★
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle

Kiana Khansmith

Product Placement
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin
macklin celebrini has autism
NASA

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
RMH
noise dept.
taylor price

#extradirty

Origami Around
Cosimo Galluzzi
$LAYYYTER

PR's Tumblrdome
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from Netherlands
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from Colombia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
@the90skidfromyesterday
I’m so excited to announce that the Kickstarter campaign for my very first art book is LIVE!!! 🎉🎉💕💕 🥹
Click the link below to support the project and grab a copy! 🤍
Featuring Gabriela Niko, Hannah Alexander, Jackie Droujko, & Maxine Vee
not my tweet but I thought it would be a good psa for artists here too
Oh this is a common scam I find at work. Any file that:
isn't jpg, jpeg, pdf, or png
Is a file extension you don't recognise (this one is a visual basic file, used for scripting, but others like exe or bat are used)
has a very low or unexpected file size (this one's is less than 1KB, or 0.001MB, a good reference should be at least 500KB)
Is likely a scam. Stay safe kids.
I've said so on bsky about this, but it's worth saying here:
Scammers will use pressure, panic, over-payment, and rigidity* to try and get their scam to work.
A REAL honest to goodness client will work with you, show at least some modicum of patience, and be flexible. So if you are provided a link or file you don't absolutely trust, you can ask for a different file type, or request the reference via a different method.
*What I mean by rigidity is that they'll INSIST they cannot use a different payment method. they'll INSIST they only have that one reference. They'll INSIST to overpay you. They'll be very rigid in what they want you to follow because they need you to do things a certain way for the scam to work.
I wish i was in a band with a fine guitarist and me and him kiss with tongue in the stage
I have some type of addiction.
can we pretty please get a funpoison kiss :) as a treat :)
Okay :} they kiss
It’s rotten work…
aaaa snippet of a small comic that was supposed to be like 7 pages long that I’ll never finish… a glimpse into my sick twisted funpoison mind…………
“Thank you. I’m totally not gonna wear ‘em, but thank you so much. I’ve got a feeling that Frank Iero might like them.”
- Gerard (talking to a fan who threw bunny ears on stage)
GERARD TEXT FRANK! GERARD TEXTED FRANK
STOP no more live-action remakes. We're going the other way now. Animated Casablanca. Animated The Godfather. Animated Oppenheimer. Animated Fight Club.
Animated Goncharov.
Definitely that one.
unless, hear me out...
Muppet Goncharov
Look at these idiots who haven't seen Gonzorov (1993).
Reblogging entirely for Gonzorov.
In light of the no.1 trending topic on this site, I'd like to inform youse that Kitty Kendall, one of the survivors who bravely spoke out against Neil Gaiman and accused him of rape in 2025, has said here and here that if you are looking to support her and other survivors, you can make a donation to OurVOICE (the counselling service Kendall herself used) or your local rape crisis centre. If you can't make a donation, you can help to ensure people do not forget what Kendall and other survivors have gone through and continue to go through as they pursue legal action, and that Gaiman has already spent a lot of money in the attempt to sue these women for speaking out.
hey what the fuck does this mean. what does this mean. what is tomorrow. i’m scared what does this mean.
Hey, if you don't have something nice to say about other people's creations (gifsets, art, fic etc)
then
don't say anything at all.
You're telling me you think you have a right to give unsolicited criticism on fandom content that someone made for free? No. You don't. There is a huge difference between giving someone constructive criticism when they invite it, and rolling into their comments and replies to tell a creator you don't like their work.
The former is a cooperative collaboration. The latter? It's useless. It's not something the creator asked for, it's not what fandom content is about.
The unsolicited negative opinion of some Internet stranger, even if it's given with the aim to be helpful (which it rarely is, to be honest) often does more harm than good.
Fandom content is first and foremost made for the creator. They write the fic they want to read or post the gifsets they want to see.
They post because they want to share that joy within a community, and if they want constructive criticism they will ask for it and invite trusted individuals they know to offer it.
Also not every creative endeavour is practice "for the real thing". Not everyone wants to improve. Sometimes they just want to make a thing and be satisfied with it.
PREACH.
Here also is the thing that few readers want to hear (but the strong and wise ones understand):
We didn't do it for you. We did it for us.
