when i meet bob dylan me: hey him: hello him: ( hands me glowing ancient gem stone )
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

No title available

#extradirty
tumblr dot com
will byers stan first human second

JVL
wallacepolsom

No title available
dirt enthusiast
đȘŒ

blake kathryn

PR's Tumblrdome
noise dept.
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

romaâ

Janaina Medeiros
taylor price

Product Placement
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
seen from Israel

seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from North Macedonia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Italy

seen from Israel

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from North Macedonia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Israel
@theelastword
when i meet bob dylan me: hey him: hello him: ( hands me glowing ancient gem stone )
Me: *Removes my cat from my lap to do something else.*
My cat: Father is...evil? Father is unyielding? Father is incapable of love? I am running away. I am packing my little rucksack and going out to explore the world as a lone vagabond. I can no longer thrive in this household.
The spiritual successor to Miette
Might I also add
May i add the piece from artist Verbal Vomit
Glad to see weâre all in agreement that cats talk like disparaged victorian children
I am so incredibly glad we finally moved on from "i can has". Cats are clearly smart enough for advanced sentence structure and dumb enough to draw entirely incorrect conclusions about what they're talking about.
My cat, banging the cabnet door over and over and over: bang bang bang
Me: you will not earn what you desire by banging the cabinet door.
My cat: This is a test of wills, is it not? We shall see if your ability to put up with my incessant banging outlasts my eternal lust for snackie treats. Years of conditioning have hardened me for this purpose. bang bang bang
Me: ksst!
My cat, throwing herself to the ground like she's been shot: Oh! Oh I have been assailed in my own home! Have mercy, have pity! Surely in the cruel darkness of your heart there is some mote of goodness that might stay your hand! Do not strike me, I pray you!
Me: ok
My cat, after waiting about 3 minutes: bang bang bang
Can haz snackytreat
(source)
Source
#the ancient texts
... My reblog was only six years ago!
the count talking to the gang in bram stokerâs dracula
for all of us who are disappointed and heartbroken by the ending of Good Omens 3, may i suggest the epilogue of the musical Les Miserables (based on the novel by Victor Hugo)?
i think this verse perfectly encapsulates what many of us wish GO3 had been. itâs an acknowledgement that things DONâT end perfectly in the musicalâ the opposite, in factâ but rather than deliver a hopeless message that the world is broken and needs to be replaced because of those tragedies, the writers of Les Mis leave us with this: the world is broken, and thatâs why we need YOU to help us fix it. the finale breaks the fourth wall and begs viewers to take a stand and try to change the world together even if progress an infuriating battle. we believe in the world and in humanity; there IS a âworld we long to see.â and weâre going to fight for it, because the world isnât by any means perfect, but it is ours. in my opinion, season 1 of Good Omens echoed this moving and brilliant concept: âYou're going to burn all this away. Why? Because some adults mucked things up. That's a reason to fix it, not destroy it.â THATâS the message I wish Good Omens had left us withâ and the message that Les Mis does. itâs not an admission of defeat, itâs a promise of activism. so if youâre looking for something to fill the Good Omens-shaped void that is devastating but hopeful in its devastation that religion doesnât come from organized faith, but love for one another (âto love another person is to see the face of godâ is another brilliant lyric), i highly recommend the brilliant and incomparable Les Miserables.
explodes you. spinning you around. I love your good omens fics :)
explodes YOU. spins you around. i love that you read my good omens ficsđđđđ€ (seriously these asks make my day i appreciate you so much)
I just found out that you wrote "I don't want to change that" and I AM HAPPY TO FIND YOU! That story is my favorite as an Aziraphale Defender and it made me happy to see him written by you as someone who finally stood up for himself.
I know the finale might not be the best and I agree with that, is there any plans for you to do a fix it fic of that and give Aziraphale the recognition he deserves? I would love your interpretation of the finale and a fix it
THIS IS SO SWEET AND MOVING THANK YOU SO MUCH THIS ABSOLUTELY MADE MY DAY!!!! it makes ME so happy that you read my fix it fic that accidentally turned into a feminist manifesto i wasnât sure anyone would readđđ
and yesâ i definitely want to write a fix it for the end of s3 that gives more credit to aziraphale than the writers did. iâm going to try to write it in June over the summer!
i want to thank you over and over again for the fanfiction youâve written đ i just had to come tell you now because i JUST tried to read something and the whole time it was crowley being incredibly cold and short to aziraphale telling him how stupid and selfish it was of him to go to heaven. and, well, it just feels like thatâs every fanfiction i read of them now. so thank you for writing them BOTH so incredibly well.
this is SO sweet oh my god this made my day thank you so much. itâs so comforting to know that other people interpret this show that means the world to me in the same ways that i do.
