One Nice Bug Per Day
Show & Tell
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
d e v o n
Claire Keane
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
taylor price
Kaledo Art
Andulka
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
occasionally subtle
DEAR READER
#extradirty
pixel skylines
tannertan36
No title available
Product Placement
shark vs the universe
Jules of Nature
h
seen from New Zealand
seen from Oman
seen from France
seen from Germany
seen from T1
seen from Jamaica
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from Georgia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
@the-joju-experience
In case you didnt have enough to do this July, or feel more crafty than art fight might fulfil, I present to you:
Joe This In Your Style Craft Prompts!
Basically, Joe Hills doesn't have any official merch at the moment, but that doesn't mean fans of Joe, Juppet, and Beetlejhist must go without!
By creating our own fanart in alignment with the prompts, we have a shared space to collaborate, coordinate, and generally share our fun together!
tags: #joethisinyourstyle and #jtiys2026
when i play among us in public games i’m usually a pink astronaut in a pirate hat named hamlet and i know that lots of kids and teens playing with me haven’t heard of or read hamlet yet, so i like to imagine that months or years in the future when they do read hamlet they just picture the titular character like
this is how act one scene four goes
i got fucking recognised
Official graveyard post
New York District 12 Polls
NY-12 is an interesting race. It's an open seat because a very senior Democrat is retiring, and there are four candidates running for the seat with over $1,000,000 in donations. If you want a full candidate list, it's in this post.
Out of curiosity, I poked at the polls for this race, and saw a good opportunity to show some stuff off. I've talked before about sponsored vs. unsponsored polls, but with this race, there were a pair of sponsored and unsponsored polls taken at almost the same time two months apart. So I put them side-by-side.
The thing I want to draw attention to is how the differences between the sponsored and non-sponsored polls change. Compared to the unsponsored polls, in the sponsored polls:
Alex Bores does worse in the March Poll (9%) but better in the May Poll (7%)
George Conway does better in both (3%, 8%)
Jack Schlossberg does better in March (7%) and worse in May (6%)
Micah Lasher does worse in both (8%, 5%)
As I noted in the Illinois breakdown, the thing that made me think better of those sponsored polls was that the order was basically consistent between the polls, even if the numbers were different. Here, there's not really a consistent direction, which makes me ask a lot more questions about the methodologies used.
There’s a possible explanations for why the results are so different: the unsponsored May poll only asked half as many people as the unsponsored March poll. Generally, when you take a poll, you are trying to ask a small group of people for their opinions and then use those as a general pattern for a much larger group of people. Logically, having more people in your smaller group makes it easier to capture more opinions. Usually, the magic number for getting enough people to get a reasonable reflection of a larger population without making too much extra work is around 1,200 people. All the polls except the May poll use between 500-600. This isn’t an ideal size, but it’s still workable within the accuracy math. The smaller you get, the steeper the dropoff is, and 300 respondents is much less reliable.
With all that in mind, what’s useful to take away from this?
Sponsored vs. unsponsored polls are cool to look at, especially if the sponsoring candidate didn’t get the data they wanted to use.
For all of the issues with the May unsponsored poll, it’s the only one that on the face of it, got the correct winner. Poll nerds can argue about the margin of error here, and that’ll probably get its own post, but if you want the simplest possible visual answer, weirdly enough, the small poll got it right.
Polaris
Meatball Special
Would love to see more of Heavy being a young asshole in the ‘60s.
My first piece for the @scottsmajorzine !!! Witchcraft holds a very special place in my heart, since its the first smp I watched by myself, and I absolutely fell in love with the coven. I am so proud to have been a part of this project, and to have been a part of the community that has formed around it, so I could share this love with everyone!
Watch out for my 2nd piece (It is much more relevant I prommy)!
Wips under the cut
Introducing Pandora and Noon!
Meet the teachers helping run the schools! What will their stories be?
just so we’re clear if you’ve never actually seen a cybertruck in person and have only seen photos of them i cannot stress enough how much worse they look in real life. like i honestly don’t know how it’s possible. most things look basically the same in pictures and in real life. but as stupid and ugly as cybertrucks look in photos, every person i’ve spoken to who has seen one in real life agrees that they somehow look even worse in person. and i know you’re thinking to yourself “tah they already look so bad in photos, how can they possibly look even worse in person?” I DONT KNOW. the first time i saw one on the road i was on a phone call and i literally cut myself off in the middle of a sentence just to be like “oh my GOD.” just an incredibly, laughably, unbelievably bad vehicle. i’ve never experienced anything like it. they’re just so bad
im so sorry that you're doomed by the narrative but i really need you to answer my message on Microsoft Teams
Cyke backhands Logan
Presented without context. It's hilarious to see Scott shouting 'SHUT UP!' and Looney Tunes backhanding Logan spinning like a top. I guess demerits don't work on this man
Brian McFadden: Is Google Cooked? (via Daily Kos)
Every single “trillionaire”* alive is so uncool that not even the secret island of evil pedophiles wanted to hang out with them.
*stock valuation is a bullshit measure of wealth but we all know who I mean
Big day for the aromantic scientific community I assume was working on this
Oh come on lady, you can't deny a man his gaycation
You must surrender yourself mind, body and soul to the gaycation or be destroyed
Someone on reddit already suggested a sapphibbatical
Someone on reddit
already suggested a
sapphibbatical
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
how could you leave out the best part—the aquarium bit
"become a fish" (gay)
men will jump through an entire circus' worth of hoops rather than admitting they're bi
The level of mental hoops that guy had to jump through to say to his wife, "No, honey! Of course I wouldn't be cheating on you! Sex during gaycations doesn't count!"
Holy fucking shit! It gets trippier!
I mean, I feel horrible for the OP and her SIL...but "surrender to the gaycation" made me laugh way more than I should have.
this is an insane story
“Some men never return”
Helpppppp 😭
Um…here’s the reddit link? I’m speechless.
Don't worry honey, all the other men on gaycation aren't real people and they stop existing after. Hey, where's all the homophoboa coming from suddenly?
That's the beauty of the gaycation!
It get wilder. I only found out about this b/c of a youtube video reading the Gaycation post but, this isn't even the first one.
7 years ago someone posted this-
And 5 years a different user posted this-
What is happening with these people??? What weird ass cult did they find??
I read the shithead guy’s rambling in Nagito Komaeda’s voice
"some men never return because they're "totally feminized" into the state of permanent "pseudo-gayness"" is my favourite line out of the entire post
"Men Aren't Better Than Women: Both Genders Are Inferior To Me" is a 1991 book by Dr. Ivo Robotnik (better known for other work). Though its primary purpose is clearly to stroke the author's own ego, it is generally regarded as a comprehensive, well-constructed, and accessible work of contemporary feminist theory, and is still commonly-cited to this day.
Most of the critical complaints have been about the tone; in a review from 2005, Professor Victoria of Spagonia University said, "The constant self-aggrandizement undercuts the idea that its subject ought to be taken seriously. Also, wasn't the 'feminist' line from the Sonic Heroes manual a mistranslation of 'womanizer'?"
In 2026, Dr. Robotnik released a new edition updated for the preceding 35 years of developments in feminism, with the subtitle changed from "Both Genders" to "All Genders."
female-presenting vitruvian
i appreciate the amount of people reblogging this despite me not really tagging this at all. im glad many of people feel the same anger i do.
