I think I never said anything but Iâve made an art-only blog where I tried to collect all the recent art of my main blog and that you can find here shadowsartistartsometimes .
ojovivo
đ
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism

Discoholic đŞŠ
The Bowery Presents
Game of Thrones Daily
No title available
Not today Justin

No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

#extradirty
No title available

â
Sweet Seals For You, Always
tumblr dot com

@theartofmadeline
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Netherlands

seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
@shadowsartist
I think I never said anything but Iâve made an art-only blog where I tried to collect all the recent art of my main blog and that you can find here shadowsartistartsometimes .
I turn to Ares.
Thanks to Tyler Miles Lockett who allowed me to draw inspiration from his ARES piece for page 2! Look at his etsy page it's SICK
âď¸ If you want to read some queer retelling of arturian legends have a look at my webtoon
dude i saw this years ago on my dash and it deadass rewired how i look at Ares. And just. is cool to think about in general.
not every piece of art centered on a straight woman is "hetslop" and at some point it becomes misogyny to dismiss art abt women with that term
itâs never a normal temperature anymore itâs always some fucking bullshit
the whole discourse behind the original post being dunked in water is so astronomically silly. âpeople are just making ocs for their own enjoyment and not doing anything Productive with them >:(â why are you mad about this. who cares. yelling at clouds
âif youâre making turnarounds and concept art and storyboards and plot outlines that donât eventually become a finished polished story or ip then whatâs the point :/â i think the act of creation is a beautiful thing that brings people joy even when it doesnât âamountâ to anything marketable. also is it your first day on godâs earth
The Orange Awning - Antonio Barahona , 2026.
Spanish , b. 1984 -
Oil on panel , 50 x 75 cm.
Into the Big Blue Heart: Ocean Currents 1.01 ⢠The Tropics
Blade drawn by Yoji Shinkawa for Kojima Cinema 1999
Maybe one reason time seems to speed up in adult life is because when your full time job leaves you roughly 5 hours of free time a day plus two days off a week your life turns into a sort of monotony that makes the days blend together and creative pursuits move in slow motion as you can only get to them when other your commitments are done.
When you look back and think damn 2019 wasnât that long ago where did the time go? Job. Your Job took it.
Pack Animal, now with color!
Compared to a brahmin, a well trained pack-deathclaw is worth its weight in caps, as they often only need to eat once a week. Caravaneers often proudly display little tokens on their valuable beasts of burden - those who wander off can be easily identified.
"Take from me a life of sorrow. Lift me from a world of pain. Judge me worthy of Your endless pride."
Josephine Montilyet and Inquisitor Lavellan sketch for Michelle â¨ď¸
Commissions info: carrd
Drawing almost every Dragon Age character â Part 8, Carver Hawke
Guys fellas people, I love Carver with my whole heart. Sure he can be a jerk a lot of the time but no character in DA is just one thing, Carver isn't an exception. Being on the run his whole life, not really having a typical childhood, all because people he loves most are in danger just for who they were born as and there is nothing he can do about it. And on top of that feeling left out and not enough due to his parents putting everyone else in the family above him because of magic.
From his perspective one thing tied to all the bad in their life and the only thing he can blame â is magic. He can't put that responsibility on his loved ones, they don't control it, I don't even think he ever blamed Malcolm for prioritizing Bethany and mage!Hawke. Blaming magic was always just an outlet, because he could never blame his family, he loves them too much
And that complex knot of feelings just turned him resentful and snappy, not being able to have a tangible thing to blame or fix it. Don't even get me started on Carver always living in a golden child's shadow, his big brother Hawke. Again the duality of admiring, striving to be like him, yet feeling he can never reach the heights of a "perfect" child no matter how hard he tries, just because he's not Hawke
Anyway, I love our baby brother and will never tolerate Carver slander
Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 9
Please return us to a world where Notp and squick are used for a ship you donât like instead of just making up a load of bullshit about how immoral it is or w/e lolÂ
a short selection of concepts and phrases that used to be commonplace in fandom and weâd really benefit from making that a thing again:
NOTP: the opposite of an OTP (One True Pairing). It is a ship a fan strongly dislikes. The word is a portmanteau of ânoâ and âOTPâ and thus is not a contraction of any particular phrase.
Squick: anything that is a deep-seated, visceral turn-off. Squicks may be shared by many fans or be specific to one; one personâs kink may be another personâs squick.
YKINMKATO, or kink-tomato: Your Kink Is Not My Kink, And Thatâs Okay: used to indicate support for fannish diversity and to distinguish between disapproval or kink shaming and simply having different taste.
DLDR: Donât Like, Donât Read: a phrase used to warn against complaints about an aspect of fic or meta. A âlive and let liveâ philosophy of fandom, which places the responsability for avoiding content one doesnât want to see on the side of the fanwork consumer, rather that on the creatorâs.
SALS: Ship And Let Ship: similar to the above specifically about shipping tastes.
