You are an adventurer in a generic fantasy world and you use this weapon!
Do you like it?
YES!!!!!
yes
Eh it's okay
No
NO!!!!!!!
tumblr dot com
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price

shark vs the universe
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie
Keni
will byers stan first human second

Kiana Khansmith
Misplaced Lens Cap

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Stranger Things
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Xuebing Du
wallacepolsom
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
macklin celebrini has autism

tannertan36
Cosmic Funnies
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia

seen from Austria
@windona
You are an adventurer in a generic fantasy world and you use this weapon!
Do you like it?
YES!!!!!
yes
Eh it's okay
No
NO!!!!!!!
there was a post on here that i can’t find that went something like “i can’t imagine wanting to ‘get a rise out of people’ or ‘rile them up’ or ‘stir the pot,’ that’s abuser behavior” that made me go oh, okay, OOP is an only child.
It is amazing to me how many people in comics or shows discover a superhero's secret identity and then REVEAL it! Like???
If I found out my nice neighbor who helped me jumpstart my car at the god awful hour of 5am was Superman? NOBODY'S GETTING SHIT FROM ME I KNOW NOTHING!
a) bro can shoot lazer eyes
b) bro is minding his own business, I can do the same
c) The moment I start blabbing I get involved and I DO NOT want to be involved with the day to day life of a fuckin superhero. So I don't know shit, okay?
My lawyer's some vigilante. Sounds like a conflict of interest but what do I look like? A cop? My trash collector is a superhero? Anyway, thanks buddy, have a great one, say hi to the kids for me. I watched my waiter at McDonalds absolutely throw hands with a supervillain. That's crazy, anyway here's a 30% tip in cash. Good luck with those student loans.
Like I am not getting involved with ANYYYYY of that. Uh uh, no way, I don't see shit. I am just trying to make it to the end of the day without being kidnapped, held hostage, tortured, or interrogated and the best way to do that is keep. My. Damn. Mouth. Shut.
PBS and NPR were never beholden to the US government.
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting was created so that the US government could fund public media without public media being influenced by the government. It was a private non-profit funded by the government, not a part of the government itself. This is by design. This was a good thing. It meant that even small local TV and radio stations, could afford to create media for the public good, without government influence.
This meant TV and radio stations for poor communities. For non-english speaking communities. For rural communities. For minorities. It meant that free and accessible media could be created for everyone, even if the government didn't like it.
That's why conservatives defunded it.
Because if they couldn't control it, and if it helped the people they hated, then they would have to destroy it. Do you really think that a fascist government would defund their own propaganda machine?
Not only is the idea that PBS before being defunded was propaganda wrong, but ignores the fact that defunding it is going to have long-term negative effects on vulnerable communities.
OP of the post in the screenshot called me an idiot and blocked me for pointing this out. So I'm setting the record straight. The CPB was never our enemy.
there’s this term i coined in my friendgroup i call “the charizard effect” and it can apply to anything and everything, but it was born from me explaining my feelings about the pokemon charizard. the term is basically about how overexposure to something be it by corporate shilling or fandom prominence drives me away from really enjoying something bc i’m exposed to it so much against my will i become tired of it. it came to me bc i was ranting about how tpci does not, and cannot stop reinventing charizard, and how it is popular and obtusely included in almost every region, merch, etc in every way possible and it’s highly commodified.
i dont dislike the pokemon charizard, in fact i really like its X form, but i am exposed to so much charizard in my pokemon consumption that i cant be bothered to care for it in any more than in passing. this applies to a bunch of other stuff i’d otherwise be ok with, but i always just call this aversion phenomena “the charizard effect”
making this term has done numbers for me being able to concisely express how i feel abt something. like. its not charizard’s fault i feel this way, im sure i’d feel normal abt it if it was stripped of all this over commodification, but i cannot. hence the name
How to tell a person “hey you are responding to a narrative that you’ve made up in your head rather than what’s actually happening” without sounding like a gaslighter.
im american and i knew that like in kindergarten so i think some of you are just stupid sorry
"US curriculums don't talk about-" ok? And? Are you guys not absorbing literally any information from the outside world? Tv, movies, books, people talking around you? Hello????
