Jay's cave of horrors @c4tb1rd - Tumblr Blog

☢️Meet the artist☢️

Hello, my name is Jay! I’m a 19 year old transmasc cosmic horror coming at you from the PNW. I may or may not emit radiation at concerning levels :)

My Ghost sideblog is @dewdrops-whammy-bar if you want to see me be horny about demons and sexy old men

Pronouns- He/it

Main fandoms- Hermitcraft, Life Series, QSMP, WTNV, TMA, JRWI, SCU, Genloss, Resident Evil, Ghost

Favorite streamers- Ranboo, Aimsey, Sniff, Sneegsnag, Slimecicle, Jerma

Favorite bands- Ghost, Los Campasinos, Will Wood, MCR, Subvision, Repugnant, Drag Talk, Against Me!, Mitski

Other interests- Forensics, radiation, psychology, horror, candid photography, TTRPGs, cosplay, generally making stuff, human rights activism, alt rock music, writing fanfic, journaling, sleeping

Other socials:

Insta, Tiktok, A03- c4tb1rd

I’m also autistic and a fictive heavy DID system!

If you’re reading this, remember you are loved <3

#intro post

gorgynei

new propaganda campaign just dropped

vulturevanity

hate what people did to the dead dove tag

vulturevanity

mothers and fuckers of the jury. "Dead dove: do not eat" is a label on a bag in the fridge. It means "the content of this bag is exactly what is labeled". It does not mean "trigger warning uhhh something". In fact, it means the exact opposite of "trigger warning uhhh something", because you use it with other tags. You write a fucked up fic with extreme violence and gore, you tag it as "extreme violence", "gore" and you tag it with "dead dove: do not eat". You write a fic with emotional abuse, gaslighting and manipulation, you tag it with "emotional abuse", "gaslighting" and "dead dove: do not eat". You write a fic with your extremely niche kink that appeals to like 3 other people and may skeeve out the rest of the fandom, you tag that with your kink and "dead dove: do not eat". It's so people know you really mean the content warnings.

It's NOT a catch-all term for "uhhh this may be fucked idk". TAG YOUR SHIT GENEROUSLY.

#important #currently in the beginning stages of a fic that will be very dead dove appropriate and I'm gonna slap that warning everywhere on that shit #you better READ THE TAGS

tuberrrrrr

"i asked chatgpt-" ok well i asked niklaus hendrix and now i have his initials tattooed on me as a womb tattoo so whos really winning here

#my beautiful wife #i havent jrwiposted in a while #probably time to get back on that #niklaus hendrix

turquoisemagpie

Introduce a law to legally protect the right of those aged 18 and over to transition using NHS services. This should specifically cover phys

Uk peeps!! Let’s get this going! 🏳️‍⚧️🇬🇧

18thcenturythirsttrap

...Non-UK peeps, please reblog for reach ❤️

Top surgery is not enough I need to hack my body like a 3DS

#jay feeds the void

enygma-and-crow-show

Hello everyone! I'm sure this has probably been mentioned or talked about before, but I have something I want to day about the irony of Rouges! The Podcast's Edward Nygma and a comment he made on a very specific ask and how it is hilarious to me that his very response to it is him somehow predicting the downfall of his and Jon's friendship. (I know it's probably a coincidence but who cares. Also i have yet to listen to the latest ep of Rouges, pls dont spoil it for me!)

Now which episode might I be talking about? To be specific, Rouges! The Podcast, Season Two, Episode 7: Weakness as a Trait. This is how the episode starts (thanks Codot for uploading a transcript to RSS):

"Jordenmendes says: I need your opinion on this one. What’s a trait someone could have that could make them weak? Now don’t just say stupidity, ignorance, or something of that sort. Really think about it. What’s a trait that could only day become a weakness for someone?"

Of course Edward gets annoyed at the user for assuming his answer and proceedings to tell to never tell him what to do. Then he says this:

"– one trait immediately leapt to mind. Two actually, but the second was pride, and I decided to leave deadly sins for another day. No, my dear listeners – this trait is far more tragic. Loyalty. There is nothing so crippling and pathetic as loyalty. What brings the painfully predictable Boy Blunder to his precious Dark Knight, despite the incredible risks?" He of course goes on about Harley and Joker, Echo and Query, etc. This brings me to my point.

