#enneagram 3

[unpurrofessional]

f2u enneagram subtype stamps. !! ART USED IS BY MATRIX (so3sx8lover on tiktok) !!

67

[gigijenga]

𝔼𝕏ℙ𝕃𝔸𝕀ℕ𝕀ℕ𝔾 ℍ𝕆𝕎 𝕋𝔼 + ℕ𝕀 𝕎𝕆ℝ𝕂𝕊 𝔸ℕ𝔻 𝔻𝔼𝔹𝕌ℕ𝕂𝕀ℕ𝔾 𝕄𝕀𝕊ℂ𝕆ℕℂ𝔼ℙ𝕋𝕀𝕆ℕ𝕊 (𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕗𝕣𝕠𝕞 𝕒𝕟 𝔼ℕ𝕋𝕁)

xNTJs are often stereotyped as evil CEO billionaire masterminds, so these types are often bombarded with horrible misconceptions. First, I’ll explain how the two functions work together, then I will debunk misconceptions. I will also compare INTJ and ENTJ. This analysis will be predominatly focused on Te-Ni / Ni-Te, NOT Te-Ne or Ni-Ti, which are both ESTJ and INFJ in loop but ENTJ and INTJ in dichtomy.

*ೃ༄Extroverted Thinking*ೃ༄

Te: Extroverted thinking is the most pragmatic function of all the cognitive functions. It is only concerned with what is impersonal, objective, and truthful. It is focused on the systems, laws, and structure in the environment. It makes decisions based on how logical something is based on if it’s truthful compared to external logic. While Ti users aim to understand their logical interpretation of something, Te users are only concerned with what is universally true. Te is like deductive reasoning. It draws a conclusion based on external rules you know to be true. 

How it manifests: Te users are concerned with results because of their natural instinct to prioritize the logical connections and effects of decisions. If Ne is focused on connections between abstract ideas, Te is focused on how logical ideas connect to each other. They have less focus on internal consistency/reasoning within one idea. Te users are often blunt, strategic, organized (mentally), and good at managing. Furthermore, Te has an externalized opinion of how things should or should not be done and see everything else as bad / wrong if they don't fit into the external standards. This belief oftentimes creates rigidity in terms of morality.

Behaviors that can exist due to dominant Te:

impatience due to inefficiency. Becomes frustated when cirucmstances are not clear or nebulous

Large focus on organization. Likes to sort ideas and concepts into boxes

Pragmatic, impartial, refuses to act on impulses

Oriented towards intellectuality. Judgemental and strict with morality. Only acts when it is rational

Frequent emotional suppression, oftentimes lack of emotional introspection, represses internal emotions and desires. Oftentimes subconsciously hostile towards those subjects

Interactive with the external world. Likes to negotiate with other people to carry out plans / operations. Has a tendency to want to "fix" systems to make it more efficent, logical, effective, and right

Can be emotionally unexpressive, unperturbed, even harsh at times

Moralistic / strict in what is right or wrong

*ೃ༄Introverted Intuition*ೃ༄

Ni: Introverted intuition is focused on abstractionism, symbolism, main ideas, and trends. Rather than seeking possibilities, newness, and change, Ni is convergent, seeking one core insight or pattern than endless options. Ni users are visionaries: they are focused on one possibility and building upon it. While Ne spreads ideas outwards, Ni takes information in, distilling many inputs into a singular, synthesized insight.

How it manifests: Ni users are not very spontaneous. They are focused on predicting how the future could play out. They ask themselves: “Where is this going?” “What’s the purpose of this?” etc. They often step back from the noise of the present to analyze what is happening. Ni users often get “aha” moments where they realize the overall theme and connection of an idea, but oftentimes they glimpse over smaller details. Sometimes, they “just know” without linear reasoning and step-by-step logical build-up. Ni users can often be poetic and enjoy symbolism and metaphors in media and literature.

