Archive Info
Just putting this here to be pinned so people know that I am GoofyBoss
AO3
Current Primary Projects (As of April 2025)
An Archivistâs Spark (MegOP Fic)
NOTICE - All BNHA related projects are on hiatus
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available

Kiana Khansmith
đ
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Keni
Fai_Ryy

romaâ

No title available
The Bright Sessions
Mike Driver
taylor price
art blog(derogatory)

blake kathryn
tumblr dot com
The Stonewall Inn
Cosimo Galluzzi
The Bowery Presents
h
noise dept.

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Maldives

seen from Ukraine
seen from Brazil

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from India
seen from Brazil
seen from Guatemala
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Myanmar (Burma)
@boss-the-goofball
Archive Info
Just putting this here to be pinned so people know that I am GoofyBoss
AO3
Current Primary Projects (As of April 2025)
An Archivistâs Spark (MegOP Fic)
NOTICE - All BNHA related projects are on hiatus
Hello.
On the subject of AI, I have a confession to make: I use it. Not to write for me, but to help me check for inconsistencies, to brainstorm ideas, to write outlines, to give me a couple of lines when I've been stuck for hours, to be my beta reader, if you will. Generative AI is bad? Yes, but it also a useful tool if one isn't lazy. I don't ask: write me a story. I go with my story and ask: help me with continuity. Look, this paragraph is clunky, how do I make it better? The demonization of generative AI is fair, but to be honest, I also understand people who use it. Maybe they're afraid of writing themselves, maybe they're insecure and don't trust their prose. Maybe they have brilliannt ideas but they need help to make them become fics.
To me, this is very much connected to my last ask where I was talking about how we don't have enough mentors in fandom to support the influx of people entering it.
All of the things that you're asking AI to do used to be done by a beta reader (or more than one!). A fandom friend (or even a random stranger who volunteered) would read through your work and help you with those issues.
Betas are amazing. They can help with grammar and spelling. They can regionalize language. They can provide sensitivity reading if they're from a marginalized community that you're writing about and aren't a member of. They can track canon, help with research, even just be a sounding board to discuss ideas with.
And sometimes, they're just a cheer reader - someone reading your story and telling you how awesome it is because they love it just as much as you do.
I understand turning to AI if you 1) don't know beta readers exist or 2) don't know how to obtain one. The need for that kind of support doesn't go away just because you can't access it.
But for anyone out there who needs this kind of help and wants to avoid Gen AI, you can write a post on your blog, add it to an author's note, check out resources like @needabeta or - if the time of year is right and you have the funds - place a bid on beta reading services during @fandomtrumpshate
Beta readers are often involved in fandom events like big bangs and exchanges, and if anyone is looking to host such an event, it's a great way to get people involved who aren't writers or artists but would love to help out.
I get it, anon. We use the tools that are available to us. But here's another potential tool if you're interested in branching out?
Sometimes it's scary to post a message asking for beta readers, you are putting yourself out there, you have no idea who might respond to your message (if anyone at all) and nowadays a lot of bots are muddying the waters.
I definitely recommend searching a beta reader within the fandom you're writing for rather than someone who knows nothing about it.
And when you don't immediately get a response, ask again. This comes from a person (me) who is now two and a half years into dating the girl who replied to my 'I need a beta reader' post that I was debating to reblog that day.
Sometimes I wonder where our lives would be if I hadn't reblogged it or if she had skipped past the post.
Fandom is a community of people with shared interests. It's supposed to make it easier for us to become friends, hang out and talk for hours.
Not a single AI tool in the world is capable of giving (fandom) writers/artists/creators what they actually need.
Connection.
On a related note, members of the community betaplease on Dreamwidth would love to see more activity there! If you're looking to be a beta or get a beta, that might be a good place to check out.
I also cannot emphasize enough: those things you are asking generative AI to do? Those are not things it is actually capable of doing. It cannot actually recognize inconsistencies in your writing, but it can generate a simulation of what an analysis might look like. If you're treating this like meaningful advice, you are doing your writing a disservice.
