[bannedtags]

A Growing List of Banned Tags

This is my second go at making this blog. The first time, I got shadowbanned immediately for writing a post with these words on it, so I’m going to have to link to a google doc instead.

You can find my current list HERE

If something is not on the list that does NOT mean it isn’t blocked. It just means I haven’t checked/added it if it is.

If you’d like to contribute tags you’ve found, please send it via an ask or submission so I can double check and add it to the list.

EDIT: Right now many of these are only banned on IOS, but that really doesn’t make it better

[bannedtags]

Been seeing some notes so I want to remind everyone: This is not a comprehensive list. If it’s on the list, it was blocked/scrubbed when I checked. If it’s not on the list, that does not mean it isn’t blocked.

I will do my best to keep updating, but I’m only one person. Please don’t take my word as gospel.

Things are changing quickly. Tags that worked for me this afternoon are gone. Tags that were empty for me no longer are. This list is not 100% accurate. It’s really important to me that you all understand that.

[vintage-tigre]

[animeandcatholicism]

Guys, this is gonna get people harmed either by the electrical shorts or by data center security who are going to most likely employ lethal means.

[jdeko]

[impishthing]

[silverscreeny]

You made San Diego?

[granmabarb]

He was just a young man. His life mattered.

*nitter link below for those who can’t access the twatter. simply copy and paste to your preferred browser to watch the video and read the comments

https://nitter.net/Banksycat/status/2057500117905682762

[susanoos-wife]

[burningabyss572]

Cause one is white and the other isn't.

[murgoten]

blacksmith🔥

but where is the forge- oh

[frogressive-rock]

am I actually agreeing with Jeff Fucking Bezos here

[dakotaking]

Isn't that how it used to be or am I misremembering?

[robin-hood-for-freedom]

Everyone should pay zero in taxes

[silverscreeny]

I don't mind paying as long as that money actually goes to bettering my country, not into corrupt pockets

[userfish]

this pride month we’re all going to be radically pro transgender. or else.

[silverscreeny]

You mean you HAVEN'T been trying to be as purposefully annoying as you can, yet?yall are insufferable.

[qqchurch]

[qqchurch]

[yourtoradorasextendedwarranty]

The arrogant thing about PizzaCakes is that she is kinda stupid.

But it's intentional stupidity. It's not that we "Allow Hate Speech". The fact is we don't arrest people for speech alone. (Direct calls to action in certain cases do not qualify) But the reality is that who decides what is hate speech? Explain why it is that Christianity is the only faith in Canada right now in which is considered "hateful" to pray near clinics. Yet Islam and (and to a lesser extent) Judaism, seen untouched. And here's the kicker. If Islam ever takes power in Canada what follows is (under your gate speech laws) any criticism of their faith. And any "modern progressive" views as most Muslims are disgusted by the LGBT.

Hate speech is a stupid term that changes depending on who's in power. And if you DEFINE it to be, "anything that goes against modern Progressivism", your mandating your world view at that point. And it will be used against you eventually using speech manipulation.

[toastyglow]

(some guy on the internet voice) it's so unrealistic and forced when women win fights against men in stories. of course, when a young boy defeats a huge man I'm cheering and screaming because it is so badass, and when a frail old man defeats a cocky young warrior I feel nothing but satisfaction. I love these power fantasies about easily dispatching people who underestimate you, a thing I desire despite the fact that I will likely never have the skill to achieve it in real life, but I'm pretty sure women don't have that same desire, and even if they do, they shouldn't get to see it in media. because it's so unrealistic, you see. I mean I'm smart enough to know I can't take down a big man in a fight but the women, you know, they'll get ideas. I could probably do it if I trained hard enough, but the women??? for some reason I can't see it happening, and who can say why that is.

[jogothy]

Ok; maybe this is a devil's advocate but:

When a child or really old person defeats a strong warrior it's generally a pretty explicit subversion. Like, We the audience are meant to understand that this is very much not normal, that this person specifically is not representative of their demographic at all.

But, if it's a woman doing it, in order for it to be the same, the writing would have to at least implicitly acknowledge that most women are in fact pretty weak and powerless. Which is usually the thing the writer is trying to avoid doing, so women doing this stuff ends up getting presented as "how dare you be so sexist that you assume she'd be at any disadvantage just because she's a woman."

[cookingwithroxy]

Meanwhile, in the actual real world, the internet is absolutely and unquestionably full of videos of women attacking men, openly and unhesitatingly, beating the shit out of them in front of crowds. Where nobody acts to stop them because 'He can take it' and 'It's just a woman'.

