
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
occasionally subtle
Cosimo Galluzzi

No title available

ellievsbear
Claire Keane
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Origami Around
sheepfilms

Product Placement
No title available
h

Kiana Khansmith
almost home
macklin celebrini has autism

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies
we're not kids anymore.
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from Kenya

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
@rat-desire
Burn me for this if you want but i hate when the female love interest expresses being uninterested in a relationship (either with the main character or in general) and then later turns out she was just “playing hard to get” or some shit and they fall in love anyway
If you add two pounds of sugar to literally one ton of concrete it will ruin the concrete and make it unable to set properly which is good to know if you wanna resist something being built, French anarchists used this to resist prison construction in the 80s
I’m just gonna go ahead and reblog this for purely educational purposes.
Of course. Purely for education.
WHO USED THIS POST TO WRITE A BEAUTIFUL ENJOLRAS/GRANTAIRE SOULMATE AU FIC BECAUSE I LOVE YOU
How do you people turn every fucking post into this shit?
I hate it when you’re reading smut and you can’t figure out what position they’re in.
sometimes it just ends up being something like
ITS BACK
@hellsite-hall-of-fame
crimes against the Jacobs family
Jeffrey Katzenberg pressuring Bob and Noni into making Sarah the love interest just for the sake of having one (rip Charlie, disney said no newsgirls)
Sarah's song What Will Become of the Boy? getting cut early in production because "it wasn't relevant to the story" (biggest lie ever told)
Sarah's stage song The Truth About The Moon getting cut along with her character and Harvey Fierstein generally disrespecting her in interviews.
Harvey Fierstein changing the Jacobses name to "Baum" making them less explicitly Jewish and somehow nobody went back to the film and went "hey actually they do have a surname" (assuming they thought they didn't have one)
Adding to the previous point, it has been said that their surname was changed to avoid confusion with the stage character Mr. Jacobi. You know. An entirely new character. But no, change the established family's name instead.
(On a similar note, I'd bet Racetrack's cigar on David being referred to as "Davey" 99.9% of the time so that people wouldn't confuse him with the David and Goliath references...)
Esther Jacobs being turned into "Ms. Baum" and then being cut anyways.
Mayer Jacobs being cut and his injury changing from his arm to his leg??? This one really gets me guys because in the grand scheme of things the specifics of Mayer's injury doesn't really matter so why change it???? It's such an odd detail to get wrong and if anything Mayer's leg being injured seems like a weird choice when one of your characters literally has a bad leg and is still able to work. (Mayer could have taken up piecework with Esther and Sarah while he healed if he still had use of both of his hands!)
David and Les surviving the Jacobs purge but at what cost?
Who stole Les's sword and who do I need to beat up for giving him a broken arm on Broadway?
David's role and importance in the newsical significantly diminished when he was originally the deuteragonist. His character arc was slowly and painfully cut down with a blunt axe.
No solo for David in the newsical when literally every other primary character including Pulitzer has one.
Sarah and David regularly being reduced to their relationships with Jack.
Sarah being the subject of so much undue hate dished out over decades and the lie that she was added to the film "last minute" because it was "too gay" continuing to be told when it is one of the easiest things in the world to debunk!! Sarah was created by Bob and Noni in draft one alongside the rest of her family and I'm tired of her very existence being disrespected in the name of Javid (both Jack and David would hate it btw)
Sarah being treated as an extension of David or as a plot device rather than as a real person.
David being regularly turned into a caricature of two or three traits that he may or may not even canonically display.
People pitting David and Crutchy against each other for the title of Jack's best friend??? You can have more than one best friend???
People still treating the Jacobses Jewishness as a headcanon or plain not knowing they're Jewish at all when it should be a very basic fact after 34 years.
I'm not here to start fights, but I love the Jacobs family and they deserve better.
Some old men Javid for the soul
Click on image for better quality!!
AHHHHHHHHHHHH @mindofeth
This is the full artwork for the third background concept experiment, drawing over the 3D model.
This would be the Blue Lobby, the entrance to the Cerulean Tower of the Seven Waves residential, the home of my sharkfolk. 🏢🦈
For this scene, I improvised by filling it with several other residents instead of just Tiago and Roberto alone. I tried to portray that in this universe there are no 'maintenance services', the residents themselves take care of the upkeep of the residential complex, a kind of ancient tradition.
For location reference, this scene would be from this area.
lil pötkös🐛
(stickersheet for future cons!)
playdate
Tove Jansson, The Conscientious Moomins
More concept art of toph and sokka
If the woman that JK rowling posted an upskirt photo of had been a cis woman snopes wouldn't have said this was "mixed" and you know it.
Not that it was necessary, but I looked up definitions, and yeah, obviously "taking a photo under someone's skirt" is literally it. Fuck Snopes so fucking hard. I need them to explain to me how it doesn't fit the definition to a fucking t:
And what the FUCK do they mean, "public setting"?? Yeah, upskirts are mistly taken in public fucking settings! That's not an eycuse, that's part of the fucking issue
And truly what do they mean it was in public? Does that mean that the upskirt photos people take on subways dont count because other people are around? OF COURSE IT WAS IN PUBLIC THATS HOW THE PHOTO GOT TAKEN IF SHE HAD BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AT HOME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BREAKING AND ENTERING
what do they mean "it wasn't taken surreptitiously"? there isn't any implication here except that because Freda Wallace was in public, she consented to any pictures that might be taken of her? this is just "look at the way she* was dressed". snopes is doing rape culture.
https://archive.is/Nv1K1
according to archives the first version of the snopes article listed it as "true," but it seems to have been changed. given rowling's widely known history of extreme and aggressive litigiousness i'd be willing to bet her legal team probably objected and snopes caved
You can report suspected or confirmed IDF war criminals to the Hind Rajab Foundation, and they will try to get the war criminal's country of residence to follow international law by prosecuting them
Some of their recent cases against international IDF volunteers and vacationing IDF war criminals:
you can support their work [here]
i feel like there is a sleep in me that needs to be slept but each time i sleep i don't sleep that sleep
the ideal media diet for a child is books and music from at least fifty years ago so they are always out of touch with the references and allusions of their peer group
the thing about phone in bed is that it's so awesome. almost makes you feel like betraying & destroying yourself for nothing isn't all so bad