i saw a tumblr post a while ago that implied that the purpose of book reviews is to help the author get better at their craft by evaluating the book and pointing out its strengths and weaknesses, and i disagree with that so strongly. a book review is not for the author of the book youāre writing about. itās for potential readers, and readers who want to see someone elseās thoughts on the book. and on a more personal level, itās for you, the reviewer, to bring your own analysis and your unique perspective to the review. a book review is about the book youāre reviewing, obviously, but itās also about you, and what that book meant to you, and why it affected you the way it did. a book review can and should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the book, but not for the purpose of instructing the writer how to improve their craft. thatās not your job.Ā the author of the book may read your review, but if you have the idea that youāre writing for them, that youāre their editor or pr manager, then you misunderstand the purpose of a book review, and your review will suffer for it.Ā