In a period where people already feel trapped by institutions, authoritarianism, inequality, ecological dread, etc., it's no wonder the "your only hope is obliteration" ending is landing so badly. A story that once said: "the world is flawed but worth saving" suddenly pivoting to: "burn it down and maybe something better comes after" doesn't hit me as beautiful and profound. It hits me as bleak and nihilistic.
THIS!!! âthe system is broken therefore must be destroyedâ sounds good in theory, but not when it brings countless of innocent lives along with it. âthe system is broken therefore must be FIXEDâ is so much more aligned with the showâs original messaging (ie when The Them told Adam that the world being mucked up bc of adults is a reason to fix it not destroy it).
thatâs why it always rubbed me the wrong way when fans attacked aziraphale for his choice at the end of s2. abandoning the system entirely and running away with crowley sounded nice on paper, but leaving angels and humans alike to suffer under the bureaucracy of Heaven just because aziraphale wasnât directly affected by Heavenly abuse anymore would have been selfish, and not the person heâs always been. actually, i wish the finale had shown us more of what aziraphale had wanted to accomplish in Heavenâ he clearly had plans to reform it before Metatron even told him about the Second Coming! i totally understand they only had 90 minutes, but it feels like their choices in what to cut out of that lost time were all the things that MADE Good Omens the show that it is.
there was no hope and love but obliteration and sacrifice, no queer joy but queer trauma (aside from asa and anthony who were very sweet but it doesnât exactly feel the same). bring back saving the world with the power of friendship, bad computer skills, and 11-year-olds calling the Four Horsemen a bitch. THATâs the campy love letter to humanity that i and so many others fell in love with.
wasnât gonna drink tonight but then i remembered that aziraphale died thinking that the person he chased the approval of his entire life thought he was lazy and gluttonous, and that nobodyâ not even his best friend / partnerâ would stand up for him. plus despite the fact that he disobeyed direct orders to help humans and demons alike countless times, his legacy is just another mindless drone of heaven rather than someone just as âbraveâ as his counterpart. sedate međ„đ„đ„
Take me back to when the saddest part of good omens was the bandstand scene and the most contentious debate was how aziraphale managed to get into the bathtub without getting crowleys socks wet.
tragedy protagonist categories:
yknow what yeah I think that's just about how anyone would react in this situation. fair enough.
alright this isn't how just Anyone would behave in this situation but I'm humble enough to admit that there have been times in my life when I was doing badly enough that I'd probably also fumble it like this
babygirl what the hell are you even doing
thank you hamlet prince of denmark for being the character ever for the 437th year in a row
[X] <- psst click this
put gay people on a bench!
Iâm honestly really bothered by the way that Aziraphale was treated by the writers and, notably, by CROWLEY, throughout the finale. why on EARTH did every single interaction between crowley and aziraphale regarding s2 Final Fifteen consist of crowley accusing aziraphale of abandoning him, aziraphale explaining that he had to try to do the right thing / they couldnât have been happy if they left all of earthâs inhabitants to suffer, and then crowley just making faces at him and never ONCE responding to those valid claims??? i kept expecting crowley to eventually arrive at the conclusion that yes, aziraphaleâs motivations WERE noble, and clearly his attempts to do good actually WERE on track to achieving something (ie the Second Coming wasnât going to be a war at all before michael ruined everything). but crowley never breached that topic.
it was all about crowleyâs forgiveness of aziraphale, but never crowleyâs admission that aziraphale made valid choices, too. throughout the show, aziraphale may have been flawed for acting like angels were superior to demons in efforts to keep him and crowley safe, but crowley is also flawed for always belittling aziraphale and calling him stupid/idiotic/etc any time he made a choice independent of their relationship out of some kind of protective instinct. iâm just so tired of the narrative that aziraphaleâs flaws are flaws, and crowleyâs flaws are quirks.
like what do you mean aziraphale is a âtakerâ????? he went back to Heaven to save all of humanity, yet he was characterized as selfish for it and no one ever stood up for him or acknowledged his attempts to stand up for himself. and in the end it was crowley who god gave the choice of what to do about the universe to, and whose idea it was to start a new universe for the sake of humansâ freedom. aziraphale sacrificed himself and his happiness FIRST with the s2 finale, but that choice was dubbed selfish whereas crowley was given the big moment to be self-sacrificing in s3 yet his choice is heroic. never mind the fact that aziraphale fought for the humans even harder than crowley did when he refused to run away in both seasons 1 and 2. no no noâ aziraphale is lazy. crowley is a hero.
besides, to imply that aziraphale only âtookâ and demanded things from crowley is to entirely misunderstand their dynamic. crowley takes on a doting role in that relationship because he has been told that he has to be the symbol of evilâ not even just a demon, but THE snake itselfâ and as much as he tried to convince himself otherwise throughout history, thatâs NOT who he really is. caring for aziraphale gave him the chance to be vulnerable and loving; aziraphale loved him BECAUSE he was different from other demons, not in spite of it. weâre expected to believe that while crowley is a good person BECAUSE heâs not like other demons, aziraphale is a good person DEPSITE the fact that he enjoys food and is âlazyâ or âpridefulâ or âgluttonous.â
