This week, I get to show somebody one of my favorite math book figures, illustrating Liouville's theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics:
Misplaced Lens Cap
tumblr dot com
Monterey Bay Aquarium
KIROKAZE
Mike Driver
dirt enthusiast
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

shark vs the universe

No title available

titsay
NASA

★

JBB: An Artblog!
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Cosmic Funnies
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
RMH
ojovivo

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Czechia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
@alexythimya
This week, I get to show somebody one of my favorite math book figures, illustrating Liouville's theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics:
you solve the mystery of what to have for dinner one night and you think "hell yeah case closed forever" WRONG there is a dinner mystery the next night too
it's very frustrating seeing otherwise well-structured posts about media literacy and critical thinking bookended with statements about "nowadays", "nobody has literacy anymore", "this generation is so anti-intellectual", and the like, unquestioningly falling into better past fallacies.
Do we really think the 80s and its Satanic Panic were better at critical thinking? what about the 40s? the Victorian era? societies have always had problems with critical thinking and literacy, because most societies have dealt with propaganda, corrupt leadership, difficulty providing education (due to poverty or discrimination or other issues), and/or people who resist critical thinking (due to privilege or circumstance or what have you). we can criticize media trends without pulling a "well back in the GOOD OLD DAYS" about it.
mind palace that was formerly a palace until the ruling family was killed mercilessly for its crimes. and now it's the thinking woman's socialist republic.
Mind People's Congress
my unwritten novels were snubbed at the international booker prize once again
fuuuuck I'm glowing pink in the night in my room again. fuuuuck
i wish our accent was as interesting as the occasional article or blog post makes it sound. one blog post goes innnn and calls it a mumble which is so funny as someone who is loathe to enunciate like sure i guess i'll claim that as an accent
ok i absolutely need to know what accents u all have pls reblog and tell me or comment or whatever I must know
i would like to be thinking about other stuff besides education but i was just thinking about when i had that 7th grader who they had practicing counting her single digits in iready and after lots of trying different things i learned she knew nothing about counting change so i brought in change from my car to practice w her and she was interested in it and also was able to do whatever specifics we were practicing pretty readily. it's enough to make you crazy
TW: discussion of slavery and the slave trade
One particularly disgusting thing about living in western Europe is non-Black people's total ignorance of and refusal to engage with the fact that so much of what we have (and what we are proud of having) is built from the proceeds of trafficking slaves out of Africa. And even on those rare occasions when people do acknowledge it, they do so in a way that minimises and ignores huge parts of the history.
Take the city of Oxford as an example. It's a famously beautiful city which millions of tourists visit anually to enjoy the architecture. And when you're there you might find yourself thinking "Wow, I wonder how they could afford all this?" And if you look into it, you'll find that, yes, some of the buildings are connected to slavery, and the city has seemingly attempted to reckon with its involvement in the slave trade.
For instance, the library of All Souls College (which you can kind of see if you lean through a gate on Radcliffe Square, but you probably wouldn't notice it if you weren't deliberately looking) was built with a donation from a man who owned plantations in Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda. In 2020 the college renamed the library to remove his name, and installed a plaque to memorialise the slaves he had "owned". They also took £6 million of their funds to invest and use the proceeds to pay for three studentships for Black Caribbean students. It's a fairly meagre response, but at least it's acknowledgement, I guess.
And there are a couple of other cases like this. Exeter College calculated that 1.5% of the money donated to fund its chapel came from donors linked to slavery. Balliol College calculated that 10% of its major donors from between 1600 and 1919 were linked to slavery, and their donations amounted to at most 1.6% of the college's current funds. The impression is of a notable but limited connection to slavery, consisting of a few buildings here and there and a small percentage of this or that college's investments. It's the kind of impression that makes people say "Oh, okay, I'm glad we've reckoned with that, now we can move on."
But, honestly, this is just scratching the surface of the problem. Probably the most famous building in Oxford is the Radcliffe Camera. I've often wondered if it's connected to slavery, I've looked into it before and found no known connection, it is never mentioned in the context of slavery.
It was built with money donated by John Radcliffe, a wealthy physician who donated a lot of his money to Oxford, who apparently had no connection to slavery himself. If you look into his story, you'll find that he made his money from his successful medical practice, he served various monarchs, it's not surprising he was rich, but I think it is surprising he was quite so rich as he was. If you look a little deeper, you'll find that he made his money from his medical practice and investments. OK, I guess that's normal.
