hello, welcome to my page š¼ 26, vegan since 2018
ššššššššš¬š³šš
$LAYYYTER
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
Monterey Bay Aquarium
todays bird
Interview Vampire Daily
Today's Document

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

@theartofmadeline
Sade Olutola
RMH
No title available
š
The Bowery Presents
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Origami Around
NASA
art blog(derogatory)
almost home

blake kathryn

titsay

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Norway

seen from United States
seen from Albania

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Cyprus

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@veganagenda
hello, welcome to my page š¼ 26, vegan since 2018
ššššššššš¬š³šš
I've been thinking about "you cannot solve systemic problems with individual action" a lot lately and it's like. It's not that it's wrong exactly but I feel like it's become a thought-terminating cliche, a rallying cry for apathy and inaction.
You can't change anything with your actions so don't bother. You going vegetarian won't shut down a factory farm so don't bother. You buying something in sustainable packaging won't make a dent in the landfill so don't bother. You donating five bucks to a charity won't solve poverty so don't bother. You buying ethically-made clothing won't stop sweatshops from operating so don't bother.
I agree that the only way these problems are going to get solved is if the government enacts regulations to do so, but the key point here is that the government is not going to spontaneously do that. Everybody says they want to protect the environment and for people to make a living wage in the abstract but as soon as regulations start being passed people start throwing fits about how it's impacting their lives.
If the government banned factory farms, meat would suddenly be priced like a luxury item and people would throw fits about how poor people can't afford protein anymore, if they banned plastic packaging people would throw fits about how we're expected to bear the increased production costs, if they banned imports of items made in sweatshops or by slave labor people would throw fits about how they can't get their coffee and chocolate and electronics anymore.
There's a post on here about how community river clean-ups don't actually make much of an impact on water pollution, because the major cause of water pollution isn't random trash but industrial and agricultural run-off. But the clean-ups are still extremely valuable because they get the community invested in the cause of water pollution, the community starts taking pride in their local environment and start actually caring about environmental regulations on a personal level, and that grants activists the buy-in to push for changes that actually can reduce water pollution.
We absolutely must get individual buy-in before we can expect systemic change. You can't solve systemic problems with individual action, but you can't solve them without it either. Making small changes to your consumption habits isn't going to fix the world, but it gets people invested in and connected to the cause, it makes them feel like they're part of a larger movement, and it primes them to think of these regulations as wins for that movement rather than a sacrifice being forced upon them by the government.
"No individual solution for systemic problems" seems like it's just become a way to justify not having to actually do any work to address issues you claim to care about. It's just "surely someone will do something eventually" writ large.
british vegans!
Labour are asking for your views. This consultation could shape the future of hunting ā now is the time to help bring it to an end.
the government consultation on trail hunting closes on Thursday the 18th! the Hunt Sabs Association have guidelines to help you fill out a response. share the news! š¦š¤
a reminder that this closes tomorrow!
british vegans!
Labour are asking for your views. This consultation could shape the future of hunting ā now is the time to help bring it to an end.
the government consultation on trail hunting closes on Thursday the 18th! the Hunt Sabs Association have guidelines to help you fill out a response. share the news! š¦š¤
british vegans!
Labour are asking for your views. This consultation could shape the future of hunting ā now is the time to help bring it to an end.
the government consultation on trail hunting closes on Thursday the 18th! the Hunt Sabs Association have guidelines to help you fill out a response. share the news! š¦š¤
vegan activism webinar - insight, impact, influence š
I recently attended a webinar by Clare Mann, author of Vystopia, about the strategies she has used & found most helpful in building productive dialogues with non-vegan people. I took a handful of screenshots of her presentation, which emphasized the importance of:
insight: developing an understanding of how communication interacts with human psychology, and as opposed to simply "being nicer", what distinct patterns of speech/choices of phrasing are observably more likely to foster open-mindedness, emotional honesty & radical perspective changes in others
impact: challenging the idea that stating facts/logic is the most effective path towards change (and hence that intense emotion such as 'vystopia' is a hindrance to be subdued before successful dialogue can occur); instead, positing emotional intensity as politically valuable & vital, and promoting healthy processing through mindfulness tools & channeled action
influence: committing to compassionate self-development in order to discover, build & refine the skillset needed for productive dialogues, rooted in the idea that the "influential vegan" is not a lofty or mythical status reserved for a select few, but rather a real & obtainable quality for any vegan activist
I took an audio recording of the webinar for personal purposes; I might share it privately upon request but would strongly recommend attending the live event if possible. she is hosting a waitlist for her next webinar, and you can also book a call with her for personalized advice on how to advance your activism skills :-)
Animal agriculture has been around for thousands of years, and for a great deal of time, people have used language of āstewardship, husbandry, and dominionā to describe it. In contemporary agricultural practice, those words are still used very often, even when what they mean and how they work together is not well understood. Stewardship and husbandry may be related concepts (as they āboth describe a process of interactionā), and the author [of the study] here is even willing to describe how they work together as a āsymbiotic ideology.ā In other words, the idea that we live in harmony with farmed animals creates a (false) ideology that actually obscures our dominion. This ādominionā is the power relationships that is āinherent in animal agricultureā and unavoidable in any process that involves breeding and killing animals for their bodies.
(from)
I have aged 30 years since starting this class,, hereās my 2nd to last project of the semester They Werenāt the Stupid Ones
prompt was history & we were allowed to use 1 tone of color
ink on bristol board, scanned, & edited in Photoshop
Part of the reason I'm so adamant about encouraging people to get comfortable with bugs, my own interests aside, is because we cannot have a bright, solarpunk future without them.
