The book is about whether eating meat is good for health or not. What are the pros and cons of eating meat? The author also broke various myths regarding meat-eating.
So let's start
Iron deficiency is one of the most widespread as well as one most problem as it affects 1.6 billion people more than 1/5 of humanity and meat is one of the best sources which can reduce iron deficiency.
Apart from this modern nutritional science discovered meat value as an outstanding source of key vitamin and several essential minerals.
However, the two main leading causes of death in modern societies are cardiovascular and cancer.
And meat consumption is one of the major contributions to this death.
Another study conducted by Oxford founds that there was an increase in colon cancer incidence among vegetarian which lead to another question
That should we stop eating more vegetables also??
Methane and Dinitrogen monoxide emission released by meat affects not only humans but s e the single largest emission of global warning also.
In the global term, Ammonia emission from livestock has tripled during the 20 century which has to lead to an increase in Earth temperature.
Meat is undoubtedly an environmentally expensive food.
More ever to say 1 kg of fresh vegetables is good for 1 kg of meat is also not right.
It is a myth that meat-eating people die fast. Japan the longest living population eat meat, European three societies which have the highest life expectancy Sweden, Norway and Iceland have meat in their diet.
Thinking about the environmental effect it can be reduced.
for that, we have to follow
A term called "RATIONAL MEAT EATING"
Which is to reduced meat-eating by only 40 kg per year for young and adults and 25-30 kg for old people ie above 60 age
IF we further reduced this in the month it will be 3.3 kg and in week term maximum 800 to 1000 grams only Ie only 2 to 3 days only
By this much eating meat only we can not only save our planet but also make ourselves healthy.
This article is partly excerpted from chapter 10 of my book, “The Little Book of Revelation.” Therein, I explain that there are not 2 resurrections but only one! Daniel 12.2 explicitly mentions that both the saved & the damned will be resurrected TOGETHER in one general resurrection. By contrast, the second death in Revelation 20.14 is incorporeal, NOT physical. It’s the lake of fire; a spiritual death. So, only 1 physical resurrection is indicated in the Bible; not 2! Notice what the passage of Rev. 20.4 (KJV) actually says:
“And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them,
and judgment was given unto them: and I
saw the souls of them that were beheaded
for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of
God, and which had not worshipped the
beast, neither his image, neither had
received his mark upon their foreheads, or
in their hands; and they lived and reigned
with Christ a thousand years.”
Notice that the verse doesn’t tell us if and when they were resurrected. Only that they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years; (not “for” a thousand years).
Then, the following verse (Rev. 20.5) goes on to say:
“But the rest of the dead lived not again until
the thousand years were finished. This is
the first resurrection.”
But that’s the only resurrection! Biblically speaking, there is no other physical resurrection. And if it’s explicitly mentioned as the first resurrection, then it means that there couldn’t have been an earlier one. We erroneously assume that the previous verse (v. 4) mentions an earlier resurrection. Not so! Revelation 20.4 and 20.5 appear to be two different versions of the SAME resurrection!
It seems to me that Revelation 20 verses 4 and 5 are talking about the *same resurrection* but in light of varying reward scenarios. The implication is that the believers of verse 4 (probably the tribulation saints or the recently deceased) lived and reigned after the thousand years (καὶ ἔζησαν καὶ ἐβασίλευσαν μετὰ . . . τὰ χίλια ἔτη)! Similarly, in verse 5, the rest of the dead (presumably the believers who had been dead for many centuries) were not raised from the dead until the thousand years were finished, which is the first resurrection:
οἱ λοιποὶ τῶν νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔζησαν ἄχρι τὰ
τελεσθῇ χίλια ἔτη. αὕτη ἡ ἀνάστασις ἡ
πρώτη.
In other words, it appears that the faithful throngs (both the recent dead and those who had been dead for a long time) took part in the first resurrection after the thousand years had passed. But the details of their rewards——namely, that they lived & reigned, and that they were resurrected——are differentiated for a more comprehensive elaboration!
5 Questions Need to be Asked
A) According to the text, when does the 1st resurrection take place? Answer: when the thousand years were finished (Rev. 20.5)!
B) Can there be 2 resurrections? Answer: No. There can’t be 2 physical resurrections. According to the Bible, there is only one (Dan. 12.2)!
