thank you ao3 for protecting writers and never allowing censorship to plague your platform. we love and respect you for this
No title available
No title available

JBB: An Artblog!
todays bird
RMH

shark vs the universe
Cosmic Funnies

★
sheepfilms
Stranger Things
styofa doing anything

Kaledo Art
Game of Thrones Daily

⁂

izzy's playlists!
Sweet Seals For You, Always
dirt enthusiast
Not today Justin

blake kathryn

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
seen from Chile

seen from Singapore

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
@beatrice-otter
thank you ao3 for protecting writers and never allowing censorship to plague your platform. we love and respect you for this
I got this from @elljayvee!
Rules: Share the first lines of ten of your most recent fics and tag ten people. If you have written less than ten, don’t be shy and share anyway.
Learning the Steps. Goblin Emperor, Maia/Csethiro. The original proposal—Csethiro did not know who had made it, whether her father or the Emperor or some nameless secretary—was for the wedding to take place on Nan'desazh, the spring lambing festival. This was the most auspicious date for a wedding in the whole year; unfortunately, it was also a mere three months after the contracts had been signed, and there was simply no way to arrange things in time. Csethiro was not often grateful to her stepmother, but she was in this; the Marquise Ceredaran had flatly refused to contemplate so early a date.
The Obloquy of Newness. Goblin Emperor, Vedero. Vedero could barely see her hands as they worked.
What Abigail and Ione Did That January. Rivers of London, Abigail/Ione. I am standing in Euston Station, and it's even worse of a madhouse than I expected it to be. But I'm so excited I'm not even bothered by the crush of tourists with roller bags who seem determined to run me over as they dash to catch their trains. Ione is coming, and though we've talked on the phone almost every day, it's been months since we said goodbye in Scotland.
A Summer in Devonshire. Pride and Prejudice/Sense and Sensibility, Charlotte/Colonel Brandon. Sir William Lucas had never aspired to visit St. James' Court, nor indeed to become a knight; he had been content with his life as a respectable (and prosperous) tradesman. When such an opportunity had been granted him, all unexpectedly, he had been so overcome with all the honor of it that he had not been able to savor the pleasures thereof. Given his humble antecedents and employment, very few in that place took any notice of him, and those who did cared more to practice their superiority than form any connection. It was an experience more pleasurable in the telling, for he spent many congenial hours describing the grandeur of the court and its people to his acquaintances in Meryton, as he and Lady Lucas took their place as one of four-and-twenty families of good breeding in the neighborhood.
the wings of our frail souls. Peter Wimsey/Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries, Peter Wimsey & Phryne Fisher. It was not, Phryne thought as she steered Josephine through the French countryside, that you could precisely call her job boring. There was a war on, and she was much nearer the front than she told her parents in her infrequent letters home. She was driving an ambulance between the French triage unit and the hospital, avoiding potholes as best she could. The men in the back of her bus moaned or swore at each one she hit. It was important work, one part in the chain that saved as many men as possible from the jaws of death. It was good work, and more meaningful than she'd thought it would be when she'd signed up for the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry, desperate for anything that would get her out of London. It was only that she'd driven this route so often she could do it in her sleep. The only change was the appearance of more potholes and ruts.
Extra Time. Star Trek TNG, Riker/Ro. "I wish I could give you better news, Will," Captain Picard said over the shuttle's comm system.
the bells are going to chime. My Fair Lady, Eliza Doolittle & Hugh Pickering. Mrs. Higgins was showing Eliza how to arrange flowers. Eliza had always made nice bouquets, everyone said so, even the fine gentlemen and ladies she had sold them to, but the sorts (and amounts) of flowers in Mrs. Higgins' house were far beyond what got sold by the side of the road in Covent Garden. She'd told the Professor that she meant to teach phonetics, and she would certainly try, but she'd never taught anything before and it was always good to have a second string to her bow if it didn't work out.
that I could call my very own. Star Trek Enterprise, Trip/T'Pol. "Ensign Sato, are there any remaining communications difficulties?"