A green future is not a bugless future. It is, in fact, a fairly bugful future. If you care about ecological stability, then you need to start with bugs, because they're the most at risk with our current use of pesticides.
It's hard to express to people born after ~2005 or so how many insects there used to be. Even in cities. All the time. Everywhere. Swarms of gnats in the air during the summer. So many fireflies that it was disorienting. Couldn't drive even on an urban highway in some places during spring without apologizing every five seconds because a butterfly splatted on your windshield. Actually, just having to constantly clean your windshield from bugs in general.
Yeah, the mosquitoes sucked a lot. But there were plenty of other things too, including birds that ate the mosquitoes. Now the same birds don't come around because there isn't enough food to make it worthwhile. And there were toads out and about, all the time. In the middle of urban areas! Now I only see them close to natural parks. I'm only in my early 30s, and the decline I've witnessed in my lifetime is staggering.
A lot has contributed to this: urban sprawl creating habitat fragmentation, pollution in general, global warming creating climate change which shifts weather patterns away from what insects in the area are adapted to. But the absolute worst thing we've done (wrt insects) is pesticide use. We never needed to use pesticides in urban lawns (we never needed to have lawns in the first place). People are so afraid of insects that they would rather wage a forever-war with chemicals rather than cultivate a healthy ecosystem to more efficiently limit the populations they don't want.
And then cities started conducting aerial spraying for mosquitoes, which hastened the collapse of everything else. People will say "this pesticide doesn't target those other insects", but fail to understand that you can't just pull at one part of an ecological web and expect the rest of it to stay intact. Everything is interdependent. If we want to build a just future, we need to remember and honor reciprocity.
directly asking merch makers in their preorder fundraising posts who makes their products & where & if equitable pay can be guaranteed to the ppl actually sewing their shit together .. perhaps a new trend this year
Starter questions
Who made this? What country? What factory?
Are there any accrediting schemes for factories making these items?
What techniques are used?
Can you find factories making these items based in your own country? If no, why not?
What are the materials? Are they sustainable? Are they hazardous?
What's the recommended method for disposal of the items?
"oh vegans don't understand the food production process, they just need to educate themselves-" north american vegans have a long-standing debate about avoiding white cane sugar because of the use of burnt animal bones in the refining process. did you know about that? how about wine and beer - products such as gelatin, milk protein, or fish bladders are often added to fermented drinks to help remove suspended organic particles, and whilst the drink is filtered afterwards traces from the process remain. that means, in the case of gelatin or fish bladders, that those drinks aren't even vegetarian. there are animal products everywhere, in everything, and even the most surface-level research over how to avoid them will dump such a ridiculous number of Food Production facts in your brain that you cannot talk about the subject without an illusory red-string conspiracy board appearing behind you
need a vegan review of Hoppers before I can go see it
ok holy shit. went WAY above & beyond my expectations, full throttle commitment into scathing merciless critique of lackluster liberal corporate portrayals of environmentalist issues. felt something wake up inside me towards the end of this. genuinely gripping
need a vegan review of Hoppers before I can go see it
[ID: a digital drawing of many different animals and plants in a simple style in grey, including opossum, owl, snake, seal, panther, chicken, monkey, bat, turtle, squid, scorpion, frog, penguin, jellyfish, and more. they surround the words "every other being is as real as i am" in light blue capital letters. end.]
Why am I me and not someone else? Does everything have its own "me"? Living beings see from only their own perspective, but we can observe our fellow beings and imagine - what is it like to exist as a cat or an oak tree? They're all out there having their own experience of existence that I could never come close to understanding with human senses. But does that mean those experiences are less important than mine? Maybe from my own perspective, presumably not from theirs.
Anyway, that line of thinking results in drawings like this one - an obvious truth that we can perhaps forget at times when our empathy fails. How many different living things can you identify in this drawing? :)
Seafood, in its final form, is worlds away from its origins. The human rights issues it cloaks along with the animal welfare and rights issues it should theoretically present, are often lost in discussions of either a more palatable origin story (āis this local?ā and āwhere was this caught?ā), or a shrug of resignation at a āfish stickā in the shape of, well, a fish. The absenting of interspecies violence is multifaceted, and data is scarce because it is not prioritized. Terrestrial animals used in industrial agriculture are at least accessible as individuals in oneās imagination in part because they are counted as such: one can imagine the cow from which oneās milk came. With seafood, the animals are not tracked as individuals but as weight and hauls. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) states terrestrial animal production in tonnage as well as number of individuals, but it reports all āseafood,ā only as tonnage. Similarly, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) report on domestic livestock slaughter does not include aquatic animals. Climate justice activism has, to an extent, begun to include issues like species extinction and entangled well-being (human animal and nonhuman animal health as linked); yet, it is often couched as concern about the environmental impacts of animal agriculture, not the ethical concerns about animal cruelty and suffering (Franks et al., 2021; Hessler & Wilson, 2021).
"Animals and Environmental Justice at Sea", Yanoula Athanassakis
Not weird at all how despite everyone stating they only eat meat from organic free range local and humanely raised animals, they still tell you veganism is expensive and classist.
Not weird either how despite everyone saying they barely eat any meat, they will say it's too difficult to cook vegan and that it's so difficult to get nutrients from plants.
Super normal how everyone is against factory farming, yet they eat animal products from restaurants, bars, pubs, cafes, and takeout almost daily without ever caring to find out where those things come from.
Definitely not weird at all the way everyone claims to know better than vegans and to be against factory farming and animal abuse, yet the only time a post containing the words "animal rights" or "vegan" in this site ever makes the rounds it's because its calling vegans stupid, classist, or whatever other buzzword.
All very normal, consistent, not-weird-at-all behaviour, yea.
Northern flicker. Jefferson County, Colorado. Photos by Amber Maitrejean