C) Which physical resurrection is explicitly mentioned in Rev. 20? Answer: The one in verse 5, which is said to occur at the end of the millennium or at the end of the thousand years. Verse 4 does not explicitly mention a resurrection. It simply says: καὶ ἔζησαν (and lived). It doesn’t say that they came back to life or that they were resurrected, as some modern Bible versions do. Nor does the original Greek text have any parentheses, as you find in the NRSV. It reads:
καὶ ἔζησαν καὶ
ἐβασίλευσαν μετὰ τοῦ
χριστοῦ χίλια ἔτη
(Rev. 20.4 SBLGNT).
The textus receptus has it as follows:
καὶ ἔζησαν καὶ
ἐβασίλευσαν μετὰ τοῦ
χριστοῦ τὰ [the] χίλια
ἔτη;
The Greek New Testament doesn’t say “for” a thousand years. And the Greek word μετά can be translated as either “with” or “after” Christ. In other words, this could also be translated or paraphrased as follows: [after] the thousands years were completed, they lived and reigned forever. In other words, the original Greek text doesn’t say “for” one thousand years.
D) which resurrection is referred to as the 1st resurrection? Answer: the one in verse 5 that occurs when the thousand years are finished. The one in verse 4 is neither mentioned as a resurrection nor as being the first.
E) So then, how could the same people who would not be resurrected “until the thousand years were completed” (Rev. 20.5) simultaneously live and reign with Christ for a millennium? (Rev. 20.4). Answer: They cannot be both dead and alive at the same time! The only explanation is that the people who are said to reign with Christ are the same people who took part in “the first resurrection” (Rev. 20.5), but they’re described differently in the earlier verse (v. 4) in order to furnish the reader with further details about this particular time-period. It’s similar to the different descriptions in Revelation chs. 19 & 20 about the beast who is thrown into the lake of fire in Rev. 19 but who nevertheless continues to be active in Rev. 20! There are not two Beasts or Antichrists; only one. The same satanic beast who is captured in Rev. 20.2-3 is the exact same figure who was captured and thrown into the lake of fire in Rev. 19.20, but in the following chapter (ch. 20) he is described in more detail as the text provides further descriptions of his release and whereabouts prior to being cast into the lake of fire (see Rev. 20.7-10).
Conclusion
There is also a judgment (κρίμα) mentioned in Rev. 20.4. But are there really 2 judgments? No. Only one! Thus, the millennium implies 2 additional comings of Christ, 2 appearances by Satan, 2 Great Wars, 2 Great tribulations, 2 resurrections, 2 apocalypses, 2 Armageddons, 2 judgments, 2 Great Ends, and so on and so forth. This binary eschatology is biblically unfounded because there is only one of each!
It demonstrates that this brief passage must be taken symbolically, not literally. So, the passage really indicates that when the thousand years are completed the believers will be raised from the dead and begin to reign with Christ. This is also the chronological time period when the Antichrist is released for a short time. This is probably a reference to the Great Tribulation which only lasts for 3 and a half years, or 42 months, or 1,260 days, or a time, and times, and half a time (cf. Rev. 11.2; 12.6, 14; 13.5). This is also the time when the apocalyptic events will commence!
It took 21 symbolic days for God’s word to arrive on earth (Dan. 10.13–14). There are also 21 Judgments in the Book of Revelation. And since “one day is like a thousand years” (2 Pet. 3.8), the implication seems to be that the apocalyptic events are set to take place in the 21st century. It is a symbol of our century! Thus, the millennium seems to be referring to the end of the 20th century (i.e. 2,000 CE) and the beginning of the 21st!
By the way, the Bible never mentions the alleged “thousand-year reign of Christ on earth.” Only 2 verses mention those who “reigned with Christ a thousand years.” These are not to be taken literally but rather as *signs* that reveal the timing of Christ’s coming and of the apocalyptic events! In other words, when the thousand years are completed, Satan will be loosed for a little while (a reference to the 3 and a half year Great Tribulation). Then, the first resurrection will occur and the believers will henceforth reign with Christ!
What is the ultimate signpost that indicates when these events will commence? These apocalyptic events will begin when the thousand years are completed!
