🥘 ͟͟❘❙❚Ꮺ @rusted-joints - Tumblr Blog

literally nobody is saying that men are innately abusive, or that every single one of them is evil, they’re saying that you can’t tell who the good ones are. they’re unpredictable. men who have raped and killed women have been described as a great father and decent husband. male socialisation cannot be revolutionised within patriarchy; patriarchy must be overthrown for their conditioning to radically change. and in order to rip patriarchy out at the root, you can’t keep excusing and choosing and enabling them. acting like you’ve got the good detective skills, you know a good man from a bad man, shits on every single woman who has been abused by a man she loved and thought was good. you’re not exempt. your husband isn’t definitely different. a radical feminist should be prioritising the liberation of women. that’s what will induce feminist revolution. not “my man’s different.”

workdie-deactivated20230411

lamujermorena on tiktok

cryptogamist

What’s especially scary about this is that men’s natural, evolutionary response to women crying is decreased sexual arousal.

<p>A chemical signal in women's tears may reduce men's aggression and sexual urges by lowering their testosterone levels</p>

These men are so porn-brained, so conditioned to be turned on by the sight of women in distress, that they’ve completely inverted their in-born arousal pathways.

iceyrukia

Never forget that after Trump won for his second term "feminists" got angry and the 4B movement trended for no more than a single day on social media before they called it too extreme and misandrist and "terfy". Talk about throwing a tantrum...

hirsuteandcute

I'm just going to say it - body hair (and beauty standards in general) is truly one of the final frontiers of women's issues in the West. Too many women just love their gilded cage too much. It shocks me how virulently women will defend it. I barely open my mouth and the "well I like how it feels. it just makes me feel cleaner. sensory issues. I do it for me. feminism is about choosing (to conform)." brigade come rushing in by the dozens.

Well I don't like how it feels. I don't feel cleaner without body hair. I don't prefer not having body hair. But who will advocate for women like me, but me? For women who do like hair removal, they are advocated for every time they step out of the house and see 99% of the female population also conforming to that standard, or when they watch a movie and see all the shaved actresses, or view an advertisment, or open a magazine, or watch a music video, or scroll through social media, or walk down the streets without receiving insults and glares for having a completely normal bodily feature.

You genuinely can't even point out that hairlessness is a man-made standard without women losing their shit and acting like they are totally immune to propaganda they've been exposed to from birth. I'm so tired.

fembandit-deactivated20230528

It's increasingly aware how much the newer generation sees misogyny as a joke.

Misogyny has become so ingrained into our society that people see it as a "lesser" form of oppression. "Misogyny is only done by harmless incels online!" Yeah, and those "harmless" incels go on to beat women because they won't give them what they want. The harness incels who degrade women for wanting to live life peacefully without misogyny. The harmless incels who then go on to make YouTube videos targeted to little boys ages 9 about "trolling feminists" who are just women online saying they don't want to be treated unequally and telling them to go back into the kitchen. The harmless incels who idolize fictional characters and even men in history who kill women. So yeah, I guess misogyny isn't such a big issue, huh!

madwomxxn

Men kill hundreds of women and girls globally every single day, not counting the thousands if not millions more being abused/raped/trafficked etc. Every single day. But yeah misogyny should take a back seat.

clytemnestradidnothingwrong

If you don't believe misogyny is a serious form of oppression, I do not trust you. I will never believe you're a smart or compassionate person, and I will certainly never call you "feminist".

kkoffin

hate crimes against women aren’t even considered on most charts and statistics records because they make it impossible to visually compare the other forms of hate crimes because they literally become so small in comparison.

it’s literally just seen expected now though. my entire life i’ve been told “women belong in the kitchen” “shut up dishwasher” etc etc. women face misogyny day in and day out, and it literally shapes our lives. it gives us a life-long curfew, every single time we are in a car park, elevator, public bathroom, we search for something to defend ourselves. it becomes a part of our lives and habits next to eating and sleeping. but that is simply seen as “just how things are”, “just the way the world works”

they know perfectly well what misogyny is, how it effects women - they just don’t care to change it. they expect us to just accept it.