To where one of the most notable videos I remember seeing is of a teenage girl smacking and hitting a boy as he backs away from her, trying to avoid her and not get hit as she attacks him again and again and again... And the moment he hits back, everyone screams and jumps him for daring to hit a woman.

The double standard already exists, and is known, as well as the whole factor of 'training, mobility, equipment and surprise needs to overwhelm the gap in size'.

Because just outright, someone with more muscle mass than you is someone who is going to be stronger than you. Someone with better bone density will handle blows better. These are not elements that require gender to be a factor.

[beardedmrbean]

[silverscreeny]

FUCK YOU

[robin-hood-for-freedom]

What idiot communists think 'from each according to his ability, from each according to their need means: I get to do whatever I want and be given infinite luxury goods whenever I want.

What it actually means in practice: Comrade, you are able to work 16 hours a day at the radioactive asbestos factory. And you only need flavorless gruel and a cot to sleep on. Actually scratch that, having a cot is bourgeois decadence.

[unionizeurmom]

Quick tell the socialist and former socialist states that their higher homeownership rates than any capitalist nation is bourgeoise decadence.

Lol you must be talking to babies. Which tracks if you're a libertarian or rightoid.

[silverscreeny]

You mean the ugly, brutalist and small brick shit houses plastered everywhere like gigantic cinderblocks?

[unionizeurmom]

You can always go with Vienna's model, then. Lol grrrr I'd rather have homeless people and the threat of homelessness. That's better than *checks notes* ugly buildings.

[silverscreeny]

Unironically, yes

[unionizeurmom]

Okay, then look up the Vienna model. After Red Vienna, most of the housing was socialized. They have BEAUTIFUL architecture and comfortable living space. So, there are different approaches. But, you wanted to just be absolutely certain you locked in a yes to homelessness. Neat.

[silverscreeny]

So you mean to tell me a homogenous, high trust society the size of one of the smaller US States - I'm assuming Austria as a whole - managed that, because it knew it's citizens wouldn't abuse and exploit it?

How bout that?

[unionizeurmom]

Yeah, I know your type. Japan is an ethnostate. They have no immigration and they are about to decline. They also hold 1.2 Trillion in US debt. So, that will be fun.

Israel is an ethnostate...

Good luck with that.

So, Austria is big penis and US is small penis? Austria can achieve things that America can't? Damn, dude if you think life would be better somewhere else, maybe you should move? Eh? Eh? See how fun that was?

[silverscreeny]

I'm German. Half my country already went through communism and it was hell for everyone involved.

Importing foreigners who hate you is NOT a solution to declining birthrates. Never will be.

And yeah, if America WAS a high-trust society from coast to coast, it COULD do what the Austrians did. I am just going to take your word for it that it worked, by the way. But the American government can't even keep the frauds and scams out of their existing social programmes. What makes you think adding MORE would solve anything?

[unionizeurmom]

Nah, shoulda been more hell. Stalin wanted to kill 50-100k Nazi leaders still in Germany and the West said no. Stalin wanted to starve out the East German population. I genuinely think the wall was a bad idea. Let them leave, let the clusterfuck of over population that capitalism never solved be an every day reality for West Germans.

You have universal healthcare, tuition free education, mandatory paid leave, pension schemes, and robust worker protections. That's literally all I'm advocating for, is what you have lol and Americans would call that communism or at least socialism.

Okay, what's your solution to declining birthrates? No more Turkish people? 😂😂

You should look up social housing in Austria. It is still happening to this day. They have more affordable rent than Berlin or wherever you're from. The amount of frauds and scams being shown on TV are the same level of issues Germany has, you just don't have a reality TV style media environment like we do.

I'd love to see the rampant problems that come with having more than enough housing and having it be a right. Can't even imagine what that problem would even look like lol maybe some lost GDP? God forbid.

[silverscreeny]

The guest workers of the post WW2 era were actually needed to rebuild everything destroyed. Moreover, they integrated into our society. They were doing their thing and Natives did theirs. There was a mutual understanding of live and let live. NOW, we have yearly protests at Christmas markets, terror attacks on them and demands to comply with Islam even if we don't follow that pedophile prophet.

The people coming today are not the same people who came here back then.

And the answer is to make it more financially viable for young people to start families. Not importing foreigners who hate you.

And maybe your people would be more open to thes protections if your government wasn't so shit at handling taxpayer dollars and funneling it into their own pockets. I point again to the Minnesota fraud schemes by Ilhan Omar and, who was it, Tim Waltz?

