No title available
šŖ¼
will byers stan first human second
hello vonnie

Andulka
noise dept.
Today's Document
todays bird

Discoholic šŖ©
Show & Tell

if i look back, i am lost
Claire Keane

JVL

ā
trying on a metaphor
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
h
Monterey Bay Aquarium
AnasAbdin

JBB: An Artblog!
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Pakistan

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@transgendog
The queen of fashion from the patreon livestream today!!!! I love my girlā¦.so much *sob*
it is constantly amazing and terrifying to me the amount of propaganda that is necessary in order to sustain capitalism
I'm not saying this to sound so smart and evolved, I'm absolutely including myself in this. I am constantly in awe of how much I have had to unlearn and how much more I need to unlearn. The first time I saw someone criticizing the nuclear family model, I was completely taken aback, and now I fully recognize the ways in which this social family model perpetuates abuse, poverty, and neglect.
And the capitalist class really has us believing that the products we consume have something to say about our identity. It's fucking wild.
The United States is a country that believes that the availability of 27 different types of Oreos is somehow an indication of freedom while people starve to death on the streets and die because they can't afford a medication whose price is artificially inflated.
The idea that someone can earn (and therefore deserves) millions or billions of dollars is absolutely asinine! The myth of the "self-made millionaire" is an outright lie! And yet both are bedrocks of American culture.
Final Memory
(made this for a conventionās art contest)
āIf a society puts half its children into short skirts and warns them not to move in ways that reveal their panties, while putting the other half into jeans and overalls and encouraging them to climb trees, play ball, and participate in other vigorous outdoor games; if later, during adolescence, the children who have been wearing trousers are urged to āeat like growing boys,ā while the children in skirts are warned to watch their weight and not get fat; if the half in jeans runs around in sneakers or boots, while the half in skirts totters about on spike heels, then these two groups of people will be biologically as well as socially different. Their muscles will be different, as will their reflexes, posture, arms, legs and feet, hand-eye coordination, and so on. Similarly, people who spend eight hours a day in an office working at a typewriter or a visual display terminal will be biologically different from those who work on construction jobs. There is no way to sort the biological and social components that produce these differences. We cannot sort nature from nurture when we confront group differences in societies in which people from different races, classes, and sexes do not have equal access to resources and power, and therefore live in different environments. Sex-typed generalizations, such as that men are heavier, taller, or stronger than women, obscure the diversity among women and among men and the extensive overlaps between them⦠Most women and men fall within the same range of heights, weights, and strengths, three variables that depend a great deal on how we have grown up and live. We all know that first-generation Americans, on average, are taller than their immigrant parents and that men who do physical labor, on average, are stronger than male college professors. But we forget to look for the obvious reasons for differences when confronted with assertions like āMen are stronger than women.ā We should be asking: āWhich men?ā and āWhat do they do?ā There may be biologically based average differences between women and men, but these are interwoven with a host of social differences from which we cannot disentangle them.ā
ā Ruth Hubbard, āThe Political Nature of āHuman Natureāā
I love my soft cheek and second chin. I love my stretchmarks that cover my thighs. I love my stomach and the rolls that accompany it. I donāt need to be smaller. I refuse to shrink myself to fit a mold I was never meant to occupy.
āāCaw, caw!ā A huge black crow circled above me in the air and landed on a rock nearby. We looked at each other in silence. āCrow, are you a boy or a girl?ā āCaw, caw!ā I laughed and rolled over on my back. The sky was crayon blue. I pretended I was lying on the cotton white clouds. The earth was damp against my back. The sun was hot, the breeze was cool. I felt happy. Nature held me close and seemed to find no fault with me.ā
ā Leslie Feinberg, Stone Butch Blues p17
āThe more psychotherapy an abusive man has participated in, the more impossible I usually find it is to work with him.
Ā The highly ātherapizedā abuser tends to be slick, condescending, and manipulative. He uses the psychological concepts