So, the thousand years act as the defining moment, the temporal mark, the chronological signal, the millennial warning that the end is near. It is not a coincidence that the 70 weeks of Daniel, the Mayan Calendar, Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes, the recent Blood moon prophecy, and all the other biblical & extra-biblical doomsday prophecies began to hold sway after the thousand years were completed in 2,000 CE. Moreover, the Bible clearly prophesies the arrival of the Antichrist (Dan. 9.26-27). And I believe that he has already made his appearance on the world stage, namely, on the eve of the 2,000 year mark, that is to say, on December 31, 1999, precisely at the end of the thousand years, as prophesied in Rev. 20.7. For further details, see my article: https://eli-kittim.tumblr.com/post/623534877070016512/nostradamus-and-the-bible-seemingly-predict-the
Chuck Missler reviews the historical roots of the modern day Russians and the peoples to which Ezekiel referred when he prophesied about tha
The reference to the chiliasm, then, serves as a caveat that Satan will be loosed when the thousand years are over. In my view, that’s what the millennium actually means! Thus, I don’t believe in a literal millennial kingdom because it contradicts the Bible. It implies, 2 comings of Christ, 2 apocalypses, 2 Great Wars, and so on. That’s probably why the doctrine of millennialism was condemned at the Second Ecumenical Council in 381 CE. In addition, the endtime war that Satan is said to unleash at the end of the millennium (Rev. 20.8) is the exact same war mentioned in Ezekiel 38: Gog & Magog. Also, 1 Thess. 4.17 says that after the rapture “we will be with the Lord forever,” not just for 1,000 years. And the Book of Daniel is clear that both the Saved and the Damned will be resurrected simultaneously, not successively (12.2).
Therefore, the millennium represents the sign of the times when the thousand years are completed. It signifies the beginning of the apocalypse, that is to say, the period of the Antichrist, who will gather the kings of the earth for Armageddon. It also represents the time of the Great Tribulation, the rapture, and the resurrection of the dead, when the faithful will be glorified and reign with Christ not simply for a thousand years, but forever (cf. Dan. 7.18; 12.2; 1 Thess. 4.17)!
Although there are some similarities between my view and that of Amillennialism, I don’t consider myself an Amillennialist because I don’t share their core views on realized millennialism, perfect/imperfect amillenarism, or that “Christ’s reign during the millennium is spiritual in nature.” We have completely different views on a number of topics! Similarly, my view is in agreement with that of postmillennialism in regard to a literal thousand years, after which Christ will come. However, I disagree both with the quality as well as with the timing of the millennium as explained by postmillennialism. I don’t view the millennium as a literal thousand-year-Kingdom of peace nor as an interim period (or parenthesis) that will transpire in the far distant future. Rather, I see it as a period that already started in the year 1,000 CE (with the crusades) and culminated in the year 2,000. That’s when the Antichrist came to power (in the year 1999 = 666) in Russia (see my articles on that subject), at the end of the thousand years, and Satan was released from prison (Rev 20.7), so to speak, and was allowed to gather the kings of the earth for Armageddon! And since I have a number of disagreements with postmillennialism, I don’t consider myself a postmillennialist either.
What Shape Is Space? by Giles Sparrow. Thames & Hudson, 2018. 9780500293669. 142pp including an index and list for further reading.
-
I read this in a hotel bar full of screaming and moaning football fans while waiting for my daughter, who was attending a Brockhampton concert, and it still managed to hold my interest! There is no greater praise I can offer a nonfiction book.
-
This serves as a great primer/review of the history of human views of space and the way we calculate the size of the universe. It also offers a math-free overview of string theory and the definition of a universe, discusses why scientists think dark matter and dark energy are out there, plus explains black holes and the possible ends of all things.
-
I love that the text is different sizes. (see the image that’s part of this review) I easily skimmed the big text for topics I was interested in, skipped the smaller text when I didn’t give a damn about the details (or already knew them) (or when my eyes hurt), and read the captions when I was curious (needed my reading glasses, aka magnifiers, for this). The book flowed like good graphic novels do (all the images helped) -- I rarely fall into nonfiction this easily, even when I’m interested in the topic.
-
Based on this, I’m going to keep reading Thames & Hudson’s The Big Idea series. Next on my list: Is Capitalism Working? (I can’t tell you about the next concert on my daughter’s list, because it’s a surprise and I know she stalks me on Instagram occasionally.) (Hi BB!)
