the rainbow is a well-known symbol of gay pride that originated in the late 1970s in san francisco, when the gay community promised to never again destroy the earth by flood
KIROKAZE

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
Show & Tell
Fai_Ryy

roma★
Noah Kahan
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
🪼

titsay
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
No title available
EXPECTATIONS
official daine visual archive
Cosmic Funnies
noise dept.

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from France
seen from New Zealand
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Switzerland

seen from Türkiye

seen from Thailand

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
@skylightsalwaysleak
the rainbow is a well-known symbol of gay pride that originated in the late 1970s in san francisco, when the gay community promised to never again destroy the earth by flood
actually I think if you tell (non-climate-denying) people who complain about the heat that it's just gonna get worse forever now that you ARE being an arsehole and that's not helpful at all. cos they fucking know. we fucking know. what does that help. if you want to redirect conversations about extreme weather into climate action have you considered something like "god I know right? that's why I'm doing XYZ* to see if I can improve things locally so it doesn't get worse, want to join me?"
*local action, campaigning, planting trees, targeted politician lobbying, whatever: something CONCRETE and achievable with measurable results
otherwise all you're doing is making powerless and despairing people feel more powerless and despairing and that isn't helping shit
This is a much better way to respond. That "and it's just going to get hotter" response always bugged me and I couldn't put my finger on why I found it so grating. Like, why would you sound so smugly gleeful about imparting such shitty news that everyone reasonable already knows?
From The Intercept
"The Feds Want to Make It Illegal to Even Possess an Anarchist Zine"
"Daniel Sanchez is facing federal charges for what free speech advocates say is a clear attack on the First Amendment."
By Seth Stern
November 23 2025, 6:00 a.m.
Daniel Sanchez is facing federal charges for what free speech advocates say is a clear attack on the First Amendment.
a follow-up article now that the trial has concluded
What does [Daniel's conviction] mean? * the physical act of moving literature (transporting a box from one house to another, or potentially from a print shop to a post office) can be charged as "concealing evidence" if the government claims you knew an investigation was underway or imminent. * Normal distribution activities (shipping, relocating stock) could be reinterpreted as "flight of evidence" if law enforcement decides the materials are linked to a crime. * "Protected Speech" Can Be Reclassified as "Contraband": * The zines in the box included crimethinc, anarchist library, little black cart, and titles from many more distributors. is there a complete list? * Prosecutors successfully argued that because the zines contained the same ideas as the "Antifa terrorist enterprise" (per the government's theory), the zines themselves became "instrumentalities of a crime" This bypasses First Amendment protections by treating the published anarchist texts as "tools" of terrorism rather than speech.
BLM has published a plan to maximize logging in Oregon forests, including old growth forests, without due regard to wildlife (including endangered species) and waterways. They're claiming it will help prevent forest fires, though that seems to be contrary to current science, including that published by the forest service (you can find a list of sources here). This is in response to Trump's executive orders 14223, Addressing the Threat to National Security From Imports of Timber, Lumber, and Their Derivative Products and 14225, Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production.
We have 30 days to submit comments if we want to prevent this. This article has suggestions for what you can say, and how:
One billion board feet per year... 30 days to make your voice heard.
You can read more about it here:
Conservationists say proposal to “maximize” logging across nearly 2 million acres of Western Oregon BLM lands would devastate fish, wildlife
If you live in Oregon and you love our forests, please submit a comment before March 23rd.
If you don't live here, it would be super helpful if you could reblog to spread the word.
easier for the owner of LED headlights to pass through the eye of a needle than to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Are Pinky and the Brain still trying to take over the world? Because at this point, I'm willing to hear the Brain's platform.
At this point, I'm willing to hear Pinky's platform.
At its heart, American conservatism is a fantasy. It’s a vision of a world too evil to be saved or cared about, and fearsome enough to justi
Good enough to quote in its entirety, all credit to its author Albert Burneko
At its heart, American conservatism is a fantasy. It's a vision of a world too evil to be saved or cared about, and fearsome enough to justify any and every impulse toward cruelty and violence that a person might have. A world resolutely unworthy of knowing, except as a danger. A world in which you will always need a gun, and to shoot somebody with it, instead of just lusting for both. Because the world isn't actually like that—because, in general, people are just people, and mostly want to live peaceably and get along with each other—most American conservatives must mainline Fox News (or Newsmax, or whatever) directly to their brains at all hours in order to remain within the fantasy that both sustains and degrades them. In this respect, Dick Cheney got luckier than most American right-wingers could ever dream. Fanatics with brown skin crashed commercial jet airliners into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, at a time when, as vice president under the harebrained and banally evil George W. Bush, Cheney for all practical purposes ran the most lethal death-dealing apparatus in the history of the world. He got to spend seven years deciding who the bad guys were and how to kill them. He got to scrawl the simplest possible moral calculus across the world in blood. He lived the dream. This is the Mega Millions jackpot for the American conservative. This is the golden ticket to Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory. No one has ever welcomed their firstborn child to the world with greater joy than that with which the American reactionary greets a Pearl Harbor, a 9/11, a dead cop, an assassinated YouTube bigot. Dick Cheney's celebration lasted more than 20 years; by the time it ended—to the extent it ever did—a crucial portion of American civil liberties had gone with it. More than half a million Iraqis were dead. Against the sheer scale of that mountain of corpses, it seems almost ghoulish to mention that Cheney, more than any other