
#extradirty

No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

No title available
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
occasionally subtle
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available
NASA
untitled
cherry valley forever
Show & Tell
𓃗

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

Love Begins

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
taylor price

seen from South Africa

seen from Vietnam
seen from Israel

seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Tanzania

seen from United States
seen from Estonia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
@c4rr1ee
happy last day of pride to the gay snails who hug and kiss for hours without mating
This is your reminder today that Irene Adler in the original Conan Doyle story is literally not a criminal. She never commits a crime.
Nor is she a seductress in any kind of negative or manipulative sense - she has a mutual relationship with a powerful man who then breaks up with her, and afterwards she keeps protection against him in the form of evidence that the relationship existed. She HAS blackmail material, she even waves it at him threateningly because he treated her like shit, but she never even uses it.
Irene Adler is not a thief, femme fatale, or blackmailer. She's just a cool lady that wants to be left alone.
@delphi-star You do recall correctly!! She does not give a shit about that man! She's happily married! She tipped him for being a witness at her wedding!
If your Sherlock Holmes adaptation has a character whose identifying qualities are that she is a seductive criminal in love with Holmes, you have created a character that is basically the literal opposite of Irene Adler and you should name her something else.
She's also -- and I cannot stress this enough -- from New Jersey. IMO this is the single most important detail missing from all the adaptations -- IRENE ADLER IS FROM NEW JERSEY.
Please just once in my life I would like to see this adapted faithfully it would be the funniest fucking thing ever.
Irene Adler in the actual books: a successful opera singer who once dated a king, and kept a photo of them together and his love letters so that if he ever tried to ruin her life in the future she could have some security against him, literally commits no crimes at all and in fact is a victim of a crime (Holmes literally breaks into her house with the intent to steal from her), never uses her blackmail material because all she wants is to marry her new (much nicer) boyfriend and go off and sing in the opera and live her fabulous life with her loving husband
Every male writer adapting Sherlock Holmes for all of eternity: WHORE??? SLUT???? SHAMELESS SEDUCTRESS??? FEMME FATALE?????? CAREER CRIMINAL!!!!! BLACKMAILER!!!!!!! DOMINATRIX SEXY MOMMY DOM LOVE INTEREST?????? NAKED WOMAN???????????? IN LOVE WITH SHERLOCK HOLMES????????????????? DANGEROUS SEXY WOMAN MANIPULATIVE SEDUCTRESS CRIMINAL LIAR DISTRACTS GENIUS DETECTIVE WITH HER GORGEOUS TITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bedheaded League, are you perhaps mad about Irene Adler?
WHATEVER GAVE YOU THAT THOUGHT?????
more pyaari everyone say hi to pyaari
you dont have to be a parent to understand the horror of walking into a room to discover that the baby crawled out of his crib and onto that pottery wheel you forgot to turn off, and while the baby is spinning around and around, the dog is sitting there all calm, like a person, gently using his paws to fashion the babys soft cartilage head into something a little more modern. it might be the classic tale of bad parenting, but lets see where the dog is going with this
This post is from 2013. It has less than 100 notes. Together we can revive this work of art that tragically ahead of its time. We’re ready for it now
But reylo really is the most heterosexual ship out there because the man’s violence and anger and general immaturity are taken to be romantic and the woman’s clear feelings of disgust/hatred/fear of the man are completely ignored.
to think they crucified me for this and acted like I was shitting on DV victims. I’ll add that reylo is white as FUCK.
I’ve managed to make all my straight friends feel like being straight is illegal and deviant and I think they’re actually enjoying the game
Apparently the dude who runs the crematorium is just fundamentally confused about how advertising works. He actually thought that the way you made an ad was you found a picture that got people’s attention … and then also included information about your company. He was genuinely surprised and baffled when people thought there was any relationship between the (independently nonsensical) captioned image and his cremation business. There were two more ads in the series that are equally, just… so much…
_______________________________________________________________
this is somehow incredibly effective tbh
It's so awesome cool and progressive that the second result of looking up a trans woman on this site is a dedicated hate blog that specifically states "DNI if you defend this trans woman"
But it's okay guys, they put a sign saying "don't harass the tranny! Just let me collect all the reasons that she is unforgivable in one place :)"