Behaviors that can exist due to dominant Ni:

Lacks touch with reality. Lives in their head and is not attached to the present

Finds self-expression difficult. Vague with ideas. Has a liking for subjectivity, symbolism, and interpretations of life

Insightful and reflective, may be mistaken for Fi

Sticks to a singular vision of the future. Be certain of such insights and has a hard time not commiting, unlike Ne

not focused on objectivity, but rather its own personal subjective view of life, which is not related to the concreate reality

Like what I've said before, their arguments often lack reasoning due to the vagueness in their perception of the world. Intuition can be hard to back up with practical evidence

*ೃ༄How Te + Ni work together*ೃ༄

I call the Te + Ni combination “the visionary” or "the truth finder" because not only are these types constantly building upon an idea, but they are also consistently focused on the overall structure and main idea of everything. xNTJs are concerned with putting everything into boxes based on the overall framework and ensuring it all connects logically. The Te + Ni combo is a truth seeker, always focused on finding the meaning behind everything. Te takes Ni’s insight and translates it into concrete plans, systems, and structures that can be applied in the external world. The two functions create a mindset that is always refining and building upon ideas for long-term impact and efficiency.

*ೃ༄Misconceptions*ೃ༄

I blame 16personalities, my nemesis, for most of the misconceptions

Te is controlling and bossy -> False. That is a BEHAVIORAL trait. Te = / = bossy, it is simply a cognitive function that focuses on external logic. Controlling the environment is not Te, that is more related to socionics Se. However, Te is inherently focused on making systems and operations more rational and effective, which can manifest into a "controlling" behavior, but none of these behavior suggests that the person is physically aggressive, controlling / possessive, etc.

Te lacks empathy -> low Fi does not mean someone lacks morals or emotions. None of the cognitive functions stand for feeling emotions. Fi is simply a function that evaluates and interprets internal feelings and is focused on subjective interpretations/meaning. A Te user usually pushes their feelings aside to seek the impersonal truth, but that does not mean they are heartless.

ENTJs are explosive and impatient -> unless you’re dealing with an unhealthy ENTJs, typically, Te doms tend to put emotional needs aside to act impartial. But it is true than ENTJs may be unaware of how their emotions build up and may become explosive under stress.

Emotional manipulative character, are they Te or Fe dominant? -> if someone emotionally manipulates but chooses not to dive into other people’s feelings usually, then they are probably a Te user. Te users would rather focus on logical manipulation as they lack concern for the emotional atmosphere, but speaking from a socionics perspective, dominant Te users may be capable of adapting to the emotional atmosphere, but this effort is lowkey and of short duration. If someone is focused on constantly adjusting to other people’s moods and emotions, then they are an Fe user. An evil and controlling character is not always a Te user.

Controlling, action-oriented character, ESTP or ENTJ?: Generally speaking, many stern, bossy, power-hungry ESTPs are mistyped as ENTJs (cough cough Sukuna), but it is never the other way around. Remember, ENTJs still have auxiliary Ni, so they would rather step away from the environment and evaluate before jumping into action (unless they are in Te-Se loop). ENTJs are judgers, meaning they need to analyze where the situation is heading before acting. ESTPs focus on living in the moment. If this archetype does not value abstractionism, structure, logical connections, or hidden meanings, then chances are they are not a true ENTJ.

Ni is about having hunches and being able to predict the future -> that’s a superpower, silly. I mean I wish I had that ability, but no, Ni is not about literally predicting the future. Ni will try to predict how situations will enroll.

Ni is detail-oriented and good at planning things out -> while aux Te can help INTJs be exceptional at planning, Ni is not step-by-step itself. It usually jumps to conclusions due to the prioritization of main ideas and overall structure. Intuition functions are not rational, and they focus on ideas that are not pragmatic or concrete.

Quiet, mysterious, stoic character, INTJ or ISTP?: a lot of ISTPs get mistyped as INTJs (Wednesday Addams). ISTPs analyze and see themselves as being in the moment, while also focusing on their logical perception of the whole situation. INTJs see themselves as being apart from what is going on around them and analyze the situation from afar, looking for main ideas and structure. 

INTJs are cold and emotionless -> this, again, is a behavioral trait. There’s probably no need for an explanation

xNTJs can’t be impulsive -> this statement is half true. xNTJs would rather not jump into action without thinking, but they tend to focus on main ideas over details, which means they may be careless when evaluating situations.

xNTJs are unaccommodating -> not always, being a nice person has nothing to do with cognitive functions. I’m an ENTJ who scored SCOAI in big five soo.

