UPDATE!!! POST OUTDATED.
TERM IS EXHUMANIZATION NOW!!!
imhumanization
(an alternative to "dehumanization" that affirms nonhuman =/= less than human)
lowkey considering saying "imhumanization" instead of "dehumanization" to describe, in a value-neutral way, the process of unlearning human traits and behaviors that don't suit you and expressing/becoming more nonhuman.
the im- in "imhumanization" is the same as in impersonal or impassive, which have mostly neutral connotations as words. it means "not" or "oppositely", so imhumanization says "becoming not-human / opposite of human" without inherently implying that nonhuman = less than human.
in the same way, impersonal and impassive describe being less personal / emotional, without inherently implying that it is inferior to being more personal / emotional.
it's slightly different from saying "unhumanized" because that implies someone was humanized/human-like/human before they went through a process of dropping those traits. "unhumanized" also has a neutral-to-negative connotation because searches say
most usages are either the same meaning as "dehumanization" / "subhumanization" and
in the context of losing humanity that needs to be returned, or being perceived to be "in need" of human influence
and it's different from "nonhumanized" because that implies never experiencing (voluntary or involuntary) formative human influence at all. "imhumanized" is moving away from formative human influence one's actually experienced
this is just my take as a weredog of color who likes to bridge gaps i see in alterhuman language, since it rubs me the wrong way when animal folk say "dehumanization" like it's a good thing, but then realized there wasn't an alternative that didn't imply nonhumanity was below humanity.
but what do y'all think?