I see a lot of people say, "sure, I'd love to do this the right way, but I just don't have the resources, so the AI is the best option I have," and you can't combat that by saying "no you have to find a person." But crucially, the AI is not actually helping you. You would be better off without it.
Somthing that I think is honestly really funny , is how the brim cap SOLD the book to Coco.
Like not only was he setting this kid up for the horrors , but he also took her fucking money ???
Like Why ?????
Flew into a blind rage and made this after reading this post.
"Why do they care about Fauci now?"
Because of the midterms
"Covid was years ago I don't understand why theyre rehashing it!"
The midterms are happening in a few months
"How can they hold him in contempt? He didn't say anything!"
They're performing political theater to remind people of how upset they were during the pandemic about the decisions being made because the midterms are happening in November and the Covid backlash is how they won 2024.
Please please please learn to recognize political theater when it's happening. It'll spare you so much grief.
AMERICANS!!! DO NOT DO THIS TO FLOCK 'SECURITY' CAMERAS. REPOST AND SPREAD THE WORD
do not get IR blocking fabric or thick wool to cover your nose and mouth
do not get IR blocking sunglasses since facial recognition has moved up to targeting and identifying the upper face
do not avoid having your phone or any bluetooth devices around these cameras as they can detect and track those signals
do not buy cheap green lasers 1 milliwatt or above from etsy or walmart or amazon (i will not try and find a link if you ask)
do not use them to fry those fuckers from a distance damage the delicate inner sensors by pointing the beam in the lenses
AND unless you want to cost Flock more money in repairs, do not buy a small circle saw or a reciprocating saw and cut down the pole
OR do not climb said poles, spray paint on the solar panels, cover the lens with paint or a sticker, then use bolt cutters to sever the wires
when doing all these things, DO NOT avoid using latex gloves as fingerprints can leak through
DO NOT USE DEFLOCK TO FIND FLOCK SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS NEAR YOU
remember, flock is for YOUR safety :) even though crime rates have not gone down since they were implemented, they're being abused to track down exes and s/os, and many face pools or houses or schools or gymnasiums! Where there are no liscence plates to be found!
DO NOT DO THESE THINGS and enjoy a life under surveillance!
enjoy living in the country where 87,000 of these cameras were used to track down a woman who got an abortion!
enjoy living in the country where there's no consequences for a flock exec to watch a inside of a gymnastics place without their knowledge!
Remember, this is their American Dream.
EDIT: 53 cities have cancelled contracts with flock and are now turning to Axon, in which đş invested 1-5 million dollars earlier this year.
adulthood notes:
The Rodeo Rule: you only have to do it for the first time once.
The Rohan Rule: if you are at a social function full of new people and you want to be liked, find someone doing important work like setup or food prep and offer to help.
The Tutorial Mode Rule: to navigate an unfamiliar situation where you fear you will mess up an interaction, preface the interaction by mentioning that you've never done this before, and let them know if you have a specific concern or question.
The Rocket Science Rule: most new things you want to try seem very complicated but are simple when taken step by step.
The [X] Will Remember That Rule: if you need to make small talk with the same person on a regular basis, try to save one fact or current event in their life from a given conversation and bring it up next time you talk.
The Cool Binder Rule: by wearing clothes and accessories that are to your taste instead of trying to blend in, people will be more likely to compliment you and show interest in you as a person.
Phenomenal spare wheel cover I walked past the other day
charles knows exactly what the word means
So Marble and I had a chat about upcoming events in "Save a Grimlock, Ride a Decepticon Outlaw" and we all know Marble has a bottom Megatron agenda.
So anyway! Optimus is going to be carrying in this fic, but I need help deciding on one important matter!
Which Scenario?
Optimus carries either Sari or Roller
Optimus carries both Sari and Roller (Twinsies!)
Optimus carries Roller and Megatron carries Sari at the same time!