person, brought us today's political reality. He did, though; the American conservative project, the old dream of making the world into a place awful enough to justify American conservatism, never had a better champion. He was a shamelessly self-dealing con man, for one thing: Chosen as a trusted associate of the elder George H. W. Bush to lead the search for the right running-mate for George W., Cheney picked himself, and then ran the Iraq War as a monumental graft machine for his Halliburton oil company and as many cronies as could be dealt in. The nature of Cheney's con—aided by its contrast against Donald Rumsfeld's burlesque vamping, John Ashcroft's spiral-eyed eschatological lunacy, and the president's plain brainlessness—was a thin performance of steely, flinty-eyed competence laid over arrogance, ignorance, and ineptitude. He wrecked everything he touched, and was wrong in all of his predictions and analyses, and as a result completely discredited America's respectable establishment. Along the way, he played white America's (and mainstream media's) Islamophobia and bloodlust like arcade joysticks, to rearguard each next extension of authoritarianism and paint the administration's critics as traitors. His vileness and cynicism were corrosive, and have by now more or less fully eaten through every surface and institution exposed to them. Cheney, that is to say, gave Donald Trump a template for looting the government and for what to run against and for who to scapegoat and how. In 2024, Cheney endorsed Kamala Harris's presidential candidacy and denounced Trump as a grave threat to democracy. You could almost laugh, or cry. He died on Monday, aged 84. What do you do with a life like his, at its end? Shiver at the thought of it, mostly. Bury him in a salt cavern. Bury him face down.
My toxic trait is that no matter what I need three hours to myself at the end of the day to do absolutely nothing.
The second you start talking about some mysterious "they" that are controlling society in some fashion, you are engaging in dangerous conspiratorial thinking even if you're being woke about it. "They" did not institute the 40 hour work week specifically so you would be too tired to revolt. "They" did not invent the sleek minimalist aesthetic in order to crush the spirit of art in the common people. "They" are not pushing mediocre media into the mainstream in order to poison people's critical thinking skills.
Your best case scenario after that is you talk to someone who actually knows what the fuck they're talking about and you get embarrassed because you can't answer basic questions about your own ideology because you never learned anything past "the ruling class/capitalists/politicians are making things bad and if we got rid of them the bad things would all go away!"
Your worst case scenario is obviously the woo-to-fascist pipeline and you end up believing Jews are poisoning American food supplies with GMOs in order to turn us all into beta cucks, so like . . . maybe just stop blaming "them" before you fall down that route.
Obligatory round of disclaimers: Yes, sometimes people do bad things. Be specific about exactly who is doing what instead of ascribing it to some vague group of shadowy elites. Yes, sometimes things in society are bad. Learn to identify the root causes of complex social issues instead of assuming that they're actually extremely simple to fix and we're just not doing it because of some vague group of shadowy elites. Yes, minimalism isn't for everyone. Learn that some people don't share your tastes and get the fuck over it for the love of god.
Also, before you blame a vague "they" for a contemporary social norm or law or policy you think is bad, look up what the norm was before it. What did it replace?
"They created the 40-hour workweek to --" QUERY: What was the average working-class person's weekly workload before the 40-hour workweek was standardized?
"They created credit scores to --" QUERY: How did banks determine who was and wasn't worthy of a loan before credit scores?
"They promote bad media to --" QUERY: What was the average working-class person's entertainment before this era of "bad" media?
"They invented schools to crush children's creativity and --" QUERY: What was the average working-class child's daily life like before universal public schooling?
To be clear. Before someone accuses me of pissing on the poor.
I AM NOT SAYING "Stop opposing current social practices because Things Used To Be Worse, stop complaining about a 40 hour workweek because great-grandpa worked 90 hours a week uphill both ways in the snow --"
We should advocate a shorter workweek, actually! We should advocate abolishing credit scores, actually! We should advocate non-authoritarian schooling, actually!
But we should do it from a place of informed historical perspective that doesn't quickly become romanticizing the past and perpetuating the idea that Things Were Great Until They Took Over.
The best argument for why people need to learn their labor history is that that seems to be the most common area where people online are easily convinced that the past was so much better, when in reality the past was so much worse. That the 40-hour work week was a major labor victory and it used to be longer is like labor history 101! It's even covered in popular works of mass entertainment like season 2 of HBO's The Gilded Age!
reblog if you're an actual person IRL who gets genuinely upset if you catch someone using ChatGPT and view it as a serious moral failing
i must not get takeout. takeout is the wallet-killer. takeout is the little-death that brings total obliteration. i will face the kitchen, fridge, and pantry. i will make choices about what to cook and then execute them. when hunger is gone there will be nothing. only i will remain.
I think now that queens dead they should have her stuffed and put on display in Cairo for the next 150 years.
BLAZE REJECTED MY POST WOW LOL
We'll make sure at least 100k people see it for free then.
solidarity with california.
scientists wont tell you this! (because it's not true)
experts don't want you to know this! (because it's made up)
doctors HATE this one trick! (because it's dangerous and unhealthy)
I've managed to put together this vague idea from Being Online that USAmericans have a range of dolls (avec tie-in book series) that are all from different periods of the country's history. Like, every time something bad happened in the past, there's a girl assigned to it and she suffers nobly through the horrors and wears a detailed little outfit. And now that I'm aware of that concept, I find myself spending a lot of time imagining that sort of doll for non-us moments in history, especially when I'm waiting around for something. Italian Girl Doll who witnessed the Siege of Rome in 1849. English Girl Doll who was in Brussels during the Battle of Waterloo. Spanish Girl Doll who survived the sacking of Badajos. Find a terrible moment in the past, invent a little girl to make endure it, give her a cute hat to wear. It's very satisfying.