passing in public makes me feel like white shrek
literally how it feels
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
ojovivo
Jules of Nature

shark vs the universe
Today's Document

oozey mess
Sweet Seals For You, Always

tannertan36
Mike Driver
No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
KIROKAZE
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
almost home
sheepfilms
𓃗

No title available
official daine visual archive

roma★
seen from Germany
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Morocco

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@zer0-likes
passing in public makes me feel like white shrek
literally how it feels
“Did these people [in academia who claim that they are not exposed to disabled people] realize that when they encountered the work of Rosa Luxemburg (who limped), Antonio Gramsci (a crippled, dwarfed hunchback), John Milton (blind), Alexander Pope (dwarfed hunchback), George Gordon Brown (club foot), [Jorge] Luis Borges, James Joyce, and James Thurber (all blind), Harriet Martineau (deaf), Toulouse-Lautrec (spinal deformity), Frida Kahlo (osteomyelitis), Virginia Woolf (lupus), they were meeting people with disabilities? Do filmgoers realize when they watch the films of James Ford, Raoul Walsh, André de Toth, Nicholas Ray, Tay Garnett and William Wyler that these directors were all physically impaired? Why is it when one looks these figures in dictionaries of biography or encyclopedias that their physical disabilities are usually not mentioned – unless the disability is seen as related to creativity, as in the case of the blind bard Milton or the deaf Beethoven? There is an ableist notion at work here that anyone who creates a canonical work must be physically able. Likewise, why do we not know that Helen Keller was a socialist, a member of the Wobblies, the International Workers of the World, and an advocate of free love? We assume that our ‘official’ mascots of disability are nothing else but their disability.”
— Lennard J. Davis, Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body (via irwonder)
grout white shark
once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out
THE FLY 1986, dir. David Cronenberg
White dads when you talk to them about mental illness
Stolen from reddit where it wasn't being properly appreciated
"Indigo dyeing silk thread"
In case anyone wonders what the Japanese is saying
I just learned about this recently from a Viking reenactor! Indigo dye isn't blue until it oxidizes, so when you dye with indigo your cloth or thread doesn't come out of the water blue, it comes out and then reacts with the oxygen in the air and seems to spontaneously turn blue in front of your eyes. It's a really cool process to witness.
5 0 Y E A R S A G O
Almost 57 years ago!
[“Fungal appetites are diverse, but there are some materials they won’t break down unless they have to. In one of his workshops, McCoy explained how he had trained Pleurotus mycelium to digest one of the most commonly littered items in the world, cigarette butts, more than 750 thousand tons of which are thrown away every year. Unused cigarette butts will break down, given time, but used cigarette butts are saturated with toxic residues that impede the process. McCoy had weaned Pleurotus onto a diet of used butts by gradually phasing out the alternatives. Over time, the fungus had “learned” how to use them as its sole food source. A time-lapse video showed the mycelium seeping steadily upward through a jam jar filled with crumpled tar-stained butts. A burly oyster mushroom soon bundled itself up and out of the top.
In fact, it is just as much “remembering” as “learning.” A fungus won’t produce an enzyme it doesn’t need. Enzymes, or even entire metabolic pathways, can lie dormant in fungal genomes for generations. For the Pleurotus mycelium to digest the used cigarette butts it might have to dust off an unused metabolic move. Or it might deploy an enzyme normally used for something else and press it into the service of a new cause. Many fungal enzymes, like lignin peroxidases, are not specific. This means that a single enzyme can serve as a multitool, allowing the fungus to metabolize different compounds with similar structures.
As it happens, many toxic pollutants—including those in cigarette butts—resemble the by-products of lignin breakdown. In this sense, to confront Pleurotus mycelium with used cigarette butts is to offer it a commonplace challenge. Much of radical mycology is underwritten by the radical chemistry of white rot fungi. However, it isn’t always easy to predict what a given fungal strain will metabolize. McCoy told us about his attempts to grow Pleurotus mycelium on dishes spotted with drops of the herbicide glyphosate. Some of the Pleurotus strains avoided the drops. Some grew straight through them. Some grew up to the edge of a drop and stopped growing. “It took those ones a week to work out how to break it down,” McCoy recalled. He likened fungi to jailers with bunches of enzymatic keys that can unlock certain chemical bonds. Some strains might have the right key ready to go. Others might have it buried somewhere inside their genome but choose to avoid the new substance anyway. Others might take a week to riffle through the bunch of keys, trying different ones until they get lucky.”]
Merlin Sheldrake, Entangled Life
i get the spirit of folks posting "you can want bottom surgery and be nonbinary: you can have a penis and not want it, you don't have to be a monogender woman to want a vagina, vaginoplasty/orchiectomy can be for you! you can have a vagina and not want it, you don't have to be a monogender man to want a penis, metoidioplasty/phalloplasty can be for you!"
this is my ally speaking, not my enemy. the sentiment is there, all true. and yet...
not wanting a penis ≠ wanting a vagina, friends. not wanting a vagina ≠ wanting a penis. that's really important here.
and you CAN SIMPLY REMOVE. without a "replacement." which is in my experience the greatest knowledge gap!! that nonbinary people are shocked by! which i think is the goal to address here!!
you can get penectomy on its own, you do not need to get a vagina to remove a penis; you don't even need orchiectomy if you don't want that. you can get vaginectomy on its own, you do not need clitoral release or phallus construction to remove a vagina.
you can also ADD without removal! the other great knowledge gap shocker! first of all, scrotoplasty exists, and is not just for phalloplasty or metoidioplasty; you can get it on its own, including without vaginectomy if you want. you can get vaginoplasty on its own, without penectomy ("penis-preserving") or orchiectomy. you can get metoidioplasty or phalloplasty on its own, without vaginectomy ("vagina-preserving").
