Ivan Kupala celebration in Kyiv region, 1995, photos by Iva Zimova
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
occasionally subtle
Fai_Ryy
hello vonnie
Cosimo Galluzzi

@theartofmadeline
YOU ARE THE REASON
$LAYYYTER
Noah Kahan
Jules of Nature
art blog(derogatory)

Discoholic 🪩
we're not kids anymore.

bliss lane
No title available
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
taylor price
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Italy
seen from India
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Slovenia

seen from Hungary
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@the-shevchenko
Ivan Kupala celebration in Kyiv region, 1995, photos by Iva Zimova
Media literacy hot take and I’m not sure some of you are ready for it:
if a fictional character is russian and lives during Russia’s military aggression against another country, and the work never addresses their thoughts or position on that war in any way, it automatically reinforces an already existing space where russians are not expected to reflect on the criminal actions of their state or their fellow citizens.
At the same time, it reassures russians — through foreign media — that the world also doesn’t see this as their problem.
If you believe that giving a fictional character a stance on their country’s military invasion "isn’t important", or that “there’s no reason to bring it up” because the story is just about their everyday life, then it’s hard to expect anything more responsible from real people.
“This is just a story about the struggles of an ordinary german dude during World War II — without touching on war or nazism, because he’s just a civilian and his personal life is already difficult” — i hope the analogy speaks for itself.
So please, don’t forget: while fictional films are being made about russians, documentaries are being made about the victims of their country.
I have a bisexual guppy and its funny as hell to watch because it seems like he’s only bi out of desperation. Like all of the female guppies are unimpressed by him, and dont accept his mating displays, and every time he fails, he goes over to a SPECIFIC male guppy (the prettiest male guppy in the tank) like PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE and that male guppy always lets him????
i would read that fanfic ngl
About my fish??
HELP?????
YEAH THIS IS SCIENTIFICALLY RECORDED
WOMEN LOVE GAYBOY
FUJOSHI FISH????
when people mistake Jason's "I can do this crime, but you must die" ethos as him wanting to kill all criminals + not an evolution of Post-Crisis Jaybin's belief that what mattered was not legality but harm + victimisation. Oughg. he's not Helena Bertinelli, he doesn't think criminals are all scum who deserve to die b/c unlike Helena, he wasn't victimised by criminals. He was victimised by structural inequalities + the institution (+ institutional ethos) of heroism.
Rocky: we built our spaceship by unifying every mind on the planet to create a super hive mind, pooling out collective knowledge and problem solving skills to come up with a plan.
Grace: we gave the scariest woman I've ever met two coffees every morning, an unlimited budget, and enough legal immunity to cuss out any world leaders she wanted to and boy did she want to.
What the hell is wrong with people who think homophobia is the only bad thing about Russia? Especially in the Heated Rivalry Fandom I hear this excuse all the time. "OMG poor Ilya won't even be able to go back to Russia", "OMG poor Ilya can't even visit his niece in Russia or his mother's grave" blah blah blah. War? What war? There is no such thing. Also "Poor Russians living in Russia", as if their silence didn't help what's happening now. "If you say X you're a Russophobe!" God forbid you criticize Russia. I'm not from Ukraine but my hatred for Russia boils over every time I see people defending Russia and treating them like babies. "Not all Russians agree with the war!" As if they have any proof. Most of them either keep quiet and leave things as they are or agree. Silence contributes. The Russians didn't even take to the streets for their own people who are now in prison and they expect me to think they care? WTF.
I also came across this post (Don't ask me how ☠️):
https://www.tumblr.com/sevrin-descaray/812633505398947840/is-heated-rivalry-homonationalist-propoganda?source=share
Immediately someone appeared in the comments to say that Heated Rivalry is not propaganda. 💀💀
For some people, Ukrainians are the crazy ones for not liking Heated Rivalry and the fact that it's a big pinkwashing for Canada (Canada loves to do pinkwashing and homonationalism in their country) and a whitewashing for Russia (Let's pretend that only homophobia is the problem, not that Russia is and always will be an imperialist country and they like to colonize other territories that they say historically "belonged" to them. Oh, and let's ignore the genocide, only Israel commits genocide, in Ukraine it's not genocide!)
"If I close my eyes maybe it didn't happen, maybe reality doesn't exist" that's exactly what Heated Rivalry reminds me of. Let's not forget that Heated Rivalry came out right when a huge scandal broke out in the NHL, apparently a sexual assault case involving five junior hockey players that everyone has now forgotten about because they're too busy worshipping Heated Rivalry and the NHL. They also forgot about the "Junior Hockey Bible" where hockey players were supposed to do horrible things. Those players of course went back to playing like nothing happened because they came out clean.