they simply accept women’s role as something akin to prey animals. like it just has to happen and everyone needs to move on. it’s a waste of time to mourn or do anything. they accept women as second class.

if a man tells you misogyny isn’t a real form of oppression it’s because he sees you as a prey animal in a wildlife documentary.

anomalys-bane

STOP! 🛑🤚 Before you claim a woman on the internet is policing your/anyone else's behavior, please consider the following.

-> Does she control government entities around us that can legally enforce her ideology? Can she actually suppress opinions or reduce people's freedom of expression?

-> Does she control your social position? Can she alienate you from your existing group on a whim?

-> Do her views/actions actually mirror the popular, widely accepted one in the contexts you frequent? Or is she an outlier?

-> Are you a member of a majority that she cannot control or escape?

-> Does she control your internet access or what you can post? Can she force you to read and follow her ideology?

-> Can she physically remove or suppress the media you/your group enjoy? Can she stop the production of such media? Does she occupy a powerful position in group that affects the existence of such media?

-> Can she actually physically, legally force you to stop whatever you are doing?

-> Does her opinion or criticism carry enough weight to directly, materially affect your life and wellbeing?

Chances are this is not the case. And chances are you have no idea what policing actually is. dumbasses

sickofthis666

radfemart

natnormalatall

roald dahl was antisemitic and misogynistic. george orwell was openly homophobic. edgar allan poe married his 13 year old cousin. dr seuss cheated on his wife (and was racist as well as antisemitic!). hp lovecraft was racist as fuck. anyways they’re fucking dead it’s not like you’re enabling their behaviors in the afterlife or something. then again I think they bleed into the books so uh keep an eye out for that

the difference between these old white guys and jk rowling is that the former group is all dead. jk rowling is alive and using your money to oppress trans people

11thfempachi

hello i am a deltarune pfp fandomite and i compared a woman who wants bathrooms to be accommodated based on genitals people use to pee and not pronouns, to a fucking rapist pedophile. 10000 people believe this is a normal thing to say

finnishrogue

no matter how much OP tries to justify their hatred of jk rowling, it isn't helping. you all come across so misogynistic that it's fucking breathtaking at this point. like we can see right through your bullshit, just admit you want women to stop writing books altogether and go back to kitchen, you fucking coward. why do you even care to do the lip service?

unnamedaddisoncogwyrm

clearly OP doesn't hold a strong hatred towards women, or even want them to stop writing books. JK Rowling is actively anti-transgender and likely uses the money from her sales to fund those anti-trans activities. If we were saying this about the books of a famously prejudiced person from history, you'd all be agreeing with us, so I'm not sure why the person still being alive makes this any different?

some people don't want to fund anti-trans violence

sorry for unnecessarily joining the argument.

finnishrogue

there is no such thing as her funding anti-trans violence. that is the fucking point. you are all just misogynists who JUMPED at the opportunity to hate a woman who is writing books the SECOND she did not agree with one thing in your activism (which is that trans women are not females and that women's spaces are for females).

unnamedaddisoncogwyrm

upon further research, she doesn't fund anti-trans violence, but she owns and funds a charity dedicated to sex-based womans rights and TERFism, which is transphobic in itself.

A legal fighting fund for women protecting their sex-based rights

finnishrogue

yes, what she is funding goes against the basic belief within trans ideology where trans women claim that their desire for self-expression and validation should override other people's safety and human rights. that is indeed what she is trying to address and dismantle, and in my opinion, it makes her a perfectly reasonable person. you are still free to not support her or her work for this reason, obviously. but to compare her to an actual fucking pedophile? yeah, that is where you just become a classic old misogynist. it's only possible to see these wrongs as equal things if you think that her being a woman somehow worsens her sins.

vintage-bentley

violet-lavender-fem

the actual pride month rundown

- marsha p. johnson repeatedly identified as a gay man and drag queen and survived into an era where the language did already exist if he chose to identify as transsexual. he explicitly stated that he was not transsexual and claimed that all transsexual people were also homosexual.

