Robotic woof arf arf @robot-kindagirl - Tumblr Blog

dollification is appealing to some because it provides the ultimate fantasy of taking a goddamn break from thinking for a bit

nyancrimew

chat. I might be cooked. But at least the kitchen is in a Michelin star restaurant.

milobyte

commission

dogpuppy

itsjesscapade

Poor girl's CPU is being worked so hard...

borghound-pilot

@k1nky-r0b0t-g1rl

foone

I tested a machine learning model designed to detect NSFW content. It marked this image as unsafe:

The blue is "breasts detected" and the green is "penis detected" .

yeah I don't think I'm gonna be using this ML nonsense

foone

I also tried giving it a GIF of two women fucking doggystyle and it said it was safe. *shrug*

foone

no I'm not going to post/link the GIF. this is a SFW family tumblr, except for pictures of Tim Allen's Big (Super)Naturals.

foone

Some more bonus images: That one pluot is a penis

And my chin is a nipple

foone

did another test on a tumblr photo I saw:

monochrome bondage, with no nipples showing? SFW

foone

I started processing every 24th frame of The Santa Clause to detect any NSFW content (with the confidence level turned down to make it over-detect). It's… working?

I mean, I'll give you the tie.

foone

So looking through the (partial) results that are in so far, it looks like the only things it can detect with any kind of reliability are TIM ALLEN'S BIG SUPERNATURALS

foone

Here's some progress: my first pass at annotating a video instead of an image.

I need to write some code to make it less flickery but this is definitely progress

foone

btw according to the stats on huggingface this model has been downloaded 68 million times... in the last month.

this model is being HEAVILY used.

vmlinuz-edge

i think political awareness is a kind of madness, you know? not to look at bananas in your grocery store in the mountains in landlocked america and know why exactly they're so cheap. that's sanity. not to see the shadow people stand stock-still out of the corner of your eye, that's an irritant, not madness. but to talk to someone you know, and for them to talk about hallmark movies. and then they mention how wholesome they are. that's when the madness takes you. it seeps into your neurons, saturates your grey matter. the madness takes you, and you have to look them in the eye, and smile, and nod. you have to nod your head about how hallmark movies are so wholesome, as if you can't draw a straight, clear line between the political underpinnings of the average hallmark movie right to the political beliefs of fucking adolf hitler himself. and then the conversation passes, and you can hide in a world of your own creation, once again, and the madness passes. and you take the moment to complain with some friends about how much hallmark movies suck.

analog-delight

Public Service Announcement:

INJECT ESTROGEN AND SWITCH TO LINUX TODAY

analog-delight

for my other robotgirls:

INJECT LINUX AND SWITCH TO ESTROGEN TODAY

velvetmommy

forcing the shyest girl you've ever met to touch herself while she leans her back against you, hands trembling cause she's just too embarrassed to do so. to make it harder, you make sure both of you are sitting in front on a mirror, at the bed's edge.

pokeballvictim

do you ever feel the urge to ruin yourself so you can't be expected to perform anymore? To break the thing that people want so much from? To put yourself in a position where not even you can expect anything from yourself?

#very much so #i kind of did it already. i feel like half the mental illnesses and shit i have i gave to myself as a way to get relief from the pressure #it's still not enough. it's hard to convince people i am broken

sleepy-bebby

There’s a scientific journal called “Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List”.

In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph.

An Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.

Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as “excellent” — and requested a fee of $150. While this incident is pretty hilarious, it’s a sign of a bigger problem in science publishing. This journal is one of many online-only, for-profit operations that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.