A Winter's Visit. Goblin Emperor, Mireän & Idra. Cousin Maia was very good with children, and very affectionate with them. More than that, he held very different views on the proper place of children than most others in the court. Thus it was that, unless the duties of the court required his presence in the early morning (which very seldom happened), he had breakfast with all the children in the Alcethmeret nursery old enough to reliably feed themselves without assistance. When Ino had been seven, it had been wonderful. She had delighted in the attention, felt very grown-up, striven to be worthy of it, and the severest punishment her nursemaid Suler needed was a threat to keep her in the nursery of a morning instead of at the Emperor's breakfast table. Now that Ino was nineteen, it was a very different matter.
Faithfulness and Fortune. Persuasion, Anne/Wentworth & Lady Elliot. The marriage between Sir Walter and Lady Elliott had been, at the time of its consummation, a love match; to be sure, both were from ancient families of wealth and rank, and it was an entirely suitable connection in which both sides equally bestowed honor and fortune upon the other. But that suitability had merely encouraged the match, not created it. They had become acquainted at a series of balls, while visiting in the same neighborhood; both were young, she was a noted beauty and he was remarkably handsome. He was active, and she was accomplished. That, combined with the encouragement of all others concerned, was enough to bring them to the wedding breakfast in the full flush of infatuation of which young people are capable.
Tagging @alexseanchai, @chimaerakitten, @teland, @philomytha, @malkaleh, @whetstonefires, @sixth-light, @tielan, @lannamichaels, @dsudis, and anyone else who wants to do it!
#I maintain we'd live in a better world if more shows let their leads do drag for fun and enrichment
I've seen a lot of bizarre stretches to yoke TOS Kirk to some exclusively binary hyper-masculine gender presentation (it's deeply strange to me given his onscreen hostility to it, but for whatever reason, the fandom seems super anxious about finding some way—whether in reactionary or progressive language—to re-define Kirk in particular in these terms). However, now and then I'll see him described as "ruggedly" masculine and just about bluescreen
Jim Kirk? This Jim Kirk?
Rugged?!
Amazing moments in Dads: my friend’s dad’s critique of Frankenstein was, “I just don’t think the author had read science fiction before.”
How careless of her
CRIMINAL MINDS 2.21 — "Open Season"
Yes yes yes this scene thank you for the tag, heehehehe
It’s funny because this scene must be based on the memoir Special Agent by Candis DeLong. In it she describes being out looking at clothes at a department store on lunch break with another female agent and overhearing a conversation between a man and a woman in which he says he’s an FBI agent. They peer around some clothes racks thinking that they’re going to see one of their fellow agents trying to get a date, and when they don’t recognize the guy they go over and pretend to be interested in the big strong FBI agent themselves and ask to see his badge. The guy actually pulled out a fake badge, whereupon they said “Huh, that doesn’t look anything like ours…”, produced their own badges and arrested him for impersonating an FBI agent. (I remember this bit from a 25 year old book because I actually stole it myself for a fic)
Exquisite. Glorious. 10/10 thank you for sharing.
Interesting how the first article link’s title named him the restaurant owner and referred to Thy Mitchell only as his wife.
The next article credits her as a restaurateur. That all should have been easily verifiable and uncontentious information.
I'm not so sure this is the base cause tho. I think the fact that indie artists are accessible and engageable and corporations are not means that we treat indie artists as reasonable agents to request change, thus we can engage with them on our terms, and treat soulless megacorporations as forces of nature, deity-level intelligences for whom the only option for compelling change is engaging them on their terms.
Thus, we place incredible burdens on indie artists because they're people and should know better, and place no burden at all on soulless megacorporations, because they're not people, so any turn towards people-like behaviour has to be actively and financially supported or they'll never learn.
I don’t know what to call this phenomena but it happens a lot in smaller communities. You see this sort of thing happening amongst small queer groups online, and it’s something you’ve seen in feminist circles in the 80’s and probably is a thing humans have done for forever.
It’s the “I have access to yell at you and since I can’t yell at the mega corp doing huge amounts of harm, I’m gonna just yell at you cause you’re right here” thing. Like when “canceling” became a specific thing, it was black women going after r Kelly (good). And then other women started going after Weinstein and the like (also good). And then, suddenly, it was shown to be possible to go after the bad people if we just talk enough about it, and so because we could, we had a moral responsibility to go after everyone “bad.”