he has learned to dissect his partnerās flaws and dismiss her perceptions of abuse. He takes responsibility for nothing that he does; he moves in a world where there are only unfortunate dynamics, miscommunications, symbolic acts. He expects to be rewarded for his emotional openness, handled gingerly because of his āvulnerability,ā colluded with in skirting the damage he has done, and congratulated for his insight. Ā Many years ago, a violent abuser in my program shared the following with us: āFrom working in therapy on my issues about anger toward my mother, I realized that when I punched my wife, it wasnāt really her I was hitting. It was my mother!ā He sat back, ready for us to express our approval of his self-awareness. My colleague
peered through his glasses at the man, unimpressed by this revelation. āNo,ā he said, āyou were hitting your wife.ā
Ā I have yet to meet an abuser who has made any meaningful and lasting changes in his behavior toward female partners through therapy, regardless of how much āinsightāāmost of it falseāthat he may have gained. The fact is that if an abuser finds a particularly skilled therapist and if the therapy is especially successful, when he is finished he will be a happy, well-adjusted abuserāgood news for him, perhaps, but not such good news for his partner. Psychotherapy can be very valuable for the issues it is devised to address, but partner abuse is not one of them; an abusive man needs to be in a specialized program.
Therapy focuses on the manās feelings and gives him empathy and support, no matter how unreasonable the attitudes that are giving rise to those feelings. An abusive manās therapist usually will not speak to the abused woman, whereas the counselor of a high-quality abuser program always does.
Ā Therapy typically will not address any of the central causes of abusiveness, including entitlement, coercive control, disrespect, superiority, selfishness, or victim blaming.
Ā It is also impossible to persuade an abusive man to change by convincing him that he would benefit from it, because he perceives the benefits of controlling his partner as vastly outweighing the losses. This is part of why so many men initially take steps to change their abusive behavior but then return to their old ways. There is another reason why appealing to his self-interest doesnāt work: The abusive manās belief that his own needs should come ahead of his partnerās is at the core of his problem.
Ā Therefore when anyone, including therapists, tells an abusive man that he should change because thatās whatās best for him, they are inadvertently feeding his selfish focus on himself: You canāt simultaneously contribute to a problem and solve it.
Ā Women speak to me with shocked voices of betrayal as they tell me how their couples therapist, or the abuserās individual therapist, or a therapist for one of their children, has become a vocal advocate for him and a harsh and superior critic of her. I have saved for years a letter that a psychologist wrote about one of my clients, a man who admitted to me that his wife was covered with blood and had broken bones when he was done beating her and that she could have died. The psychologistās letter ridiculed the system for labeling this man a ābatterer,ā saying that he was too reasonable and insightful and should not be participating in my abuser program any further.
Ā The content of the letter indicated to me that the psychologist had neglected to ever ask the client to describe the brutal beating that he had been convicted of.
As a routine part of my assessment of an abusive man, I contacted his private therapist to compare impressions. The therapist turned out to have strong opinions about the case:
THERAPIST: Ā I think itās a big mistake for Martin to be attending your abuser program. He has very low self-esteem; he believes anything bad that anyone says about him. If you tell him heās abusive, that will just tear him down further. His partner slams him with the word abusive all the time, for reasons of her own. His wifeās got huge control issues, and she has obsessive-compulsive disorder. She needs treatment. I think having Martin in your program just gets her what she wants.
BANCROFT: So you have been doing couples counseling with them?
THERAPIST: No, I see him individually.
BANCROFT: How many times have you met with her?
THERAPIST: She hasnāt been in at all.
BANCROFT: You must have had quite extensive phone contact with her, then.
THERAPIST: No, I havenāt spoken to her.
BANCROFT: You havenāt spoken to her? You have assigned his wife a clinical diagnosis based only on Martinās descriptions of her?
THERAPIST: Yes, but you need to understand, weāre talking about an unusually insightful man. Martin has told me many details, and he is perceptive and sensitive.
BANCROFT: But he admits to serious psychological abuse of his wife, although he doesnāt call it that. An abusive man is not a reliable source of information about his partner. What the abuser was getting from individual therapy, unfortunately, was an official seal of approval for his denial, and for his view that his wife was mentally ill.ā
