Fun fact — the author of the document about Andreas asked in his VKontakte group not to distribute the document, as it contains incorrect information. He said this several years ago, I can’t provide evidence because I’m banned from my favorite VKontakte that steals personal information.
I don't understand how you can not know about this if you respect the author of the document.
In fact, this document looks like crap because there is too much wordiness here that no one need. Insult through insult is a very good way to convey important information, uh-huh. The author of the document also notes that his dislike for Andreas has always been.
The document often throws the blanket onto the authors of the document themselves, who describe in a few sentences how much he love his community, game, etc. Why do we need to know this if we want to get information about Andreas? I see two options: manipulation or fear of being blamed.
I don't understand how Andreas wife didn't notice his self-harm, which he tried to manipulate.
The document also states that he had been friends with his victim for a long time, but Andreas was 29 at the time and she was 16. But at the same time, she helped him in a conflict that happened several years ago🤨🤨. The question is, can a minor resolve a conflict between adults?
I also don't understand how Andreas was accused of promoting drugs when he simply answered people what prescription drugs he takes (these drugs don't work at all, because these are weak medical drugs for mild anxiety) and why he uses weed and etc. By the way, it is, in principle, expected from a drug addict to praise drugs, because that is how the human psyche works (anosognosia, loss of natural joy and psychological defense), especially if a person has low critical thinking about his condition (as we know Andreas has Sukhareva syndrome. Some symptoms: straightforwardness, rigidity, difficulty with theory of mind).
The author of the document constantly screams that Andreas is breaking Swedish law because he is a drug addict, but at the same time the author of the document publicly insults (Article 5.61 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation) Andreas and arranges lynching (Article 330 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the article includes causing moral harm). I'm not threatening, I'm just saying.
I don't understand how people can simultaneously enjoy reading the ableist insults (psychopath, troubles with the head as an insult, which means you're wrong, "schizophrenia" in the context of Andreas' irrationality, megalomania as an insult) the author says. If you knew Russian, you would discover so much about both sides.
Some examples of ableist insults
The author of the document also says that all people should not take any action and not harm anyone, but then he calls all people with the opposition that they are stupid and should be hit on the head.
Fuck, the author of that post really pulled a stretch by claiming Rumpel’s donations go toward games and weed and that the game isn't free out of the goodness of his heart. It’s fucking obvious the whole conflict was pulled out of his ass — especially considering he’d already revealed he’d always looked down on Andreas. His egocentrism lies in thinking he gets to decide how people should live their lives, even when no harm is being done. If people want to donate — fine, whatever, their choice. By the way, I’d bet he only wrote that take about his group to fish for sympathy and get people donating to him. Like, "Look at me, I’ve been in the fandom for eight years, wasting my life away in some VK group; I’m such a selfless, poor soul — give me money."
Actually I don't understand the logic of some Savid fans. Like they love the adult/teen ship but despise Andreas and still terrorizes people who love his appearance. And this document is more than 5 years old, lol.
At the same time, they lick the remake of David's model and Simon's model, while this is literally Andreas's appearance.
In short: Three brothers fell in love with you, who will you choose?
An ableist who is easily emotional and manipulates people subconsciously.
Depressive potential pedophile manipulator.
A moron with moral nihilism and aempathy.
I don't think either side is holy or evil. Both of them can be justified and humiliated.
I will ask one question that interests me.
If you don't believe that Andreas has Sukhareva syndrome, then why do you believe that that Ukrainian woman was 16 years old? No one showed any documents, and there are also inconsistencies here about her age.
