dirt enthusiast

blake kathryn
AnasAbdin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price
No title available

tannertan36
almost home
Peter Solarz
will byers stan first human second
i don't do bad sauce passes
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
tumblr dot com
h
đŞź
DEAR READER
Cosmic Funnies
One Nice Bug Per Day
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
@vulturesbones
my heart breaks for her and all the unhoused women. men do not see women as humans.
repost from r / blatantmisogny
not my screenshots!
what the fuck
Abusive men pave the way for lazy men to get wives and girlfirends.
Lemme clarify, how many times have you heard your overworked female friends and relatives say âYeah, Jerry drinks beer every evening after work while I cook dinner and clean up after everyone and does the bare minimum to help me raise the kids but heâs such a nice guy. Heâs never beat me in my life. I couldnât ask for a better guy in my life.â
Like no, Sally, your husband is a common stone among turds and you know it.
I try to explain this conceptually to people as a thing that happens not saying that this is good but itâs a thing that happens.
This is what male privilege is and how all men benefit from it.
This is why you are not exempt from statements about âall menâ even if you are overall good.
You benefit from the bar constantly being lowered by systemic issues within the gender.
The expectations on you are always lower than they should because âat least youâre not Xâ.
ThatâŚis the best response Iâve seen to the ânot all menâ thing. Thank you.
Yeah, this post reminded me of this bit from a talk by Lundy Bancroft
#if youâve never worked with older people you canât realise how many women are just living like this#they work all week and then go home and do nothing except cook and clean and thatâs fine with them#their husband does fuck all and if they get really drunk at the office Christmas party theyâll tell you how much they hate him#but most of the time heâs nice enough and the kids like him bc heâll take them for ice cream so could you really do better @cloud-frost
Researchers look at countries that have prohibited corporal punishment for kids and their rate of youth violence.
Now a new study looking at 400,000 youths from 88 countries around the world suggests such bans are making a difference in reducing youth violence. It marks the first systematic assessment of whether an association exists between a ban on corporal punishment and the frequency in which adolescents get into fights.Â
[F]or both boys and girls, [prof. Elizabeth Gershoff] said, âWe found [spanking] linked to more aggression, more delinquent behavior, more mental health problems, worse relationships with parents, and putting the children at higher risk for physical abuse from their parents.â
âPeople often ask: Why didnât you look for positive aspects?â she continued. âMy answer is: We did, and there were none. We see consistently that the more children are spanked, the more behavioral problems they have in the years ahead.â
Once again worth emphasizing that this is pretty much the exact opposite of what authoritarians said would happen
This is an important study in the same way that many âwater is wetâ studies are; it provides hard data that can be referred back to.
But yeah, startlingly enough if you donât use violence to control children, theyâre less likely to try to use violence to control others.
You can be talking to someone and she'll be like, "Oh I made a silly mistake. Women don't deserve voting rights teehee." And you'll be like, "What." And she'll be like, "Oh I'm sorry! That must sound so bad out of context. No it's this Tiktok meme where, if you're a girl and you do something dumb, you say 'Women don't deserve voting rights teehee.'"
And you'll be like, "That sounds bad." And she'll be like, "No no. It's totally not that bad. It's just a meme. Men say it too. Like if a man does something silly he'll be like, 'I am like those women who do not deserve to vote.'" And you'll be like, "Does that make it better?" And she'll be like, "Well there was one guy who tried to make 'Men shouldn't vote' a popular meme. But it never caught on and also he got yelled at a lot."
And then you drop it there because like, you're harshing the vibe.
I'm convinced, 100% sure trends like this are engineered to make women believe in two things: That we, as sex, are incapable and stupid, that we don't need (and deserve) rights. And most importantly, it is a psyop to make dissolution of our hard fought rights as a fun thing that's actually good for us.
Women in politics face higher risks of violence, with female mayors in Italy three times more likely to be attacked than men. This disparity
Female leaders face a harsher realityânew study highlights alarming risks
Despite some progress, women remain seriously underrepresented in politics globally. As of 2023, women held only 26% of parliamentary seats and 15.8% of the positions as heads of state or government.
My new research with colleagues raises one possible factor in this representation that goes beyond discrimination in selection procedures. It is simply more dangerous for women to pursue careers in politics than men. They are far more likely to become targets of violence.
Heads up, American women. They are trying to take our vote.
The bill H.R.22 has been introduced and it is currently being fast-tracked. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act will require you to register in person from now on and with proof of citizenship documentation. You will now be required to provide your Driver's License and your Passport or Birth Certificate. The gotcha here is that you cannot register to vote if the documentation doesn't match- so, for example, if your birth certificate has your maiden name but your driver's license shows a married name, you'll not be able to register to vote without jumping through additional hoops (as to be determined by each state).
This will add significant barriers to voting for women, especially married women, poor women, rural women, disabled women and WOC, as updating/acquiring this type of paperwork costs money and time and is more accessible in some areas than others. They are using anti-immigration sentiments as a smokescreen for this legislation. Make no mistake, the only people who will be affected by this are American citizens. Non-citizens can't vote anyway. This only affects people who were able to vote before.