āāWhy does he do that ? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling menā
by Lundy Bancroft
āwhen anyone, including therapists, tells an abusive man that he should change because thatās whatās best for him, they are inadvertently feeding his selfish focus on himself: You canāt simultaneously contribute to a problem and solve it.ā
Tooth Infection: Can literally kill you and wreck your overall physical health. United States: Dentistry is a frivolous cosmetic luxury which we should bar the poor from having. To even have access to a dentist should be a sign of affluence akin to some forms of plastic surgery. How else will we laugh at the poor and their disgusting toothless mouths which showcase how inferior and uneducated they really are in comparison to our pearly-smiled perfection?Ā
Like honestly?! Iām a nurse on a cardiac surgery unit. Do you have any idea how many patients I see every year have to go through open heart surgery to get a valve replacement because they got a tooth infection that caused endocarditis and vegetation on the heart valves? Itās appalling that people have to go through such a traumatic surgery when it could have been prevented by routine dental care.
I also once had a patient lose his fucking EYE because a tooth infection migrated into his sinuses and then his eye. And of course he had shit insurance so he didnāt get seen until it was too far gone for us to be able to save his eye. We did save his life but he was left without an eye and I can only imagine how much debt for that hospital bill.
The US healthcare system is so fucking broken.
What really annoys me in all this discussion about the Amazon that has started recently is that a lot of people engaging in it - gringos and brazilians/other south-americans who don't live in the region - are acting as that forest is just a bunch of trees. It isn't just this, it's much more. There are people living in there, you understand? Indigenous people of various cultures, some of them not even contacted yet. The ribeirinhos, a typical population of the Amazon. Important towns such as Manaus are located in the Amazon, and thousands of people live in there. All of them are facing the consequences of these events right now. The Amazon means a lot to their lives and culture. And you must remember that the land of the forest is theirs by right before you enter this conversation.
the wrong amazon is burning and the wrong ice is melting
IT DIDNT CATCH FIRE IT IS BEING DELIBERATELY CLEARCUT AND BURNED BECAUSE LARGE AGROBUSINESS CONGLOMERATES PAID THEIR FASCIST GOVERNMENT TO IGNORE THIS COURT RULING
Itād explain why it isnāt getting coverage for sure.
You can give *directly* to Indigenous forest protectors in Brazil by supporting @ApibOficial (Brazilian Articulation of Indigenous Peoples). Indigenous groups are the only reason there is any rainforest left in Brazil at all at this point.
Hereās the link.Ā
Link
iām not sorry
thereās really noĀ āpassingā when youāre nb, itās more like āaiming for confusionā
i get top notch euphoria when people have to ask my gender
top notch euphoria was a child asking if i was a sir or ma'am and two people beside the child answering at the same time, loudly, and very sure of themselves, āsirā and āma'am.ā
u know what... it may be true that most pollution is caused by large corporations but repeating that like a mantra over and over whenever youre asked to do something environmentally conscious but personally inconvenient really makes it feel like youre just shirking responsibility... recycling and using public transport and eating less meat and using reusable water bottles/coffee cups maybe wont change the world overnight but these are all things that will impact the environment over time, and to just go āwell im not CEO of a fuel company so i wont botherā is so lazy and... irresponsible
you people are driving me crazy jesus christ. im not saying the ordinary person is to blame for global warming, im just saying helping out WHERE YOU CAN, especially when its not difficult, is a good thing and you should stop giving up just because youve been told its pointless. almost every person is going to have to make lifestyle changes in the next few years. stop pretending the commulative effect isnt real just because the impact of corporations is larger. im not burning down the houses of poor people who go to mcdonalds or disabled people who have to use straws or anything like that, and im not saying you should feel guilty for daring to be alive, but theres nobody on earth who cant like. make sure they turn lights off when they leave the room or make sure they have all their windows closed when using ac or make sure their fucking pet cat stays indoors. small things like that. its not going to make the rainforests grow back but fucking hell it cant hurt! frankly, the fact that everyones getting angry and defensive just proves my original point. its easier to be outraged and call me an elitist for having the GALL to tell you to care about the environment than to just accept that ok maybe im not being my most ecological self. yes, ceos are destroying the earth, but until you personally are going out there and protesting and advocating for large-scale change, settle for a smaller one. how the hell are you going to revolutionise the modern world if you wont even change small aspects of the way you live?