Edward himself says that loyalty is a weakness, and yet, here in season seven, we find that his loyalty is the very thing that has him desperately trying to keep Jon around. I mean, the man whent to pull Jonathan out of that barn down in Georgia! I know Oswald order him to, but this is Edward. He couldn't just sent someone else to do it, but his loyalty and his trust in Jonathan as a friend made him go. He let his guilt build up all the way down to Georgia and back up because he didn't want to lose Jonathan! I mean, hell! Edward took care of Jonathan's bird during the whole Valentino arc! If that isn't loyalty to a friend, I don't know what is.

If only Edward could look at his past self and hear himself say "The fact is, loyalty will inevitably lead to your downfall." Imagine him hearing his own self say that with a sense of arrogance he doesn't dare to use on a subject such as this anymore because he knows it's true for himself now. He said it to us viewers and now he has fallen to the very weakness he mocked so long ago! There is a sweet sense of irony in it.

Crazy how this two minute episode launched an entire 7 paragraph essay rant about loyalty and the irony of it...

[I'd also like to put a special mention to one of my favorites from this show; Waylon. Edward literally won a trivia night at a bar in Metropolis so that he could get Waylon a shirt!]

#rouges! the podcast

antlersish

Mad about politics again

edjicatrydau-deactivated2026012

this iis funny af to me cuz like. of the queers i know. its cis who're meek and scared. and the trans are arming themselves

definitely-not-lordenglish

Starting a collection

definitely-not-lordenglish

home-and-having-tea

gammelgaedda

pig,,

gammelgaedda

This little butch piggy went to a bar and tried to pull a femme baddie

gammelgaedda

she succeeded

kurhanchyk

the most annoying people are people who don't understand storytelling. they be like "oooo how convenient that this thing happened to the main character in the very beginning". yeah no shit. that's why the story begins here

#i saw a review for Tender Is The Flesh once that said #'this premise is stupid if they learned to synthesize animal meat in a lab this wouldn't have happened'#my sister in sin. let me hold your hand.#the story would not have been told if the society in it didn't decide to commit the atrocity of putting humans in factory farms.#media literacy is dead

saintemiliosandoz

y’all really recommend books like: title, there are gay characters, enemies to lovers, young adult, written by poc

not once do i ever see a summary

mycoolstoryworld

What more info do you need?

A SUMMARY

WHAT DO U MENA SUMMARY WHAT ELSE MATTERS ITS GAY POC AND ENEMIES TO LOVERS HOW OFTEN DO U CONE ACROSS THAT

i want to know what its about mainly. is it a romance? is there plot besides the romance? is it realistic fiction? sci fi? fantasy? historical? future? alternate history? whats the tone? what are the themes? what are the main characters’ NAMES?

I- it’s gay the gay

i value queer characters too. but i also want to know WHAT THE BOOK I’M READING IS ABOUT.

marzipanandminutiae

“GAY AND/OR RACIALLY DIVERSE” IS NOT A GENRE. nor is it an indicator of quality

do you know how many times I’ve been recommended a book solely because “it’s queer fantasy!”

do you know how many times those books have been so poorly written that I couldn’t finish them

captainlordauditor

Mostly, I want to know the tone. A 19th century war story isn’t gonna do it for me when I’m in the mood for a lighthearted austenesque romance - and those are both historical. A star warsy space romp isn’t gonna do it if I want to read about interplanetary political negotiations - and those are both sci fi. A fun gratuitious don’t-think-about-it-too-hard action story is not the same as a dark and complicated mob drama. A suspenseful thriller will bore me if I’m looking for a fast paced spy novel.

not providing a summary literally just shows how you treat marginalized people and their representation as this token woke thing that you can show off like a shiny trophy. no, people aren’t going to read something just because it has representation! that’s not how it works!