The powerful got smart then. They figured out how to PR their way out of this. They figured out how to change the narrative. Let’s put all of this moral outrage and diversify it to a thousand smaller groups, politicize it, and maybe they won’t notice that we’re still doing big bad things. Trump showed that the powerful could just say “yeah we’re bad, so what.” So canceling big people became intractable again, but we still crave that relief of justice, the dopamine of seeing someone powerful fail.
And don’t get me wrong, we should call out harm in our communities. But damn, it’s fucking scarlet letter in queer/leftist communities sometimes, and people don’t realize the difference between “I didn’t like that” and “this was morally wrong and caused material harm.”
Last thought, COINTELPRO is alive and well today and one major part of this was the government creating infighting amongst dissident groups so they’d tear each other apart before the government had to do their own damn dirty work.
We gotta keep the true enemy in line when we evaluate harm from those in our communities. There’s a wide valley if wrongdoing between benign and literal murder, and maybe we should recalibrate our expectations of people who do harm because they are also struggling to survive and are just doing their best.
Something to keep in mind…. building muscle is so hard people compete to see who can do it best. If you’re a woman worried about “getting bulky”, i promise you that you cannot achieve that physique by accident. Now go lift weights to increase your bone density & protect yourself from osteoporosis and improve your insulin resistence and eat a fiber + protein dense meal with some carbs to refuel and fat for satiety + energy 🫵
trans women this goes double for you especially the part about eating 🫵 you are not immune to your bones becoming tapioca in your old age pick up the weights and the fork sister we’re all gonna build our new bodies if i have anything to say about it
If I get into art again I'm gonna draw all the women muscular for representation, to piss off incels and to treat lesbians. There's so many bonuses and no downside to that (except maybe extra shading)
As a woman into muscle mommies I approve but this isn’t about “representation” or “pissing off incels”, it’s about encouraging real women in real life to lift weights because a not-insignificant amount of women are intimidated by weight lifting, which is frustrating because it would help them out so much, and becoming strong will not give you a muscle mommy body because you have to be incredibly intentional to get the muscle mommy body
As an artist you also should get into some sort of sport or physical activity so your body doesn’t collapse 🫵 put down the pen pick up the sword and fix your posture
anyways (I say this as someone who is deeply critical of the united states government, military, unchecked capitalism, police, etc) I am SICK of people treating america as if it has no cultural value or positives so….. I love u 85 million acres (bigger than italy) of national parks. I love u harlem renaissance. I love u groundhogs day. I love u sweet tea and fried chicken and jambalaya. I love u apple cider donuts and maizes on crisp autumn days. I love u 95k miles of coastlines and new england fisherman and hand knitted sweaters. I love u halloween where millions of people dress up and give candy to strangers and carve jack o’lanterns. I love u small talk and small towns and potlucks and bringing over casseroles to your struggling neighbors. I love u cowboys and ranch hands and arizonian cactus. I love u appalachian trail and dirtbikes and divebars. I love u sparklers and fireflies. I love u mark twain and toni morrison and emily dickinson and henry david thoreau. I love u rock n roll i love u bluegrass and hippies i love u jimi hendrix and nirvana and CCR and janis joplin. I love u victorian houses and jonny appleseed and john henry and mothman and bigfoot. I love u foggy days in the pacific northwest and neon signs and roadside attractions. I love u baseball and 1950s diners and soft serve. I love u native american art and pop art and poptarts. I love u blue jeans and barbecues and jazz musicians
I would genuinely love to hear what a resident of china or russia loves about their home bc I’m not a fucking bigot and I know a government doesn’t define a culture but thanks for ur exposing yourself babe xoxo
[Image ID: Tumblr reply from againstPollution reading: now imagine the reaction to someone posting shit like this about russia or china for a second ;3 americans rly think theyre poor little meow meow ls beecause some people online told them to stfu /End ID]
UPDATE! They found the original photo!
I think it's important to specify that it's not just Seb Stan as Jesus, it's specifically Bucky Barnes, the Winter Soldier as Jesus.