- sylvia rivera did identify as a transsexual woman (and made disparaging speeches about lesbians). she was not an ally to lesbians. lesbians and transwomen have not always been allies.

- neither of them were there when the stonewall riots began, according to marsha’s own testimony. sylvia was sleeping off a drug trip on a park bench, and by the time marsha arrived at stonewall, the riots were already in full swing.

- storme delarverie, a mixed black gender-nonconforming lesbian and drag king, may have been the one who incited the stonewall riots. she never identified as a transman despite surviving into an an era where the language was made accessible to do so. accounts differ as to who started the riots.

- stonewall was not a special haven for trans people and drag artists, it was just some bar where gay people met up. by all accounts, it wasn’t even a good bar.

- pride as a festival and parade was invented by gay men, lesbians, and bisexual people. fred sergeant is one of those gay men, and he has been beaten (in recent years, as an elderly man) by trans people and their allies due to his views on medical transition. non-homosexual trans people were unheard of in this era.

- this is just united states history, and not even the beginning of gay rights activism in the united states alone. the rest of the world didn’t necessarily base its gay rights activism on stonewall.

cherrycherub2222

The Epstein files tell us who men really are - maybe we should believe them.

no comment. Except KAM2026.

prodigalwitch

"You can argue that these ways of speaking about women and abusing them are just a niche preserve of the superrich, but that argument simply doesn’t wash. What is more likely to be true is that the superrich have an wealth-based immunity that facilitates these behaviours that your average man in the street does not. For the same reason, your average man in the street, in his fifties or sixties, is unlikely to hook up with a twenty five year old. A superrich man almost always will. What this tells me is not that these two men are different - both would much prefer the twenty five year old - but only the superrich man has the funds and the access to facilitate his desires."

gendercriticalbutch

since pride month's coming up just a friendly reminder that the stonewall riots were sparked by biracial butch lesbian/drag king Stormé DeLarverie's resistance to an NYPD raid at the Stonewall Inn.

it was NOT Marsha P. Johnson who "threw the first brick." Marsha arrived to the riots hours after they had already started. he also was not a transwoman, and has described himself as a gay man/drag queen in multiple interviews. (massive credit to twitter user Zombie_Jesus_v3 for finding all these clips. if you have twitter I'd recommend giving that entire thread a read. it puts to bed all the Marsha P. Johnson myths people are still constantly perpetuating for some reason) anyways some respect on Stormé's name. thanks.

lavendyker

people will really see a masc or butch female character and go what if this was a hulking brick house of a man. unidentifiable as a woman. with a penis. also the woman she gets shipped with? we make as tiny and feminine as possible even if it's not in character at all

fernstream

zombierightsadvocate

They did far worse than call her a liar. They all laughed at her. Thought her being raped with a bottle was hilarious. Said it “sounded like a good time.” Many said they had wished that rapist would fuck them with a bottle and Amber should be grateful.

iloveleslove

Strip clubs posted billboards telling her to audition. A sex toy company made and advertised a liquor bottle shaped dildo based off of her assault testimony and tagged it as I stand with Johnny depp. Thousands of twitter users posted at her asking when she’s starting her only fans saying that’s her only skill. Everyone was laughing at her and her testimony in the most disgusting, misogynistic way imaginable. It’s actually when I deleted my twitter and reddit bc I was so disgusted. I’ll never be over it.

iwanttolisten

That "if you believe in male socialization you just think i'm EVIL for being BORN" post has 8k likes. Jesus. Tumblr has really allowed itself to be taken over by idiotic and abusive males in the name of not being mean.