Hello there! Iâm currently writing a story that takes place in the future, around 2120, and one of the points (but not really touched upon, mostly bc I feel it's not my place to do so) is that Hawaii is an independent nation. One of the main characters is a Hawaiian scientist, along with her mother, and I gave them both (researched) Hawaiian names. But my question is, how do you feel I should handle this point? JSYK, Iâm white (southern european), not Hawaiian.
Hawaii as an independent nation in future
In navigating a very complicated history like that of Native Hawaiians, it is important to ask yourself if you can accurately communicate the nuances of the difficulties Kanaka Maoli face. Especially considering you want to have the Kingdom of Hawai'i regain sovereignty in your story, I would recommend you do further research on the illegal annexation and the history surrounding the end of Hawaiian sovereignty.
As of right now, I do not think you should write this character. As someone who is a part of the Kanaka Maoli community, I don't feel that you fully grasp the severity of the topic and the relevance of it to modern times, as Kanaka Maoli are still fighting for sovereignty to this day.Â
Echoing Ren, you would need to ponder not only what sovereignty means, but also the geopolitical implications of restoring sovereignty.Â
What would have to change about the way our world operates and how nation-states interact with each other not only for sovereignty to be restored but also preserved?Â
How did the United States of America benefit from annexation?Â
Who are the other stakeholders on a global scale?Â
Why does the occupation of Hawaiâi continue to this day?Â
I donât think you can dodge addressing such a critical part of the setting, and if you donât feel itâs your place to do so, then it is probably not your place to utilize this setting. Â
Also, just speaking more broadly: If you have restored sovereignty to one place the US is illegally occupying, why have you not mentioned the hundreds of other territories the US is illegally occupying? Both abroad (the number of places the US military has de facto rule) and domestically (Indigenous peoples).Â
Why just the US? Why just Hawaiâi? When and how did it happen?Â
Does the United States still even exist, or has it returned to a collection of sovereign Native peoples?Â
What about Canada? The rest of the Americas (Central and South)?Â
Does France no longer control a third of Africa?Â
The list, sadly, goes on. A long, long way (I am not getting into Asian political dynamics here, but they exist).
I realize this is likely far outside of the scope you were originally asking, but if I, a North American Indigenous Person, were to read that Hawaiâi was independent but Canada still existed, I would be yanked right out of the story because the greater implications of colonialism havenât been addressed and the author just had one pet issue they were trying to champion, without understanding any of the broad-reaching colonialism of North America.
Hearing news stories about Hawaiâiâs struggles and deciding âoh, Iâll fix this and return the land to them, this is respectful, itâs in the future so Iâll handwave itâ is easy and feels like a quick thing to show you want to respect an unfairly colonized power. But actually genuinely returning land is hard, and most groups who have been fighting for sovereignty have been doing so for centuries already. As Marika said, you have to ask yourself what changed to allow this to even happen, and stay this way.
Until youâre ready to fully look at the concept of nations as they exist now, from why they hoard land to why they colonize, youâre not ready to write a setting where colonized people finally won.