Good job Rachel Reid (A straight woman but fans lie that she is queer so as not to be criticized, and who writes MLM and only MLM (She is not interested in WLW) and writes superficially, the romance genre is not an excuse not to write more in-depth things or to ignore the fact that Russia is horrible not just because it is a homophobic country. Her fans will not admit that their "favorite" author helped to make pinkwashing (Canada), whitewashing (Russia), soft propaganda (Russia), racism, stereotypes and fetishes about Russia and Asia etc (Ilya of course is a very tall Blue-eyed Blonde with muscles and has a Russian accent that makes women wet 💀 (at the same time no one is talking about Ilya being misogynistic, his father who is a former officer, Ilya who is a Russian hockey player and he has certainly shaken hands with many high-ranking Russians...), and Shane could be replaced with a woman and you wouldn't know the difference because oh, Ilya is so masculine and sexy and Shane needs this Russian to stuff him like a turkey) and many things they don't like to talk about like toxic masculinity, queerphobia/homophobia which is not always taken seriously and why the NHL really is toxic, apparently the NHL is only bad when it involves Ilya and Shane, and much more). And it's no secret that Ilya is Rachel Reid's favorite, apparently according to her, only Ilya has real trauma and Shane doesn't... even though Shane is Asian and comes from an immigrant family and we all know that racism is a problem in Canada. And Yuna (Shane's mother) has some stereotypical Asian mother traits. "OMG the books and the TV show are just a fantasy, why would they talk about war or other issues!?" This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Especially since this TV show and books take place in our world, not in another universe. It's never been a secret what Russia is doing. But of course, only homophobia is the problem, and that serves no purpose since they don't talk about why all this is happening. Ilya "suffers" and... I guess that's what matters. These types of books and TV shows are clearly for white people who prefer not to use their brains most of the time. And I say that as a white person. This also reminds me of the PJO Fandom who didn't understand why the Greeks were so upset that PJO and Rick Riordan took their gods just to make them USA. (PJO and Harry Potter can compete together for the biggest loser, these books/movies/tv shows are not as fantastic as their fandom claims them to be.)
Good job Jacob Tierney (A misogynistic man who also, despite being gay, has encouraged and sided with straight women who fetishize gay men and only consume MLM (Which of course helps him make money watching this tv show), even though he knows that straight women always take the space of queer people in the community and kicks us out of them and any discussion because the opinion of queer people doesn't matter when you want to fetishize something. And if you draw their attention and tell them that they make you uncomfortable, it's all your fault, not theirs. Let's not forget the straight men who do the same to lesbians that straight women ignore. Also, his fans have the impression that this tv show is better than the book, both are the same but god forbid you say something like that). I wouldn't be surprised if he read Rachel Reid's books superficially, ignoring any red flags and problematic things... and then made this TV show that supposedly is "better" than the books... He did the same thing as Rachel Reid, how is that better? Wow, this fandom... and the fact that they kiss the ass of anyone who claims to be on their side. By the way, if you judge him and Heated Rivalry apparently the fandom will accuse you of homophobia. Besides the fact that this TV Show is not canon because the source material is the true canon, this TV show also made small changes that do not respect the canon even if they are small changes. For example in the book Svetlana is just a hookup for Ilya, in the TV Show they are childhood friends. It's funny how a misogynist wants to erase the misogyny in the book with a sponge, only to then find other ways to be misogynistic because in the TV Show Svetlana is there only because poor Ilya needs a friend AND hockup.
Good job Canadian Government (Which funded/endorsed Heated Rivalry to do even more pinkwashing and which also inevitably did soft propaganda for Russia because most fans and people in westerns fetishize Russia and are not interested in their past and current crimes). This is not even the first time this country has done this.
Canada when bored:
https://www.tumblr.com/chaoticamelay/789974981542084608/july-24-you-know-what-that-means-happy-eighth?source=share
Canada, stop, please. 🤣💀
I also get annoyed by the international queer community who are generally from countries like the USA, Canada, UK etc (who think they know best, better than anyone else) who immediately jump on you if you criticize something queer. I know we are desperate for representation in the media regardless of the country, but the fact that we encourage such things and ignore some issues just because they are queer... annoys me and doesn't help us at all. Queer people deserve good representation no matter what kind of media it is. But god forbid you criticize the queer community that encourages certain things or ignores certain things because there is a lot of toxicity there too and they will immediately jump on you.
