austereanastasia @austereanastasia - Tumblr Blog

femanthropy

༻❁𝕦𝕡𝕕𝕒𝕥𝕖-𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕖 𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕦𝕣𝕔𝕖 𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕥 ❁༺

(keep in mind this may be updated after you reblog it)

emergency abortion resources/ online pharmacies

༄ general radfem resources + the absolute masterpost of every argument

༄ stats for gender resource for quick reference to papers and other data

༄ sistaseparatist & donate to sista surge media

༄ a radfem zine made by my amazing friend @moonshineshrew !

https://transcrimeuk.com/ •→ review of gender dysphoria treatments and demographics ←•→ lupron (puberty blocker) may cause lasting health problems ←•→ research into transgender medicine has been manipulated and are not based on very reliable research ←•→ suicide risk and gender dysphoria debunked suicide risk and puberty blockers ←•→ cass review + politicians undermining the cass review ←•→ TIM & males pattern of violence is ultimately the same ←•→Black women are touted as political props for the trans movement ←•→ uptake of gender dysphoria/demographic of those identifying in recent years ←•→ study on the uptake of gender dysphoria and other diagnoses ←•→ Mr Menno on WPATH and gender “affirming” surgery on children ←•→ lesbians feel pressurised into sleeping with transgender women for fear of being shunned ←•→ High suicide rate of transgender people is a myth + the transgender suicide statistic is false another ←•→ myth of the gendered brain + the female brain + Neurosexism: the myth that men and women have different brains + another reference + and another + transgender brain studies are fatally flawed ←•→ disturbing leaks from US WPATH +follow the money + “transhumanism”←•→ transgender murder rates (white transgender individuals using the violence and murder of Black and brown transgender individuals to push a narrative) ←•→ trans-identifying male pattern of criminality ←•→ inauthentic selves The modern LGBTQ+ Movement ←•→ trans widows on abuse ←•→humans are hard wired to recognise the difference between male and female peers←•→ HRT and quality of life ←•→ Psychiatry’s ethical involvement in gender-affirming care ←•→ gender identity hurts statistics and public information ←•→intersex conditions and gamete-based definitions of sex←•→ she won- documenting female athletes who lost to trans-identifying males. ←•→ The trans movement is erasing black women from history ← emerging studies on the dangers of estrogen usage in natal males + an article Incorrectly referring to men as women & vice versa is psychologically harmful federal bureau of prisons jan 2025 inmate report, sexual crimes TIMs

gendercriticalbutch

it sort of creeps me out that TRAs don’t just want JKR to be evil. like, they NEED it to be true. i’m not even saying the woman’s a saint or that i agree with everything she’s said and done, but there are so many other male celebrities that have been outwardly anti-trans or made transphobic jokes and are undeniably infinitely worse people…radio silence. maybe it gets an article on some stupid “kweer news” website and they get shit on for like a week, if even.

like the richest man in the fucking world is ACTUALLY a white supremacist that claimed “the woke mind virus” infected his estranged trans child, yet you don’t see trans people complain about elon musk A FRACTION as much as they do JK Rowling, who is apparently the number one investor of the alleged trans genocide because she cares about protecting female only spaces and has an unhealthy twitter addiction. okay. and i’m supposed to believe this isn’t a community built on misogyny. right.

niebieski-blask

Hmmm a TIM with a Hatsune Miku profile picture is trying to teach us something about womanhood. I wonder what kind of posts I can find on his blog.