when we breathe heavily after, say, holding our breath underwater, we donāt call that breathingĀ ācompulsiveā. we donāt say weāreĀ āoverbreathingā.
when we nap bc we got 4 hours of sleep the night before, we donāt see that compensatory act as something pathological. we think,Ā āmy body didnāt get the amount of sleep it needs and now itās making up for itā
but we will restrict our food intake as much as we can for as long as we can, and when the reactive eating inevitably comes, we call itĀ ābingeingā orĀ ācompulsive overeatingā, instead of seeing it (as w the other functions) as a biological drive to meet one of our bodiesā basic needs.
we donāt have this different view of eating patterns bc itās actually the case that compensatory eating is pathological⦠we view it in the way we do bc weāve been thoroughly indoctrinated by diet culture, a form of social control
my therapist was talking about this a little while ago. She was talking about how cycles of deprivation tend to function likeĀ deny yourself a physical need (food, rest, emotion, etc.) Ā ā> your body takes over and you [eat a lot/arenāt able to do anything physically or psychologically draining/experience extreme emotions] for a period of time ā> you feel guilty/ashamed/worthless ā> you deny yourself a physical need
and she said that most of us are conditioned to believe (if we recognize this as a problem/something weāre genuinely struggling with at all) that the way to solve it is through trying to force ourselves to stop āover-indulgingā in our needs. But the way to break the cycle isnāt during the deprivation or the need-recovery stagesā itās during the stage where you feel guilty/ashamed/worthless.Ā
She was saying that if you can work on that stage and start to internalize that your body keeping you alive through recovering [calories/energy/connection with yourself] is a good thing and nothing to be ashamed of, but instead something to be grateful for, then you can gradually stop depriving yourself out of an attempt to maintain self-worth, which in turn means you wonāt be waiting until your body goes into crisis mode to get your needs met.Ā
It was really insightful and itās something Iāve been kind of turning over in my head since.Ā
Y'all. This is a fucking global emergency.
Some quick facts:
The Amazon rainforest is responsible for 20% of the world's oxygen.
It's home to numerous species of wildlife.
It is referred to as the lungs of the Earth.
And it's been burning for weeks, and no one is talking about it.
What is happening right now is an emergency that should be concerning all of us. The air we breath is at stake. This isn't exaggerating. Our lungs are destroyed as we speak and we are only just finding out.
This is our future. Are you upset about Spiderman? Same. Were you sad over Notre Dame? Same. But this is so much more important.
SPEAK UP. GET THIS KNOWN. Even if you can't do anything else, at least raise awareness to put some pressure out there on those who can do something. OUR HOME IS AT STAKE. The skies in Sao Paolo turned black. We are losing our most valued rainforest. WE CANNOT JUST SIT BACK.
If youāre struggling to figure out what to do, start with donating to these organizations:
The Rainforest Action Network
https://act.ran.org/page/11127/donate/2
Donate Now & Help Protect the Planet
The Rainforest Trust
https://www.rainforesttrust.org/
Rainforest Trust purchases and protects the most threatened tropical forests, saving endangered wildlife through partnerships and community
The World Wildlife Fund
https://www.wwf.org.uk/where-we-work/places/amazon
The worldās biggest river flows through the worldās biggest rainforest ā both called the Amazon.
Keep spreading awareness, but also if you have ANY spare cash there has never been a more important cause to give it to!!!!!!
I probably donāt have to tell you to put public pressure on your governments as well!
So, our Lung is on fire.
It is already threatened by huge deforestation, to the point it lost 20% of its wildth in less than 30 years.
Itās been burning for around two weeks and almost no word has been uttered about it. I, sincerely, have come to find out about it just now. Iām shooketh ā¢ļø because weāre really burning away this planet.
The Amazon Rainforest holds 20% of global waters, itās an area of incredible value in termns of biodiversity and, nevermind, itās a crucial climate regulator. Spread awareness, demand help.