Sweet Meets the Family - Scribble (3/4)
Scribble: Archival note: comfort object accepted.
Threat assessment remains low. Sentimental value remains unexpectedly high.
I will preserve both.
[Sweet belongs to @asksweetdisaster]

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from India

seen from India
seen from Bangladesh
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from India

seen from China

seen from Denmark
seen from India
seen from Denmark
seen from Latvia
seen from United States
seen from Taiwan
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ukraine
seen from Denmark
seen from Bulgaria
Sweet Meets the Family - Scribble (3/4)
Scribble: Archival note: comfort object accepted.
Threat assessment remains low. Sentimental value remains unexpectedly high.
I will preserve both.
[Sweet belongs to @asksweetdisaster]
first lunatic in my bloodline to be self-aware
Sweet Meets the Family - Scribble (2/4)
Scribble: Archival note: comfort object accepted.
Threat assessment remains low. Sentimental value remains unexpectedly high.
I will preserve both.
[Sweet belongs to: @asksweetdisaster]
Sweet meets the Family - Fox (1/3)
Fox: A guest deserves warmth before disclosure.
Power may guard the door, but judgment decides what crosses the threshold.
That is why there is tea on the table before there are secrets in the room. Sweet belongs to @asksweetdisaster
Sweet Meets the Family - Taking a Break With Storm
Storm: Guarding her from danger is easy.
Guarding her choices from my own fear takes more discipline.
I am learning the second one.
[Sweet belongs to @asksweetdisaster]
Sweet Meets the Family - Basic Rules (1/5)
Sweet: “Harmless nanomachines” is the kind of sentence that absolutely sounds less harmless the calmer you say it.
I agreed to the eyeball upgrade, but I reserve the right to be suspicious the entire time.
Ask Blog Note: Comments, questions, and interactions are always welcome and may be featured in future updates. [Sweet belongs to: @asksweetdisaster]
Sweet Meets The Family - Scribble (4/4)
Scribble: I was not made to make the past polite.
I was made to keep it accurate enough that no one has to survive the same warning twice.
Compliments will also be preserved. Carefully. [Sweet belongs to @asksweetdisaster]
Fox: Your concern is reasonable. However, Ash is not the member of the household responsible for that particular system.
Chris continuously monitors spatial fractures, unstable wormholes, dimensional overlap, folded-space intrusions, and other large-scale irregularities. A crack may be invisible to ordinary perception. It is not invisible to him. He can isolate, stabilize, collapse, redirect, or repair the affected region before it becomes a permanent bridge between realities.
Sky handles the contamination such contact may leave behind. Her Null Veil can peel foreign framework away from our reality, while Null Gate can sever the transition itself before anything further crosses through. The Ark provides the deeper structural stability that prevents stress to space, causality, and universal law from becoming a cascading failure.
We also do not assume that something wearing a familiar face is the person it resembles. Any duplicate, altered continuity, displaced history, or foreign version of an individual would be contained and verified before being allowed near the household.
So, no. Finding one of these cracks would not necessarily mean there is ‘no way back.’ It would mean someone has opened a door without our permission.
At present, that door appears to be allowing a rather irritating degree of outside commentary.
That is not the same thing as unrestricted access.
Chris would locate where it leads.
Sky would determine what it has changed.
And if something hostile came through it, Ash would become involved after the intelligent solutions had been attempted.
Thank you for the warning. We have encountered enough alternate dimensions to know that doors require locks. At the moment, we are evidently dealing with one that has begun passing questions through the frame.