sheepfilms
I'd rather be in outer space đž
â
No title available
RMH
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Discoholic đȘ©
dirt enthusiast
AnasAbdin
shark vs the universe
⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
No title available
DEAR READER
Andulka
will byers stan first human second
styofa doing anything
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
d e v o n
No title available
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan
seen from Croatia
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@thequeenscoffin
seeing an endogenic call themselves a system gives me the same feeling as when a straight girl calls herself a twink -kaz
It's something that has no affect on you but you're mad about it anyways?
or u could just shut up?? wait till bro figures out that endos aren't real systems
you saying something doesnt make it true xoxoxo
I'm 14 and this is deep...
I need the Olivia Haas fandom to get bigger NOW. She's so cutieful I <3 Olivia
how the movie Frozen shouldve gone
what the fuck are people on here EVER talking about
if my slutty asexual cousin Maryland can suck cock and hate it so can you
very confused about what oop is eveb saying?
"I'm no better than a man!" Men being horny for women is also morally neutral. Hope this helps.
Men being horny for women isn't inherently about power though. Like this is so odd. OP is completely correct and y'all should really acknowledge that yes, straight men being horny for women IS in fact morally neutral
Mens attraction being inherently predatory and destructive and needing to be restrained is, in fact, part of evangelical ideology, and i think a number of people have unrecognised evangelical beliefs, left over from their youth or gained from societal permeation of whatever. And maybe they should recognise and critically examine those beliefs. And think a bit about where they got them from, instead of thinking up feminist justifications for them.
"Mens attraction being inherently predatory" is an excuse to pretend men are mindless beasts who aren't in control of their own actions, which by extension also means they cannot be blamed for said actions.
It's "Boys will be boys" taken to the extreme.
It's the attitude that leads to bullshit like blaming rape victims for the way they were dressed.
It's not feminism, it's the exact opposite, it's a fucking scapegoat for the people these "radical feminists" claim to hate.
Asscastle from Lamezone is intersex, and she's canonically a trans woman!
thinkin about COC!!!!
happy pride! this dragon is gay <3
What are endos?
Ah, hello!
I'll try to put it simply, and to explain my reasoning behind not wanting them around :] This isn't a syscource blog, so I'm not gonna try to like debunk things, I just wanna explain why they aren't allowed here specifically.
Endos, or Endogenic Systems, are systems that believe they are plural for any reason that isn't created from trauma.
More specifically, they claim to have disorders that require trauma to form (DID, OSDD, PTSD, UDD, etc) without having trauma.
Usually, people who identify as endos are:
‿ Systems who do not remember their trauma (which is completely valid, but by claiming they are endo they are spreading misinformation and further harming themselves)
‿ Singlets (people without said disorders at all) misdiagnosing themselves (which is yet again very valid, but usually they refuse to believe that it could possibly be a different thing that they haven't looked into yet)
‿ Singlets who do not have any disorder at all who simply want to be a system because they think it is fun or interesting (see: ableist, god forbid).
Generally (although obviously not all, but a good portion) tend to put down traumagenic (systems created by trauma) experiences and their opinions when they don't match up with theirs, harass and fake claim traumagenic systems, spread misinformation, and generally create a very toxic space (there are many horror stories of trauma-genic systems in endo-inclusive spaces believing they are endo after being told that their trauma was fake, or that they shouldn't look into actual medical professionals). Obviously, this isn't to say every traumagenic space is completely free of any assholes and that we're all angels- there's many examples of traumagenic systems harassing endos, too. Generally though, it's closer to like a 10-1 ratio from what I've seen. We may be biased because we don't partake in any endo spaces anymore, but even when we previously did it was a horrible stressful experience.
I don't care if you do support endos or not, it isn't any of my business (although personally as a traumagenic system who has been repeatedly put down by endos, we do not support them and do not want them anywhere near us).
I hope this helps, and you have a great day! If you need anything else clarified I would be happy to explain further, although we aren't open to debating with endos over our or their existences.
-đŠ©Matthew & đRDR
wrong on all counts & embarassing.
More specifically, they claim to have disorders that require trauma to form (DID, OSDD, PTSD, UDD, etc) without having trauma.
This is an impossible conclusion to come to unless you only ever learned about what an endogenic is from people who don't like them. If you have done an ounce of research you'd learn that this isn't true at all. Don't try educating on what you clearly haven't done any amount of digging on, please.
And that whole long paragraph about how they all put down traumagens and this & that is untrue historically & if you look at the community today, & clearly your own opinion based on heresay since again, you can't even get the definition right so I doubt you've ever actually spoken to any endogenics or looked into those spaces.
Anyways, endogenics is plurality formed without trauma. Plurality is just being multiple in some way. These spaces have existed for many decades, & have never been about "claiming to be a OSDDID+ system". DID is younger than these spaces.
Additionally, plurals who are not OSDDID+ systems have long had solidarity with those who are. The word fictive came from them, the word plural came from them, their spaces accomodated us, they lent their words to us, they advocated for us long before most 'anti-endos' were even born.
this isn't an attack on the person i'm replying to, just a reminder to put down your preconcieved biases and do some actual research. Opinions based in anything but facts & reality is nothing more than biases against certain groups.