I always laugh when I hear: "Poor Russians suffer and seek escape but at the same time they are happy to be Russian and want to share their culture with you. We should cry for them, they are so good." Who cares that Ukraine and other countries suffer because of Russia, it is our fault that we do not understand Russia and Russians who are the real victims. 🙄
Sorry for writing so much, but after being silent for so long I felt the need to release myself because my country borders Ukraine and we are neighbors, drones have also come through my country and every time I hear someone praising Russia from my country, I feel like sending them there to Russia to see if they would still like this country.
No, anon, I get it. It is maddening to see takes like, russia is bad because it's homophobic, because it simultaneously:
asserts that this is the sole, or main, reason why russia is bad; whereas colonialism, imperialism, wars, occupation, genocides is swept under the rug;
implies that other countries with a similar level of homophobia are the same level of bad.
"Not all Russians agree with the war!" As if they have any proof.
I just want to clarify here, because I feel like some moron will misinterpret it and come here asking "Well, do you have proof otherwise?" or "It's statistically impossible for everyone to agree!" completely missing the point. Which is again, two-fold:
Most russians do agree with the war, even if they dislike putin, or dislike the amount of losses of russians/economic hardship/certain acts of russian government. So in either case, it doesn't matter how many of them disagree while the war is still happening;
"Not all russians agree with the war" and what then? Should we... lift the sanctions? Economically cooperate with "good" russians who disagree with the war? So russian state gets even more money and resources for the war? Because that's where this argument ends up.
Immediately someone appeared in the comments to say that Heated Rivalry is not propaganda. 💀💀
I mean, that post really doesn't provide a good case of homonationalist anti-russian propaganda. (small aside: I also find the whole concept of homonationalism kinda... skewy. Sketchy? Applied to russia as opposed to Middle East countries and people of Islamic faith. Now simply showing homophobia in other countries is homonationalism? You do get that it's russia threatening everyone with nuclear war because there's too many damn gays in other countries, and not, like, Canada threatening to nuke russia because they oppress queer people?
I also find it extremely disingenuous when people talk about homonationalism, even within the framing of white American queers supporting Iraq invasion or Western European fearmongering against POC/Muslim immigrants etc, and at the same breath they're saying how they don't care about war in Ukraine, because Ukraine is either homophobic or racist or Nazi or capitalist. Or that it's even good that Ukraine is invaded, actually. Make it make sense!)
Let's not forget that Heated Rivalry came out right when a huge scandal broke out in the NHL, apparently a sexual assault case involving five junior hockey players that everyone has now forgotten about because they're too busy worshipping Heated Rivalry and the NHL.
Link to a case description. And yeah now male hockey got more fans, and sponsors coming back to Hockey Canada Let's Pay Sexual Assault Victims Off Fund. Diversity fucking win. Everything about this show is cursed for real.
re: Rachel Reid being a straight woman, I don't think it matters, even if she were a queer woman, if she made all the same mistakes and stereotypes, even if she wrote about other women instead of men. I don't begrudge straight women writing LGBT romance, especially since it's a danger in the end for queer people who would get outed. It's just... doesn't seem to be a particularly good book, even outside of its politics. I said it before and I will say it again: they should have adapted the Check Please webcomic instead. It has its own problems, sure, but just comparing the two...
I always laugh when I hear: "Poor Russians suffer and seek escape but at the same time they are happy to be Russian and want to share their culture with you. We should cry for them, they are so good." Who cares that Ukraine and other countries suffer because of Russia, it is our fault that we do not understand Russia and Russians who are the real victims. 🙄
oh, the russian-centrism in western countries...
Diagnosed brawler by need to have a varied group dynamic via shoving into premade roles. This is a callout post to Gotham Knights the game and also that one panel that was so bad i cleared the comic name from memory
I don't really understand where people get the whole "Jason begged Bruce to break his moral code to kill the Joker" interpretation from. I imagine maybe it's more from the movie adaptation than the comic? Because I feel like the comic is fairly clear in that Jason is willing to do it himself. It's not just about the Joker dying or Bruce being the one to kill him; it's about Bruce seeing that Jason has to be the one to go to that extent.
When he tosses the gun to Bruce, Jason offers the ultimatum of: I'm going to kill Joker. You can stop me by shooting him yourself or shooting me before I'm able to.
The point of the confrontation isn't that Jason wants to force Bruce to kill the Joker. It's that he wants Bruce to undeniably feel the repercussions of his decisions/moral code. That's why Jason didn't kill the Joker when he had the chance in Lost Days, and why he didn't kill Bruce with the car bomb. It's why he painted the message "JASON TODD WAS HERE" upon his return. Jason is the consequence. Jason having to resort to becoming Red Hood is the consequence. He wants Bruce to see it, to acknowledge and confront the failings of his code directly.
