#infodumps

[dreamweave01]

TMNT 2012 Swap AU Masterpost:

Decided to make a masterpost because I forgot I don't have one. . .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Infodumps:

Best Friends

Doodles

Who-got-what-role + Shredder history

Swap infodump 2

April and Casey

Weapon infodump

Footclan and other villains infodump

Some info on Splinter

[cryoverkiltmilk]

A coworker asked what my favorite ergonomic keyboard is and I had to hold back a Category 5 Autism Event. I tell you, my stomach CLENCHED the way I felt fuses firing in my brain.

I eventually just choked out 'How much time do you have?'

[lullabytez]

i feel so bad for my siblings these fuckers gotta put up with me infodumping about anything and everythimg from random things of science i watched like 4 videos on at maximum, deltarune theories and tidbits, random memories ive probably brought up before, to the language and word choices made in shakespeares plays. sometimes multiple in the same breath.

[bobauthorman]

Two things about RWBY "Amity"

First off, while it would have been more pragmatic for Penny to atomize Emerald and Cinder, if Emerald didn't make it back to to Monstro and eventually help Oscar with his escape, which meant she wouldn't be able to RRAYNBOW take down Ironwood and save Penny from his and Watts' virus.

Second, that Harriet shuts off Ruby's broadcast just when she's getting to talking about Ironwood fall to the dark side helps spare the viewers to be told what they've already seen. What I respect about RWBY is that unlike most anime, it doesn't force you to re-hash what you've already.

But maybe I'm being a bit harsh. Most shows come from the era when regular television was a thing, and there was no way to really tell if a viewer had seen the relevant information. Ergo, 'flashbacks' and 'As you Knows' were necessary to keep everyone on the same keel. RWBY, being a series from a web-streaming service, doesn't have that problem and assumes that its audience has obsessively kept track of its lore.

This, tragically, is more credit than the casual anime viewer really deserves.

[jake-and-gina-in-a-trenchcoat]

What Character would you like me to write an Infodump on next?

Amy Santiago

Rosa Diaz

Captain Holt

Voting ended onJun 12

Thanks for voting! Will be posting this weekend

[claypotz]

when I finally figure out the thing that gets my friend to infodump to me I get so excited

[ningauinerd]

This year has been quite rich for new dasyurids - a couple months ago we were gifted with a two new planigale species from the Pilbara, and even more recently, a new paper by Newman-Martin et al. was released that found mulgaras, previously believed to be two species, are actually six. Tragically, the number of mulgara species out in Australia's deserts today remains two, as four of these species are already extinct.

But I'm getting ahead of myself. For someone who isn't a dasyuromorph disciple or other variety of Australian mammal nerd, what are mulgaras?

"Crest-tailed mulgara" on the left and "brush-tailed mulgara" on the right (Image credit: Yingyod Lapwong & Owen Lishmund)

Mulgaras (Dasycercus) are a genus of carnivorous marsupials in the family Dasyuridae, which includes Tasmanian devils, quolls and a huge variety of other smaller but equally vicious predators. A fair size as far as dasyurids go, these rat-sized mammals are specialists of arid and semi-arid environments and were previously widespread across much of inland Australia, but their distribution retreated deeper into the interior of the continent following European colonisation. One trait that sets them apart from other dasyurids is their burrowing prowess - while many dasyurid species will inhabit burrows dug by other animals, mulgaras are skilled diggers that will construct their own extensive burrow networks, complete with a main entrance and several side tunnels and pop holes.

Trying to figure out how many species of mulgara there are has always been a source of great confusion to mammal taxonomists. The first species described was Dasycercus cristicaudata back in the 1860s, followed by D. blythi and D. hillieri in the early 1900s. These two new species were synonymised with D. cristicaudata in 1988, leaving one species of mulgara. In 2000, mulgaras were split back into two species, D. cristicaudata and D. hillieri, but a 2006 study believed the species in question had been misidentified - what had been thought to be D. hillieri was actually D. cristicaudata, and what had been thought to be D. cristicaudata was actually D. blythi. Confused yet?

Dasycerus blythi (Image credit: Walter Baldwin Spencer)

Since then, the consensus has largely been that the two species of mulgara were the crest-tailed mulgara (Dasycercus cristicaudata) and the brush-tailed mulgara (D. blythi), both named after their distinctive tail shapes. However, the new paper turns this idea on its head yet again, with the most dramatic revision of Dasycercus species thus far.

Based on measurements of the teeth and skull, Newman-Martin et al. identified six different species within Dasycerus - this included D. cristicaudata and D. blythi, the previously invalidated D. hillieri, and three newly described species, D. wolleyae, D. archeri and D. marlowi. Despite this, the two previously identified living populations remained the only surviving species, with the other four being considered likely to be extinct based on their distribution. However, in one final twist, the surviving mulgaras previously considered to D. cristicaudata were found to actually be D. hillieri after all, meaning the type species of the genus is now among those believed to be extinct!

Of these species, three (D. cristicauda, D. hillieri & D. archeri) could be considered to be "crest-tailed" and two (D. blythi & D. marlowi) are "brush-tailed", while the sixth species, D. woolleyae, is usually crest-tailed but rarely brush-tailed. Given this, the appearance of the tail is no longer a distinctive characteristic of any of the species, but the authors stated that the common name could be kept for the extinct D. cristicaudata and potentially also the extant D. blythi. All other species required new common names, listed below:

Ampurta (Dasycercus hillieri)

Spinifex/brush-tailed mulgara (Dasycercus blythi)

†Crest-tailed mulgara (Dasycercus cristicaudata)

†Northern/sand mulgara (Dasycercus woolleyae)

†Southern mulgara (Dasycercus archeri)

†Little mulgara (Dasycercus marlowi)

What was previously believed to be the crest-tailed mulgara, D. cristicaudata, is now the ampurta, D. hillieri! (Image credit: Mike Letnic)

The fact that four species of mulgara are now extinct is not only inherently disheartening, but these also represent the first known dasyurid species to have disappeared in modern times. Dasyurids were previously considered to be more resilient to the impacts of invasive species and habitat degradation than other small marsupials, hence why no species had yet been lost, but the discovery of extinct mulgaras demonstrates that we are likely underestimating the impact that European invasion has had on dasyurid diversity. There may well be many other species that have already gone extinct without us even realising they existed.

But, while more than half of the mulgaras are tragically now extinct, we must also appreciate the precious species that remain. The brush-tailed or spinifex mulgara thankfully remains widespread and common, but the ampurta now occurs in only a small portion of its former range and is considered to be vulnerable to extinction - we must take careful steps to protect this enigmatic little marsupial, unless we want to see Dasycercus lose yet another species in the not too distant future.