Linda Perry
Anonymous asked: Linda Perry? My brain just keeps going 'ISTP doesn't quite feel right.'

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Russia

seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Norway
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
Linda Perry
Anonymous asked: Linda Perry? My brain just keeps going 'ISTP doesn't quite feel right.'
ENFP's age crisis from weeks ago...
Everyone: 🎶HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU, HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU, HAPPY BIRTHDAY DEAR ENFP! HAPPY-
ENFP: *starts crying loudly like a child*
INFP: hey hun what's wrong? 🥺
ENFP: *still crying and sniffling* I'M AN OLD *keeps crying loudly and repeating "I'M AN OLD" over and over more quietly while whimpering*
ISTP & INTP: 😂😂
ESTP & ENTP: 😑😑
INFP: *pats ENFP* hey hun you're not old, in fact lemme send you this article I found specifically about neurodivergent people, apparently they consider us young adults up till 32!
ENTP: phew I still got some time, sucks for you tho 💀 *looks at ESTP*
ESTP: fuck off 😂
"The stupid MBTI test"...
ENTP: you know what, lets take that stupid and idiotic ass "64 types" test, I wanna see what it says about us and what STUPID ass "extra combo" it gives us
ENFP: *deep sigh* ENTP, I GET why you don't like the formula, I don't either but-
ENTP: BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING TESTS IN THE FIRST PLACE TO FIGURE OUT YOUR MBTI IT'S NEVER FUCKING ACCURATE, AND THIS STUPID ASS TEST DOESN'T EVEN TEST FUNCTIONS
ENFP, INTP, & INFP: *judgmentally stare at ENTP*
ENFP: ok, so WHY TF DO YOU WANT US TO TAKE IT AGAIN IN THE FIRST PLACE?
ENTP: 💀 I'm bored and I wanna argue with it
ENFP: ...... you do realize the test isn't like a sentient being right
Age Crisis...
ENTP: *puts shaping cream on hair and messes it up with the hands until he notices something weird* 🤨🧐🥲 INTP...
INTP: *just observing him* Mhm?
ENTP: 🥲 tell me that's the cream... I mean it's white... or light?... Its the cream right? 🥲 *keeps frantically rubbing the 2 hair strands*
INTP: *looking at the two strands closely* 😬 eeeh 😅
ENFP: it's prolly the cream don't worry 😌 *as he deludes himself too since he just turned the same age as ENTP days ago*
ENTP: *has a short realization that it's not, in fact the cream, but wants to stay deluded* 🙂 I'mma forget I saw that *covers it with the top hair*
INTP: *concerned* uuuuuhhhhh....
ENFP: 😌 you know sometimes it's ok to stay in delulu land
ENTP: 🙂 I'M GONNA. FORGET. THAT I SAW THAT. *keeps doing daily things like taking meds*
ESTP: *looking and listening from far away concerned* *thinks to himself: wait do I? fuck 🥲 I've been dying my hair green for many years so I don't even know 🥲...*
Not sure if you're familiar with the enneagram personality type system, but I was wondering what Riko and Mish's types are?
I kinda picture Riko as a 3, since he seems very performative but I could also see him as a 7. It's hard to know since we don't get very many Riko POVs that are just him being normal and not in great distress. What is going on in that head of his (if anything)?
As for Mish I frankly have no idea lol.
Familiar?? Darling. Baby. My love. You have no idea how FIXATED I am with the enneagram. Also MBTI and to a lesser (but no less enthusiastic) degree, Gallup's Strengthfinder.
omg omg omg I get to talk about this
OK, first the gobbledygook. The rest of what has turned out to be an essay will be less technical sounding, I promise:
Riko is: ESTP 7w6 so/sp.
For Mish, she is asserting herself more and more as an IxTJ 8w9 so/sp.
(It hasn't yet become clear to me whether she is N or S yet... a lot of stuff happens in later arcs that would make that aspect clearer.)
