mozzarella and cheddar when i open my fridge and its not their time to be added to a fuckalicious grilled cheese sandwich

Origami Around
AnasAbdin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
art blog(derogatory)

Love Begins
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic đȘ©
Cosimo Galluzzi

JBB: An Artblog!
Game of Thrones Daily
we're not kids anymore.
NASA
I'd rather be in outer space đž
sheepfilms
No title available
ojovivo
Xuebing Du

JVL
Sade Olutola
will byers stan first human second

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from China

seen from Vietnam

seen from Poland
seen from Senegal
seen from Senegal
seen from Senegal

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@sapelihammaskeiju
mozzarella and cheddar when i open my fridge and its not their time to be added to a fuckalicious grilled cheese sandwich
purity politics
(reposting this because tumblr deleted my blog funny enough for nsfw)
Someone sent me anon hate then reported every single one of my posts because of this post
I don't think this is possible????
Hello Ryan I am here to help. So the first step is pretty easy: Three cheeseburgers are worth 18, so each one is worth 6. If these are dollars, that's a steal!
From the second equation we get that cheeseburger plus fries-squared is five. Subtracting cheeseburger, which is six, from both sides, we get that fries-squared is negative-one. Math fans will know that there are two solutions to this; either fries are the "imaginary unit" đŸ or they are its negative, -đŸ. We'll do the rest of the problem with đŸ, keeping in mind that at the end we should also take the complex conjugates as solutions.
Finally, we have that cup to the power of fries, minus cup, equals three. Replacing fries with đŸ, and moving a cup to the other side, we get that cup-to-the-đŸ is equal to cup-plus-three.
Now, the weird part about this is the cup-to-the-i. The problem with this is that complex exponentiation is technically not a thing. That is to say, there is no one function which is mathematically equal to "input-to-the-power-of-đŸ". In fact, there are infinitely many such functions.
Fortunately, due to reasons that take about six pages to explain (trust me I've done it), there is one particular function that many people have agreed is "the most reasonable one". This is not a mathematical notion, but a human preference. Seeing as this question was presumably written by a human, I am comfortable with using this function.
So, what function is this? Well, given a complex number râ Ξ written in polar form (if you don't know what that means don't worry), where -Ï < Ξ †Ï, then (râ Ξ)^đŸ = e^(-Ξ)â ln(r).
Applying this to our problem a value râ Ξ will be a possible solution for cup if e^(-Ξ)â ln(r) = râ Ξ + 3. Splitting this into real and imaginary parts, we get two equations: e^(-Ξ) cos(ln(r)) = r cos(Ξ) + 3 and e^(-Ξ) sin(ln(r)) = r sin(Ξ). We can graph these equations on Desmos:
The possible values of cup are the intersections between the red, green, and purple. There are infinitely many of these which have an angle of around -Ï/3, and there are two weirdos: One which is a complex number very close to -2.98, and one which is somewhere around -25. The possible values for cup are all of these infinitely many solutions, and also all of their complex conjugates.
They were right, 99% of people can't solve it.
i've actually been working on some formulae to give all possible solutions to complex exponentiation problems recently, so here's my take on this:
let the value of the glass = z, for z â â:
z^(±i) = 3+z
let z = r·e^(iΞ) for r,Ξ â â, -Ï < Ξ †Ï
⎠z = r·e^i(Ξ+2Ïn) for all n â â€
⎠(r·e^i(Ξ+2Ïn))^(±i) = 3+r·e^i(Ξ+2Ïn)
distribute powers (apologies for the use of â):
r^(±i)·e^(â(Ξ+2Ïn)) = 3+r·e^i(Ξ+2Ïn)
convert to the same base:
e^i(±ln(r))·e^(â(Ξ+2Ïn)) = 3+r·e^i(Ξ+2Ïn)
split into real and imaginary components:
re: cos(±ln(r))·e^(â(Ξ+2Ïn)) = 3+r·cos(Ξ)
im: sin(±ln(r))·e^(â(Ξ+2Ïn)) = r·sin(Ξ)
in effect, all this changes is the restriction on the domain of theta to be between -pi and pi, so you can just ignore that constraint.
You know, I don't think I'll ever get over how that one post I made about women as knights in history, made it all the way to Reddit only for a bunch of redditors to argue that women couldn't actually be knights because:
- "the term is gendered" (it's not, and feminine equivalents were sometimes created specifically for the purpose)
- "they didn't actually do things as knights" (who didn't? The Hatchet women fought the Moors. A few other Orders had women as masters of arms. Both martial and formal examples)
...and a few other reasons that come down to "I don't like imagining my manly men in steel had women in their ranks, girls have cooties".
And the reason I say this is because recently, Wikipedia updated their page on "Knight", specifically adding a section about women with the title of knighthood, and what function they performed. And I know: "Wikipedia is not an academic source"--but every academic institution will accept the sources and articles used to back up wikipages, which confirm what has been said.
