seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Poland
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
ok you guys know how Stu said smth like
“we get to carry on an plan the sequel, cause let’s face it, these days you’ve gotta have a sequel!”
do you think in scream 8 if Stu actually comes back it’ll be the sequel he nd billy were supposed to plan
I’m forever staying hopeful that they won’t fuck up the potential scream 8
I’m rewatching Scream scenes & was reading through the comment section on a YouTube video of Principal Himbrys death & came across a really interesting theory. I don’t believe it’s the intention of the creators but it’s a super fun (to me) head canon.
Billy didn’t show up late to the party because he was killing Himbry, but rather because he was waiting for Tatum in the garage (considering the timeline this does make a lot more sense to me - he showed up so fast after her death & we know Stu didn’t kill her because he was at the party in the living room).
Instead, it was one of the nameless bullies that got expelled earlier for using the Ghostface mask to trigger Sidney. This would make them the only Ghostface to ever get away with it!
I just think it’s a fun head canon. I’ve already expressed my negative feelings about upcoming Scream projects due to the IRL bs I’d rather not get into on this silly theory post but just forget about that for a second & imagine for fun if this random boy was a killer in a future movie. Maybe he never killed again after getting away with it that once, quietly reveling for years in his victory but then one day he got restless & decided to start a new spree - something in the current timeline could trigger him idk. And thus this new killing spree meant Sam & Tara took him down & he didn’t get away with it after all.
Either way the idea of one of those guys killing Himbry & everyone assuming it was Billy is just fun to me.
Anyway this was just a fun idea & theory to me.
Ok so this image the official Scream twitter posted of the shrine has been eating my brain for days now.
WHO THE FUCK IS THIS GHOSTFACE? Just look at all the shit in this shrine! This isn’t just a Stab fanboy, because there’s stuff like the fax machine from Scream 3 and what looks like Richie’s shirt. This isn’t just a Billy/Stu fanboy because Mrs Loomis’s jacket’s in there, what looks like Kenny’s cap is in there, and again Richie’s jacket. But they also have crazy shit like Billy’s blood stained shirt, the robes Stu wore during the party, Tatum’s outfit, a recreation of Steve in the chair complete with the jacket, what looks like SKETCHES Stu or Billy made planning what they wanted to do to Casey, what looks like someone sketching portraits of Sidney Tatum Stu and Billy in the case next to tatum’s outfit, what looks like the CAMERA Gale used to film what went down in the house, there’s a gun next to Mrs Loomis’s jacket that looks just like the one she used, and what I think is most important, the ACTUAL GHOSTFACE COSTUME USED THAT NIGHT. Well, one of them at least, since most likely Billy did also get up at one point to help Stu out, meaning two ghosties were running around at once that night. It’s the only one behind protective glass, and you can see the blood stain on the right shoulder from where Sidney wore it (she was stabbed there and bleeding). If it’s the only one being that well cared for, it has to be the real deal. SO WHO THE FUCK WAS ABLE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON ALL THIS SHIT? Even if most of it is just recreations, HOW DID THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT TO CREATE? Why such obscure shit like Kenny’s hat? You don’t just recreate sketches when you don’t know someone did them in the first place. So who the fuck could get their hands on Stu/Billy’s art??
They made it clear at the end of Scream 2022 that they weren’t going to share the names or motives of the latest killers to try and break the cycle, so this is someone who KNOWS about Richie. There is a very small number of people in the know about what happened, so it’s someone we KNOW (theoretially). BUT, also someone who’s been religiously following ALL the ghostface murders since the beginning. AND it’s someone targeting Gale and Sam spesifically, NOT SIDNEY.
So, first obvious answer. Is this Stu? Honestly, I really don’t think so. Stu was never this obsessive, his end goal from the start was always just to have fun indulging in his dark desires, and because he loved Billy so much all he had to do was ask. Without a Billy, why would he be doing this? Especially to Billy’s daughter. Even if you want to go the route of he lived and is still full of that old hate, why would he be attacking Billy's daughter when presumably his motives would still be avenging Billy? At the end of the day, if Stu were to still be holding a grudge after all these years, his target would still be SIDNEY. Not Randy’s niece and nephew. Sure, Gale wrote the books that lead to the movies, which slammed the hell out of him, but his end goal has always been Sidney. Plus, the Ghostface we see in the trailers is someone who’s been training for this. They’re fast, agile, strong, they’re trying to be the ultimate killing machine. Even if we say that goofy ass Stu has been training all this time, he’s still at bare minimum, 44 years old. Sure, there’s some fit as fuck people in that age range out being commandos, but someone we know as a gangly stick tripping over his own feet? That and why would he collect stuff from the Stabs and murders not related to him? The Stab 3 case is the most prominant thing in that picture, and why would he track down and keep RICHIE's jacket? I love Stu to death, but it really doesn’t make sense that this is him as the killer.