They made the hand metal too hahaha
It all goes back to Bucky
*sniffs* I smell antisemitism. Yep. Antisemitism. Say that you hate diaspora Jews and don't think they should have been allowed to make their offerings to G-d with your whole chest.
@dancinbutterfly I am perfectly willing to admit that I don't know everything that might be antisemetic, but I am not entirely sure how it applies to the original post.
The general gist of the versions of the story that I've heard (from how I've always heard it told at least, mostly back when I was in Sunday School) was that when Jesus went to the temple during Passover there were a bunch of people who had turned it into a marketplace where they were selling livestock, and that they were turning a location meant for worship into some kind of marketplace. Also that the money lenders were taking advantage of people while doing the exchanges, and it was generally really scummy business being done.
The message they always seemed to apply to it was "Jesus doesn't like when people try to turn houses of worship into markets, and he really doesn't like scammers and con artists. Don't sell things in church, and especially don't use it as a place to con people."
I'm not entirely sure where exactly the connection to offerings would come into play.
You need to remember that the New Testament is literally not figuratively Roman propaganda written by people who are trying to survive following a failed uprising after the majority of the indigenous population have been slaughtered and exported to the West as slaves or escaped to the East.
So.
The money changers are at the Temple because Ancient Judaism wasn’t like Judaism today where each synagogue is self contained. It was a temple religion. Ancient Judaism was a temple religion Hinduism and Buddhism is where sacrifices are made. For Temple Judaism with the Holy of Holies, be the time Rome colonized Judea, Jews made grain and animal sacrifices a monotheistic G-d.
Before the Romans sacked the Temple and stole our treasure (you can see a depiction of the theft on the Arc of Titus next to the Coliseum), the BeitHaKadosh, aka THE Temple in Jerusalem was the place in Temple Judaism that people came to to make pilgrimage to G-d. Just G-d. He is only there. Temple Judaism was centralized.
Come to the Temple. Spend the shekels you can afford get the portion of the right kind of goat and grain. Make the sacrifice.
Very organized.
So why are money changers at the Temple?
Well Jews live all over the world. That was true then as it’s true now.
We have for example fragments from hundreds of years before the Christian bible was written of a letter written from a Jew in Egypt to a relative in…I think it was Samaria??… talking about Passover preparation. (@prismatic-bell you know the one I mean )
So you’re a Jew from Egypt with Egyptian money and you need an unblemished goat to make a sacrifice unto the Lord your G-d, how are you going to get it? You found a good goat but the merchant only wants shekels.
The money changers do a service. If they are Jews and they do it at a fair rate? They they did it within the Commanments of G-d and enabled other Jews to serve G-d.
Jesus is an uneducated carpenter reacted like angry teenager who read a blurb about what divinity could be but who doesn’t understand that all of these things - the marketplace the livestock the money changers - can and do exist to serve G-d as it functioned in Temple Judaism.
Jesus’s response is Roman. He just reacted decided to destroy the Jewish way.
I don’t bother to entertain the “was Jesus real” question. The writer decided to write a story that distains and destroys the entire functioning of Temple Judaism.
It’s antisemitism.
I'm going to gently suggest this one wasn't actually intended by anyone as antisemitism. While the text being referenced here is indeed antisemitic, I feel like it's one of those "you don't even know what you don't know" things. Sort of like this article I read last year about how the worst getting-to-know-you question a white person can ever ask a Black man is "so, what do you do?" It comes across as confrontational and potentially judgmental for reasons I don't remember all the details of, but it comes down to how socioeconomic pride functions in Black communities. I read that article and was horrified because I'd always learned "so, what do you do?" as a polite conversation-starter. It never would have occurred to me that someone might find it not just rude, but belittling.
I suspect this is in the same vein. Most people are not hanging out with Temple-era Jews and have no reason to have learned this, and Christianity itself has this weird duality where the "old testament" might be allegorical, but because the "New Testament" takes place in Roman times where record-keeping became so much better, clearly it's actually accurate and this stuff was actually said and done.
....of course there is the fact that a lot of the "history" and social records at this time were hagiographies designed to gas up whichever leader you needed on your side, but I don't think most people know that, either. The only reason I knew it as a teenager is because I read American Gods, where they tell you (correctly) Herodotus was known as both The Father of History and The Father of Lies.