It’s a waste of time to talk to this misogynist.

its-terf-or-nothin

Every day I lose more faith in humanity. Chris Watts is getting married! You know, the evil piece of shit that killed his pregnant wife and toddler daughters? Yeah, that Chris Watts. I don’t understand how so many women look at men like that and think “Awwww the way he killed his family was so hot and sexy”.

pure

if u only learn one thing from my washed up blog, learn this. one of the many things both the left and right can agree on is that women’s social, physical and sexual boundaries are to be held in contempt. unfettered sexual access to women is the nucleus of male supremacy.

women who say no to sex with any kind of male for any reason or no reason commit an injustice. to the right, our injustice is against civilization itself, because our failure to comply means they will find it harder to propagate the next generation of slaves and slave masters at our expense. to the left, our injustice is against the oppressed, the marginalized males who want to reap this particular spoil of patriarchy but cannot due to their diminished value in the patriarchal pecking order.

the right will be honest. they will tell you that their solution is to simply erode and eliminate your ability to enforce your boundaries. that your ability to say no is a glitch in the system that has been left unpatched for far too long. the left will lie. they too agree with the right’s solution, and they too agree that your boundaries are an inconvenient glitch in the system. but the left will use progressive language to obfuscate this belief. to the left, the erosion of your boundaries is necessary for the marginalized males of this world to achieve some semblance of their denied birthright.

come to think of it, both the left and right believe your ability to say no can be an act of oppression; some of the most high status, western white men, are losing their minds over birth rates, saying women are oppressing the human race itself by saying no. they both believe that your ability to say no is an ethical and moral failing. to the left, to say yes is justice, to say no is bigotry. to the right, to say yes is justice, to say no is catastrophe—on par with human extinction.

all males are politically incentivized to view your ability to say no as an injustice, and they are socially and culturally compelled to correct and overcome this injustice. they correct or overcome this injustice with rape. the more sophisticated male supremacists will push for a psychological strengthening of patriarchy. a world where you’ll never say no at all, because you are a good comrade, or a good wife, and there will be no rape to speak of and no boundaries to think of because you will always say yes. that is true liberation for both the marginalized males, and for the higher status males who have marginalized them. you were never really supposed to say no in the first place. it’s inconvenient. they want to claw back this power.

don’t let them. keep committing the injustice. it is important that this injustice is ours to commit. embrace the failure of ethics, embrace the criminality, and smile when they attempt to wear down your ability to uphold your fortress. don’t allow anyone to take your spine. if sex is a need, then let them die, and tiktok dance on the gotdamn corpse.

elbiotipo

More than "here in the Southern Hemisphere we have inverted seasons :)" thing, which is TECHNICALLY true, I would go a step further and encourage to think about that "much of the world does not exactly has a spring-summer-fall-winter season sequence as they show in cartoons"

paperdragonsong

I will scream about this to anyone who listens forever. AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE "ENGLISH SEASONS BUT BACKWARDS" and the insistence that it does creates a massive layer of alienation from the natural world.

I never really realised how much difference it makes until I went to England and realised that here the change of seasons is an obvious, visible, physical change in the world. Like, everything REALLY IS orange and foggy in autumn! In spring there are flowers EVERYWHERE, so much more than any other season, and the trees really do have all blossom and no leaves. Even if it doesn't snow, in winter there's frost all the time and the trees are bare and the sky is visibly greyer all the time. You don't need to be told "this date is the first day of spring", you can SEE IT (although this is getting way messier and less precise due to climate change).

By contrast, most places in Australia the seasons we're taught feel like arbitrary categories - and is it any surprise considering they're colonial constructs? Orange-leaved autumn and blossom-covered spring is a cartoon stereotype with no relevance on a continent where ALL NATIVE TREES ARE EVERGREEN!! Snowy winters are a joke in the desert, and even sunny summers don't ring particularly true considering that much of the country is in the tropics, where summer means monsoons - not that I've ever seen the concept that WE HAVE A MONSOON SEASON taught at an Australian school.