It gets funny when you forget you're following someone and then get a sudden jumpscare when they make a post.
ROUND 2 â Match 76 of 138
The Dark Urge (Baldur's Gate 3)
Problematic because: "Dark Urge is kind of a special case because they can be played as redeemed, resisting, fully evil, or somewhere in the middle, but the backstory is still insane. Before the Nautiloid, they were the Chosen of Bhaal(the God of Murder), one of the people behind the Absolute plot, and Gortashâs original co-conspirator before Orin betrayed them. So even if you play them as trying really hard to be better, their past is basically âserial killer cult leader helped invent the main crisis of the game.â In-game, they can also do some truly awful things depending on player choices, and even a resisting Durge has at least one horrible forced moment with Alfira or Quil. They can give in to the Urge repeatedly, kill companions or innocents, embrace Bhaal again, take over the Netherbrain in his name, and generally become exactly the kind of person everyone was afraid they might be. So, yeah: murder cult backstory, Absolute plot involvement, Bhaalspawn problems, potential companion-killing, and the looming possibility of becoming the worldâs worst relapse arc. âŚAlso it's kind of implied in dialogue with their butler that they were a necrophiliac and cannibal?" Propaganda: 1. "You can play them as someone clawing their way out of a past they barely remember, or as someone happily walking straight back into it, and both routes make sense in a horrible way. I love that the game doesnât let the redemption version be clean. Even if they resist, thereâs still blood behind them, fear around them, and this constant question of whether being better counts if the worst parts of you are still technically yours. Itâs messy, uncomfortable, and probably the most interesting origin in the game." 2. "tav is out here having a normal fantasy adventure and durge is slowly discovering they were basically the cancelled co-founder of the apocalypse. every long rest is a gamble, your butler is a freak, your family situation is somehow worse than everyone elseâs, and gortash greets you like you used to have matching evil friendship bracelets. absolute disaster. incredible origin. 10/10 would put in therapy and also maybe a locked room overnight." 3. "I enjoy the exploration and slow unveiling of their backstory. As they realise how fucked up they were they (through the player) can go through a moral quandary, either revelling in their past or regretting it and wanting to be different. I deeply enjoy that the game allows you to play a fully (even, comically) evil character with no reserves. Probably one of the most problematic of problematic characters out there."
vs. Albert Wesker (Resident Evil)
Problematic because: "The original âthe hot man in sunglasses has betrayed everyoneâ Resident Evil problem. He starts as captain of S.T.A.R.S., the elite police unit sent into the Spencer Mansion, but heâs secretly an Umbrella spy using his own team as test subjects/data collection for the companyâs bioweapon research. He survives through an experimental virus, gets superhuman abilities, steals/reuses bioweapon research, works with rival organisations, manipulates Adaâs mission around the Plaga sample, and eventually ends up in Resident Evil 5 trying to release Uroboros across the world. His plan there is basically forced âevolutionâ - most people die horribly, a tiny number survive, and Wesker gets to stand there pretending this is science instead of eugenics. Also, after Jill and Wesker fall during the Spencer estate incident, he keeps her alive, uses her as a test subject, and later controls her with the P30 device so she fights Chris and Sheva while fully aware but unable to stop herself. Then he betrays Excella too by infecting her with Uroboros once sheâs no longer useful. Weskerâs whole thing is treating every person around him - teammates, allies, enemies, women who trust him, literally the entire planet - like material for the next stage of his plan." Propaganda: 1. "Wesker is terrible, obviously, but heâs terrible in such a satisfying old-school video game villain way. He has the betrayal twist, the sunglasses indoors, the secret lab job, the ridiculous superhuman dodging, the obsession with Chris, the god complex, the voice. What makes him fun is that heâs both genuinely important to the horror plot and completely over-the-top by the end. The early games have him as this cold traitor working in the background, and then by RE5 heâs talking about world evolution while punching people through walls and planning mass bioterrorism on a global scale. It should be too much, but itâs Resident Evil, so somehow itâs exactly enough." 