But wait, what were his investments? Well, we know that he invested heavily in the East India Company (EIC), we even know that in 1697 he was planning to invest the profits he made from a specific investment in the EIC on building works to enlarge University College Oxford. OK, what kinds of things were the EIC making money from in 1697?
Well, we don't have great records from that time, but we know that in 1685 they set up a settlement at Bengkulu, Sumatra, to manage the trade of black pepper, a settlement that experienced severe labour shortages and "required" shipments of slaves predominantly from Madagascar. We know that EIC officials in 1687 declared that they had an "absolute need" of 50 or 60 further slaves at this specific settlement because local labourers were too expensive. In 1687 company directors suggested that the slaves should have dry and comfortable lodgings. In 1690 they recommened that they should be adequately fed to encourage them to "multiply". In 1695 it was ordered that all slaves should have food and lodging. And in 1709 the EIC directors reprimanded those running the settlement and ordered that they should have suitable food and lodging and receive medical attention if they were sick, for “they are likely to be more beneficial to our affairs the longer they live.” (You can read more about this in: Slavery in a Remote but Global Place: the British East India Company and Bencoolen, 1685-1825 by Richard B. Allen, of which there is a free downloadable pdf if you search).
So, that gives you some idea of what John Radcliffe was investing in in 1697, and what he waiting for the profits from, the profits he planned to use to fund the building work to enlarge University College Oxford. And if University College investigated itself to determine which of its donors was linked to slavery and which wasn't, John Radcliffe would be classified as "not linked to slavery", because he didn't personally own or inherit his wealth from the owner of a slave plantation. And I think this example shows how totally self-serving it is for white institutions to investigate themselves for complicity and find themselves mostly innocent, based on defining "complicity" in terms so narrow that they hide the vast majority of criminality.
It's impossible to check something like this several centuries in the future, but I would quite confidently guess that there is not one single building in Oxford from that era that is *not* the proceeds of slavery. Any donation from any nostalgic University graduate who has a little money invested in the East India Company, the Royal Africa Company, the South Sea Company (as so many people did in those days) is the proceeds of slavery. Any money made by owning and renting property (as so many Oxford colleges did and still do) to someone who pays that rent using the profits from their investments in those companies, those are the proceeds of slavery. The whole city is complicit.
And you can find an equivalent to Oxford anywhere in western Europe, not just the "obvious" examples like Lisbon, Bristol, Nantes, Seville, Amsterdam, that directly profited through their roles as cities directly handling the products of slavery, but also famously beautiful urban landscapes like Edinburgh's New Town or Eixample in Barcelona were built with slave money. You simply can't get away from it, it's everywhere, and that's without even going into the fact that virtually everything built in the era of slavery was funded by wealthy investors, who acquired their wealth through previous investments in shares, which were often shares in companies who profited directly from slavery, a chain of responsibility that obfuscates where the guilt lies but cannot forgive it.
And to come back to where we started, at All Souls College, Oxford, where the meagre reparations for a library built by a plantation owner consisted of a £6 million investment whose profits would pay for fellowships for three Black Caribbean students, we have to ask (in light of the above) what exactly did All Souls College invest this money in? And, well, that's an interesting story in its own right. Just tear the whole thing down at this point.
there's an interesting thing in the college prep vs going into the trades conversation that people neglect to mention which is that if you are talking about learning as something to do with getting a job then you've already lost
im not a big herbal tea fan unless its floral so a lot of tea mixes are not really for me
someone in the local subreddit posted asking about tea shops and so now im learning theres some interesting tea shops around, theres one place (not really near me lol) that is like an around the world place and they sell a lot of teas for 5-6$ for an ounce which feels like a fun way to do a big sampler
I Guess By Now I Thought I’d Be Done With Shame by Franny Choi
staring at the dessert menu and twirling my hair and going "should I be baaaaddd" until the autistic girl I'm eating with says "there is nothing bad about eating dessert. it is a morally neutral action"
funny thing about “pure obsessional” or mental-only compulsive OCD is that you could be having the most devastating mental health crisis of your life and spiraling into the brainworm dimension but to everyone around you, you’re just politely browsing for medicated chapstick
literally just
me: having a devastating mental health crisis invisibly in the middle of a grocery store is so absurd it’s funny. here’s a doodle of how absurd it feels.
this person: wow I can’t believe you don’t believe other people can have their struggles you stupid individualist asshole