Most Indigenous nations around Australia had six or more seasons, revolving around wet and dry times as much as hot and cold, and marked by the appearances of certain native animals and flowers. Schools need to start teaching the real seasons, and explaining that climate cycles are too complex to generalise globally, or else we will keep raising generations who view the natural world as hostile and unpredictable and climate predictions as generally irrelevent and frequently wrong - and I'm sure I don't need to spell out why that's a problem in the era of climate crisis.

tiredtransgal

i want to add that 40% of the world's population lives in the tropics, and the 4 season model just doesn't make much sense for a lot of places in there. usually it's just the wet season/monsoon season and the dry season. it's often hot year round.

the 4 season model as you and i know it is a european invention, though 4 season models aren't unique to europe! most notably china has the same type of season subdivision.

in general the way humans define seasons is largely subjective and varies across cultures. the one you were taught is not at all universal!

thelawfulchaotic

This is different even across America; as someone who's lived in Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and some of the mid-atlantic states in the past, Texas has summer and not-summer and Los Angeles has more flavors than seasons. My understanding of Seattle is that it has one season, and that is Wet.

Been a while since I lived in Chicago, but I recall Chicago's seasons as being Hot, Breezy Cold, Freezing Dark, and Overwhelming Relief.

darkladynyara

Seattle and the rest of the Puget Sound region actually has two seasons- Wet and Dry. It's just that the Wet part is longer and also iconic. (The rainy season is officially October through April but really more mid-September to mid-May)

pacificnorthwesterngothic

For most of the coastal PNW:

(Not showing current position)

female-uncle

I feel like part of why all this repetitive navel gazing tgirl art gets so popular is because it's a way for males to talk about their grievances with their socialization and self-imposed issues while adding a shiny new veneer of respectability. We live in an era now where you can make more money and be more relevant if you seem more diverse, so now the privileged straight white men who are a bit quirky/autistic/gender nonconforming, who were starting to (rightfully) lose traction so other people's voices could be heard, are clawing their way back so they can wave their dicks all over the place and talk about how messed up their lives are now that they're spiralling into the delusional peaks and lows of the trans community. And yet their issues are still all decidedly male, and usually self imposed! Like dude I actually don't fucking care and your story isn't even remotely interesting unique or new just because there's a pink white n blue coat of paint on it LOL. I'll take ftm stories over those any day, even when they are repetitive at least they have heart.

female-uncle

I dated FTMs most of my romantic life. It was fun, I enjoyed us being ftm together, I love that brotherhood and understanding. But it wasn't the same as us both being butch women. I feel like a veil has been pulled back for me now and I can't lie to myself or anyone else any longer. It sucks being primarily attracted to a subset of women who have been systemically culturally erased. I don't think I can handle dating a Woman of Gender again, it's not healthy for me to do and I would just be lying to us both.

drpepper-is-a-woman

Once again for gender ideologues, segregation of the sexes is not comparable to racial segregation. Using this comparison is usually racist and unbelievably ignorant.

Racial segregation was put in place to alienate, disenfranchise, degrade, and control Black people in America. Any spaces that were accessible to Black people were usually put in inconvenient places and made with lesser quality. They could be jailed, beaten, or murdered for daring to use white facilities for ANY reason.

Black men and women have the same needs as White men and women. Segregating schools, restaurants, water fountains, and public areas was not for the protection of either class. It was meant to oppress. This is not the same as women fighting for their own protected spaces.

Sex segregated things like bathrooms, locker rooms, gyms and even schools emerged from the fact women were literally not allowed to be there in the first place. Feminists had to fight for a public bathroom, they had to fight for the right to an education. Even when women were legally allowed to have jobs and attend school they were subjected to mass amounts of sexual and physical violence.

Women created female only spaces for themselves. For their protection in public spaces that they have every right to occupy. Black women have the same need and right to safety from men that White women do.

Trans women are not being denied access to public spaces. They never have been. They can use public bathrooms, locker rooms, and gyms. They have never historically been banned from getting an education, having a job, being able to vote, getting an abortion, or owning property. They never had to use a 'trans only' water fountain, lest they be jailed or beaten.