Knights were sometimes women. đ€·
I saw this and needed to answer.
The gendered versions of 'knight' come from Romance languages, and literally just change the word to fit the gender of the subject (within a binary). So it isn't like English, where a female knight has always been a 'Dame', but, using Spain as an example, the word for Knight in Spanish is 'Cabellero'. This is the default masculine.
The feminine word for Knight? 'Cabellera'.
Similarly in French: "Chevalier" becomes "Chevaliére".
In Italian, "Cavaliere" becomes "Cavaliera".
Outside of Romance languages, "knight" is just a title for a social rank, so even the English Dame is by default a knight by rank, but may not have the title (although not impossible).
So it's not a silly infantilisation, than using a word for the knightly class and gendering it in a binary, which means we can actually tell that, yes, women as knights existed, enough that the feminine form of the word pops up now and then, so we know it existed.
ooh, where one could read that original post??
Just a note about translations and ... well, patriarchal bullshit.
When you say "Hatchet women fought the Moors" I was like "hey, that seems to be part of my local history, how have I never heard about it?", and when I googled it ... I actually have heard about it, it's the Orden del Hacha from Catalonia (Orde de l'Atxa in the original Catalan). But ... there's something odd going on. Why the fuck in English they have translated like "Order or the hatchet"? You know, in Spanish and Catalan there's no really a difference between "Axe" and "Hatchet": There's a single word for them, "Hacha/Atxa". But in English, there's a difference. A Hatchet is a hand axe, pretty much the smallest one you can think of:
So It's pretty remarkable that whoever translated the name of the order to english first decided to use "Hatchet" and not "Axe". I'm pretty sure if this was a order of men warriors the name would have been pretty different. Specially when THIS was their coat of arms:
So dear academic-who-translated-this-first: Does that look like a hatchet to you, motherfucker?!?!?
Important inclusion I was not aware of, thank you very much friend. :)
Iâm going to be chuckling over âDoes this look like a hatchet to you, motherfucker?!?!?â for the rest of the day.
i think i should be allowed to quit my job and write gross and smutty fanfiction all day and still pull in a salary. i think it's a reasonable ask.
thank you scherz et al. for bringing us the frogs Mini ature, Mini mum and of course, the Mini scule
"why did you write that"
my fetish
my friend's fetish
not my fetish but it fits in the story so i threw it in there as a treat. you're welcome.
"why is THAT your fetish"
idk i was probably scared of it so i decided to get horny about it instead. to deal with my fear. fuck off.
look at this wonderful gif of scallops getting scared and scattering like a flock pigeons
whatever. go my scallops
last night I had the experience of "referencing a tumblr post that you think is widely known but turns out to not be as widely known as you thought it was" last night and it was this post. whatever. go my scallops
Suomitumppu on niin mainio. Mun ei tarvi muuta kun postata tÀÀ kyltti
ja sanoo ettÀ "höhö pillu :D"
Ja jengi rebloggaa
Helppo nettisivu đ
XU GEM 104 Pohjan Ankka
Aku Ankka Jumbo 16 - KesÀherkku (2009)
PiirtÀjÀt: Pat Block & Shelly Block
Laitetaan nyt tÀmÀ netti-klassikkokin tÀnne, kun kerran vastaan tuli.
executive dysfunction is literally like. ive had a random dollar on my floor for two weeks and i dont know when ill fit it in my schedule to pick it up. people dont realize this
oon alkanut miettiÀ tÀtÀ pride-hommaa siitÀ nÀkökulmasta ettÀ oon aivan totaalisen kyllÀstynyt englannin kielen jatkuvaan tunkeutumiseen jokapÀivÀiseen elÀmÀÀn. ettÀ mitÀ jos palais ko. tapahtuman alkuperÀiseen suomenkieliseen nimeen VapautuspÀivÀt?
koska siis siinÀ tulis paljon selkeemmin esille se mistÀ tapahtumassa on kyse. joo on tÀrkeetÀ voida olla ylpee itestÀÀn, mut ylpeys on yksilön tunne. vapaus on systeeminen asia, yhteisön asia. ja vapautus muistuttaa ettÀ vapaus ei oo valmis asia vaan sitÀ tÀytyy toteuttaa koko ajan.
ja joo hiffaan ettÀ kun kÀytetÀÀn tÀmmöstÀ hegemonisen kieli-imperiumin antamaa nimeÀ niin muualtakin tulevat tietÀÀ mistÀ on kyse. voishan pride-nimen pitÀÀ mukana jotenkin suluissa tai jotain.
mut vapautuspÀivÀt, ja sit sama kaikilla kielillÀ mitÀ skenessÀ osataan. miten paljon mageempi nimi!
MÀ pÀÀstÀn saman ÀÀnen komeasta sÀÀilmiöstÀ ku nÀtistÀ miehestÀ ja kukaan ei voi pysÀyttÀÀ mua
Cosign.
i love declining birth rates đ„° "what a horrible problem! society will collapse!" oopsie it looks like you're gonna have to make having children worth it đ teehee you're gonna have to improve society in order to fix this problem, or it will all collapse. oh noooooo. how horrible. :3c