I'm sorry do people need to be taught that other countries have metropolitan cities in school or is that information you can kinda infer from like. existing in real life
Absurd that people will just say shit like this with their whole chest. If I had somehow gotten through life to age 21 believing that my country had cities but my silly primitive sepia-toned neighbours didn't then when contrary information came up I'd keep my mouth shut and head right to wikipedia. I'd take that misconception to the fucking grave.
For USAmericans who care to listen; the issue here is not that you were never taught or exposed to facts about the world but rather that ignorance is used as a shield for criticism. This is considered a dick move as you're basically saying you know you're ignorant, you're saying you don't want to learn.
If you're older than fifteen and not currently trapped in or recently escaped from a very overbearing cult then "I wasn't taught that at school" isn't an excuse for beliefs that reveal that you fundamentally don't think of other places as real or important. "It wouldn't occur to me to put 'USA' on my address for international shipping because I just expect everyone in other countries to know where my state is even though I don't know theirs" "I just assumed that other countries on my continent wouldn't have cities for some reason" "naturally I just assume that having states is a US thing and other countries either don't have them or they don't mean anything, other places don't have regional differences like we do, we're so varied and everywhere else is a Country Of Hats" THIS IS A YOU PROBLEM. We all have shitty education systems, yours isn't special. We all have racist governments and nationalist propoganda machines, yours isn't special. Your American exceptionalism isn't suddenly cute and humble if you try to make it about your country being extra bad instead of extra good. You just learned you made a stupid assumption due to inherent racist or nationalist or whatever beliefs? Now you have better information. Maybe think QUIETLY TO YOURSELF about what other dumb assumptions you have because of that and spend some time on wikipedia or watching foreign movies or something instead of crying to the internet that it's your fourth grade teacher's fault for not making you memorise a list of foreign cities.
We all believe dumb shit and don't know anything. You think I know anything about your states? I don't. When people from non-English-speaking countries started buying my books online I couldn't understand the address formats to post them; I had to learn. I don't automatically know which countries in the world are larger than mine, I look up the info if I need it. Sometimes I say make a bad assumption and dumb shit and people are like "Derin what you said is wrong actually" and tell me otherwise and then I learn that. This is not an issue of having information. Everyone can be wrong about stuff, but your "uphill in the snow both ways" ranting about how nobody should expect better from you because Your Uniquely Bad Culture And Schooling is at fault for every problem is getting old.
Y'all don't seem to understand that, for a lot of Americans, the first time they experience truly global thinking is University. That's why Universities are so dangerous to certain political factions. It's not rocket science, but education is IMPORTANT and not all educations are created the same. I would encourage you to try to understand that an alarming % of the USA is illiterate or has a very low level of education. That's not necessarily their fault. Be kind. Understand that the world SUCKS and some people need a little help seeing that the world is this huge, complicated, interconnected machine that runs BETTER with kindness.
What Americans leaving comments like this think they sound like:
What they actually sound like:
It is true that, since this is such a widespread phenomenon among USAmericans, there has to be some non-individual factor that causes it. But that isn’t the education system not teaching that other countries have real people in them, it’s the degree to which American exceptionalism is ingrained in US culture— and I suspect that “progressive” USAmericans often can’t recognize that this isn’t just an education system problem because they don’t want to admit that they could have actual deeply rooted biases, and would rather just imagine that this isn’t all a simple educational blind spot. If that’s all it was, then you would just look it up and move on.
You're not wrong but think more than that the answer is a little bit simpler: Americans, as citizens of the world's foremost cultural and economic hegemon, have no material incentive to learn about the rest of the world. They simply don't *need* to. Everywhere else in the world you kinda need to have a baseline level of knowledge about the USA and other first-world countries, but in the USA you don't need to have a baseline level of knowledge about anywhere else in the world, so most people never learn it.
Which honestly by itself would be fine with me, can't blame them for responding to the material incentives present in their society.
