"To the self I used to hate" - Annie Jankovic, 2022
(Image has alt text)
h
Keni

tannertan36
styofa doing anything
DEAR READER

oozey mess
NASA
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms

shark vs the universe
Cosimo Galluzzi

titsay
Misplaced Lens Cap
YOU ARE THE REASON

JBB: An Artblog!

No title available
i don't do bad sauce passes

Discoholic 🪩

No title available
Show & Tell

seen from Malaysia

seen from Belgium

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
@annieisyourfavourite
"To the self I used to hate" - Annie Jankovic, 2022
(Image has alt text)
i think to make a gimmick blog on this website you need a "when is it fine to start joking 101" class because i just saw one roleplaying on a post about a trans woman being banned
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
I had a lot of issue with the way my former employer, a hospital, handled gender concepts in their yearly training protocols. But at least they were trying. That is most certainly going to be excised if this provision goes into effect. Doing everything they possibly can to keep us from existing in the public consciousness.
It's only going to get harder from here. Get your hands on your HRT supplies *now*.
also this would mean any federally funded museums and libraries will likely not be able to host exhibits on gender. As always, we will have to carry our own history. Here's a huge list of Gender Related Books, please make sure to include Black and indigenous authors.
We gotta hold each other's hands
for anyone who needs help with writing a comment this article talks about how to format it and lists off the specific section numbers (§200.300 is the one that talks about the gender ideology prohibitions)
this is an extremely scary time but i believe in us together.
The Botox post really just makes it clear how many people think “supporting and defending bodily autonomy” means saying that those actions are free from criticism. I can believe that everyone should be free to get whatever procedures they want and still criticize cosmetic plastic surgery for upholding patriarchal beauty standards. It would be bad if people were prevented from getting procedures they want. It’s still worth questioning why women want these procedures in the first place, and the answer is misogyny. Just because you’re in charge of your own decisions doesn’t mean you’re choosing to do feminist actions. Not every choice a woman makes is feminist.
like okay yeah man I do think that freak Clavicular should be "allowed" to hit his bones with hammers to his heart's content. like yes, he surely is entitled to make that decision. that doesn't mean that WHY he is doing it should go unquestioned. like. surely we must recognize that the choices people make about altering their appearances are shaped by bigger factors than independent whims, and that those factors are deeply rooted shaped by culture and politics.
Women stick thin and malnourished on the red carpet, and people are saying you can't point out that these women are dying because that's body shaming. Girl.
@whitenikes
(Images have alt text)
every day she tests me
the garden of rear palace
If the lord ever got attached to a toy, he would never be able to let it go
boy who is emotionally attached to his sword
i had this saved as a draft for 2 days and its honestly more canon compliant than i originally thought.
see this is the problem with Wanting Things. it feels like a hot knife through the chest when you don't get them
(To the tune of Rasputin): BLEH BLEH DRACULA, KING OF TRANSYLVANIA, HE IS A BAT AND ALSO A MAN
as requested by the twitter people
How it feels to be mutuals with someone for over a year
Being hairy is so awesome #mammal