Don't walk, RUN to the video @nullbutler and I made on the black butler fandom!

izzy's playlists!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
taylor price

tannertan36
todays bird
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Sade Olutola

No title available

Andulka
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
The Stonewall Inn
Game of Thrones Daily
untitled
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
will byers stan first human second
official daine visual archive
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
hello vonnie
Show & Tell
Cosmic Funnies
seen from Colombia
seen from India
seen from Peru
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Greece

seen from Congo - Kinshasa
seen from Canada
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Pakistan

seen from Spain
seen from Latvia

seen from Russia
seen from France
@weeb-cheese
Don't walk, RUN to the video @nullbutler and I made on the black butler fandom!
Sebastian as the Personification of Ciel's Trauma
Sebastian was never meant to represent evil. He represents what the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung feared most: an autonomous Shadow so powerful that the ego mistakes it for a loyal servant while slowly becoming its servant instead.
On the surface, Ciel is the one in charge. Sebastian does what he is told, calls him "my lord" and spends his days serving him. But psychologically it is the reverse. Every choice Ciel makes – vengeance over mourning, control over vulnerability, efficiency over healing – reinforces the power he thinks he controls.
What is unconscious, Jung argued, does not disappear but becomes autonomous. Sebastian is the epitome of that autonomy. He continually draws Ciel back to the identity that sustains their contract: the Earl, the Watchdog, the avenger. Whenever the frightened child begins to surface, Sebastian restores the mask.
The Green Witch arc is a perfect illustration of this. Under the hallucinogenic gas, Ciel faces the terrified child he has repressed for years. Instead of letting that encounter become a moment of integration, Sebastian reminds him of the contract. The vulnerable child is gone and the Earl is back. This is not healing in Jungian terms, but repression reasserting itself.
That’s the real horror of Sebastian. He is an inhuman psychology, slowly colonizing a traumatized child. He has no interest in warmth, friendship, forgiveness, healing. People are useful or entertaining to him. Or they are disposable. And slowly, Ciel starts to see the world in the same way.
A scene from the Book of Circus opening is actually a great example of this.. because opening songs always carry more symbolic imagery rather than literal one. The image of Ciel reaching toward Doll while Sebastian steps between them can be read as more than protection. Doll represents one of the few people who genuinely understands what it means to survive exploitation as a child. There is a possibility—however small—of recognition, empathy, even connection between the two children.
For a brief second, Ciel reaches toward another human being. And then Sebastian steps between them. That image isn't just about him protecting his master. It's about mediation. After the ritual, Ciel almost never encounters another human being directly. He encounters them through Sebastian. Sebastian becomes the lens through which Ciel experiences the world. Every relationship is translated into usefulness. Every stranger is a suspect. Turn every ally into an asset. Every victim into collateral. Every emotional decision becomes a strategic one.
The opening visualizes that perfectly. Ciel reaches for another wounded child.. Sebastian (i.e. Ciel’s trauma) becomes the space between them. Not because he physically prevents contact— but because he has become the psychological distance between Ciel and everyone else. By that point, Sebastian doesn't have to pull Ciel away from warmth. Ciel does it himself. And that's far more frightening than any command a demon could issue.
This is why I don't think Sebastian merely follows Ciel's darkness—he shapes it. Not through force, but because trauma makes inhumanity feel safer than hope. Sebastian never tells Ciel to become a monster. He simply makes being human seem inefficient... unnecessary.
Finny (and the servant) repeatedly display their unshakable loyalty toward Ciel. Soma offers uncomplicated and non-transactional friendship, something Ciel consistently struggles to accept. Elizabeth never stops loving the boy beneath the Earl.
Sebastian never outright forbids these relationships. He doesn't have to. He is the psychological distance between Ciel and genuine human connection. Not through lies, but through constructing a worldview in which affection becomes weakness, empathy becomes inefficiency, and people become pieces on a board.
The most unsettling possibility is that, by the current point in the manga, Ciel often sounds less like himself and more like Sebastian. If Sebastian is read as Ciel's externalized Shadow, then the real horror isn't that a demon is following him—it's that Ciel is slowly internalizing the demon's way of being human. That's a very Jungian tragedy: the ego doesn't notice it's being possessed because it mistakes the Shadow's voice for its own.
Lil doodle inspired by new chap cover
Hermitcraft's photographer
he didnt need to be chosen, he needed to be nurtured
Ciel moment real
Made this weeks ago and then never posted it
Got nostalgic and wanted to draw smth from my old fandoms. My shayla Lizzie hehe. Enjoyed to draw her a lot!
tonight's shower though: I finally cracked the code on why I think I'm such a bad person, and now I can finally start dismantling all that. Turns out someone threatening suicide or bodily harm as a way to manipulate you into doing things you still didn't actually do actually has long lasting impacts on your psyche. Especially when you see it as you're willing to let someone die for your own inaction/comfort. I'm not actually a bad person, I'm just not as easy to manipulate as I say I am.
the butler, forgetting
The Vampire Armand THE VAMPIRE LESTAT (2026–) 3.07 "The Failures"
armands
It really says something that a lot of monogamous people consider polyamorous and aromantic to be "opposites" but every polyam person I know took one look at aromantics and said "they're just like me for real"
Poly folks x aro folks in the sense that "alloromantic heterosexual monogamous people view love and sex as an entirely different entity than me, and that makes life kinda strange"
official aro-polyam solidarity post
Might’ve already reblogged this but it needs to be said again
“after dinner is when the gentlemen play”
play with what, their balls?
severely deficient in whatever vitamin makes u a person
this is what is happening between us when i like your vent post
i cant believe that there's still gamergate STANK on games that women enjoy. NASTY misogyny residue. stardew valley is in fact a video game. animal crossing is also a video game. so are otome games and dating sims and twee little cozy games. sometimes a bitch doesnt wanna play bloodborne that shit's hard
guys who mainly play 2k and fortnite will still be like oh youre not a real gamer for having 1000 hours in stardew. mother fucker you're larping as a basketball player
AROMANTIC
Hit the like button