2. "wesker is THE resident evil problematic fave to me because every time he shows up the plot immediately gets more stupid and more serious at the same time. like yes, he betrayed his team. yes, he worked for umbrella. yes, he did virus crimes, jill crimes, global saturation crimes, and âchris i have thought about you an extremely normal amountâ crimes. but also. look at him. the man is dressed like a matrix villain. heâs awful, heâs iconic, heâs impossible to take fully seriously, and yet he still feels like a real threat whenever heâs onscreen." 3. "Imagine surviving the mansion incident and finding out your captain was secretly working for the evil pharmaceutical company the whole time. Already bad. Then he comes back with glowing eyes, super speed, a trenchcoat, new virus nonsense, and the confidence of someone who has never once thought âmaybe this is a bit much.â By RE5 he is fully trying to rewrite humanity because apparently being a normal evil scientist wasnât dramatic enough. He is not morally grey. He is not misunderstood. He is a bioterrorism peacock with a superiority complex and a weirdly personal beef with Chris Redfield. But thatâs why he belongs here. Sometimes a problematic character is compelling because theyâre nuanced, sometimes theyâre compelling because they walk into the room, adjust their sunglasses, say something unhinged about evolution, and make the entire fanbase go âoh thank god, this idiot again.â"
Who should advance?
The Dark Urge
Albert Wesker
(Disclaimer: All text above was sent in by submitters and not written by OP.)
Need I say more?
So Marble and I had a chat about upcoming events in "Save a Grimlock, Ride a Decepticon Outlaw" and we all know Marble has a bottom Megatron agenda.
So anyway! Optimus is going to be carrying in this fic, but I need help deciding on one important matter!
Which Scenario?
Optimus carries either Sari or Roller
Optimus carries both Sari and Roller (Twinsies!)
Optimus carries Roller and Megatron carries Sari at the same time!
rb and tag your favorite song that's not in english, japanese or korean
Ngl the actual criticism could be legitimate but if i see a post criticising an individual creator and when you look at that person's account it's ALL just long posts criticising that creator and attacking them personally like
That's no longer legit. It's at best obsessive, at worst, harassmsnt
Like esp when it's a smaller creator like an author or an artist, if the blogger in question is basically a one-man protest brigade against that person, and that person hasn't actually like. Done anything hurtful to an individual - ie like. Sexual assault, physical abuse, theft, etc
Then it's like. Cool. What's happened here is you as an individual have gotten really fixated on this creator or their work as Representative Of All Wrongs.
No amount of apology or change of behaviour from them will matter, bc you're being obsessive and parasocial.
And i won't reward that
And i certainly will not engage with it
It's good to like, aware of media and engage critically but when you're just like. Obsessed with a random person and stalking their socials and doing the "this bitch eating crackers" shtick but with beefed up media criticism language, that's NOT good
As always, remember to have hobbies and activities that are not social media, that involve friendships in meatspace where possible, that are creative or constructive in a way that satisfies you
If you find yourself fixated on someone like this, take a step back, take a breath, and redirect.
I have a new standard for the level of haterdom to aspire to, and it's Reddit User KismaiAesthetics, who hates doing laundry so much that he got really good at it, so that he can (I quote) do it right the first time, every time, and get back to watching cat videos on the Internet.
and by "really good at it," I mean that he does a bunch of reading on the chemistry of laundry, subscribes to academic journals about laundry, and buys a bunch of different laundry products (including from outside the US) to scrutinize their ingredients and test them for himself. he writes a bunch of incredibly detailed longposts about his findings on /r/laundry and his website, which is also about laundry. he even got interviewed about his laundryposts, in which he revealed he's writing a book about laundry. this man is like ahab and the white whale, if ahab had a reddit account and moby dick was a pile of clothes with cheeseburger stains on them
anyway the reason I encountered this guy was because recently, the household washer has been leaving these gross little oily brown flakes on anything washed in it. this is kind of a big problem for me, given that I not only have (literal, diagnosed, medicated) OCD which includes a contagion phobia, I also sew a bunch of stuff with the intent of gifting or selling it, and sometimes that involves prewashing fabric. only, you know, washing is supposed to make things cleaner, not dirtier.