furthermore, while i understand that throughout history aziraphale could have reciprocated crowleyâs care more openly, letâs not forget that over and over again, crowley implies things like âthey never check upâ and âthey love me down there.â while the risk of punishment and death is equally huge for both of them, the risk was always more likely to be a problem for aziraphale, who had heaven breathing down his neck 24/7 if he so much as used one frivolous miracle to save his own life. aziraphale kept them both alive for 6000 years by keeping crowley at a distance, yet he STILL showed up and gave him holy waterâ something that easily could have gotten him killedâ and showed up for crowley however he could. their situations were different, and in season 1, crowley understood that difference. they had to go at aziraphaleâs pace. but all of that went out the window when aziraphale was characterized as a selfish âtakerâ who abandoned his city and his soulmate rather than someone who tried to fucking save them.
donât even get me STARTED on the scene between the two of them and God; the entire show has clearly indicated that, in different ways, aziraphale and crowley each have equal degrees of trauma surrounding God and her lack of communication with them. thatâs what made their moments throughout the Job minisode so movingâ they understood what the other was going through because they were experiencing the same thing. so why on Earth was the moment of Godâs arrival given to Crowley and crowley alone?? aziraphale literally stepped aside to encourage crowley to ask his brilliant question, yet crowley didnât offer aziraphale the same stage, and when god took it upon herself to address aziraphale, his question was exclusively romantic and had nothing to do with his own trauma surrounding heaven and humanity. aziraphale was reduced to crowleyâs love interest, from the interaction with god to the fact that (nearly) every step along the way, it was crowley who figured out the next phase of the mystery first.
aziraphale has ALWAYS had ambitions outside of crowleyâ they both adore humanity, but it was crowley who always suggested that they say fuck it and run away whereas aziraphale stood by earth time and time again. so it makes NO sense that aziraphale wouldnât ask god a question about anything besides his love story. thatâs never been who he is. his love for crowley is an important part of his identity, but itâs not the only part. you wouldnât get that if you watched that scene out of context.
and unlike the crowley we know and love from seasons 1 and 2, finale-crowley NEVER intervened to say something like, âno, angel. you are not good DESPITE the fact that you eat and dance and act hedonistically. you are good BECAUSE of those things.â aziraphaleâs goodwill has always rippled out of small kindnessesâ he stops crowley from abandoning a stranger in the street whom he just ran over with a car. his love of music caused him to forgive a tenantâs rent for free. his love of food gave him a connection with the owner of a local coffee shop and sushi restaurant. fucking BULLSHIT that heâs lazy or hedonistic âbutâ still a good angel. heâs a good angel BECAUSE of the things God criticized him for, not in spite of them. and even if she said those things with respect /teasingness, Mr. âI did not care for itâ was SILENT during all the moments that implied that aziraphaleâs interests and joys were flaws.
aziraphale is selfish for loving food and comfort, but crowleyâs obsession with his car or plants just makes him funny and iconic. i kept waiting for crowley to intervene and say something beautiful about aziraphale the way that azi did for him in that scene, but nope.
and while i understand the argument iâve seen some fans make that itâs religiously liberating for aziraphale to acknowledge that he is technically a sinner by biblical standards but is still good, my issue stems from the word âstill.â he argued to god that she was right about him âBUTâ he still always tried to do good. no oneâ not aziraphale OR crowleyâ pointed out that those things arenât sins in the first placeâ they make him who he is. crowley is redeemed, in godâs eyes, for his creativity and curiosity, but his temper/selfishness was never addressed. alternatively, aziraphaleâs so-deemed âflawsâ were criticized, but his love for crowley is what made god appreciate him. and as sweet as that idea is, itâs also a version of synecdoche; it reduces aziraphale to his love story and nothing else.
and SPEAKING of aziraphaleâs speech to crowley, while it WAS so sweet, i call bullshit on the idea that crowley was the âonlyâ one willing to question, or that he âtaughtâ aziraphale bravery. aziraphale has been THE bravest character on that show since Day One; the very first thing we learned about him was that he gave away his god-given sword because adam and eve were alone and scared, and aziraphale made that choice entirely without crowleyâs influence. we also watched him look out for his fellow angel and warn him not to get into trouble BEFORE the Fall even happenedâ proving that deep down, aziraphale suspected heaven for what it really was before crowley even did. and then in the finale, we watched an angel who JUST saw what happens to deserters take off his own wrappings to help an injured demon whoâd threatened him with his own blade.