*ೃ༄Differences between ENTJ and INTJ*ೃ༄

ENTJs value taking action efficiently and quickly, INTJs value fully analyzing the situation before acting

ENTJs are more impersonal and logic-oriented, while INTJs tend to me a bit more attuned to their feelings and focus more on symbolism and abstractionism (Tertiary Fi)

ENTJs are objective and good at explaining their ideas to be more efficienct. INTJs struggle with explaining their ideas in a concise and coherent way as they value intuition over logic

ENTJs push against the idea of making decisions based on their personal needs, emotions, or subjective interpretation (Te against Fi), while INTJs push against the idea of making decisions in the moment or simply evaluating the situation as it is (Ni against Se. Ni favors hidden meanings and intuition, while Se values realism). 

ENTJs focus on the environment around them more, while INTJs tend to live in their head

INTJs are better at evaluating their own emotions and personal views on situations, while Fi being inferior puts ENTJs in a more vulnerable position when it comes to dealing with such matters. Hence, ENTJs either don’t care about evaluating their own feelings, or they feel insecure when it comes to controlling their emotions (Te suppresses Fi)

Similarly, ENTJs are better at acting in the moment when needed, while INTJs are not as quick to adjust to external systems/environments. Se being inferior puts INTJs in a more vulnerable position when it comes to dealing with fast-moving situations. INTJs either don’t care about living in the present/being present in the moment, or they feel insecure when it comes to not being able to take decisive action when needed (Ni suppresses Se)

ENTJs may aspire to be more connected with their emotions, while INTJs may aspire to be more focused on the present (Fi suggestive and Se suggestive in socionics)

ENTJs become more focused on themselves, emotionally explosive, biased (in terms of their subjective views), etc. when they are stressed, while INTJs feel the need to act/focus in the moment, may become more impulsive and reckless 

Most common ENTJ enneagram = Social 1, sexual 1. Last one I would associate ENTJ with is social 3. Wings include 1w2, 3w4.

Most common INTJ enneagram = all enneagram 5 subtypes (primarily social 5)

Most common ENTJ trifixes = 137, 358 135, 136

Most common INTJ trifixes = 135, 145, 458, 358

Rarer combos (ranked from most to least common): ENTJ Sp3, ENTJ Sp1, ENTJ Sx6, INTJ So6 (I haven't looked too much into So6 but I assume it can exist), INTJ Sp3 / e1, ENTJ social 7

Anyways hope this helps :)

[aannomaly]

small art dump I love typology so much 💔

also sx4 is a kid in that last one awww baby little baby 🥺🥺

[needserotonindealer]

According to Naranjo's teachings, every subtype of the Enneagram has "irrational ideas": these are the unspoken creeds that shape the neurosis of each type. Following/acting on these ideas intensifies your neurosis, making it worse and preventing a type from moving to a healthier place.

All of this is extracted from Naranjo's books on each type.

E1.

From: Psicología de los Eneatipos, Eneatipo 1, Ira.

E2.

From: Orgullo: Caprichosos, histriónicos y conquistadores.

E3.

From: Vanidad: Psicología de los eneatipos.

E4.

From: Envidia (Eneatipo 4): Abnegados, odiadores y melancólicos.

E5.

From: Avaricia: Mezquinos, arrogantes e indiferentes.

E6.

From: Cobardes, desafiantes y fanáticos: Las formas del Miedo.

E7

From: Golosos, tramposos, soñadores y charlatanes: Psicología de los eneatipos.

E8 - not out yet.

E9.

From: Acedia: Psychospiritual laziness.

[driftwooddiaries]

I know this is my Enneagram blog as a 9, meant for me as a 9, to share my 9ness with others…

And I didn’t want to mix media/posts with the other types but I can’t help myself. So here’s a little series of quotes from film/TV for each type #.

Type One.

Type Two.

Type Three.

Type Four.

Type Five.

Type Six.

Type Seven.