yes, some surgeons will insist certain surgeries require other surgeries. sometimes this is for a fundamental health reason (eg vaginectomy needs to solve for menstruation one way or another). sometimes it's about a risk (eg urethral lengthening into phalloplasty causing higher rate of complications if no vaginectomy) that other surgeons will accept informed consent for. sometimes it's oh no but if we don't do this at the same time you lose your best graft tissue and what if you change your miiind (but there are in fact other graft sites if you do). sometimes it's a skill issue, that particular surgeon just can't manage it. sometimes it's bias.
but as far as Can Be Done? most of it's modular!! these are NOT TRADES!!
so
please don't get stuck thinking not wanting something means you gotta get something else.
and please don't get stuck thinking wanting something else too means you gotta lose what you've got.
and especially please don't get stuck encouraging nonbinary people they can access bottom surgery to Trade.
➡️ Content warnings on fiction are a courtesy.
➡️ Not every medium of fiction and storytelling has or is expected to have content warnings or extensive tagging.
➡️ Print novels do not traditionally warn for content in any way.
➡️ Until AO3 came along, fanfiction did not traditionally warn for content in any significant way.
➡️ An author is only obligated to warn for content to the degree mandated by the format they publish their fiction on.
➡️ Content warnings beyond the minimum are a courtesy, not an obligation.
➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is a valid tag that authors are allowed to use on AO3. It means there could be anything in there and you have accepted the risk. 'May contain peanuts!'
➡️ Writers are allowed to use 'Creator chose not to warn' for any reason, including to maintain surprise and avoid spoilers.
➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is not the same thing as 'no archive warnings apply'.
➡️ It is your responsibility to protect yourself and close a book, or hit the back button if you find something in fiction that you're reading that upsets you.
➡️ You are responsible for protecting yourself from fiction that causes you discomfort.
IDK I think if cis men are being told that being fat will lower their testosterone and make them Insufficiently Masculine, and cis women are being told that being fat will raise their testosterone and make them Excessively Masculine, and fat trans people are being denied the right to medically transition if they're fat, and thin trans people are warned against HRT because it will make them fat (and this is said about both testosterone and estrogen HRT), and androgynous-presenting people are told that only thin people count as androgynous...
Then maybe...
Maybe...
Maybe the weight loss industry is just using Gender to enforce fatphobia.
where’s that article by james frankie thomas where he says like “prior to my transition there was only one kind of sex i wanted to have. and i thought i could never have it” because i am about to blow these people’s minds
i found it 😌 the article was published on Slate and here’s JF’s commentary on it
i have gotten some very odd anons about this post that i’m choosing to ignore. but i am going to double down on this. no i don’t care if girls watch gay porn or imagine themselves as a gay person or wonder what it would be like to have gay sex. so many people imprison themselves by thinking they could never be gay and/or trans. well i’m telling them they better watch out. being gay and/or trans is real. and it could happen to YOU. as a matter of fact i sincerely hope it does
from Anarchopuppy
#tbh i think the intense stigma against “straight” ppl “fetishizing” queerness keeps a lot of ppl in the closet
#theres no harm in exploring those feelings in private. indulge in the fantasy and see where it takes u
#dont be a creep to other ppl obv but that goes w/o saying #if id had the courage to confront the ache id feel when i thought abt lesbian sex and how id “never be able to have it” earlier
#it wouldve saved me a lot of time
Leslie Feinberg, Judith Butler, Kate Bornstein, and Riki Wilchins are all Jewish nonbinary people who have paved the way for trans and intersex rights and transfeminist action in the United States over the last several decades and you should know their names and what they've done.
There is a reason why there is a more modern antisemitic caricature of "the college educated coastal elite trying to erode at western masculinity and femininity" and it's literally, in part, because of Jewish led transfeminist action. It is a caricature that exists in dialogue with longer standing antisemitic stereotypes, but we're talking specifically about the modern iteration of it.
It's because of Leslie Feinberg's action, mobilization, and writing in the late 70's through the early 00's as a vocally Jewish transgender feminist. It's because of Judith Butler's essay "Performative Acts and Gender Constitution" and their book Gender Trouble in the 90's. It's because of Bornstein's books Gender Outlaws and Gender Outlaws: The Next Generation, the second of which was worked on in collaboration with Jewish trans man S. Bear Bergman. It's because Riki Wilchins has been an active part of trans and intersex feminist action for decades despite you probably not knowing hir name.
Wilchins co-founded Camp Trans with Feinberg. S/he co-founded Transsexual Menace with Denise Norris. Wilchins coined the term "genderqueer" and s/he also helped lead to the foundation of Intersex Awareness Day thanks to hir work with intersex activist Cheryl Chase and the Hermaphrodites With Attitude! protest group. Wilchins has been a backbone of trans and intersex activism since the 90's.
All Jewish nonbinary people from different assigned gender backgrounds working towards trans liberation and solidarity. For decades.
If you ever question why my own politics are aimed so pointedly towards liberation and solidarity, particularly across the lines of sex and gender, it's because it is a legacy that I'm very proud to follow in the footsteps of as a nonbinary Jewish person.
I love gay people theres a guy in my neighborhood who named his one singular dog “simon and garfunkel”
tumblr is great bc its like a diary where I can take other peoples diary entries and glue them into my own diary