Favorite line = No one leaves the home unless the home is the mouth of a shark. You only leave home when a home doesn't let you stay there. The economy is a science of a common one who understands this understands life. In the book, noble prizes winning author has discussed serval worldwide issues that the world is facing and then providing their solutions too. Some main problems are 1)Immigration issues Most European think that migration will lower the demand for native workers which is wrong. Instead, migration makes both native as well migrate life better and leads to better industrial production. no supply-demand model is used here And sometimes they became a job Creator too. Eg Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs grandparents were not born American they were migrated. 2) Fear of failure We are afraid to show to the world and ourselves that we are selfish, or bad sometimes Like If I crossed the road because to avoid a beggar I don't have to reveal to myself that I lack generosity 3) Trade issues. The case of free trade will help is without any evidence. It sometimes leads to unemployment and dependency. For eg when countries like China produce almost everything, they can simply throw away other local markets. This problem can only solve if importing countries are tax and money is then distributed to unemployed people. But this is only if. 4) Preference choice We like to connect with people who are similar to us that's why the majority of marriages are done within their caste only. The downside of this is that we are not exposed to others' points of view. This makes things worse. This is called the Echo chamber We prefer doing what others do. Our biases towards religion, gender can be solved only with socialization when everyone comes together Recommendation The book is best for one's interest in world politics or wants to understand the economy. Since the U.S election is coming books become more important for Americans. Qotd = Do you think there will be another Great Depression or everything will be fine after the pandemic? #economicbooks #booksummary #booksuggestions #nonfictionbook #bookblog #bookpic #booklover (at Mumbai, Maharashtra) https://www.instagram.com/p/CDgzxIGj4vD/?igshid=1vvpb1crl1xid
I Will Do Nonfiction Kindle and Minimalist Book Cover Design Professionally
I Will Do Nonfiction Book Cover, Kindle Book Cover, and Minimalist Book Cover Design
Are you looking for a professional, eye-catching, and bestselling book cover design for your nonfiction or Kindle book? You've come to the right place! I specialize in creating modern, minimalist, and high-quality book covers that capture readers' attention and make a strong first impression.
Your book cover is one of the most important marketing tools for your publication.
Fiverr Profile Link : https://www.fiverr.com/holytach
Fiverr Gig Link : https://www.fiverr.com/s/qDLAvw5
A professionally designed cover can increase clicks, improve credibility, and encourage more readers to purchase your book. Whether you're a self-published author, coach, entrepreneur, educator, or publisher, I'll create a custom book cover that reflects your message and genre.
I design book covers for Kindle eBooks, paperback books, hardcover books, journals, workbooks, planners, guides, manuals, business books, self-help books, health and fitness books, finance books, educational books, cookbooks, biographies, and many other nonfiction genres.
What You'll Receive
Custom nonfiction book cover design
Professional Kindle eBook cover
Minimalist and modern book cover
Paperback and hardcover cover layout
High-resolution JPG and PNG files
Print-ready PDF for publishing
Editable AI, PSD, or source files (depending on package)
3D book mockup
Fast delivery
Unlimited revisions (according to your selected package)
Why Choose Me?
Professional book cover designer
Creative and unique concepts
100% original designs
Clean and modern layouts
Attention to typography and visual hierarchy
Fast communication and reliable service
Customer satisfaction is my top priority
Every book cover is carefully designed to match your title, subtitle, audience, and publishing platform. I focus on creating visually appealing covers that communicate your book's value while maintaining a clean and professional appearance.
Whether you prefer a minimalist, corporate, elegant, luxury, bold, or contemporary style, I will create a cover that represents your content and strengthens your brand as an author.
My designs are suitable for Amazon KDP, Kindle Direct Publishing, IngramSpark, Lulu, Barnes & Noble Press, and other self-publishing platforms. I ensure that every cover is prepared with the correct dimensions, bleed, and print specifications for a smooth publishing experience.
Let's work together to create a stunning nonfiction book cover that attracts readers, increases sales, and gives your book the professional appearance it deserves.
Order today and let's design a premium Kindle and nonfiction book cover that makes your book stand out in the marketplace!
non fiction book cover,kindle book cover,book cover design,minimalist book cover,ebook cover,amazon kdp cover,paperback cover,hardcover book cover,self publishing,book designer,professional book cover,modern book cover,custom book cover,kindle cover design,author branding,graphic design,book cover artist,publishing design,kdp book cover,book marketing