That's even disregarding the fact that OUR OWN government can't handle these tax payer euros. Our pensions and social security funds are RAPIDLY depleting and all our chancelor has to say is that "young people gotta start saving up more"

So no, IT OS CURRENTLY NOT WORKING

Not to mention, importing foreigners takes away housing from the native population. By default. Immigration makes the housing market worse.

[robin-hood-for-freedom]

What idiot communists think 'from each according to his ability, from each according to their need means: I get to do whatever I want and be given infinite luxury goods whenever I want.

What it actually means in practice: Comrade, you are able to work 16 hours a day at the radioactive asbestos factory. And you only need flavorless gruel and a cot to sleep on. Actually scratch that, having a cot is bourgeois decadence.

[unionizeurmom]

Quick tell the socialist and former socialist states that their higher homeownership rates than any capitalist nation is bourgeoise decadence.

Lol you must be talking to babies. Which tracks if you're a libertarian or rightoid.

[silverscreeny]

You mean the ugly, brutalist and small brick shit houses plastered everywhere like gigantic cinderblocks?

[unionizeurmom]

You can always go with Vienna's model, then. Lol grrrr I'd rather have homeless people and the threat of homelessness. That's better than *checks notes* ugly buildings.

[silverscreeny]

Unironically, yes

[unionizeurmom]

Okay, then look up the Vienna model. After Red Vienna, most of the housing was socialized. They have BEAUTIFUL architecture and comfortable living space. So, there are different approaches. But, you wanted to just be absolutely certain you locked in a yes to homelessness. Neat.

[silverscreeny]

So you mean to tell me a homogenous, high trust society the size of one of the smaller US States - I'm assuming Austria as a whole - managed that, because it knew it's citizens wouldn't abuse and exploit it?

How bout that?

[unionizeurmom]

Yeah, I know your type. Japan is an ethnostate. They have no immigration and they are about to decline. They also hold 1.2 Trillion in US debt. So, that will be fun.

Israel is an ethnostate...

Good luck with that.

So, Austria is big penis and US is small penis? Austria can achieve things that America can't? Damn, dude if you think life would be better somewhere else, maybe you should move? Eh? Eh? See how fun that was?

[silverscreeny]

I'm German. Half my country already went through communism and it was hell for everyone involved.

Importing foreigners who hate you is NOT a solution to declining birthrates. Never will be.

And yeah, if America WAS a high-trust society from coast to coast, it COULD do what the Austrians did. I am just going to take your word for it that it worked, by the way. But the American government can't even keep the frauds and scams out of their existing social programmes. What makes you think adding MORE would solve anything?

[robin-hood-for-freedom]

What idiot communists think 'from each according to his ability, from each according to their need means: I get to do whatever I want and be given infinite luxury goods whenever I want.

What it actually means in practice: Comrade, you are able to work 16 hours a day at the radioactive asbestos factory. And you only need flavorless gruel and a cot to sleep on. Actually scratch that, having a cot is bourgeois decadence.

[unionizeurmom]

Quick tell the socialist and former socialist states that their higher homeownership rates than any capitalist nation is bourgeoise decadence.

Lol you must be talking to babies. Which tracks if you're a libertarian or rightoid.

[silverscreeny]

You mean the ugly, brutalist and small brick shit houses plastered everywhere like gigantic cinderblocks?

[unionizeurmom]

You can always go with Vienna's model, then. Lol grrrr I'd rather have homeless people and the threat of homelessness. That's better than *checks notes* ugly buildings.

[silverscreeny]

Unironically, yes

[unionizeurmom]

Okay, then look up the Vienna model. After Red Vienna, most of the housing was socialized. They have BEAUTIFUL architecture and comfortable living space. So, there are different approaches. But, you wanted to just be absolutely certain you locked in a yes to homelessness. Neat.

[silverscreeny]

So you mean to tell me a homogenous, high trust society the size of one of the smaller US States - I'm assuming Austria as a whole - managed that, because it knew it's citizens wouldn't abuse and exploit it?

How bout that?

[mollybeenoel]

[fictionadventurer]

The Phantom of the Opera: I was born with facial deformities that are so horrific that even my own mother couldn't bear to look at me.

Me: So that's why you have to live as an outcast in the basements of the opera house?

The Phantom, who has been an admired performer, palace architect, royal executioner, and chief contractor of the opera house who is able to go out in public with no alteration to his face except a false nose and mustache: No, that's a separate choice that I've made.

[silverscreeny]

Wait, huh?