aziraphale has NEVER needed crowley to teach him bravery; crowley taught him that the bravery he already possessed was nothing to be ashamed of. but to rob aziraphale of the same qualities that crowley possesses, to give him no ambitions outside of romance (ie âi only want one thingâ), is to demote his character to crowleyâs love interest, and not once in this finale did crowley speak up about it.
i think a lot of times when we have a queer relationshipâ even one like this in which neither being is genderedâ fans subconsciously try to find a Man and Woman in the dynamic based on systemic heteronormativity and misogyny. so when we condemn aziraphale for his flaws but treat crowleyâs as silly aspects of his personality, when we refuse to acknowledge that aziraphale might have ambitions outside of his love story (ie the Nate and Andy From Devil Wears Prada Effect), or when we claim that wanting SOME creature comforts for himself makes him lazy and prideful, we end up treating aziraphale exactly the way that female love interests are treated. and while i personally think thatâs been a huge issue in the fanbase for years, this finale is the first time in which crowley acted that way, too. crowley actively mistreated aziraphale throughout this entire finale.
even down to the human versions of themselves: anthony is a published author, a teller of his own story (albeit not a particularly successful one), whereas that scene implied that asa didnât even own that bookshop, he was a subordinate employee in it, connoting an inherent difference in power. and while i understand that âcrowleyâ might be an easier name to adapt than âaziraphale,â something in me twinges sadly at the fact that he doesnât even keep his own name in their supposed, reincarnated happy ending. and our very last scene of them involved crowley looking at the stars-aka HIS passionâ and aziraphale bringing him a drink like some kind of housewife. whatever happened to all the fanon representations of the south downs cottage that was overrun with plants AND books? aziraphaleâs personality was bled from his happy ending, and only crowleyâs remained.
iâll always be sorry for that clever, kind, compassionate angel who forgives all at the expense of himself, who willingly sacrificed his own happiness after fighting for it for 6,000 years so he could undo the system of abuse that HE was a victim of only to be obliviated out of existence before he got the chance to have that happiness back. he was never acknowledged as the protagonist, the frodo baggins, the hero of this story. and he fucking deserved better.
I think that part of what bothers me so much about the finale is that creating a universe in which heaven and hell donât exist doesnât deny their validity, it confirms it.
what i found so moving and beautifully rich with religious commentary/satire in season one was that whether heaven and hell exists or not didnât actually MATTER, because the point was that Adam and the others refused to give them any power. the question was never do these institutions exist, it was âshould we let them hold any power over us?â and the answer to that question was a resounding âNo.â
just think about the airbase in season oneâ the younger you get, the bigger the role you have in stopping armageddon. the two millennia-old biblical figures donât ACTUALLY do all that much besides give Adam a pep talk â> the middle-aged humans physically get aziraphale to the base and stop them from k!lling a child â> the millennial humans stop nuclear warfare â> and the group of 11-year-old children are the ones who actually defeat the Four Horsemen and save the world in such a way that seems silly and childish because it IS. itâs their existence as human kids with imaginations and strong ties to earth + each other that saves the day. the question of various humans going âholy shit angels and demons are REAL???â is never actually that big of a deal in either season because the whole point of good omens is that while heaven and hell exist in all their tyranny, to actively choose earth/humanity OVER that system is to choose oneâs own freedomâ be you human or retired-angel / retired-demon.
but getting rid of Heaven and Hell removes the possibility of that CHOICE in the first place. you canât choose earth over heaven and hell if thereâs no choice to make. in my opinion, it would have been far more in line with the showâs original messaging had aziraphale and crowley asked god to return the earth to its rightful existence (w/o killing everything in creation???), but that heaven and hell no longer dictated where humansâ immortal souls went. thereâs no judging humanity based on the sums of their worst or best selves; instead, thereâs just a bunch of immortals wandering the heavens and maybe they could have even shown these wayward, bitter angels and demons finding their way to the earth, forced to experience itâ and maybe, eventually, even fall in love with it the way aziraphale and crowley did. no more miracles, no more magic, because all the magic they need comes from the earth.
killing everyone in the universe to make a new one in which itâs impossible to choose earth because earth is already the only option only confirms the fact that heaven and hell wield power over us, and to me itâs always seemed like good omens is not a rejection of the fact that heaven/hell literally do or do not have that power, but rather a refusal to allow that power to define you.
People keep trying to get in between Louis and Lestat like this unfortunate apple between two magnets
ok just to recap they lost the antichrist in S1 they lost the archangel gabriel in S2 and now they lost jesus??? omg these guys can't do anything