Anthro Notes / In Connection to the Meeting "Anti-Blackness: Readings on Violence, Resistance, and Repair" 6/17/2020
That was inspiring to be reminded that anthropology can be "an abolitionist practice," as Dr. Deborah Thomas put it. I have seen anthropology as a colonial tool even when it talks about anti-colonialism, and I have seen anthropology of white boredom, but I know little about how anthropology can be an abolitionist practice. I believe that anthropology has tools to account for violence that other disciplines cannot account for, because of the lack of statistical data or because of the insidious workings of violence that are difficult to measure in general, which has been one of the arguments of Dr. Christen Smith (that the “body count” of violence is not limited to the number of people directly dead from the inflicted violence but also members of their families, people who loved them, and even though who spectated, in reality or via videos; see her book Afro-Paradise: Blackness, Violence, and Performance in Brazil for more detailed explication of this).
To account for this less-visible forms of violence, I am deeply convinced, ethnographic practices come to be handy. However, in my own practice I have felt too many times how anthropology as a tool actively resisting being used as anti-colonial. Anthropology resists being used as an anti-colonial tool because it is a colonial discipline, of which Dr. Thomas also reminded. Colonial legacies and colonial affinities are written in the foundation of anthropology. For example, because anthropology is a study "of the other" as long as this "other" can explain us something about “us” (essentially, can be useful for "us" (see Malinowski’s Argonauts)), anthropology already has a lot of trouble when "the other" is not as "other" as the anthropology would like to conceive of them. In this case, anthropology near loses its authority for too many anthropologists. As a native anthropologist, and a native anthropologist practicing--and actively institutionally being pushed to practice--autoethnography, I meet this challenge every day. Therefore I say, that in my personal modest practice, anthropology has been resisting being used as an anti-colonial tool.
The problem deeper still here is language. This is beyond anthropology. I already stated earlier that this is my belief that there can be no anti-imperial and anti-colonial practice that uses the English language as its language. To say so has a lot of implications that I am not willing to embrace. One implication of this is that the argument has been made and is being made every day that English, in fact, allows people speaking different languages to understand each other. Another implication of the consideration with which I started this paragraph--that no anti-imperial or anti-colonial practice effectively can use English and remain such--is that to say so effectively means dismissal of any work that is being done in the English language, which, of course, cannot be permitted. What about peoples whose language was stolen and who do not possess the ability or fluency of their own language--does it mean that their struggle of liberation and work is going to be dismissed? No, not at all.
I am thinking about this with the knowledge of the implications, and I am writing about it, myself, in English, while my native language is Russian--which, by the way, is another colonial language--and while my mother tongue, in which I do not possess fluency, is Ukrainian--which can be said to be a language of the colonized. I am saying this therefore aware of these complications and regardless of them as an illustration of my thesis, which is: many things that are in the foundation of the very possibility to do this work resist and preclude this kind of work from being done. In case this is obscure, I will further explicate: the very possibility of anti-colonial work in anthropology, that requires, for being done, the use of anthropology as a discipline, and the use of language - any language that can be understood -- is always already compromised by the conditions of accomplishing it.
There is, however, an optimism that I am feeling of the possibility of this work, especially seeing people who have done this work for years. I get a feeling that this work is possible, very possible, despite all the impossibilities in which it is already entrenched even at the stage of being just thought or dreamed about.