and my research brought me to (gross photos warning!) Kismai's post on the very topic. apparently this stuff is called "scrud," and it's basically a residue that forms over time inside the nooks and crannies of a washing machine - leftover detergent reacting with mineral traces in tapwater to form a buildup that also traps dyes, grease, and other dirt, which bacteria then feeds on, because it wasn't already gross enough. it forms faster if you have hard water, use too much detergent (which most people do), use fabric softener, wash only on cold and the list goes on and on - point is, scrud is the reason that you have to actually clean your washing machine, or be super fastidious about how you do laundry.
(I'll take "things I wish school/my parents actually taught me" for 800)
so now I am engaged in a lengthy battle against scrud, armed with a tub of oxiclean and a sack of citric acid crystals. (we're renters, so disassembling the machine is out of the question.) pour in a scoop of oxiclean, run a machine clean cycle, pour in a scoop of citric acid, run another machine clean cycle, all while wiping piles and piles of scrud out of the drum at the end of each cycle. I'm on the eighth cycle now. there's still so much scrud. the reddit record for "how many cleaning cycles were needed to get a machine entirely free of scrud" is 22 cycles. help
hey so like
it turns out that laundry sucks significantly less when your clothes and sheets and etc actually come out of the machine looking, feeling, and smelling clean, rather than looking, feeling, and smelling like despair dipped in slime
... do i make it a Thing and all my wha fics get named after plants in universe
Yes.
Don't be a coward.
Fucking do it!
In the 1960â˛s Legally a woman couldnât
Open a bank account or get a credit card without signed permission from her father or hr husband.
Serve on a jury - because it might inconvenience the family not to have the woman at home being her husbandâs helpmate.
Obtain any form of birth control without her husbandâs permission. You had to be married, and your hub and had to agree to postpone having children.
Get an Ivy League education. Ivy League schools were menâs colleges ntil the 70â˛s and 80â˛s. When they opened their doors to women it was agree that women went there for their MRS. Degee.
Experience equality in the workplace: Kennedyâs Commission on the Status of Women produced a report in 1963 that revealed, among other things, that women earned 59 cents for every dollar that men earned and were kept out of the more lucrative professional positions.
Keep her job if she was pregnant.Until the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in 1978, women were regularly fired from their workplace for being pregnant.
Refuse to have sex with her husband.The mid 70s saw most states recognize marital rape and in 1993 it became criminalized in all 50 states. Nevertheless, marital rape is still often treated differently to other forms of rape in some states even today.
Get a divorce with some degree of ease.Before the No Fault Divorce law in 1969, spouses had to show the faults of the other party, such as adultery, and could easily be overturned by recrimination.
Have a legal abortion in most states.The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 protected a womanâs right to abortion until viability.
Take legal action against workplace sexual harassment. According to The Week, the first time a court recognized office sexual harassment as grounds for legal action was in 1977.
Play college sports Title IX of the  Education Amendments of protects people from discrimination  based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial  assistance It was nt until this statute that colleges had teams for womenâs sports
Apply for menâs Jobs  The EEOC rules that sex-segregated help wanted ads in newspapers are illegal.  This ruling is upheld in 1973 by the Supreme Court, opening the way for women to apply for higher-paying jobs hitherto open only to men.
This is why we needed feminism - this is why we know that feminism works
I just want to reiterate this stuff, because I legit get the feeling there are a lot of younger women for whom it hasnât really sunk in what it is todayâs GOP is actively trying to return to.
Did you go to a good college? Shame on you, you took a college placement that could have gone to a man who deserves and needs it to support or prepare for his wife & children. But if you really must attend college, well, some men like that, you can still get married if you focus on finding the right man.