To make a thing simply to have made it is honorable. Creating out of nothing is honorable. It's what Gods do; an example worthy of emulation. (And even if They didn't, it would still be honorable.)
We did it for fun. (Or for joy! The two are so frequently entangled.)
...It's work, too. Creators do it because it's what they must do. Writers write because they can't not write. And making something out of nothing is a fulfillment that those who haven't done that work will never understand.
So don't imagine we're sitting around waiting for your approval! All the best writing is done for the writer's satisfaction first. The rest of y'all? We'll let you read it, happily. But the seed of the joy was ours.
Those of us who do this work for a career: sure, we do it to eat! But we also eat so we can keep writing. And most of us learn early on not to take writing jobs we hate—be it for ever so much money—lest we poison the thing we love doing. It matters too much.
As regards fanfic writing: if you prioritize your intent to give us "negative criticism," with the idea that by teaching us what you like better, you're going to make us better writers...
Fuck straight off. We are not writing for you. We're writing for us.
Get used to it. That will never change.
As for "You have to listen to my criticism even if it hurts your feelings":
No, we don't. ...Not least because this sentiment routinely betrays what the person expressing it really wants from this transaction... almost never realizing that they were doing it, or how transparent the betrayal was.
It's one of two or three things:
(a) You want us to admit that you're better at knowing how to do or understand something that we do—even though it's something that you've never even attempted. (Wow, how do you rationalize that? But never mind.)
Or:
(b) You want us to admit that you're better at something that we do, and you have attempted. Problem is, you're secretly (to the point that you don't dare acknowledge it even to yourself) sure that you've failed.
Or else:
(b1) You've written, but never dared do what we do—submit the work to the public view. You're secretly furious with all who've done what you dare not. And so you're salving the sting of your own cowardice with the hoped-for analgesis of your own imaginary expertise.
In any of these cases:
...Naaah. Fuck off. (Nice try, though.)
(Except: not particularly nice. Do you have the slightest idea how many times sad, flabby, weak-sauce crap like this has been tried on us? Yet somehow we're still creating things... and you're still off on the sidelines, bleating about your criticism not being accepted. [yawn] Poor baby.)
...You have to feel sorry for these people, honestly.
(reaches out to TPP for their glass) ...Refill? :)
What happened to the culture of fan works where we recieved criticism? When I was starting out, the criticism stung but it helped me become a better storyteller and writer. I feel sorry for the people who are so sensitive that anything that challenges their ego is a threat.
You are completely misunderstanding the point that’s being made here.
Not wanting open season for criticism is very fundamentally not about writers viewing critique as a threat to their ego or being oversensitive. It’s about the fannish community in general deciding that posting fanfic is more like bringing a dish to a potluck than enrolling in a cooking class.
If you are taking a cooking class, every time you cook something you will get feedback/constructive criticism from the instructor and probably your fellow students. They’ll tell you what went right, what went wrong, and what you should do next time to make it work better. Because the whole point of doing it is to improve your cooking skills with the help of other people.
If you bring a dish to a potluck, the point of a potluck is to enjoy peoples’ company and eat together. If someone brings a dish that’s not very good, well, that happens. You don’t go up to them and tell them everything they should have done. You eat what you want to, pass by the stuff you don’t, and if you can’t say anything nice you don’t say anything at all. If the cook who brought the terrible dish wants to improve, they will ask for help or advice.
Maybe they’re just there for the fellowship and couldn’t care less whether they make something good or not. Maybe they just need practice. Maybe they got an inspiration that didn’t quite turn out the way they expected, but they didn’t want the food to go to waste so they brought it anyway. Maybe they were pressed for time or something went wrong, and they are usually better. Maybe it’s a new recipe and they’ve already figured out what to do next time. Maybe they don’t have the money to buy better ingredients. Maybe your ideas of what that dish “should” be like are radically different from theirs. Maybe it’s none of your business.
I’m pretty good at taking critique; I’ve taken lessons in a number of different types of endeavor, I know how it works, and if I were taking a cooking class, I’d be fine with people telling me what I can improve and how to do it.