Type Eight.

Type Nine.

[heartisrotting]

sx38❤❤

me n my wife

Design by Matrix

[lauracoretypologies]

The societal SX-shaming - destigmatizing the vocalization of one's rawest desires

(The influence of social mirage on the collective superego of SX-blind folks)

One thing that has been bothering me for probably a longer time than I've realized is the stigmatization of the most primal, raw instinctual desires and needs by our society, in the name of "calling out toxic standards imposed by people like you (read, people in touch with their desires)."

In reality, this is mere pretense, made to camouflage how SX-blind folks are unable to get in touch with their sense of attraction and disgust enough to select their choices for themselves. When they see a person, mainly SX first or second, making selections solely on what attracts and repulses them, they often resort to discriminating against them by saying their personal standards and preferences are toxic, irrelevant or unhealthy.

And of course, it's easier for them to do that, in the name of social or political acceptance (see the SO and SP nature mixed in that, by the way?) than to admit to themselves, that they themselves have a sense of attractive and repulsive, but buried so deep down out of being socially correct and guilty, that they can't help but to moralize their sensual incompetence and label themselves as the proper SJWs.

In many SX-blinds, this tendency is so pathological that while they're okay seeing people making romantic selections based on "compatibility" and "values", the very same selection becomes toxic out of nowhere, once motivated by a sense of attraction and repulsion.

Not to mention the irrelevance and fallacies in their arguments. They confuse personal selection even for the most intimate relations for imposing toxic standards upon society, even if by not acting in a hypocritical manner, you're doing the exact opposite by being fair, justful, and *practicing your personal freedom's* to do so. After all, what they see is that you rejecting a certain trait somehow equals telling people to abide by your standards, even though you're simply choosing people who fit it and letting those who don't live as they are.

It's like a brunette crying that a man wants to date blonde and resorts to accusing him of imposing the standard of bleaching hair onto her. It's like nerds refusing to date brainless people so they accuse them of elitism. It's like experienced men whining that a physically pure woman is repulsed by a non-virgin man, intimately marked by someone else prior to her and accusing her of imposing purity standards onto him, as if purity can be regained by any effort. *Diabolical laughter*

But to them, this bigotry of demonizing decisions made based on repulsion/attraction principle is a way to cope with the fact that certain preferences unselect them. They're the ones suffering consequences of making decisions against their disgust and then paying with a breakup for it. Secretly, and often subconsciously, they envy SX types that they're able to make successful decisions based on desires and turn-offs, and it mirrors their inability to do so when they experience such envy.

They project their values and *options* onto others and the moment someone has standards that go beyond what they are, they feel inevitably discriminated against. Nevermind that you value them on a social level and simply disregard them romantically, as for them they don't see when it's romantic and when it's not. How dare you, (insert a name for either sexist, ageist, or whatever label they find for your ways).

And it's exactly this SX-blind confusion and type of thinking which develops these toxic standards. Because only a person who is capable of acting upon an entirely random person's desires and translate it into receiving basic human respect in the name of being socially respected and is exploiting their desire IS setting a societal norm out of nothing but the consumerist SP idea that you can get resources in return of living to someone's sexual ideals, or that somehow you can't financially survive without being everyone's type.

Of course, this goes both ways. There are also SX-blinds, who confuse their own desires for who is worthy of their basic respect and who is not, so they assume SX firsts are the same type of evil who do it openly. Whoops...

It's a very messed-up thinking, when in reality, no person will judge your societal worth based on *one's own personal* desire, disgust, demand or preference. You can be sexually unthinkable to someone and they can still respect you as a human. I wonder if these people either sexualize their moms, or think they're invaluable because they can't get intimately involved with them. *Smirk*

At the end of the day, they're nothing but fallen victims of their own system they complain so much about. SX types are the ones who recognize the subjectivity of attraction and repulsion and don't sell their icks as an objective moral failure, but it's the SX-blinds that IMPOSE what's acceptable to desire or what isn't. In other words, they *are* the toxic standard.

[leafyteafy]

THE CHARISMA

THIS DESIGN BELONGS TO MATRIX/ SO3SX8LOVER