Trans women just want access to female only spaces because it validates their identity. It doesn't offer them any real opportunities that they didnt have before. This is why its racist to compare the plight of Black women to Trans women. It completely ignores the aspect of sex based oppression. Trans women have the privilege of being born male. They have never had to experience sex based oppression and they never will.

Stop comparing Black women to men. Its racist.

hurupasyt

The comparison is especially sinister because sex segregation has already happened, and it was to discriminate against women. The female class was kept away from jobs and schools and rights. That's literally what we are trying to fight, by creating spaces for us to congregate and shed our woes. An accurate comparison would be transracials demanding access to whatever spaces we Black people have carved for ourselves, our schools, our churches, our communities, our rights, demanding centrestage in anti-racist movements.

the-land-of-women

rozieramati

Grey Gardens (Ellen Hovde, Albert Maysles, David Maysles & Muffie Meyer, 1975)

servin-terf-haha

On abortion, rape, and being a woman:

uknow

unsentimentaltranslator

I have two of her albums, I need to get more of them. Y’all should listen to her music. (It’s Japanese rock, though, not Japanese pop. People need to stop saying “Jpop” when they mean Japanese music in general.)

neopetdestroyer

They’re mad because trans women wouldn’t be eligible to be treated as cattle and raped repeatedly and forced into birthing their rapists children??? That’s terf shit?? I cannot believe people take you freaks seriously

vampisbian

anything remotely female is threatening to them. theyre nowhere near being the majority, heck they cant even get close to one third of women but they sure as hell police our language n spin it around themselves.

women rly dont know how to be selfish n assertive when it comes to tears of men

finnishrogue

imagine being mad at a movie because it depicts misogyny in ways that wouldn't be applicable to trans women. imagine being angry that some imaginary narrative is not about you. imagine getting it so fucking insanely twisted that you assume that someone made a whole movie specifically to make you feel left out because you could not even theoretically experience the awful things those people in the movie are experiencing.

to put it in an analogy: this dudebro is watching a documentary about ww2 from the perspective of the jews, and he starts feeling victimized because his own ancestors are so aryan he could have never ended up in concentration camps himself.

moreover, there wasn't anything in the movie that explicitly stated trans women aren't seen as women in that world, he just decided to think so anyway because he loves feeling angry at nothing.

he also thinks it proves his point (... somehow) that a random woman online uses the name of one of the characters in that story. like. he's connecting the dots in his own mind in speed of light, getting foamier and foamier at the mouth, losing his touch to reality so fast that it's a wonder he could even type all those words in a remotely orderly fashion. like how does he keep existing at this point?

radfemtiktok

femanthropy

^ the clitoris is still being censored, which is leading to surgeries damaging it to the point of losing sexual-sensory function.

Whilst males will have pages and pages of information in order as to NOT harm the sexual-sensory function.

Just when I think I’ve heard everything… female bodies are being censored in MEDICAL SETTINGS.

conflictedbird

this is fucking maddening

female-uncle

I am an almost 30 year old woman, I consider myself decently well put together with a robust social support network and no threat of homelessness. And even I found detransitioning to be one of the most difficult excruciating things I've ever done. To all my sisters who are not detrans, please give patience and grace to those who are on this path. I first "peaked" 7 years before fully committing to detransitioning. It takes time and immense strength to do something like that, doubly so for those who underwent surgery and/or have their lives homes and careers wrapped up in the trans community.

rjzimmerman

Female animals get their due in Lucy Cooke’s exploration of the roles of the sexes in biology and evolution.

Excerpt from this story from Science News:

To Charles Darwin, nature had a certain order. And in that order, males always came out on top. They were the leaders, the innovators, the wooers and the doers.

“The males of almost all animals have stronger passions than the females,” Darwin wrote in 1871. “The female, on the other hand, with the rarest of exceptions, is less eager.” The founder of evolutionary theory posited that throughout the animal kingdom, males are active, females are passive, and that’s pretty much that. Females, in sum, are boring.