The narrative parts of the New Testament--the bits with story in them, i.e. the Gospels and Acts--were written 40-70 years after Jesus died. IOW, at least a generation later, after a lot of the original followers of Jesus had died. As best we can tell, the reason they weren't written earlier is because people assumed that Jesus would be coming back within their lifetimes, so there would be no need of passing things on to future generations. And then that didn't happen. There were probably some written accounts prior to those--collections of Jesus' teachings being the most likely--but a lot of what's there is an oral tradition. Nothing in the New Testament is attested to in the surviving non-Biblical records. Because the Romans did not care about the early Christians; they just saw them as a really weird sect of Jews. So they didn't write about them!
There are a couple of things that shaped what would come to be the Gospels and Acts that most Christians do not know about and that I think are really important if you want to a) understand Jesus and his first followers and b) start digging the antisemitism out of Christianity, or at least reducing it a little.
1) Jesus and his followers were all Jewish, and the split between Judaism and Christianity was long, uneven, and sometimes painful. Even after Jesus' resurrection, Jesus' followers worshiped in the Temple and their local synagogues. There was friction, but at the start nobody thought the Jesus-followers were starting their own separate religion. But a number of things happened to change this over the course of a couple of decades.
A) Paul/Saul. (He used both names for his entire life, depending on his audience--Saul among Jews and Paul among Gentiles.) Jesus' followers (including Saul/Paul) thought that Jesus was coming back soon. Once Saul became convinced that Jesus was the Messiah, he started seeking out pagans ... but he wanted them to not become Jewish. Why? Because there are several places in Hebrew Scriptures that talk about the Day of the Lord, and how "all nations" will come to Zion. IOW, people of all different ethnic/religious backgrounds will come to see the God of Israel as the best God out there. For Saul, having non-Jews who followed Jesus was proof that Jesus was the Messiah and that the Day of the Lord was here. So he wanted them to worship God, but not convert to Judaism. This caused a huge amount of friction both within the group of Jesus-followers, and also between Jesus-followers and the rest of the Jewish community.
B) As time went on, Jesus' followers went from "he's the messiah" to "he's the Son of God." Claiming he's the messiah was one thing; sure, if he were really the Messiah, why did he die and why aren't we living in a perfect Messianic Age? but still not a huge deal. There were a lot of would-be messiahs running around Judea in that era. But claiming he's the Son of God ... that's blasphemy and breaking the commandment of monotheism.
Together, these two factors (and probably others) eventually led to Jewish synagogues telling their Jesus followers that they couldn't be Jewish and a follower of Jesus; they had to pick. If you wanted to worship Jesus, you could not belong to your local synagogue. For every group, there comes a point where an offshoot or faction is so different from the original group that you can't really call them part of the same group any longer. This was deeply painful to the Jewish Christians who had to choose, and was apparently a fresh and major issue as the Gospels were being written.
Both John and Matthew have passages and story details that don't make sense if you're just looking at Jesus' life, but make a ton of sense if you realize that the people writing the Gospels are putting their own pain and anger at being thrown out of the synagogues back on the Jewish leadership that Jesus faced. Like the story of the man born blind in John 9-10. Jewish religious leaders weren't focused on rooting out people who followed Jesus during Jesus' own lifetime; we know this because a lot of Jewish religious leaders invited Jesus to their houses and considered him a fellow rabbi. But it was happening in the 70s and 80s.
This separation--and the pain and anger it caused--deeply shaped the way the stories in the Gospels and Acts are told. If you do not keep that in mind as you read these stories and think about them, you are going to swallow antisemitism without realizing it.
2) The second major thing that shaped the Gospels and Acts was the destruction of the Temple in 70CE and the mass enslavement and deportation of Jews from Judea that followed.
Both Judaism and early Christianity had the Temple in Jerusalem as their focal point. When the Romans razed it to the ground, both groups had to figure out "what do we do without the Temple and the sacrificial system?" Jews put the synagogues and the rabbis as the center of Jewish life. Christians responded by saying that Jesus' death was the fulfillment of the ancient sacrificial system, so it didn't matter any longer (cf. the Letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament). These are very different answers, which drove the two groups further apart and also started Christianity down the road of Supersessionism. Supersessionism, in a nutshell, is the idea that the Jews were only important to set up Jesus, and that Christianity has replaced them as the fulfillment of God's plan and as God's true people. So Jewish history and literature and religion only matter insofar as they point to Jesus and Christianity. I hope you can see how antisemitic this is?