The ultimatum of Under The Red Hood was Jason giving Bruce a final out. To allow him to take responsibility for the role of his previous inaction in this outcome. How you feel about the conclusion is completely subjective, but objectively speaking the ultimatum was never Jason demanding Bruce kill or change who he is on a fundamental level.
There can be a whole thesis about how Jason was just written to be a man with masculine traits, that had a homosexual undertones in its mockery of gender presentation, to a masculine man, with all the traits that you could find in many American blockbusters, with its overplayed masculinity, to a fandom portrayal that is a caricature of masculinity, that is treated as if it is a solid fact.
oh nooo they're sanding off this deconstructive character's edges and over-simplifying his motivations in ways that feed into classist stereotypes
oh nooo they're using him as a mouthpiece for their own warped view of the character that isn't consistent with the characterisation in either his robin or uth origins
oh no they're having the bad victim revoice his self-perception into something that reduces him to a violent thug/delinquent/bad egg in comparison to his siblings AND having him explain how his murder as a child was indeed his fault for being 'reckless' and 'disobedient', how he always wanted to hurt people more than help them and was doomed to a life of crime/would probably have been a rogue or a kingpin anyway if he wasn't adopted by batman (even though there's no canon basis for this assertion and plenty that implies the opposite)
???????????????????
(Me when fanon gives Jason the J scar, an autopsy scar, a thousand other scars,,, but not the fucking batarang scar?!?!???)
No hate to personal headcanons or fic writers that do this, but nothing takes me out of a story faster than a line like: "Jason doesn't cry easily". Because yes he absolutely does, and it's one of my favorite things about him.
Beach day 🌊
The minute anyone says that Jason had a part in his death because he went after the Joker, I have to automatically assume that you either haven't read A Death in the Family or have absorbed the information from a post.
Here are a couple of true statements that you would know if you read ADITF:
Jason didn't know the Joker was in the warehouse.
Jason didn't go into the warehouse to save his mother from the Joker, she told him to come with her so they can talk about what the Joker wants with her.
Jason was told that the Joker wasn't in the warehouse, that he had left a while ago.
Jason was given faulty information and his only sin was believing his mother.
And here are the panels:
Jason sees the Joker going into Sheila's tent and gets worried for her safety.
He says, "this is a job for BATMAN and Robin" not JUST Robin. He wanted Bruce's help.
Bruce tells Jason not to handle the Joker alone and to wait for him.
You could say that this is the page where he disobeyed Bruce, but all he does is want to talk to Sheila about the predicament she's in. Again, he doesn't look for or go after the Joker.
Sheila moves them into the warehouse so they can talk privately.
HE IS EXPLICITLY TOLD MY HIS MOTHER THAT THE JOKER HAD LEFT A LONG TIME AGO. And that turns out to be a lie.
So all of this happens without Bruce's knowledge and what does he think in minutes of coming back?
(Sorry for the blurry picture)
"I warned you not to take the Joker on by yourself." He didn't.
"I begged you to wait Jason, but of course you didn't."
"You never listen. Why. WHY?" He has multiple times.
Bruce has no idea what happened, but automatically assumes that it was Jason's fault. Even when Sheila tells him with her dying breath what happened, he still calls Jason reckless.
She tells him how much of a hero he was in his last moments, and instead of telling people that, Bruce basically tells anyone that he meets that Jason was disobedient. He has essentially erased what happened in the warehouse - the part that he knew - and replaced it with a completely different narrative that makes Jason his scapegoat.
I see there's a really shitty poll going around and I'm not going to reblog it but I am going to repost the comment I made on it:
If you say that someone walking around an area known to be dangerous alone at night was assaulted because they were in that area alone at night despite its reputation, that's victim blaming.
If you say that someone reaching for something in their pocket was shot by the cop because they reached into their pocket that's victim blaming.
If someone was a member of a gang and they were killed in a gang fight and you said it's because they were in a gang in the first place, that's still victim blaming.
If you say the kid got themself killed because they were playing with a weapon and it accidentally discharged that's also still victim blaming.