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary: a phrase used to acknowledge that any given individualâs personal opinion on the topic at hand may differ due to their own tastes, standards, values, experiences, etc.
As the OP points out, all of these crucially imply no moral judgment of what theyâre designing.
(definitions lifted more or less wholesale from fanloreâs relevant pages)
bring the healthy fun back to fandom!
90% of age gaps donât matter when youâre a grown adult as long as you donât have a repeated pattern of dating people barely legal. I would date someone 30 years older than me if I liked them who gaf
This entire conversation is somehow 90% people infantilizing themselves and 10% actually people talking about the issue of men who never grow out of dating 18/19 year olds. No it is not a big deal when a 25 year old dates a 35 year old please get a grip
Honestly if youâre in your mid twenties infantilizing yourself on this level maybe you shouldnât be dating anyone
Chimes with a thought I've had for a while, actually; sleep deprivation might mean I explain this badly, but:
What a red flag actually means: something here is an indicator of a potential problem (but might be fine with a reasonable explanation)
What people have now decided it means: abuse
I've lost count of the number of times I've now had to read variants of "My partner takes all my money and gives me back an allowance because he says it's a man's job to control finances, but he's racking up gambling debts" being met with "Wow this man is a walking red flag" no Becky that is abuse. That is not an indicator. He is an abuser. Call the police. We have lost the concept of a proxy: a thing that indicates a more important thing. And it's relevant to this conversation because I'm actually going to go out on a limb here:
With the obvious exception of paedophilia, age gaps themselves aren't a problem at all - they are a proxy for the actual harmful phenomenon. Hea me out, let me explain
The reason we don't like age gaps is because of the implied power dynamic. If one partner, usually male, is older than other - particularly if the other is still quite young - the risk is that what we're seeing is a worldly wise predator who is exploiting the lack of life experience of a young beautiful woman by mentally abusing her until she's no longer young and pretty enough to satisfy, at which point he'll move on to the next. There have been enough examples of this in human history. It's unfortunately not an uncommon pattern. Genders can also be diverse in this scenario
We can't necessarily see that dynamic from the outside. But we CAN see an inherent element of it: the ages of the people involved. So age becomes a proxy for the abuse. And, hey, it's often correct.
But here's the thing: the ages themselves are not causing harm.
The power dynamic is. The abuse is.
Plenty of age gap relationships are loving, healthy and steadfast. Two people met and genuinely fell in love regardless of the outer packaging, and have a relationship with all the highs and lows and challenges and rewards as any more traditional pairing. This happens all the time
Is the age gap a red flag? Sure! It indicates a potential issue.
Is it inherently abusive? Absolutely fucking not.
OP is right - we need to stop focusing just on the numbers and twisting the facts to fit by infantilising the younger partners, and start focusing on the actual harms. The DiCaprio Pattern of only dating under 24s repeatedly is itself a proxy, too, actually - but a much stronger one than the simple presence of an age gap.
(Even so, in DiCaprio's case, until any of his former partners come forward and describe him as abusive, actually, even that is up in the air - my personal interpretation, given how strong a pattern it is, is that he's a loser who views women as trophies (consciously or not). If any have come forward and I don't know about it, of course, fair enough. But those women were adults capable of making their own decisions, even if they might later come to regret it. And regretting poor decisions is part of life! That's how it goes, particularly with relationships. As long as they weren't abused, there's no biggie. And just as he was looking for young-and-beautiful, there's no way they weren't, on some level, looking for rich-and-famous; it goes both ways.)
Also, another element of this: I think a lot of modern extreme puritan discourse on this is actually ironically down to the age of those taking part. Up until your late 20s, ten years is actually a huge span of time to you, because in your own life you were in a completely different developmental phase ten years ago (teenager), and a completely different phase again ten years before that (child). That skews your sense of what a ten-year gap means. Whereas once you're in your 30s and beyond, ten years is like. Yeah I was an adult ten years ago, and I still am now. That's two adults. Who cares.
(Anyway I am hoping and praying I explained that well enough, and also that Tumblr's famous reading comprehension skills are solid enough to follow)
The power dynamic in itself isn't causing harm either. I am BEGGING you people to realise what you're asking for here. Like, what's the alternative? Only date people within your wealth/status bracket? Do you want castes? Because that's how you get castes. By this logic, surgeons shouldn't date waiters, lawyers shouldn't date construction workers, lauded actors shouldn't date lowly techies, and employed people shouldn't date unemployed people. Rich people should only date other rich people, poor people should only date other poor people, and no one should date anyone significantly more or significantly less educated that them.
Does that sound right to you? Do you think it would work, do you think we should try to make it work, and do you think that if it did work, it would magically make abuse disappear? COME ON.
Mia Bergeron (American, 1979) - Ancestors (2021)
I love this