The main barriers here that will primarily affect women, especially already marginalized women:
Name matching: women who are married/divorced or who have changed their name for any reason
In-person meeting: Poor people, elderly, disabled, rural, isolated/abused women, and women in
Requiring Driver's License: Poor people, elderly, disabled
In general, requiring poll workers/DMV staff to check extra documents on or before election day will have a significant impact on poor and marginalized communities that are understaffed/under-resourced to fulfill these requests.
TDLR; the gov is attempting to make it significantly more difficult to vote if you are not a rich, white male. Bill H.R.22 will add significant barriers to voting for women, especially marginalized women. Please contact your House Representative and tell them that this bill cannot pass.
I still canât get over how Chappell and Lady Gaga only talked about trans rights in their Grammy speeches without a single mention of women or the fact that our rights are being erased right now. Trump ordered womenâs history removed from NASA and military websites, the CDC deleted critical womenâs health data, the FDA erased diversity guidelines that ensured medical treatments were tested on women fairly, and the Department of Defense scrubbed content acknowledging womenâs contributions. Yet they act like women are fine as if weâre not being erased in real time. So is it acceptable for womenâs struggles to be erased and rights being stripped alongside racism being promoted while trans rights take center stage.
"Women who falsely accuse men of rape should get the same punishment the man would have gotten!"
Soooooo... No jail time and overwhelming support from the public?
Overwhelming concern for her future? That she made one tiny mistake and it shouldn't be held aginst her?
A dean of my university said something exactly like that about male rapists and he is still the dean. He called rapists âgood people who made a mistakeâ.
If I kill a rapist would I be a âgood person who made a mistakeâ or would I be put away for life?
I mean it is interesting that they harp on women falsely reporting rape when that's how they they treat people accused of rape. I mean hell in a town near me this guy brutally murders his girlfriend but he gets more time for takeing her laptop than he got for takeing her life. Some times I wish we could take things into our own hands but every single time a woman or girl defends herself aginst rapist and traffickers she gets sentenced harshly and we have to beg for the sentance to be commuted. Men only make these excuses for other men.
You don't see many homeless women on the street because they're getting trafficked and raped. Hope that helps because u ppl are so dump with your âsociety cares more about women that's why the majority of the homeless are menâ no it's because they're getting assaulted and pimped in motels that's why u don't see them.
There has been so much push, especially in supposed leftist spaces, to liken radical feminism/feminists to incels/inceldom. And it actually makes me want to bash my head into a wall. I donât know if you guys are aware but there was a mass shooting at a high school yesterday. And the perpetrator was a girl. And conservatives were instantly trying to leech onto her being apart of whatever group. Trans, lesbian, communist etc. she is a biological heterosexual female. A biological heterosexual female that was entrenched in alt right fascism who formed an entire identity around it. And her digital footprint shows that. Yet thereâs âleftistsâ that are parading around a fake excerpt from her manifesto (shared by an anti feminist incel mind you) claiming she was a radfem man hater who wanted to exterminate men and have women rule the world. And also wanted to exterminate women who worshipped men. Meanwhile this is her
Because nothing says man hating radfem like reposting memes about an incel who targeted women in a mass shooting. And stanning male mass shooters. Everything about this girl indicates the real life consequences of these alt right cesspools that are being formed all across the internet infecting children with these ideologies. She literally posted a picture of herself holding a white power symbol in the bathroom right before committing the shooting. Thereâs so much conversation to be had about white supremacy and fascism. And how itâs dominating online spaces and indoctrinating young people who are living their lives in these echo chambers and becoming violent, apathetic individuals. But do leftists wanna talk about this?? Noooo theyâd rather disparage radical feminism and grasp at straws to make this some male equivalent to incel related shootings.
Iâm linking a report that was done on incel forums to really show you how ridiculous it is when these people try so desperately to associate radical feminism with inceldom. Or try to claim that redfems are âfemcelsâ because whatâs anti feminist rhetoric if not insinuating feminists are so angry at men because they need some dick đ¤Š
If you think the point of 4b is to punish men and not to support women living fulfilling and dignified lives on their terms free from misogynyâŚ.
Morons think that womenâs spaces exist because we are inferior, and not because WOMEN ARE HARASSED BY MEN SO CONSISTENTLY THAT WE NEED A BREAK just to exist in some peace a quiet once in a while.
Nobody is arguing that women are âbiologically inferiorâ at any non-strength based games. However, it has been documented time and time again that women perform worse at cognitive games like chess and video games due to negative stereotypes around women doing these activities, which is exacerbated when 1. the performance is done immediately after questions about gender and sex are asked and 2. when they are competing against a member of a non-stereotyped class.
This is basic psychology. Your cognitive load increases and you are less likely to take risks when you feel you are in an inferior position. Taking risks and having a clear mind are essential to performing well in these games. Undermining womenâs leagues that allow women to develop confidence in their skills in a protected group is going to cause mass amounts of them to give up as their performance spirals down. Every time you lose to a non-stereotyped class, this phenomenon grows stronger.