But if I bring a dish to a potluck, and you come up to me and tell me what you think is wrong with it, I’m going to tell you not to eat it if you don’t like it, and also, stop being rude. Not because I’m “too sensitive” or “can’t take criticism” or my ego is wounded, but because you are being deeply inappropriate to the situation.
As to “when did it change” the answer will be different depending on what fannish circles you travel in. I’m pretty sure there are still fandom groups around that function like writers’ groups, it’s just that most of them are private (discord communities and the like) instead of public. I started lurking and reading fanfic in the 90s, and to the best of my recollection most places constructive criticism was only welcome if the author requested it; things were much the same in the LJ days when I started posting fic myself. Some communities never allowed criticism; some allowed it sometimes; some it was a regular thing.
But the ones where concrit was a regular thing tended to be smaller for the simple reason that “getting constructive criticism from people you know will give useful feedback” is very different from “inviting any yahoo on the internet who happens to stumble in to yell at you about what a horrible writer they think you are because you didn’t write the story they wanted” which is what happens when you’re in a more open space and allow criticism. (Even if you say “only constructive criticism,” lots of people think their ideas are constructive criticism when it really, really isn’t.)
From what I know from listening to people who were in fanfic circles before I was, part of the issue is the transition from print zines to online posting. Print zines cost money and take a lot of time to make (especially back in the era of the typewriter and the mimeograph), and so only the best stories got published. If you wanted to share your story, you had to learn to write to a certain standard of quality. And the community was fairly small, everyone knew everyone else. So critique was an important part of helping writers get good enough to get their fic in a zine and thus seen by others.
Online posting is both easier to do (so there’s no need to gatekeep who can post stories and who can’t) and easier to find (so you get a LOT more people reading, most of whom you don’t know and who may or may not have any actual clue about writing in general or the type of story you’re trying to tell). So unless you’re in a closed community, the benefits are lower and the risk of assholes shitting on you while claiming it’s “constructive criticism” is much greater. So fannish culture (by and large) changed, though again, different communities have different norms. (Sometimes very different norms.)
But it’s not about writers being sensitive. It’s about deciding that unless otherwise specified ahead of time, posting fanfic is the equivalent of bringing a dish to a potluck, not taking a cooking class.
…This.
Also: to receive critique fruitfully—and please note that critique is different from criticism—one must first have requested it. To inflict it on others without consent is (at best) thoughtless, and routinely ineffective.
Those who criticize the “sensitive egos” of their unappreciative targets might usefully examine the nature of the payoff they’re getting from the online equivalent of walking up to people they don’t know in the street and gratuitously causing them pain “for their own good.”
If I sound annoyed, it’s because I’ve come across way too much of a variant of this kind of thing while running writers’ workshops—when the (implicit) consent given is eagerly abused by people either unclear or unconcerned about what responsible critique looks like. Around here we refer to this approach as the “Rite Of Spring” model: “I’ll rip you and your work to shreds, and afterwards when you put yourself back together” (it’s never explained exactly how) “you and your work will be better and stronger for it.”
I’ve found myself having to help patch up new writers previously scarred by this approach—which is absolute bullshit. All too often it merely (and unsuccessfully) conceals the pleasure that someone uncertain about the quality of their own work gets from making sure the other person in the equation is at least that uncertain too. …Most distasteful. :/
ETA: friends, I'm sure the Sensitive Egos comment wasn't pointed at me, so please don't sweat it. Other reasons aside, it'd make no sense! Over the decades I've been critiqued (and helpfully) by professionals; criticism at the fanfic end holds no terrors for me. My thoughts about this are with writers who don't have my experience or resilience, and don't know how to deal when faced with the stuff that can come out of nowhere labeled (often laughably) as "constructive criticism". So (as we used to say when dinosaurs walked the earth), verbum sap.
anyone else can't reblog their drafts?