That’s poppycock, Lucy Cooke writes in her latest book, Bitch. This blinkered view of nature as a man’s world was conceived and promulgated by Victorian men who imposed their values and world view on animals, she says. Cooke, a documentary filmmaker and the author of The Truth About Animals and two children’s books (SN: 4/14/18, p. 26), has traveled the world and met scientists who are exposing the truth about the sexes. She takes readers on a wild ride as she observes the ridiculous mating rituals of sage grouse, searches for orca poop (to monitor sex hormones) and watches female lemurs boss around males.

Through such adventures, Cooke learns that females are anything but boring. “Female animals are just as promiscuous, competitive, aggressive, dominant and dynamic as males,” she writes.

That may not sound radical to today’s feminists, but in the field of evolutionary biology, such a pronouncement has long bordered on the heretical. Generations of biologists have focused on male behavior and physiology, on the assumption that females are little more than baby-making machines to be won over by the strongest, showiest males.

chickvandyke-deactivated2023112

“Historically, when females did something potentially interesting, like exercise leadership over their social groups, many scientists scratched their heads and chalked it up as an aberration. When behavior didn’t fit the mold, like female-dominant spotted hyenas or peaceable male pinyon jays, it was either ignored or shoehorned into existing theory. For instance, ornithologists posited that aggressive female pinyon jays must suffer “the avian equivalent of PMS,” Cooke writes. The reality is that pinyon jays have a complex social hierarchy that doesn’t include the “alpha male” that scientists had expected. In recent years, scientists (many, but not all of them, female themselves) have begun to challenge Darwinian dogma about the sexes and submit it to rigorous testing.”

absolutely fucking incredible

astonishing, even

rjzimmerman

Female animals get their due in Lucy Cooke’s exploration of the roles of the sexes in biology and evolution.

Excerpt from this story from Science News:

To Charles Darwin, nature had a certain order. And in that order, males always came out on top. They were the leaders, the innovators, the wooers and the doers.

“The males of almost all animals have stronger passions than the females,” Darwin wrote in 1871. “The female, on the other hand, with the rarest of exceptions, is less eager.” The founder of evolutionary theory posited that throughout the animal kingdom, males are active, females are passive, and that’s pretty much that. Females, in sum, are boring.

That’s poppycock, Lucy Cooke writes in her latest book, Bitch. This blinkered view of nature as a man’s world was conceived and promulgated by Victorian men who imposed their values and world view on animals, she says. Cooke, a documentary filmmaker and the author of The Truth About Animals and two children’s books (SN: 4/14/18, p. 26), has traveled the world and met scientists who are exposing the truth about the sexes. She takes readers on a wild ride as she observes the ridiculous mating rituals of sage grouse, searches for orca poop (to monitor sex hormones) and watches female lemurs boss around males.

Through such adventures, Cooke learns that females are anything but boring. “Female animals are just as promiscuous, competitive, aggressive, dominant and dynamic as males,” she writes.

That may not sound radical to today’s feminists, but in the field of evolutionary biology, such a pronouncement has long bordered on the heretical. Generations of biologists have focused on male behavior and physiology, on the assumption that females are little more than baby-making machines to be won over by the strongest, showiest males.

chickvandyke-deactivated2023112

“Historically, when females did something potentially interesting, like exercise leadership over their social groups, many scientists scratched their heads and chalked it up as an aberration. When behavior didn’t fit the mold, like female-dominant spotted hyenas or peaceable male pinyon jays, it was either ignored or shoehorned into existing theory. For instance, ornithologists posited that aggressive female pinyon jays must suffer “the avian equivalent of PMS,” Cooke writes. The reality is that pinyon jays have a complex social hierarchy that doesn’t include the “alpha male” that scientists had expected. In recent years, scientists (many, but not all of them, female themselves) have begun to challenge Darwinian dogma about the sexes and submit it to rigorous testing.”

absolutely fucking incredible

astonishing, even

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

austereanastasia