The validity of a statement does not actually diminish the fact that it's victim blaming. The normalization of this kind of framing does not actually make it not what it is. A duck that everyone labels as a chicken is still a duck.
actually I'm putting these in a reblog bcs I think they're also important:
@girlwonderous's tags which are also a really fantastic addition!!:
#also ppl say these things to cope and to also feel like they are being proactive in protecting themselves#but frankly the other side of the coin is that you are essentially saying that the harm was permitted#you are saying that there is a situation in which this awful thing is allowed to occur#and ppl use that to evade accountability#victim blaming allows harm to keep being perpetuated#which is why we need to stand firm against the reflex to fall back on it bc it’s just not helpful
Ah, new addendum:
So thus far I've been super generic about the discussion but let's get into some specifics.
"It's not wrong to just state the facts about the situation."
Yes and no.
You see the way that you present facts will always paint a story in a specific way. In my above examples I deliberately sanitized the circumstances of as many moral or motive-based factors that I could. This is another common tactic utilized in victim blaming. You misrepresent the event by deliberately leaving out sympathetic or otherwise mitigating knowledge.
Now, to be clear, I don't care if the details are un-sympathetic, or paint the circumstances in a light that many people would see as making them more responsible for bad things happening to them (such as dchuntress's example of walking around naked), putting the onus for crime prevention ultimately on the shoulders of the victim (or potential victim) is part of victim blaming. Inarguably. That's where you get (at least part of) discussions for things like rape culture.
Let's take my first example: "If you say that someone walking around an area known to be dangerous alone at night was assaulted because they were in that area alone at night despite its reputation, that's victim blaming."
Okay so why were they in that dangerous area in the first place? Why is that area dangerous? Why were they alone? Why was it nighttime?
Let's expand the scenario.
The area in question is a poor neighborhood. The victim lives near there, because they can't afford to live anywhere else. The area is dangerous because the economic inequality has resulted in it being a hotbed for gang activity and poaching by cops or other more well off individuals who know that they're more likely to get away with a crime committed on the "undesirables" who live there. They were alone, at night, because their job has them working long shifts or maybe even asked them to stay for overtime and they need that money to live. Their bills are late and their kid is sick and needs a doctor they can't afford and there's no social welfare programs that will help subsidize their care.
But, we didn't say any of that in the original example. When you pull all the nuance out of the situation, there's an inference/implication that the person chose to be there, willingly, seemingly for no reason other than to become the inevitable victim of crime.
And you know what? Maybe none of that expanded scenario is true. Maybe they WERE there for no reason other than to be a victim of crime... Who would wander into a dangerous neighborhood with the intent to become the victim of a crime? Ask yourself what kind of person would do that, and what their motivations are for doing so. And then ask yourself why you think that.
And then ask yourself if that justifies their pain.
If your answer to that last question is yes, then I don't know what to tell you. That's a very cruel way to live, believing that people deserve their pain. I hope you get better. I hope that we all do.
#“He went after the Joker” and “He went after his mom who was being threatened by Joker” are two different sentences#using the former when the latter situation is known to be the truth is a way of intentionally misframing it in a way that makes Jason#personally more at fault for his own murder. And that is victim blaming.#I dunno what to tell you guys like. A duck is a duck is a duck is a duck. via @liedownquisition
The mental back flips people make just to act like they aren't victim blaming while actively doing so... And the fact that 'Jason wasn't victim blamed' has the most votes... This has to be some sort of a joke? What happened to reading comprehension? Common sense? Logical thinking?
But well I guess people can't allow their specialest boys 🥺👉🏻👈🏻 to be blamed for anything so god forbid Bruce or tim wins there... Also it can't be Alfred either because #Alfred Pennyworth is a saint 👼🏻 It also can't be Dick because Dick is a good older brother and he would NEVER!!!! 😠 Other characters? Who's that?🧐 Irrelevant anyway because Jason wasn't victim blamed🙂↔️🙂↔️ All those times when someone said that Jason's recklessness and disobedience killed him? But that isn't victim blaming! We're just blaming the victim's... personality traits!☝🏻 If he only listened to Batman! If he only didn't rush after joker! If he only didn't listen to his mother! If he only didn't run away! If he only realised that Bruce still loved him! If he only told someone about everything! If he only– See? It's his fault that he ended up dead but it's not victim blaming because it's just what he was like!🤓☝🏻Bruce failing Jason as a father which drove Jason away in desperation for parental love? He would never do that because he was a good father!! 🫵🏻😠 Sheila betraying Jason and lying to him to lure him into the warehouse? Did that even happen... 🤨 Joker beating Jason and locking him up in a warehouse rigged to blow up? Well but Jason went there willingly so it's not like he isn't at fault either you see 😁 all those times when tim said he had to do better than Jason so he won't end up like him? Well he was just very passionate about being robin you see and if you think he was implying that Jason's lack of skills was why he died then you're incorrect because tim would never put down a dead child 🙄