâs no point in pirating it, you can get it for free on itchio.)
We do allow people to make their own Eureka stuff, and in fact we especially encourage it when it comes to adventure modules. More adventure modules is something Eureka will always need. We even have a semi-formal approval process where we read, consult, and edit on peopleâs Eureka stuff to make sure it is up to our standard and if it is we will even link to it on our itchio page and in the rulebook itself. We donât get any profits from this, you keep any money you make, but it still benefits us because having more adventure modules increases the overall playability of Eureka and it lets us play our own game.
(We are actually running a mystery module jam right now.)
This is a lot of extra work for no direct pay though, and that is part of why Trait supplements and stuff like that get much lower priority than adventure modules. I am personally much, much more anal about what is allowed in terms of Traits and stuff. (And I donât think Eureka even needs any more Traits, a bunch of the existing official Traits have barely even been used.) If anyone wants to do any extra Eureka thing, I urge it to be an adventure module. There is a very comprehensive guide on how to make a good Eureka adventure module in Chapter 5 of the rulebook.
If anyone was interested in doing a, like, alternative setting, like one where there is a VtM-esque âmasquerade,â or one where there is still no âmasqueradeâ but monsters are relatively known to science, then actually I recommend that this be part of an adventure module too. Because well, like, there is little point in an alternative setting if there is nothing setting-specific for the PCs to do in this setting.
Such a supplement would introduce itself, explain the differences in setting and subsequently game rules, explain how this would likely affect the types of characters or types of behaviors and attitudes they would have, etc., and then it would give you the adventure module taking place in that alternative setting below that.
If we donât like your Eureka project, we wonât sue you, weâll just not acknowledge or promote/approve it. Granted, making Eureka supplements or whatever that go against the design principles, themes, intentions, etc. of Eureka will personally probably really upset me, but itâs not illegal.
itâs such a basic part of the reality of disabled people as a whole but itâs STILL so hard to get ppl to understand that some people will simply die without 24/7 care. their care is not for comfort, itâs not for fun, itâs literally a matter of life and death. âif their care was taken away iâm sure theyâd learn to suck it up like the rest of us!â â something ive heard time and time again. no they wouldnât, they would die. they HAVE died. they continue to die as cuts are made to welfare and health. why is this so impossible for people to grasp.
ID / TL;DW: young Black man explains the history of voodoo dolls: they originated in England, where Black people where prohibited from learning to read or write, to help witches keep track of what ailed their patients. Eg., person goes to witch and laments headache, they treat their headache and make a small doll (called "poppet"), trying to represent them as good as possible, stick a needle in its head and put it up a shelf. When they return next week, the witch takes their poppet and asks about their headache. If it's gone, they remove the needle, otherwise they know they have to treat a rather persistent headache.
I'm just gonna freeze-frame this for everybody: