One aspect of Revolutionary Girl Utena’s deconstruction of fairy tales set up is how it doesn’t fit with how I interept fairy tales. The tale of Dios and/or the Rose Bride, as I understand it, is tied up in the sentiment of wanting someone else, the Prince, to take care of all the troubles in the world and in one’s life.
But that’s not how fairy tales work, at least not the ones I’ve read. Fairy tales are means of transformation or life blueprints or ways to understand ourselves or ways to express the world around us. They can be both powerful and transgressive (to the dominating ideology), and comforting and familiar.
But I never would have thought of fairy tales as a means to expect someone else to do the work. And even if it does happen, it’s more often magical help or an animal, usually a result of previous kindness or luck. (My personal favourite is a dead ghost.)
But the tale of the Rose Bride doesn’t really work as a fairy tale.
And maybe that’s the point? Maybe it’s an anti-fairy tale because there’s not a problem that has to be fixed or a quest to undertake or an animal spouse to appease. The Prince is being perfectly good until the witch steals him away; more precisely, the world expects Dios to...I’m not sure...preserve and protect young girls and/or everyone, even at the expense of himself, but Anthy stops this and earns the world’s wrath.
But that’s what she should do. Help in fairy tales can be cushioning but it’s usually not detrimental to the helper. Since it is to Dios, it stands to reason that the help he provides is not fairy tale-ish but rather...I’m not sure.
This has always been a bit of the elusiveness of RGU – what it is that is being deconstructed. I know there’s misynogy against Anthy “taking away” Dios, and I know there’s Akio’s conflicting manipulation that relies on adolescents believing the sentiment of fairy tales—that it can be transformative and freeing—while he sees it as a farce while being trapped in his own narrow world.
And is that the point? Akio created a story, the tale of the Rose Bride, to...? But why? Or is the point that he’s...trying to build this very narrow world on a very narrow idea: a woman ruined everlasting goodness*. But a goodness shown to be unsustainable. A goodness that’s meant to shelter everyone forever all the time doesn’t exist or work in fairy tales.
I think that’s why Mythos from Princess Tutu is able to end up as he does — still a prince but not depleted or dead. Because
other characters (like Duck/Ahiru) carry on the sentiment of the prince
other characters are able to be self-sufficient and make stands without the prince protecting or serving as the end-all purpose
Rue selfishly loves Mythos (I use “selfish” in a Tiffany Aching sense)
Mythos chooses, at the end, to focus on what he wants as an affect of Rue’s love; he can be the Prince Rue loves rather the Prince who Saves Everyone from the Raven
And I wonder if some of those things are what happens between Anthy and Utena, and which Akio can’t grasp. He’s still working from his narrow contradiction built on unsustainable claims.
But I think the idea that’s being deconstructed is that people can believe the unsustainable anti-fairy tale and wrath against women and fairy tales are childish delusions. And that seems fundamentally hard to grasp because it’s hard to imagine believing those sentiments.
Also, I think, really, RGU is more of a fairy tale than the tale of the Rose Bride or opening narration ever were.
*this plays out in other, non-fairy tale places, often in mythology/religion (ancient or modern)