But what I *can* and *do* blame them for on a cultural level is that, when confronted with this fact, the vast majority of americans construct this weird narrative wherein lacking that baseline level of knowledge about the world is a sign of them being uniquely disadvantaged (worse educated, more propagandized, more overworked and underpaid, more unable to travel, more affected my a culture that discourages learning and intellectual curiosity) compared to the rest of the world, instead of facing the reality that it's a sign of them being uniquely privileged in the sense that they can get through their entire life without *needing* to know any of this stuff.
Okay I am going to be mean for a second.
"But you see! America is so illiterate! We cannot help ourselves, we are just illiterate, it's a huge issue! You would never understand!"
Oh, cry me a fucking river
Straight for Wikipedia: World map of countries shaded according to the literacy rate for all people aged 15 and over.
Please note where the US is on the list.
And now look at the rest of the world, where people somehow don't react to being corrected online by claiming that the reason they never assumed other countries have cities is because they have such huge rates of illiteracy that the rest of the world could never understand their struggle.
My grandma has only four years of primary school and SOMEHOW she knows other countries have cities. It's nearly as if formal education is not the only possible source of information.
If nothing else I'd heard of how big and crowded Mexico City is, and Tijuana as a place just over the border from San Diego
This whole thing is a trainwreck for several reasons.
There are dumb people everywhere. I know Germans and other internationals who made some wild assumptions about the USA and other countries. Sorry, but not being aware of the world isn't strictly a USA problem.
'Uniquely propagandized' the USA isn't the only country to figure out how to propagandize to its people. I've met other Iranians- though given they're all international students, they all study hard and wanted to learn- but they tell me how bad it is in Iran itself. Overworked? Countries like China have the 996 working schedule. The USA has its issues, but none of them are ultra special unique to the US, except the current hegemony and exceptionalism. I've also noticed a lot that progressives who learn about the shitty things the USA has done don't like to unlearn the exceptionalism, but instead flip to 'the USA is exceptionally horrible'.
You know what the USA famously has a lot of? Immigrants from other countries. It's not uncommon for people in schools to do 'trace your history back to the immigrants who came' project. There's also the fact the USA is incredibly involved in other countries. Of course people should do global thinking. Of course there are good reasons for Americans to think globally. Or do the soybean farmers selling to China not care about USA-China relations?
This is the most beautiful scientific diagram I've ever seen.
Also a great example of why pink is a tint of red, but also a completely different color. Erbium? Neodymium? So beautiful.
is cadmium glass as Yikes as cadmium everything else?
"The best thing we can do with power is give it away" - On the leftist critique of superhero narratives as authoritarian power fantasies:
The ongoing "Jason Todd is a cop" debate has reminded me of a brilliant brief image essay by Joey deVilla. So here it is, images first and the full essay text below:
"A common leftist critique of superhero comics is that they are inherently anti-collectivist, being about small groups of individuals who hold all the power, and the wisdom to wield that power. I don’t disagree with this reading. I don’t think it’s inaccurate. Superheroes are their own ruling class, the concept of the übermensch writ large. But it’s a sterile reading. It examines superhero comics as a cold text, and ignores something that I believe in fundamental, especially to superhero storytelling: the way people engage with text. Not what it says, but how it is read. The average comic reader doesn’t fantasize about being a civilian in a world of superheroes, they fantasize about being a superhero. One could charitably chalk this up to a lust for power, except for one fact… The fantasy is almost always the act of helping people. Helping the vulnerable, with no reward promised in return. Being a century into the genre, we’ve seen countless subversions and deconstructions of the story. But at its core, the superhero myth is about using the gifts you’ve been given to enrich the people around you, never asking for payment, never advancing an ulterior motive. We should (and do) spend time nitpicking these fantasies, examining their unintended consequences, their hypocrisies. But it’s worth acknowledging that the most eduring childhood fantasy of the last hundred years hasn’t been to become rich. Superheroes come from every class (don’t let the MCU fool you). The most enduring fantasy is to become powerful enough to take the weak under your own wing. To give, without needing to take. So yes, the superhero myth, as a text, isn’t collectivist. But that’s not why we keep coming back to it. That’s not why children read it. We keep coming back to it to learn one simple lesson… The best thing we can do with power IS GIVE IT AWAY." - Joey deVilla, 2021 https://www.joeydevilla.com/2021/07/04/happy-independence-day-superhero-style/
Kids don't want to be Batman because he's rich, they want to be him because he's got tons of cool gadgets he invented himself, is a badass martial artist, is a genius on par with Lex Luthor, and uses all this to be on the same level as Superman despite having zero actual superpowers. They see the little boy who lost both his parents, decided nobody else should ever have to live through that, and want to be like that.