A semi interesting theory, it’s Leslie Macher. She’s been there since day 1, she’d have some knowledge about Richie since her son was killed in the events of all that, and it’d make sense she’d have a grudge moreso focused on Gale since her books would have ruined her family. It’s implied her partner left her and she had to raise her son alone, if she kept the name Macher for any period of time she would have been hounded by people about what her brother did, given the way Stu seems genuinly upset about his parents finding out what he did it sounds like they were good people who’s lives would have been DESTROYED by what happened. If someone has a grudge against Gale, it’s Leslie. But she was Stu’s OLDER sister. All of the above about Stu’s age not matching the hardcore fitness killer we see apply to her moreso. Sure, she’d have the most direct access to things like Stu’s robes, sketches, the camera planted in her house, but how would she get her hands on all of the stuff not related to her brother. They don’t just let people walk into the police station and take evidence they’re not using anymore. It could be someone on behalf of Leslie, like how Mrs Loomis had her pet Mickey to run around and do the hard work while she cleaned up the mess, but that’s something we’ll just have to keep in mind until the movie comes out.
Another theory I’ve seen go around alot, it’s Sam’s new boyfriend Danny. Ok, kinda makes sense. Danny, like DBD Ghostface Danny, and the name of the irl killer than inspired Scream Danny. That has to be deliberate, or at least known by the film makers. But come on, are they really going to have “Ooo is it the boyfriend?!” for the 4th damn time. Plus with this focus on the history of the killings, why would the killer be just some random guy we met like 20 minutes ago? Unless Danny IS the little pawn mentioned in the above bit, but again are they really going to do the killer boyfriend song and dance *again*.
There's a neat theory it's Gale given this shrine is in New York, where she's lived the entire time, and she would have the means to get her hands on all this stuff since she’s the reporter who covered all these cases. But really guys come on, after all these years of getting shot and stabbed by these people, and getting the love of her live killed by one, is she really going to turn around now and go "You know, maybe they had a point". Plus, to go back to why I think it’s not Stu, Gale is even OLDER and has a far more messed up body. She's been shot in the gut at least 3 times now. There’s no way she’s our hardcore commando Ghostface. PLUS plus, the starting phone call of the movie is HER being attacked, so why would she stage that when no one would see it but us the audience?
So to round it all back. The killer is someone who knows and worships the history of those behind the ghostface masks. Given the ancient looking mask on display, they might even HAVE the original ghostface mask (or at least one of them, Billy and Stu used like 4 in that first film). They’re someone who could get their hands on things probably SIDNEY didn’t even know exsisted, like the sketches. This isn't just a Stab fan boy, this isn't just a Billy/Stu fanboy, AND it's someone who knows about what happened in the last movie even though they never made the names and motivations of the killers public.
WHO THE FUCK IS THIS GHOSTFACE???
This post will be fun to go back to in a month after the release of the movie lol.
ALERT! FNAF MOVIE SPOILERS!
Theory idea! What if William Afton is Stu Macher from Scream?
He knows how to change his name
It's many years later
His famous quote "I always come back". Why would he need to say that if he hasn't even died before? Unless he survived what happened in Scream???
The knife thing he did. Why would he care to do that unless it was his thing or him revealing he's done this before or who he truly is??
SCREAM 1&5: KILLER IS BF
SCREAM 2&6: KILLER IS BFS PARENT
AND IN SCREAM 3 THE KILLER IS ROMAN WHOSE WHOLE DEAL WAS THAT HE SET IN MOTION THE MURDER OF MAUREEN PRESCOTT
BASED ON THE CURRENT MOVIES MIRRORING THE FIRST TWO IT ONLY MAKES SENSE FOR SCREAM 7 TO MIRROR SCREAM 3 WHICH MEANS THE KILLER WILL HAVE TO DO WITH THE PAST AND THE CAUSE OF EVERYTHING
THEREFORE IT WOULD FIT PERFECTLY FOR STU TO BE GHOSTFACE IN SCREAM 7
I am not insane and in denial I swear
Third killer?
Ok we all know Kieran is the killer But There are some things that just don’t add up! There has to be a third killer…
It is mostly the timing. For example: When Kieran kidnapped Audrey in the theatre, how could he possibly bring her to that orphanage, tie her up, make pictures of it, dress her up AND be in the fucking hospital by Brooke????? No that timing just doesn’t fit into my head!
Okay I’ve found a picture of the theatre/ghostface shrine from scream 6 and….I think Tara and Sam are gonna be absolutely fine it really isn’t that high up guys don’t worry unless someone gets impaled on the woodsboro flag (which could be a possibility)
I was just thinking about scream 7 and neve campbell being in it and I came up with a theory:
Going along with the theory that the new era being based off the the originals, Sidney would be a good GF. First, this would be the third of the new era, and Roman was the GF in the third of the og trilogy, he wanted to end it with Sidney, and obviously they were siblings, and Roman has so far been the only solo killer, which would also be a good motive for Sid, she would wanna end it to, and she would know that if she were to get a partner GF, they’d try to betray her like all the other gfs before.
Sidney being the killer is obviously not a new theory, but her being a solo GF to end the killings once and for all, to revenge Randy, her mother, Roman, Derek, Hallie, and Dewey by ending it all.
But I also kinda want Gail to be GF… she has every right to become the killer
