did i tell u guys i got into an argument on twitter bc i said foxes are dogs and someone tried to bring up their actual fuckin. classification or whatever and i just said โfoxes are dogs cause they are fluffyeโ and they kept arguing with me. the entire time i was like โyou will not survive the immigration to tumblr you are lucky we are not there right nowโ
This is especially funny because they arenโt even right. Foxes *ARE* dogs.
No they arenโt.
yes they are. because they are fluffye.
OK yes they are.
Different family, but same order as @pictures-of-dogs
No, they are the same family. They are the same kingdom, phylum, order and family. They separate at the genus.
Theyโre a dog.
yeah theyโre fluffye
theyre literally not dogs theyre not even fluffy. can we get science tumblr over hear or what!?
checkmate athiests
fluffye
okay but they literally are dogs, for those who are confused
If foxes are dogs, then so are wolves, coyotes, dingoes, jackals, and several other extant and extinct species.
Behold! A dog.
of course itโs a dog you buffoon. itโs fluffye.
Why on earth would someone think โBUT IF THEYโRE DOGS SO AR -โ
Like yes of course wolves are dogs, where have you been. Jackals are excellent doggies! So are coyotes. Why is this confusing.
I love that this is literally two completely different arguments running simultaneously.
That guy up there who said theyโre not even fluffy was thinking of sharks
sharks are also dogs. ravenous water dogs, but still dogs
Sharks can NOT be dogs they are SMOOTH
Tags via @jenroses
sharks are smooth dogs
BEHOLD, a SHARK
17 clown car pileup 84 injured 193 dead
Aha! But tumblr user @gabyluvsxena did not claim all smooth dogs are sharks, only that sharks are smooth dogs. By that logic, the object in the picture may not be a shark.
Given that it appears smooth rather than fluffye, and that it is four legged, brown, and longer than it is tall, I would suggest a walnut table