Also, the stereotype that trans women love chess and video games and computer programming is something that people within the community are proud of. They are coming in with a higher confidence level.
Itâs ridiculous to undermine decades of work to promote equality in sports and games of all types.
I wasn't surprised at all learning about this data. I know it's anecdotal but I have first hand experience throughout my adolescence doing "worse" at activities like gaming when men are around vs when I'm alone or only with other women. Even then I usually held up decently well but it was still frustrating knowing I was never hitting my peak and seemed worse because of it :/
it has been well established forever that gaming spaces are extremely hostile to women. We deserve our own spaces. To act like it is insane ask or we are admitting we are inferior is cruel as fuck. Most women who play video games with others have faced gendered harassment. All the while we are denied acknowledgement it is a problem, blaming us, or calling us sensitive. And when we want our own leagues, people who say theyâre progressive attack us. In relation to gaming specifically this pretending not to know the problem angers me so much.
Right so the womens leages for vidya games exsist only because men harrasded women out of the now mens leagues. Its eyerolling honestly that transwomen insist on going into womens spaces and when a woman is uncomportable well then its time for violent sexisim.
I hate hate hate it when women in video games make sexual noises when they get hit or die in suggestive positions
like women canât even die in a way that doesnât exist to turn men on
how dare you sexualise female pain
REBLOG AGAIN AND FOREVER BECAUSE RELEVANT FOREVER
Whatâll fuck you up more is when you realize that some of those pain sounds are actually pretty accurate but we sexualize a lot of the noises women make when theyâre in pain
Like idk how many times I pain moaned and put my head down in the high school cafeteria because I had cramps or didnât feel well and one of my stupid as male friends made a sexual comment about the sound I just made. They did the same thing to the noises we made when theyâd come up from behind and âtickleâ jab our sides. Basically any noise a woman makes can be interpreted as sexual, up to and including hysterical crying.
This relates to porn. Women get hurt are in pain all the time and the directors and editors play it like sheâs having the time of her life. Men who watch porn regularly are less adept at distinguishing noises of female pain from pleasure. Just another reason not to fuck a porn user.
đđ˝đđ˝đđ˝
This!
An otherwise demonstrably compassionate male, once showed me a porn scene where the woman was getting hammered on a bare, wooden staircase. He pointed out her noises, saying she was absolutely loving it.
Would not believe me when I said they were very obviously sounds of pain.
Porn is evil man.
OH MY GOD this reminds me of a video circulating around a while ago that was this woman, playing on her kids toy, that went down a hill and whacked herself on her private parts and was obviously in pain.
When I tell you these men were CONVINCED and unrelenting. They were all in the comments raging about how she orgasmed in front of her child. FROM A HARD IMPACT ON HER COOCH. She was wincing in pain and they were disgusted, as if any woman ever has out of the blue (with no foreplay), orgasmed from a rough impact on very tender parts. She was obviously in pain and these men thought she was in ecstasy.
What does that tell you about the type of sex/masterbation theyâre having?
And then theyâre wondering why thereâs a demography crisis.
Once you start noticing the passive voice being used for men's actions, you can't unsee it. In history class it was always "women weren't seen as equal human beings" or "women weren't able to own property or have jobs or get education" rather than men legally considered women their property and banned them from work, school, and property rights.
In the news it's always "girl raped in park" or "woman killed in home" which would make some sense if the perpetrator was unknown, but they often have already caught the culprit by the time the article comes out and it's always a man.
The amount of times I've seen a headline about a man murdering his entire family before killing himself being titled "man commits suicide after family is killed" with a nice little family photo of them is absolutely absurd.
Hell, just last night I saw an article titled, "3 kids killed after mom let ex-partner take them to get food." Her male ex took the kids to get food and murdered them before killing himself. Not only is the headline passive, but it also phrases it in a way that makes the mother somehow look guilty like she knew what he had planned or knew he was insane.
To top it off, people get really uncomfortable if you stop using the passive voice for this stuff. They start squirming if you straight up say "men wrote laws banning women from voting" even when that is literally what happened. BOTH men and women act this way. It's like we're all just supposed to pretend that rape, enslavement, murder, and other human rights violations against women just fell from the sky.
Just a reminder that any religions preaching about forgiveness, mercy, gods light⌠read the terms and conditions! That shit doesnât apply to women :
When people tried to defend her:
Christian men love salvation for their sins, theyâll even absolve pedophiles and rapists, but the second an onlyfans girl shows up for redemption, their true nature is revealed.
Im not even being hyperbolic, thereâs been multiple instances this last year of onlyfans models trying to rebrand and join the Jesus freak crowd, and Christian men lost their fucking minds. The same men who gleefully allow domestic abusers and sexual predators free clearance into their flock with a warm embrace, shut the door real quick on women whose worst crimes were having sex before marriage
Islam, Christianity, Judaism⌠all for and by men, not us!