I'm obsessed with a person who said "there's a reason the stereotype is that transmascs in college are applauded in women's studies while transfems work in the coffee shop." I want to know where tf this came from and what's the fucking proof
some uneducated transfems have incorrectly assumed their situation is universal which ig you can't really blame them for
I was a transmasc in a women's studies course and the cis woman professor felt so threatened by me being a trans person in her class and politely bringing up transfeminist perspectives that she started treating me and my friend in that class like misbehaving children, got angry with us for filing a complaint, and then spent our entire meeting painting me as aggressive and attacking her for no reason and trying to "gotcha" her by calling her transphobic for pointing out that she was noticably treating me differently than other students, even my cis friend who was ALSO filing a complaint on her.
So like. Where was my applause!!!! I would like my applause now!!!!!
I'm obsessed with a person who said "there's a reason the stereotype is that transmascs in college are applauded in women's studies while transfems work in the coffee shop." I want to know where tf this came from and what's the fucking proof
some uneducated transfems have incorrectly assumed their situation is universal which ig you can't really blame them for
I was a transmasc in a women's studies course and the cis woman professor felt so threatened by me being a trans person in her class and politely bringing up transfeminist perspectives that she started treating me and my friend in that class like misbehaving children, got angry with us for filing a complaint, and then spent our entire meeting painting me as aggressive and attacking her for no reason and trying to "gotcha" her by calling her transphobic for pointing out that she was noticably treating me differently than other students, even my cis friend who was ALSO filing a complaint on her.
So like. Where was my applause!!!! I would like my applause now!!!!!
I'm obsessed with a person who said "there's a reason the stereotype is that transmascs in college are applauded in women's studies while transfems work in the coffee shop." I want to know where tf this came from and what's the fucking proof
some uneducated transfems have incorrectly assumed their situation is universal which ig you can't really blame them for
I was a transmasc in a women's studies course and the cis woman professor felt so threatened by me being a trans person in her class and politely bringing up transfeminist perspectives that she started treating me and my friend in that class like misbehaving children, got angry with us for filing a complaint, and then spent our entire meeting painting me as aggressive and attacking her for no reason and trying to "gotcha" her by calling her transphobic for pointing out that she was noticably treating me differently than other students, even my cis friend who was ALSO filing a complaint on her.
So like. Where was my applause!!!! I would like my applause now!!!!!
people are clowning on this guy on reddit but uhhh let's pause for a minute and ask...so what happens if someone has a skin condition? what if part of their face has been burned? what if they're missing their eyes? and so what if they just have a fuckton of tattoos? recognition algorithms are aligned with the most ""average"" / ""normal"" features which means any deviation gets denied access to shit we didnt need age verification for 1 year ago. i dont care if it's a choice versus not, dont care if it's accessing porn or wikipedia, this needs to stop
Was looking in a comment section of reverse racism believers..
this girl said the quiet part out loud & started a thread where people talked about how ugly it is to be black.
It genuinely is just people who want the attention of self victimizing mixed with vile people who genuinely hate poc. that's all "you can be racist to yts" will ever be
Perisex person: "these stupid conservatives, all their arguments can be disproven with the existence of intersex people!"
Intersex person: "so we're welcome and you acknowledge we may not fit in conventional binaries depending on our circumstances. Cool. Anyways being intersex impacts how I view my identity and this is how I label it"
Perisex person: "who the fuck are you. You can't call yourself that. There's only X and Y. This is why conservatives hate us"
The other night husband and I were watching a documentary about the yeti where they were doing DNA analysis of samples of supposed yeti fur, and every one of them came back as bears.
Anyway, the next night we watched a thing about some pig man who is supposed to live in Vermont. People said it had claws and a pig nose but walked upright like a man. Now, I happen to know that sideshows used to shave bears and present them as pig men. So every piece of evidence they gave of this monster sounds to me like a bear with mange.
So now the running joke in our house is that everything is bears. Aliens? Bears. Loch Ness monster? Bear. Every cryptozoological mystery is just a very crafty bear.
Bears. Theyâre everywhere. Be wary. Anyone or anything could be a bear.
oh shit
As the OP of this post, Iâm going to threaten that if this gets to one million notes by the 10 year anniversary on 1 June 2026, one year from today, I will get a lower back tattoo of the loch ness bear monster.
Y'all know what to do Tumblr.
"you can use ai to improve spelling and grammar"
if youâre wondering why spellcheck and grammar check is worse now, itâs because they replaced it with AI! đ„°
now, instead of maintaining a comprehensive, nuanced, and human-maintained encyclopedia by which to check your document, they have switched to an AI that just compares what youâve written to what other people write in, say, Google Docs, and use the most commonly used iteration.
ever have it change something like âall intents and purposesâ to âall intensive purposesâ or âshouldâveâ to âshould ofâ? thatâs why!
people make the same spelling and grammar mistakes so often, AI thinks thatâs the way you say it because it is a PATTERN DETECTOR and cannot THINK let alone use language.
"you can use ai to improve spelling and grammar"
