A Critique of Hellaverse's Worldbuilding
Hell Is Supposed to Be Eternal Suffering⌠But It Isnât
Characters have superpowers, regeneration, and immortality from anything except angelic steel, physical suffering is temporary and trivial.
Also characters can regenerate if they're not killed by angelic weapons which should be a bigger deal but it's only mentioned like twice so inattentive viewers could have easily missed it.
Hell fails as a punishment because the physical consequences are negligible. It rewards characters with power rather than stripping them of it.
The Pride Ring Problem
Sinners are confined to the Pride Ring regardless of their sins, the other six rings serve no real purpose. If a sinnerâs greatest sin wasnât pride, why are they forced into the Pride Ring anyway? Why does the Greed Ring exist if greedy humans can't go there? Why does the Sloth Ring exist if slothful humans can't go there?
If God or Heaven created Hellâs rings as punishment, why create seven rings but force sinners into the Pride Ring anyway?
If Hell created Hell's rings, why would demons create six rings that donât serve a clear purpose? Why would Hellborn be punished in rings for sins they didnât commit, but not sinners?
I think it was a big mistake to make all of the plot take place in the Pride Ring. The rings were made to punish specific sins, restricting sinners to the Pride Ring renders the other 85% of Hell's geography useless for its intended purpose.
When Hell Is Other People (And When It's Not)
Lucifer's punishment is that he can't harm sinners. But he doesnât have to interact with them and avoids any consequence for his sins. A punishment that can be negated by just staying home is not much of a punishment. So the punishment doesnât functionally punish him.
Everyone has died and gone to Hell⌠there is supposedly no worse fate. This should result in total anarchy. The social contract relies on the fear of consequence. Hell removes that fear, yet society continues functioning normally. If the core concept is "Hell is other people" then the narrative has to show those people being unbearable. Most sinners act only slightly more cruel, wicked, and selfish than real-life people. Most characters arenât tormented by anyone. They just⌠live their lives.
Characters work, eat, drink, and date.
If sinners cannot die permanently except through angelic weapons, cannot be further condemned, and have no fear of worse punishment, then why would they obey any social order?
Why isnât society far more chaotic?
Thereâs crime, but itâs not apocalyptic.
Thereâs an economy, jobs, and functioning businesses.
Thereâs recognizable social order and power structures.
Why does an economy exist? Why is there food, drink, and currency? If the punishment is eternal suffering, why are there comforts?
Is the greatest thing we could come up with for eternal suffering is having to continue living but the average person is slightly more cruel, wicked, and selfish?
Hellborn Donât Make Sense
Hellborn species (Imps, Hellhounds, etc.) are born in Hell. They did not choose to sin. They are simply born. Why do they suffer the same fate as condemned sinners? Why are they subject to the same eternal suffering as serial killers?
If demons can procreate and create new souls, are those souls automatically damned? If yes, then Hell is creating new souls, which contradicts the idea of Hell as a place where damned souls arrive after death.
This implies a cruel universe where a sentient being can be created solely to suffer without ever having a chance at Heaven. This changes Hell from punishment and eternal suffering to a biologically diverse dimension where bad humans happen to go after they die.
This undermines every moral or cosmic justification the setting could possibly have.
Why are there imp children? If demons can have children and create a soul, why? And why are they condemned to eternal suffering for the sin of being born?
Answering that would be much more interesting instead of answering "Can sex workers, pimps, and serial killers be redeemed?" (because we know the answer is going to inevitably be yes)






















