🟠🟡⚪🌀🔵

debt is temporary. soup is forever. Asher/AJ/he+they/19/certified soup enthusiast

[soupis4awhile]

hiiiii!!!!

we do a bit of everything here, but my current favourites are project hail mary and halo. big ultrakill fan also

my asks and dms are always open and anon is permanently available just in case you'd like to poke me with a stick to see what happens and if you ever need anything tagging, just let me know. i promise i don't bite

[scary-caregiver]

Starry Night Stimboard

Requested by: Anon

☁️ - 🌟🌌🌟 - 🌟🌌🌟 - 🌟🌌🌟 - ☁️

[sprouch]

short film by jonathan djob nkondo, posted to tiktok by the artist who did the sound, nicholas snyder

[cowardsexual]

okay yaoi cocaine wore off. i can think clearly now. the sleepover scene was cute but it also kind of encapsulates all the problems i have with movie!grace because that's not how a scientist would talk about dreams. that's not how a schoolteacher would talk about dreams. that's how a ryan gosling romcom lead would talk about dreams. which is cool #gracerockynation but it really REALLY doesn't take much to make science sound magical too? maybe it was cut down from a longer scene where he makes a genuine attempt to explain and this is what's left of them trying to cram it into the movie's runtime but... where's the wonder, man. on both sides. you're a scientist talking to a sentient intelligent alien (also a scientist!) who physically cannot dream.

the book has the opposite problem where it will accidentally stumble into giving a scientific definition of a soulmate and then go "huh. neat. i hadn't thought of it like that" like the scale of cosmic coincidence necessary for rocky and grace to meet shouldn't blow your goddamn mind. but then again i just reread the scene where they're sharing facts about their biology to each other and rocky physically drops the tool he's working on and whispers "you can hear stars? light lets you hear stars?" and it's just mannnnn. where was this energy

[robotluversworld]

🎵

had to draw it as soon as i saw it

[cowardsexual]

speaking of parallels in these scenes

Ch.15

Ch.24

[1five1two]

Leopard Figurine. Mesopotamia. c. 3300-2900 BC.

[eternalgirlscout]

so called "free thinkers" when hi 1 quastion

[tiktoksthataregood-ish]

[1lluminae-files]

UNMUTE!!

[teaboot]

POV u are delicious

[dorothylarouge]

[tastylemonbread]

[playable-elite]

[bloodgulchblog]

FOUND IT

[pmamtraveller]

Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026

[originalaccountname]

Mammal in a Sunday Dress explores the uneasy relationship between femininity, civilisation, and the animal body. At first glance, the figure appears modest and withdrawn. Her posture is composed, her gaze seemingly lowered towards her bare feet, recalling the conventions of nineteenth-century portraiture where women were often depicted as passive objects of observation. Yet as the viewer moves closer, the illusion collapses. Her eyes are not lowered at all. She is looking directly back. The delayed eye contact transforms the encounter. The viewer approaches believing they are safely observing a woman; instead, they realise they have been observed themselves. The work refuses the traditional power dynamic of portraiture, denying the comfort of anonymous spectatorship. Looking becomes a reciprocal act. For Cox, the painting considers humanity's persistent desire to separate itself from the rest of the animal kingdom. The title quietly undermines this distinction. A "mammal" is not another creature—it is us. The Sunday dress, rich with cultural associations of femininity, morality, and respectability, becomes an attempt to distinguish ourselves from nature. Yet clothing cannot alter biology. Beneath lace and ritual remains the same vulnerable animal body. The work also reflects on the historical relationship between women and nature. Across art, religion, and philosophy, women have repeatedly been positioned as closer to instinct, emotion, reproduction, and the body itself, while men have been aligned with reason, culture, and civilisation. Mammal in a Sunday Dress does not reject this comparison. Instead, it questions why proximity to nature has so often been treated as something lesser. Chiaroscuro isolates the figure within darkness, allowing the luminous dress to symbolise the performance of civilisation while the bare feet quietly return the body to the earth. Neither is presented as more truthful than the other. The painting exists in the tension between performance and instinct, refinement and biology. Mammal in a Sunday Dress ultimately asks a simple but unsettling question: if every layer of culture were stripped away, what would remain? Not a king. Not a saint. Not a gentleman or a lady. Only another mammal, looking back.

source

[pineappical]

Rocky paws

stick em up!

[chesterart]

Drew this for my laptop wallpaper (and lockscreen) bcus screencaps were lowk showing up blurry 😢🙁

if yall want a UHD (4k) vers of this for your own wallpaper you can get it here ! (DW ITS FREE)

[soupis4awhile]

i just defeated laundry for real

[ajloun]

what I wish people would understand about fundraising for gaza is that while everyone is desperate and I would never say not to fundraise for or donate to individual families-- I currently fundraise to support multiple friends' families-- the overwhelming narrative I see on Tumblr that the best and most ethical thing you can do is send money to individuals and there is no option for anything else is so so incredibly damaging and inadvertently lends support to the marginalization and distrust of any remaining communal social infrastructure. the sameer project, which you should donate to, talks about this in a recent video they put out. the situation in gaza is unimaginable and everyone is in need of a huge level of support, and yet this fundraising discourse by well-meaning people in the west that donating money to individuals is the only moral way reproduces societal divides wherein resources are directed to people who speak English, who have relationships with people outside of gaza, and who have internet access while hundreds of thousands are left behind.

there ARE non-ngo locally based grassroots initiatives working to meet those needs however they can, and your small donation goes a lot further with them because they are able to buy food/water/supplies in bulk at a reduced price and reach more people with less money. again I'm not saying people shouldn't fundraise for individuals because these initiatives are so limited and many people cannot access them -- but as an example, the group I fundraise with is currently serving people fleeing north gaza who are starving and have nothing, and when we fundraise enough to do cash aid distribution there's so much need that our partners can only distribute 100-200 per large family. and then I go online and see people who have absolutely no understanding of this context at all exclusively working towards raising tens of thousands for just a few people when evacuations haven't been possible for months. it's good to do whatever you can but please consider how this narrative being reproduced among westerners trying to help that there are no other options has the potential to damage groups working towards equity and wider reach however is still possible

[imdressinguplikeacat]

The Sameer Project | Instagram | Linktree

We are a donations based aid initiative for Gaza led by Palestinians,

bigger link to get more eyes on it

[robotrocky]

this is the same image. To me