As for the mass enslavement and deportations ... in the chaos of that, all the Jewish Christians who had maintained a Jewish identity died or disappeared. The only Jesus-followers left were the Gentiles. And they had no reason to like Jews and a lot of benefit to saying "yeah, we're Not Like Them, and we don't blame Rome for crucifying our God, we blame Them!" And that is what was going on when the Gospels and Acts were written. And it shaped how those stories were told.
Now, if Christianity had stayed a tiny weird mystery-cult, none of this would matter. But Christianity made a devil's-deal with the Roman Empire--give up some major theological beliefs (such as pacifism) in exchange for power. The Roman Empire already hated Jews because Jews refused to give up their culture and meld into the dominant Roman culture. And so Christianity took the most antisemitic possible interpretation of stories that were already hostile to Jews and made the worst possible readings the Standard Interpretations. And from that flowed centuries of murder, rape, torture, and theft.
And if you don't pay attention to this, you will blithely continue on in those antisemitic readings of the text.
If you are a Christian who wants to reduce the antisemitism in your Bible interpretations, go read Amy-Jill Levine's books. She's a Jewish New Testament scholar. The Misunderstood Jew: The Church and the Scandal of the Jewish Jesus is a good place to start. The Jewish Annotated New Testament is another good place to start.
This firozi color Lehenga and choli are made of Silk fabric with sequein thread embroidery. It comes with an American crept inner accompanied by faux net dupatta with embroidery and lace Border.
It can be stitched in all sizes small medium large and extra large. Minimum 28 inches to maximum 46 inches chest size.It takes 12 business days to deliver the item. To get it in bigger sizes such as xxxl, xxxxl and xxxxl up to size 52 or for any further information please call or whatsapp us on +918460963676
I didn’t realise this had to be said until I came across a reel of someone in hospital but dear GOD if you’re in London during this heatwave do not swim in the fucking Thames PLEASE do not even touch the Thames I can name like five different ways you will be violently killed just off the top of my head STAY AWAY FROM THE THAMES and for that matter stay away from lakes/rivers in general and stick to safe, supervised areas of water such as swimming pools because the heat isn’t worth the risk of drowning, strong currents, harmful microbes, cardiac arrest with no help in sight etc. etc. PLEASE stay safe in this weather, especially if you’re not used to it!!
Gently tacking on that this should go for anywhere on the Thames, not just people in the London part of it.
I didn't get a PSA every bloody year in secondary school about the dangers of swimming in the Thames to not acknowledge the fact that this river's a cruel mistress regardless of where you are along it.
Good point, my bad. At no point is the Thames safe to swim in no matter where you are, please do NOT touch it!! It is a cruel and malevolent mistress who will kill you!!
In these last ten minutes of Pride month in my year+ of Star Trek: the Original Series stanning, it seemed only right to shout out a true icon of our people: William Ware Theiss, the lead costume designer for TOS, both a creative visionary who enormously influenced the imaginative, bright, zany aesthetic of the show and, let's say, a great ally to his wlw sisters. He died of AIDS in 1992, but the work of him and his team remains deservingly iconic.
The above is just a small selection of some of my favorite costumes from TOS!
hey yall,wanted to update that tumblr alerted me that the mature tag was removed from my gifset which was unexpected because i don’t think they even read my appeals for the ones all over my art.
ironically? the first time they removed a mature tag (on an ask i received) was after i mentioned it in a different post i made that got 11k notes meaning someone from staff definitely saw it and presumably removed it the tag.
this leads me to believe that they 10000% know this is a bigger problem than they let on because the only two times they have removed mature tags on my posts about black women and girls, was when i, or someone else, mentioned it with receipts on a post that got thousands of notes.
idk what’s worse? knowing this system targets certain people and still using it bc it’s cheaper or whatever than any real moderation.. or only stepping in and changing it when enough people complain. not sure how i feel about either.