OK, brace yourself. Because I am grabbing your vest and we are going on a DEEP DIVE BAYBEEEE.
So yes! Riko does present as a an Achiever (3) because of his (somewhat grotty) charm and chameleon-like behaviour. He is extremely adept at looking at situations and figuring out what they need from him and how to fold himself into the shape people want. His actions can look look very very very close to that of a 3.
BUT! The reason why he is an Enthusiast type (7) and not an Achiever/Performer type (3) is because of his CORE motivation:
A 3 is trying to prove their worth.
Riko on the other hand, is trying to stay free - of pain, of helplessness, of being trapped.
A 3's strategy is centred around effectiveness, reputation, or achievement. Riko doesn't do that. If anything, he actively resists being put on any sort of pedestal (he resisted Vetch calling him Ghosthands in the Selah arc).
In Surface Tension, Riko shows he really doesn't care about his reputation. He'll happily tell people he has an STD if it will achieve his goal of them leaving him be.
He lets people underestimate him, constantly undermines himself, and acts a lot stupider than he really is. If the spotlight ever lands on him, he worms his way out from under it. (Duck & Weave)
Not because he doesn't enjoy the attention; he actually is quite the slut for it. He's great at creating it AND holding it, when it serves him.
But he resists having people turn the spotlight on him because has learnt early in life that when people are watching you, your options dwindle. When you are in the light, you can't escape.
Vetch's attack on Riko in the Selah arc was particularly damaging because it targeted ALL the pain points of an Enthusiast (7). Riko became the centre of Vetch's obsession, and he couldn't escape. And then Vetch removed his ability to escape or speak, and trapped him in that maintenance corridor with him. No exits. No talking himself out of it. Pretty much a game over scenario for him.
Aaaaagh.
This constant need to keep moving is also why he very almost leaves in Plant, even though it's probably the best place he's landed in.
MBTI & Characters
Jack: ESTP
Episode: Lord of the Flies 1x02
1) Hey Charity, I've been going back and forth between ESTP and ESFP for my type. I think I could have Fe cuz when my emotions are high I feel the need to extrovert them. If I'm sad or hurt I need to cry and look for understanding, consolation and advice from others. If I'm angry I need to vent or confront the person responsible. When I'm excited I need to tell others about it, in general I look for mirroring of my emotions. But I only open up with people I can trust.
2) I'm in tune with the vibe of the room and people's emotional cues (I automatically read body language and facial expressions). But I could have Fi cuz I have strong morals I can't ignore. My sense of right and wrong is clear and I'm selective about who enters my life. I also know my likes and dislikes. I think I could use Ti since I trust my own interpretation of events and my own theories over accepted facts and external sources. I'm generally impersonal, critical, pragmatic and logical.
3) During arguments I focus on the logical consistency of the reasoning and if it makes sense with how I understand things to work together. Many times I find external sources to be irrelevant or unrelated to the point that is being made. I want things/people to be consistent, make sense and be free of contradictions. But I could have Te since at work and uni I like to have clear guidelines and expectations to meet, it makes it easier to work when I know what's being asked of me.
4) I do ignore rules when they are inconvenient and when I know I can get away with it, but I'm not a rebel. I'm good at creating structure when it comes to work/school projects, but I'm very undisciplined, generally lazy and highly hedonistic. It's a weird combo where intellectually I'm very organized and want things/people to be clear, but physically I'm messy and laissez faire. I've tried analyzing myself, but I ca't introspect to save my life. I only understand myself in hindsight.
ESTP seems right. There’s more logical detachment and emotional mirroring here than a strong sense of Fi, which makes decisions based off things like “is this fair?” “is this authentic to my feelings? Does it violate my values?” You’re asking if it makes sense, if it’s internally consistent, if there are contradictions, and dismissing external facts or evidence (no Te) in favor of your own logical theories (Ti). I doubt you argue from a place of personal conviction; you probably argue from a place of desiring coherency. So… ESTP.
Mark ruffalo