It is incredibly telling that there isnt a massive anti-oneyplays fandom despite Smiling Friends being an equally popular show among tumblr queers and those guys actually doing everything gooseworx has been accused of and more "She joked about being the next Shadman!" wow that's crazy. Chris O'Neil housed Shadman and actively defended all the vile shit he did on twitter, including lolicon of real actual children. Why is nobody talking about this. Where is the anti oneyplays fan club. Or anti GameGrumps. Or (and this is a hot one) anti Dropout. Why is there only a hate club for the tranny. Why are the hate clubs only ever for the trannies? But of course, "DNI if you make it about her being trans, thats totally not why she became our target"
I would appreciate it if people reblogged this version that specifically calls out that none of the cis men in the same industry are held to the same standard even when they've done worse, continue to do worse and have not shown any sign of changing or regretting their past actions besides "I stopped saying the n word because people would get mad at me" and not because it's racist.
For god's sake the same people that deride Gooseworx on every social media site will sometimes straight up have Max "hotdiggitydemon" "Steven Jewniverse" "Steven N***averse" "Sans from Undertale calls Papyrus the nword" "Still actively racist" Gilardy profile pics with zero self reflection. And I'm supposed to take anything ever said about "holding trans women accountable " seriously? Gimme a break
Teacher: guys this Tumblr post is 36281992 years old and only the long lost Tumblr princess can read it
Me: but teacher, I can read it just fine *starts reading in perfect tumblanese*
Who reblogged this 30 times
Who reblogged this 60 times
Keep going guys, we can get 100
STOP vagueposting TELL ME WHO YOURE TOAKING ABOJT PLEAAASE😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😢😢pleas😢😢😢😢😢😖😖😖😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭ohmggof Hyperventilates and throws up and dies Unless everyone tells me who they’re talking about Whenever they vaguepost ever
this is a post about being right about capitalism. would that, if it were true, make him not right about capitalism
but also uh.
The "Marx hated Jews" thing comes from the fact that he wrote an essay titled "On The Jewish Question."
That phrasing raises alarm bells because we associate the term "The Jewish Question" with Nazis, but it was just the way issues like this were phrased within these philosophical circles. And honestly even beyond that it's more of a translation convention than anything else. You could just as easily have translated that title as "Regarding the Matter of Jews."
The essay is actually a response to another philosopher named Bauer, who claimed that Jews would only be liberated if they stopped being Jewish, because true emancipation requires secularism. The essays Marx is responding to are blatantly antisemitic, even by late-19th century standards. Bauer was arguing that Jews who wanted liberation from oppression were basically asking for "special privileges," (in an argument that bears some similarity to modern concepts of "reverse racism") and implying that Jews aren't even oppressed because they control the economy.
Marx's "On The Jewish Question" is basically him saying Bauer is dumb and wrong and antisemitic, and he's being deeply sarcastic for most of the essay.
He does so by throwing Bauer's antisemitism back in his face, by using a series of antisemitic arguments about how the real religion of the Jew is money and huckstering, and so if you want to abolish Judaism, you'd have to abolish economic exploitation. He's responding directly to Bauer's use of antisemitic tropes about how Jews control the economy. He's using Bauer's own antisemitic framework to prove Bauer wrong.
This also goes back to the conflict between Marx and the rest of the Young Hegelians (which Bauer was). He was constantly criticizing them for being too idealistic and abstract, rather than focusing on material realities. His argument here was "You're framing 'the Jewish Question' as if it's a theological problem, but it's not. It's a political and economic one." Because he was Karl Marx and that was his whole thing.
I really don't understand how anyone reads this essay as anything but sarcasm. I get that some of it is probably lost in translation, but the context makes it really clear that Marx is making fun of Bauer. The idea of Jews giving up their religion would have been deeply personal to Marx. He would have understood exactly what it meant for Jews to give up their religion, and how that was an act of oppression rather than liberation from it. Also, Marx and Bauer had already split by the time this essay was written, and they kind of hated each other. Marx wrote a lot of responses to/criticisms of Bauer, and he called Bauer a "right wing fanatic" multiple times.
Like, what's actually more likely here?
Option 1: Karl Marx, a Jewish man, wrote one essay that is totally at odds with all his other analysis on the nature of oppression to be rabidly antisemitic and then basically never discussed the subject again?
Option 2: Karl Marx, a Jewish man and a well-known lover of pettiness and drama, wrote an incredibly sarcastic essay making fun of a raging antisemite that he already he didn't like?
I like this addition. Funny how capitalism, antisemitism and right to exist just hasn’t changed in the last 200 years since this German economist’s time.