Kids don't want to be Superman because he's superior to humans(he isn't, that's always been a core part of his character that he rejects that outlook and it's always just Lex projecting his view of Superman onto Superman himself), they wanna be able to deflect bullets and shoot lasers from their eyes because Superman uses all that to show the best side of humanity, to show how humanity isn't even tied to actually being human but to how you act towards other people.
I hate that when you’re stressed enough your body just starts falling apart. I think it should realize you’re already stressed and don’t need that and start functioning better actually
my best friend linen my brother in arms cotton my partner wool my beautiful sister silk
our sick deranged enemy polyester....
the demon lord, prince of lies, "Vegan Leather"...
MORE TENNA MORE TENNA but with colored pencils.....
Anyone who says Deltarune is 'too easy' has become such an expert at bullet hell dynamics and honing their reflexes to a fine point to be allowed opinions on difficulty.
Look, look, I'm not going to say relatable characters aren't a good lovely thing, okay? My issue isn’t that blorbo from your shows is just like you for real, that's fine. That's good even. Enjoy that.
The myth is that it's the primary, or only, way to enjoy a story. Seriously, if you can't sympathize with a fictional character who isn't like you, then that's a skill you might want to practice. Curiosity is a strong way to start.
there's a whole approach to literature for children in education that considers most fiction to be "windows." in this approach, it is crucial that children read a lot of stories, especially historic fiction, and that those books are about people, places, cultures, and ideas outside the child's experience.
the belief is that this practice will carry into adulthood and will also help a kid develop an understanding of the world that comprehends their personal life is not the "default." it helps develop empathy for those who don't look or act like them. it is incredibly important that a kid encounter many, many, many books where the protagonist does not represent them except in ways that foster the connection between the child's concept of self-identity and the idea that everywhere, always, people have been people.
it is helpful to read a story about someone whose life is vastly different from your own and then develop empathy via recognizing that they, too, are scared or shy or hopeful or hurt or lonely or growing. and it is additionally very important that those "relatable" details do not cause a mental rewriting of that character to be "just like me."
when you've had that reading experience enough times, it becomes even easier to read about people you don't find relatable at all. you now have the scaffolding to accept that someone who isn't like you at all and doesn't respond or feel the way you do is shaped by things in their own lives that are different than your own, or have lived similar experiences but had another reaction to them. and you can read a story and enjoy it or take something away from it without ever sympathizing with a character, or via finding compassion outside your personal understanding, because you have internalized some of the vastness of human experience.
all this to say that OP is entirely right. i love my blorbos that i find relatable. they can be an important processing lens for me. but if that is the only way you engage with fiction, especially if you find yourself reacting very personally and defensively to how other people talk about those characters as if they are attacking you, then give yourself the education you didn't get earlier: read books about people who aren't like you. read short stories and essays and historic fiction and modern day lit written by people from other places and times, representing themselves or their own experiences, and become comfortable with the sensation of looking through windows into lives that don't look like yours.
if you read a lot of fantasy or scifi, maybe you think this is already true. but look closer: are your blorbos acting in a way you would act? are the characters, regardless of setting, experiencing their world via the way they were written with a lens very much like your own? that's okay for fun! those books aren't necessarily BAD. but look for things where you don't understand or instinctively agree with how characters behave, where the cultural norms are fully accepted and lived by the characters, where the context is unfamiliar, and then spend time with that. let it stretch you. let it linger while you think about how you feel, and what it means, and how it impacts your perception of other people.
be curious! lean into wanting to know and learn!
jock is NOT the opposite of goth. prep is the opposite of goth, and nerd is the opposite of jock. like this
only the avatar can master all four elements and bring balance to the world.
dungeon meshi but they end up in the back rooms, a cursed idea that was eating away at my brain
Peer-reviewing @monikoishi's tags because they're banger.