No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
AnasAbdin
Xuebing Du
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
d e v o n

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available

oozey mess
DEAR READER

blake kathryn
No title available
cherry valley forever
Three Goblin Art
will byers stan first human second
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

JVL
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Ireland

seen from New Zealand
seen from Romania

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
@xyzviper
cis people will say “I found out I’m having a baby girl at my anatomy scan and I’m experiencing gender disappointment” but be mad when you say “who knows? maybe you’ll end up with a son anyway”
they found this post and they’re very very in their feelings about it
Can you imagine suing Boeing and coming home to find Boeing's faulty plane parts washed up in your backyard?
Reblog is this is a safe space for the identities theses flags represent pls follow too
Hehehe I’m a demiboy <3
Rhianna Pratchett confirming her father wouldn't be a """gender critical""" activist (whatever the hell those GCs stand for) if he were still alive
The GCs are Terfs. A specific type of transphobe. Quite a few British celebrity got recruited to their ranks and they have the money and clout to do a lot of damage unfortunately.
Terry passed away before Rowling started her downward spiral and played a significant role in creating the current toxic atmosphere around Trans rights in England . It is good to see that his daughter ,who is also a writer, stands up for human rights.
That’s despicable trying to “recruit” someone who’s DEAD. Not to mention there’s NOTHING in Pratchett’s books—including the ones of essays, articles, and speeches—to suggest he join in if he was alive.
And obviously his own kid would know his private opinions so hopefully the assholes will see her tweet and back the fuck off.
(GC stands for “gender critical”, when you see that it usually means that you’re talking to/about terfs who are trying to rebrand their image).
For those of you who are wondering who else the original tweet is referring to, they are talking about Margaret Atwood, a very prominent feminist author (probably best known for The Handmaid’s Tale). Because she is a feminist the terfs assumed that she’d naturally side with them, and it came as a massive shock (for some reason) when she very publicly opposed and humiliated all of terfdom.
But yeah I don’t know how terfs can possibly get through Discworld books without any kind of self-awareness but apparently they do. I’ve also seen them talking about how the Wives in the Handmaid’s Tale are all trans women (solely based on the fact that they are infertile). If you know anything about the plot or even the basic premise you’ll know how ludicrous that suggestion is.
Terf rhetoric basically revolves around throwing shit at the wall and then crawling around in anything that sticks, but the underlying transphobia is always present.
Rhianna Pratchett is the best.
“Terry Pratchett” is now a trending topic on twitter and everyone is just slamming the people who claim he would be transphobic. It’s been really nice to see
Also there’s this
And this. Bless @neil-gaiman
I’d already seen most of this on Twitter, but the Tom Hatfield tweet was new to me and got some laughs.
Also, this is the one that made me get all teary:
Quiet evening.
(I only realised when it was done that Trucy is the size of a toddler……. when she’s supposed to be 8…….. :( ……..)
A wild headcanon appears !
aheeheeheeheeheeheeheegiggle
i love the vorso twins on instagram also more dadnix
Wrightworth Animatic - Best Worst Mistake
centrist guy in 1970 seeing university anti-vietnam war protests in the news
The difference, of course, being that university students in the 1970s stood a good chance of being drafted, and therefore had a direct material interest in opposing the Vietnam war, because the war’s continuation could very well get them killed.
These students, by contrast, are taking a conflict that fundamentally isn’t about them and doesn’t involve them (with the exception of Palestinian-Americans and others with familial relationships in the conflict area), and using it as an excuse to play-act their revolutionary fantasies in a setting they know they’re safe to do so in, secure in the knowledge that push won’t come to shove in the form of something like a draft.
It’s also worth pointing out that the Vietnam protests could legitimately be described as anti-war. Judging by the tenor of these particular protests (and rhetorically analyzing the content of chants, posters, signs, etc.), this round of protest could, at best, be described as a mixed bag: in a “some of them are anti-war, for sure, but a non-insignificant number of them are really just fine with war, they’re only upset their side isn’t winning” way.
Here at Kent State the survivors of the 1970 shooting are going out of their way to support the student protesters. Keep their name out of your mouth.
If anything is "privileged," it's acting superior to an anti-war protest from the sidelines.
Drafting was not the only reason people protested. In the vietnam war, like now, universities were outsourced by the US to develop weapons. Agent Orange was developed in part by several major US universities. Students are protesting the use of their educational funds for military occupation. This makes complete and total sense, there is absolutely no justification for a University to supply resources for the destruction of lives and homes- doubly so when Israel has been bombing Gaza's schools while occupied.
fellas is it privileged to care about genocide even if you aren't directly impacted by it????
i saw this listing on vinted and had a vision
cool fact! writing "you have no reason not to reblog this" or "reblogging this costs you nothing" or "every decent person should reblog this" or any other kind of reblog bait guilt tripping is extremely unfair to those of us with moral ocd / guilt complexes so please fucking stop doing it!
Also the more you write it the less I want to do it! If you tell me to do something in that way I literally will avoid doing it purely because you're trying to make me
I think there's a word for that but it legitimately makes me mad when people try to tell me what to do
Seriously. The amount of times I've enjoyed a post but it says 'if you like you have to reblog' and instead just scrolled past instead of interacting at all is too many to count. Also, people who are condescending about it are so annoying.
People getting mad about likes because they don't recirculate feel ridiculous to me. Liking something was never about increasing its visibility in my opinion. It's to say you liked it. Sometimes I don't feel like reblogging things even if I like them.
heart eyes
Ahhh i love your astroboy au sooo much!! Your art and dialogue man,,, top notch...!
If you're cool with it, would you be ok to draw miles flying little phoenix in the sky?
YEAH
Part 12
<- previous | next (coming soon)