Got a job? Why? A man could be doing that job. You should be at home caring for a family. You shouldnât be taking that job away from a man who needs it (see college, above). You definitely donât have a career â youâll be pregnant and raising children soon, so no need to worry about promoting you.
This shit was within living memory. IâM A MILLENIAL and my mother was in the second class that allowed women at an Ivy League school. Men who are alive today either personally remember shit like this or have parents/family who have raised them into thinking this was the way America functioned back in the blissful Good Old Days. There are literally dudes in the GOP old enough to remember when it was like this and yearn for those days to return.
When people talk about resisting conservativism and the GOP, weâre not just talking about whether the wage gap is a myth or not. Weâre talking about whether women even have the fundamental right to exist as individuals, to run their own households and compete for jobs and be considered on an equal footing with men in any arena at all in the first place.
I was a child in the 1960s, a teenager in the 1970s, a young adult in the 1980s. This is what it was like: When I was growing up, it was considered unfortunate if a girl was good at sports. Girls were not allowed in Little League. Girlsâ teams didnât exist in high school, except at all-girlsâ high schools. Boys played sports, and girls were the cheerleaders. People used to ask me as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up. I said I wanted to be a brain surgeon or the first woman justice on the Supreme Court. Everyone told me it was impossibleâthose just werenât realistic goals for a girlâthe latter, especially, because you couldnât trust women to judge fairly and rationally, after all. In the 1960s and 1970s, all women were identified by their marital status, even in arrest reports and obituaries. In elementary school, my science teacher referred to Pierre Curie as DOCTOR Curie and Marie Curie as MRS. CurieâŚbecause, as he put it, âshe was just his wife.â (Both had doctorates and both were Nobel prize winners, so you would think that both would be accorded respect.) Companies could and did require women to wear dresses and skirts. Failure to do could and did get women fired. And it was legal. It was also legal to fire women for getting married or getting pregnant. The rationale was that a woman who was married or who had a child had no business working; that was what her husband was for. Aetna Insurance, the biggest insurance company in America, fired women for all of the above. A man could rape his wife. Legally. I can remember being twelve years old and reading about legal experts actually debating whether or not a man could actually be said to coerce his wife into having sex. This was a serious debate in 1974. The debate about marital rape came up in my law school, too, in 1984. Could a woman be raped by her husband? The guys all said noâa woman got married, so she was consenting to sex at all times. So I turned it around. I asked them if, since a man had gotten married, that meant that his wife could shove a dildo or a stick or something up his ass any time she wanted to for HER sexual pleasure. (Hey, I thought it was reasonable. If one gender was legally entitled to force sex on the other, then obviously the reverse should also be true.) The male law students didnât like the idea. Interestingly, they commented that being treated like that would make them feel like a woman. My reaction was, âThank you for proving my pointâŚâ The concept of date rape, when first proposed, was considered laughable. If a woman went out on a date, the argument of legal experts ran, sexual consent was implied. Even more sickening was the fact that in some statesâeven in the early 1980sâa man could rape his daughterâŚand it was no worse than a misdemeanor. Women taking self-defense classes in the 1970s and 1980s were frequently described in books and on TV as âcute.â The implication was that it was absurd for a woman to attempt to defend herself, but wasnât it just adorable for her to try? I was expressly forbidden to take computer classes in junior and senior years of high schoolâ1978-79 and 1979-80âbecause, as the principal told me, âOnly boys have to know that kind of thing. You girls are going to get married, and you wonât use it.â When I was in collegeâfrom 1980 to 1984âthere were no womensâ studies. The idea hadnât occurred in many places because the presumption was that there was nothing TO study. My history professorâa man who had a doctorate in historyâinformed me quite seriously that women had never produced a noted painter, sculptor, composer, architect or scientist becauseâŚwait for itâŚwomensâ brains were too small. (He was very surprised when I came up with a list of fifty women gifted in the arts and science, most of whom he had never heard of before.) When Walter Mondale picked Geraldine Ferraro as a running mate in 1984, the press hailed it as a disaster. What would happen, they asked fearfully, if Mondale died and Ferraro became president? What if an international crisis arose and she was menstruating? She could push the nuclear button in a fit of PMS! It would be the end of the WORLD!! âŚNo, they WERENâT kidding. On the surface, things are very different now than they were when I was a child, a teen and a young adult. But Iâm afraid that people now do not realize what it was like then. Iâve read a lot of posts from young women who say that they are not feminists. If the only exposure to feminism they have is the work of extremists, I cannot blame them overmuch. I wish that I could tell them what feminism was like when it was newâwhen the dream of legal equality was just a dream, and hadnât even begun to come true. When âwomanâs workâ was a sneerâand an overt putdown. When people tut-tutted over bright and athletic girls with the words, âReally, itâs a shame sheâs not a boy.â That lack of feminism wasnât all men opening doors and picking up checks. A lot of it was an attitude of patronizing contempt that hasnât entirely died out, but which has become less publicly acceptable. I wish I could make them feel what it was likeâŚwhen grown men were called âmenâ and grown women were âgirls.â
Know your history.
