charles vane || nails, hair, hips, heels

tannertan36

oozey mess
almost home
NASA

Product Placement
Mike Driver
🪼

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

No title available
Noah Kahan

pixel skylines

izzy's playlists!
Jules of Nature

Andulka
𓃗

Kiana Khansmith
taylor price
Fai_Ryy
RMH

seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from India
seen from Guernsey
seen from Madagascar
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@sluttysuperheroes
charles vane || nails, hair, hips, heels
i do think what gets ignored about carrie as a character is that she’s an incredibly easy target to bully; she’s a chubby, sheltered acne ridden teenage girl who wears frumpy grandma clothes and regurgitates the jesus freak shit her violently abusive mother tells her. she has violent thoughts about her classmates and is uncomfortable to be around. she’s far more interesting being a victim that’s somewhat uncomfortable to be in the head of than a tragic waif. she’s not a martyr, she’s a child and a child who’s been victimised her whole life shouldn’t have to be kind and angelic to be recognised as a victim. suffering teenage girls shouldn’t just be presented on screen as toned down glamorous thin ophelias, suffering teenage girls can be fat and poor and think violently. i do think we need to examine why culturally we need teenage girls to be beautiful and kind to valorise their suffering and treat it as bad
Eternity
Bonus pg below
friend sent me an Instagram reel yesterday with 1000s of likes that was basically like "pride and prejudice is timeless actually because it's about an autism romance 🥰" and then the creator proceeded to cite moments in the book and film where Lizzie and Darcy are "socially awkward" and....listen. I'm far from an Austen scholar, but I have taught Austen novels as an educator and this kind of psycho-pop analysis that views characters as individuals with autonomy over their actions, rather than tools in a story written at a particular time to say something about that time, pisses me off more than I can say without sounding like an asshole. I'm sorry but Darcy isn't rude and awkward and even cruel to Lizzie because he has autism, he says and does those things because he's a wealthy upper class land owning man raised to see a middle class woman from a large family with no male heirs like Elizabeth as inherently beneath him which he expresses to her multiple times because it is socially acceptable for him to do so in a society where someone like him is privileged above almost all others. He is "socially awkward" around her because of misogyny and classism (PREJUDICE) and she is "socially awkward" around him because a woman of her standing at that time simply wouldn't have had much to do with the gentry but to actually push back against the shit that Darcy says would be social suicide for her whole family so she protests the only way she can which is refusing his advances (PRIDE). not to be the "context collapse is the death of media literacy" guy. But this is the problem with the kind of head empty, let people enjoy things, if I can't relate to it what's the point type crowd. Youse think you're being so quirky justifying incoherent and anachronistic interpretations with your rampant individualism, ensuring that other people never confront anything that challenges them in these stories like patriarchal misogyny and classism. Pride and Prejudice becomes an "autism4autism romance", completely undermining the historical context of its status as one of the great social satires about the class and gender politics that Austen so expertly observed around her. This attitude is why we have nonsensical historical dramas that actively hate history like fucking edgy bdsm "Wuthering Heights", Bridgerton, The Buccaneers, and even a 2025 Frankenstein movie where the monster is just misunderstood and does no wrong uwu etc. because individual relatability and catharsis is king over anything actually saying anything about anything now. Everything is relatable and nothing is meaningful.
me when i like the 2-3h movie: directors should never have to compromise their vision to appeal to something as fickle as people's "patience". anyone complaining about the movie's length is simply a tiktok-addicted philistine.
me when i don't like the 2-3h movie: once i become god emperor of earth anyone trying to make a movie longer than 90 minutes will be shot.
you say to me here is a woman. she's insane and irreparably broken and probably a danger to herself and others. and i say yay yippee woohoo! and things of this nature
It’s actually so misogynistic to assume hetero Jessica doesn’t also jerk it to twinks in panties
Does anyone have that photo of the kid's Blue Angels protest sign? It was like "die, crash blue angels" or something, really funny, cannot find it anywhere online
Turns out I had it THE WHOLE TIME! golly
people will see a structural problem and go "is anybody going to attribute to this a surface-level issue that is a symptom and not the cause" without waiting for an answer
imagine him as odysseus. FUCK!
sooo annoying that my parents didn't provide emotional support growing up now it's a whole fucking thing
i have no dick and i must frot
fat lana was writing real slut songs and now ozempic lana is a tradwife. remember this.