So this, too, is what they mean saying âmake America great againâ and/or the good old days.
REBLOG FOREVER.
I am 70. I remember all those things. I was a student nurse from 64 to 67 and we were not permitted to âfinishâ a bed bath on a male or insert a catheter in a male. Seeing male genitals might cause us âharmâ or upset our delicate sensibilities. Imagine when we graduated and were âthrownâ to the wolves. Imagine if you were a male patient who had to be the first to be âpracticedâ on by a graduate nurse. (Ha!) At the school I attended no student nurse could be married. Only one school in my city (Atlanta) would even admit married women and Male Nurses werenât even thought of. What man would want to be a nurse when he could be a Doctor. In all my training I only remember 3 or 4 Women who were Doctorâs and a very few, (less than 5 or 6) female interns or residents (and this was a teaching hospital) and most of those were OB/Gyns and one was a pediatrician.
When I graduated and was going to get married I wanted to go on birth control pills. You needed to be on them for a least one cycle before they were effective. I wonât go into what hoops I had to jump through to get a prescription from my Dr. (a man, natch) but when i went to the drug store to get the prescription filled I ended up having to get my future husband to âaccompanyâ me so the pharmacist âinterviewâ him and see if it was okay with him for me to be on the pill.
Even when we went to get a marriage license I had to get my Fatherâs signature and we had to go before a Judge because I was not yet 21 (I was 20 and 9 months).
I could go on and on, getting a credit card in MY name, etc., but I will tell you that WE MUST RESIST.
The number of people I know who romanticize gender inequality is frankly terrifying. A world never existed in which the lives of women were simplified by benevolent men who saw to her every want and need. That was not a thing. A world never existed in which women were all ladies, men were all gentlemen, & everything was some great big cishet fairytale. Feminists arenât a bunch of upstarts who want to destroy a perfectly wholesome and non-harmful system. JustâŚlook at history. Look at the posts above. We. Must. Resist..
About 8: The State of New York only added No-Fault Divorce as an option in 2010 (!!!)
I want to repeat here.Â
This is what they mean, when they say âOld-fashioned valuesâ
When conservatives start waxing lyrical about the âgood old daysâ, this is what they mean. They are fully aware how much things blew for women, and they would like to return to that.Â
At first I re-blogged this with no commentary added because itâs already so thorough and good.
But then I realized I actually do want to add something. This was written nine years ago. In the 9 years that have come to pass the white nationalist Christian fascism ultra right agenda of misogyny has had many victories.
In the United States just off the top of my head a very few examples: thereâs no longer a legally protected right to abortion. Countless laws across our country police, how woman you must look or be to enter a public bathroom. We know with certainty the president and countless people around him are pedophiles and rapists. Womenâs participation in the workforce has been rolled back to 1980s levels. The pressure to be thin is higher now than 10 years ago.